Asee peer logo
Displaying results 61 - 90 of 178 in total
Conference Session
Panel: What Funding Agencies Look For
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jane Daniels, Henry Luce Foundation; Kathleen Christensen, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; Jessie DeAro, National Science Foundation; David Ruth, Elsevier Foundation
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
ofthe Clare Boothe Luce Program to increase the participation of women in the sciences andengineering. The key word is “institutional” commitment. Some institutions write about afemale faculty member, several female faculty members or a student organization whoimplement pre-college, retention or mentoring activities. Such examples describe activitieswhich may be admirable, but are taking faculty and student time away from important teaching,research, or learning responsibilities. True institutional commitment is evident through thesignificant commitment of institutional resources to counteract factors that limit the progress ofwomen; efforts to increase the participation and advancement of women that are proactive andinstitutionally sponsored
Conference Session
Retaining and Developing Women Faculty in STEM
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ziyu Long, Purdue University; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Klod Kokini, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Robyn F Wilson, Purdue University; Jennifer C Batra, Purdue University ; Lindsey B. Anderson, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
informal peer mentoring network structure as there was no formal mentoringprogram in place at the department level. Zoe shared one of her peer mentoring episodes, when my tenure stuff was official, I just did an open invite at a coffee shop away from campus, so it was kind of in a protected place, and I said, “Anybody who wants to come and talk to me, you can ask me anything you want about my process and my experience,” and I gave them a copy of my stuff, and pretty much all the assistant professors showed up. It ended up being like a two-and-a-half-hour-long discussion.In addition, Zoe and a couple of other untenured faculty members engaged in peer mentoringduring their writing sessions at a local coffee shop (see Figure
Conference Session
Interactive Panel on Improving the Experiences of Marginalized Students on Engineering Design Teams
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lorelle A Meadows, Michigan Technological University; Denise Sekaquaptewa, University of Michigan; Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech; Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Debbie Chachra, Olin College of Engineering; Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education, Electrical and Computer, Engineering Libraries, First-Year Programs, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering, Student, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering, Women in Engineering
in Engineering Education (FREE, formerly RIFE, group), whose diverse projects and group members are described at feministengineering.org. She received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women. She received ASEE-ERM’s best paper award for her CAREER research, and the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute, both in 2013. She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and re- cently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity. She can be contacted by email at
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Student Issues as Related to Culture
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Prashant Rajan, Iowa State University; Charles T. Armstrong, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Elizabeth J. O'Connor , Ketchum Change; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Rebecca L. Dohrman, Maryville University; Colleen Arendt, Fairfield University ; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
from a previous comparative analysis10 of the aggregatedataset comprising interviews with 45 women and 24 men who participated in the study. Theseresults are discussed in the next section describing the background to the present analysis.Results from an inductive analysis of transcripts from interviews with 11 white male engineeringstudents and 14 students representing non-white racial identities indicate first that maleengineers’ experience mentoring in a variety of informal and formal settings. Second, maleengineers struggled initially to connect the concept of mentorship to their mentoring experiences.Over the course of the interviews, they were able to provide examples of specific individualsincluding family members, peers, teachers and
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Pre-college Student Experiences
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lynsey Mitchell Kissane, Ryerson University; Liping Fang, Ryerson University ; Ruth Jean Silver, Groundswell Projects
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
at whichthey are opting out of academic math and science classes and , often unknowingly, closing theiroptions for engineering in post-secondary education. As such, the primary target group identified Page 26.772.6became girls who had the aptitude for STEM subjects but who were not choosing STEM coursesin grade 10. The secondary target was the girls’ key influencers: parents, teachers, guidancecounselors, and peers. The overall program was later named WEMADEIT.Members of the partnership took on projects that played to their institutional strengths in fieldsoutside of engineering. For example, Western University led the development of teacher
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jiahui Song, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Douglas Eric Dow, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Weihui Li, Biomedical Engineering, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Lili Ma, New York City College of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
[2]. In addition, different strategies were developed to recruit andretain students in the STEM education [4-5]. Creating quality, attractive STEM programs [6] andusing peer influence to motivate high school girls into the STEM fields [7-8] appears to beeffective ways to retain female students in STEM.Since 2016 our university has developed a program "RAMP for High School Girls" to exposejunior and senior high school girls to STEM fields. In the past 4 years, about 30 female studentsparticipated in the program each year. This year our university started a new STEM program forfreshman and sophomore female high school students from a girls’ high school. This programaimed to help female high school students explore STEM fields. Therefore, the
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Eleanor Leung, York College of Pennsylvania; Inci Ruzybayev, York College of Pennsylvania; Brandy Maki, Minnesota State University, Mankato
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
autoethnographies on female faculty in academia are limited [2, 11]. This researchgathered autoethnographic stories from three female faculty members in engineering, the authorsof this paper, who had also experienced gender bias in their teaching. This was then organizedinto a ”collective autoethnography”. The analysis and writing-up of the project were alsocompleted by the authors. According to Ellis’s autoethnographic principles [8], stories are centralto this paper. The literature presented and the emotions evoked after the stories are told is all doneto change the understanding of what it means to be a female instructor in the engineeringclassroom.The three authors of this paper are early-career faculty in small teaching-focused institutions.Two of the
Conference Session
Climate Issues for Women Students
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephen Krause, Arizona State University; Dale Baker, Arizona State University; Chell Roberts, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
knowledge and skills from one to another. Recommendationsare made for team-based classroom activities that would promote positive engineering self-efficacy.IntroductionThe disproportionately low representation of female practitioners in the field of engineering isstill an issue1. Engineering is one of the few fields where women representation is as low aseleven percent2. Recent studies show that women are more likely to drop out of engineeringbecause of the social and affective factors and the environment that they perceive asunwelcoming3,4. In addition, female students have lower confidence in their engineering skillscompared to their male peers, causing women to believe that they cannot do engineering5, 6.There is some evidence that self-efficacy
Conference Session
WIED: Curricular Undergraduate Student Programs
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alistar Erickson-Ludwig, Drexel University (Eng.); Alisa Morss Clyne, Drexel University (Eng.)
