boards of the Community College Journal of Research and Practice and NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, as well as is the Technology Editor for Community College Enterprise. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Lowman’s 2D Model of Effective College Teaching: Justifying the Need for Faculty DiversityIntroductionAccording to the National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and EngineeringStatistics (NSF, NCSES, 2015), women represent 50.2% of the US Resident population, 12.9%of the engineering workforce, and 24.7% of the mathematics and computer science work force in2015. The percentage of employed females, ages 16-75, in science and engineering
camp for high school girls has included an internationalexperience on two occasions. University students act as counselors and mentors, allowing thecamp to impact young women at multiple educational stages. Testaments from past participantsand counselors depict the experience as inspirational and positively transforming perceptions ofSTEM. Participants have pursued STEM degrees, including graduate degrees, and workedprofessionally as engineers after attending the camp.This paper presents the best practices, challenges, and successes of the camp as it has adapted tonew generations of participants and advances in engineering and technology. Originally createdto increase the representation of women in engineering, the camp exposes participants to
as a function oftraditional gender relations, that men-dominated industries/sectors are more innovative thanwomen-dominated ones, all rooted in a social perception of technology that is more oftenassociated to men than to women.”18In addition to teaching, research, and publishing, schools of science, technology, engineering,and math (STEM) are more frequently considering patenting, licensing, and commercializationactivities in faculty bids for tenure and promotion.2,6,19 This is particularly relevant to schools ofengineering where a large proportion of research is geared toward real world application. Federaland state agencies, including the National Science Foundation (NSF) are promoting this shift inengineering and STEM through programming
AC 2012-5444: PERSISTENT GENDER INEQUITY IN U.S. UNDERGRAD-UATE ENGINEERING: LOOKING TO JORDAN AND MALAYSIA FORFACTORS TO THEIR SUCCESS IN ACHIEVING GENDER PARITYDr. Nehal I. Abu-lail, Washington State University Nehal I. Abu-Lail received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Chemical Engineering from Jordan University of Science and Technology. She earned her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Worcester Polytech- nic Institute in 2004. She is an Assistant Professor at the Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering at Washington State University since August of 2006. Her research is focused on fundamental understanding of physiochemical cellular properties and interactions in environ- mental
ofsuccessful grants suggest indicators of a positive environment for female and male facultymembers. Similar to the proverbial “canary in the coal mine”, females’ decisions not to pursuecareers in academia, or their premature departures from academic environments, suggest thatnegative conditions in the work environment may be one factor for the ever-decliningproportions of women at each rank of academia.BackgroundResearch on factors that may account for the lower proportion of women in the various ranks ofscience, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) faculties includes the effects ofimplicit and explicit bias; differential effects on women of conflicts between work and familydemands; unequal access to resources such as space, salary, and
Associate Professor of Industrialand Management Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska Lincoln College of Engineeringand Technology. Dr. Adams is presently serving as a Fellow for the American Association forthe Advancement of Science and the National Science Foundation. The fellowship program isdesigned to provide a unique public policy learning experience and to provide insight into thedecision-making processes of the foundation. Dr. Adams will spend the next year in Washington,D.C., working in NSF's Directorate for Engineering, Division of Engineering Education andCenters. Adams research has included focused on engineering education. In 2003, she received a$587,568 career grant from NSF to implement "Designing Effective Teams in the
four of her five years at Northeastern University. In addition, she held three co-op positions at Lockheed Martin, 1366 Technologies, and Genzyme Corporation.Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University Rachelle Reisberg is Assistant Dean for Engineering Enrollment and Retention, as well as Director of Women in Engineering at Northeastern University. Prior to joining Northeastern University, Reisberg held a wide range of management positions in IBM and Hanover Insurance, and was the President of a high tech start-up company. Page 25.808.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012
. Program Development Structure, 2010 - 2012References[1] Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E., Jr., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attributepreferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 593–641.[2] Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women. Retrieved October 4, 2010, from http://www.aauw.org/learn/research/upload/whysofew.pdf.[3] National Academy of Engineering (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public
Practice at Work. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1999.[9] D. Riley, "Rigor/Us: Building boundaries and disciplining diversity with standards of merit," Engineering Studies, vol. 9, pp. 249-265, 2017.[10] W. Faulkner, "Gender in and of Technology," in Science, Technology and Society International Symposium, Istanbul, Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Social Sciences Publications, 1999.[11] J. Trevelyan, "Mind the gaps: engineering education and practice," in Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, 2010, p. 383.[12] K. L. Tonso, On the outskirts of engineering: Learning identity, gender, and power via
majorsin STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields (Grant, Battle, & Heggoy,2000; Rask, 2010; Sax & Harper, 2007; Whitt, Pascarella, Nesheim, Marth, & Pierson, 2003).This literature reveals a range of pre-college influences, from role models and societalexpectations to extracurricular exposure and high school coursework. These factors are equallyinfluential at the elementary, middle, and high school levels (Blackhurst et al., 2008) andcontinue through college (Cannes & Rosen, 1995; Rask, 2010; Sax & Harper, 2007). At the sametime, women remain underrepresented in STEM fields (National Science Foundation, NationalCenter for Science and Engineering Statistics, 2015). The National Science Foundation'sbiannual
Applied Mechanics since 2009. His research topics include Engineering Education, Struc- tural Dynamics and Applied Mechanics. He has been a member of the National System of Researchers (SNI) in the Mexican Council of Science and Technology. He has held several position within the School of Engineering, including Head of School and his current post as head of the department of Sustainable Technologies and Civil Engineering. He enjoys teaching Engineering in a fun way and likes to learn about Flipped Learning and Open Education. Since 2010 he is an Academic/educatational Youtuber.Prof. Israel Zamora-Hernandez, Tecnologico de Monterrey Israel Zamora-Hern´andez has a B.Sc. in Electronic Engineering from the Autonomous
AC 2007-124: SELF EFFICACY OF WOMEN ENGINEERING STUDENTS ?THREE YEARS OF DATA AT U.S. INSTITUTIONSRose Marra, University of Missouri ROSE M. MARRA is an Associate Professor in the School of Information Science and Learning Technologies at the University of Missouri. She is PI of the NSF-funded Assessing Women and Men in Engineering (AWE) and Assessing Women In Student Environments (AWISE) projects. Her research interests include gender equity issues, the epistemological development of college students, and promoting meaningful learning in web-based environments.Barbara Bogue, Pennsylvania State University BARBARA BOGUE is Associate Professor of Engineering Science and Mechanics and Women in
Detroit Mercy Alexa Rihana Abdallah is a professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of De- troit Mercy. She received her PhD in Environmental Engineering from the University of Michigan. ri- hanaa@udmercy.eduLauren Ross, University of Detroit Mercy Lauren Ross is an undergraduate research assistant working in the Assistive Technologies Laboratory at University of Detroit Mercy majoring in Mechanical Engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 WHY IS RETAINING WOMEN IN STEM CAREERS SO CHALLENGING? A CLOSER LOOK AT WOMEN’S INSIGHTS AND EXPERIENCES IN
designs innovative learning environments at all levels of the engineering pipeline. Her work in these areas is particularly focused on full inclusion and equity for community college women in engineering and related STEM fields.Ms. Isabel Huff, Springfield Technical Community College Isabel is a curriculum designer and training specialist for Transforming Engineering Education for Middle Schools (TEEMS). She joined the ”TEEMS team” in 2010 as a Smith College undergraduate. After spending eight years developing her love of storytelling in education and passion for encouraging women in STEM, Isabel took a one-year leave to get a master’s degree in education and technology at Stanford. Since returning, her work has
Page 1Double Standard: How Women of Color must Navigate in theEngineering EnvironmentIntroductionEngineering is in need of new ideas and innovations to keep up with the growing demands ofinfrastructure and technology of today’s world. Diversity of thought and experience is necessaryfor this need in engineering to be met. Women of color (WOC) offer a source of underutilizedintellectual capital in engineering. However, despite efforts in engineering education, WOCremain underrepresented and underserved (Green, 2006) in engineering and the student body ofmost engineering programs in universities in the United States (Cross et al., 2017). Research hasshown that a possible reason for WOC leaving the engineering field may be from experiences
overall experience of studying engineering is influencing the self-efficacy andwomen students’ sense of inclusion. A study on retention and promotion of women andunderrepresented minority faculty in science and engineering11 revealed that even in professionallife female engineering faculty who started as assistant professors had higher incidence ofleaving than men, particularly in years 3 through 7, and left without tenure more frequently thanmen. They did not see this discrepancy in the other disciplines. Servon12 focused their study onthe experience of executive level women in SET (science, engineering and technology) careerswithin the private sector. The findings of their study revealed that the workplace culture ingeneral was unsupportive to
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WiCSE: Impact of a Women’s Support Group on Increasing the Percentage of Women Students in a Department of Computer Science and EngineeringAbstractThis paper is an experience report describing the creation and expansion of a CSE women’sstudent support group. In 2013 we started WiCSE (Women in Computer Science andEngineering) in order to improve recruitment and retention of women in computer science,computer engineering, and information technology. This support group has provided significantsupport and benefits (including career guidance, career opportunities, and social outings) towomen CSE students.The key contributions of this paper are the description of the mentoring programs
: • Providing ABET course control documents for the courses3 • Providing current course syllabi3 • Having qualified CC faculty (master’s degree and 18 hours within engineering)3 • CC faculty teach courses at the four-year institution • Link community college classrooms with four-year college classrooms taught on the four-year college campus5Articulation: Articulation agreements (state-wide, if possible) are a necessity for a smoothtransition for a community college transfer. The engineering and technology part of the IllinoisArticulation Initiative, started in the early 1990’s, is described by Mirman and Skattum.6Articulation agreements are an important part of
, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM).Mrs. Selyna Beverly, University of Michigan Selyna Beverly is current doctoral student in the Higher Education program at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. She has worked as an administrator in a College of Engineering in California and through that experience grew interested in studying female faculty and students. Currently, her research centers on implicit bias within engineering and how it affects women who are pursuing engineering degrees. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Can I really do this? Perceived benefits of a
are the women and girls in Science, technology and engineering? New York. National Council for Research on Women21. Beraud, A. (2003). “A European Research on Women & Engineering Education”. European Journal of Engineering Education. 28. 4. pp 435-45122. NSF. (2009), Closing the Gender Skills Gap: A National Skills Forum Report on Women, Skills and Productivity, London, National Skills Forum.23. Fouad, NA., Singh, R., (2011). Stemming the tide: Why Women Leave Engineering. National Science Foundation & University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/NSF_Stemming%20the%20Tide%20Why%20Women%20Leave%20 Engineering.pdf Accessed: 12/3/1424. Engineer Your Career (2009). Women in
havelearned. The overall effectiveness of the workshop to increase the number of underrepresentedminorities that purse an academic career in engineering will be evaluated by qualitative andquantitative methods. Conducting the workshops at three universities increases the number anddiversity of individuals impacted, assists with assessment, and enables assessment of broadtopics for undergraduate up to assistant professors pursuing engineering careers, as well astailored for a specific underrepresented group. The use of three distinct institutions will alsodemonstrate the ease of implementation at other universities.IntroductionThere are numerous studies on the issues facing underrepresented minorities in science,technology, engineering and mathematics
among K-12, pre-college underrepresented students,who may not have role models or sufficient access to resources to develop this knowledge. Formiddle school girls, effective one-day experiences range from Girl Scout Badge Days1-3. GirlsExploring Science, Technology, Engineering and Math sponsored by SWE4, 5, and AAUW’sExpanding Your Horizons6. The resources required to execute these types of activities is oftenshared by multiple entities: parents or schools who can provide transport, institutions whoprovide the space and in-kind staff costs, professional organizations and industry volunteers. Page 26.203.2Longer term, pre-engineering programs
, skillgaps, immigration restrictions after September 11, 2001, and growing competition abroad fromcountries that historically supply S&E workers11,12,17,28,. According to the Congressional Page 12.751.2Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering, andTechnology Development (CAWMSET), the shortage could be avoided “if women,underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities were represented in the U.S. science,engineering, and technology (SET) workforce in parity with their percentages in the totalworkforce population” 7. In 2005 women and underrepresented minorities (African Americans,Hispanics, and
are susceptible to stereotype threat that woulddiscourage them from participating in STEM or choosing STEM careers[5]. Girls are attentive tothe behaviors that women in their culture engage in and thus feel efficacious in and model thosebehaviors[6]. Girls’ attitudes regarding scientists and engineers have been influenced by the lackof female representation in the media, and with this absence of role models, many girls tend toview science and technology an unsuitable career choice and personally irrelevant to their lives.One way to alleviate these concerns is to expose students to role models, specifically females todispel stereotype threat for young women, in math and science [6-10], or in general – STEMProfessionals. With a national
Paper ID #6548Promising Organizational Practices for Increasing Faculty Gender Equity: ACase StudyProf. Karen J. Horton PE, University of Maine Karen J. Horton, P.E. is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at the University of Maine, and a licensed professional engineer in the state of Maine. She is a Co-Principal Investigator on a National Science Foundation ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Grant to increase recruitment, retention and advancement of tenure-track women faculty members in STEM fields. Prior to her 1997 appointment to the University she was employed as a mechanical engineer at Bath
(International Flavors and Fragrances) prior to his current role. He served on the executive committee of the ASEE Women in Engineering division from 2010 to present.Dr. Michael D. Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Johnson’s research focuses on engineering education; design tools
Paper ID #23624Building and Breaching Boundaries: an Intersectional Coherent Group Ap-proach to Advancing Women Faculty in EngineeringDr. Coleen Carrigan, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Professor Coleen Carrigan is a feminist anthropologist and an Assistant Professor of Gender, Race, Cul- ture, Science and Technology at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. She investigates the historical and cultural dimensions of underrepresented groups’ participation in science, technology and engineering and the rea- sons why white males still dominate these fields.Saejin Kwak Tanguay, University of Washington Saejin
Paper ID #5863Engaging Foucault to Better Understand Underrepresentation of Female STEMFacultyDr. Kacey Beddoes, Purdue University Kacey Beddoes is a Postdoctoral Researcher with ADVANCE-Purdue in Purdue’s School of Engineering Education. She received her PhD in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech in 2011 and serves as Managing Editor of Engineering Studies and Assistant Editor of the Global Engineering Series at Morgan & Claypool.Mr. Corey T Schimpf, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alice L. Pawley is an Assistant Professor in the School of
-mail: 479-575-3386; E-mail: jjrencis@uark.edu.Rodica Lisnic, University of Arkansas PhD student in the Public Policy program at the University of Arkansas. Page 22.1223.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Recruitment Strategies for Gender Equity: Lessons from Cohort 1 ADVANCE InstitutionsAbstractThe NSF ADVANCE program represents one of the most far reaching gender equity effortsimplemented jointly by a government agency and institutions of higher education. Focusing onscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, in 2001
competitive departmentalclimates. Reliance on remote communication provided by advanced technology as well as theprocess of academic specialization are also related to the isolation experienced by the womenparticipants. In the absence of the buffering aspects of social integration,3 discouraging incidentsled students to question their competence, their “fit” in the institution and by association, theprofession and future aspirations. The paper further explains how the process of academic andsocial isolation unfolds and is negotiated over the course of doctoral studies, as reported by theparticipants.Introduction and Literature ReviewWomen are more engaged in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) thanever before, holding the