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
summer bridgeprograms; however, a few studies do show improved retention for summer bridge participants. Page 24.1140.3A study of 617 students who participated in the Georgia Tech summer bridge between 1990 and2000 found that underrepresented minority students who participated in the program were 19%more likely to graduate than their underrepresented minority peers who did not participate in theprogram  5. African American, Hispanic, and Native American student who participated inPurdue’s Academic Boot Camp showed higher retention rates and first semester grade pointaverages14.Institution Overview and Program ObjectiveThe College of Engineering
Conference Session
Retention Programs for Women Students
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gretchen Hein, Michigan Technological University; Amy Monte, Michigan Technological University; Kerri Sleeman, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
students in general and underrepresented groups in particular. Project RISE(Retention Initiative in Science and Engineering) initiated campus Learning Centers in gatewaycourses. Through this program, various centers have been developed and staffed since the 1990s.There are viable learning centers in Chemistry, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering,Mathematics, Physics, and Engineering (Statics, Dynamics, Mechanics of Materials). In addition,the university supports the MTU Writing Center, Modern Language Learning Lab, Center forComputer-Assisted Language Instruction, and tutoring services. The Learning Centers areutilized in two ways. First, students who need help with homework or course concepts can obtainassistance on an as-needed basis from
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer S Gurski, Drexel University; Penny Louise Hammrich, Drexel Univeristy
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
newexperiences and learning opportunities; these abilities can be improved over time and areinfluenced by the connection students make with the learning experience (Kolb & Kolb, 2005).Both environmental and individual factors affect young women’s connection to learning in theclassroom, including differences in learning styles and the ability to connect relevance to thematerial being taught (Kulturel-konak et al., 2014).Several factors contribute to the problem of retention in engineering, including cognitive factorssuch as GPA and SAT math scores; non-cognitive factors like interactions with peers andprofessors; individual characteristics like family educational background, gender, and ethnicity;institutional characteristics like environment, type
Conference Session
Perspectives for Women Faculty
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer Sheridan, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Eve Fine, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Jessica Winchell, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Christine Pribbenow, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Molly Carnes, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Jo Handelsman, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Wisconsin-Madison designed and implemented training for chairs of facultyhiring committees. Training began in 2004 and continues to the present. The workshopsare implemented using a variety of formats, but the common elements that make themsuccessful include: • Peer Teaching: Incorporating faculty from the unit to deliver short presentations and serve as discussion facilitators; • Active Learning: Most time is spent in discussion and a sharing of practices from different departments; presentation is kept to a minimum; • Unconscious Biases & Assumptions: Participants are introduced to the social psychological literature on unconscious biases and assumptions, and learn how these tendencies might impact the hiring process
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Retaining and Developing Women Faculty in STEM
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jenna P. Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University; D. Patrick O'Neal, Louisiana Tech University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Chair of the ASEE Long Range Planning Committee.Dr. D. Patrick O’Neal, Louisiana Tech University D. Patrick O’Neal is an associate professor in the Biomedical Engineering program which is part of the College of Engineering and Science at Louisiana Tech University. Prior to moving to academia in 2005, he served as PI on industrial nanomedicine-based development projects supported by NSF, NIH, and NIST funding. Given a research focus in biomedical optics, he has published peer-reviewed articles in basic and clinical cancer research, nanomedicine, and applied electro-optic instrumentation. Based on experiences instructing courses like Biomedical Engineering Senior Design and his ongoing involvement with the medical
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Janis P. Terpenny, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
conversation). In the first use of Brainwriting by the department, increased research productivity was the highest priority selected among the group. Since that session, we have implemented many of the strategies suggested from the activity (proposal writing help, seed funding, methods for integrating graduate students into the tasks, peer mentoring, and more). b) Website updates, printed promotional materials, and showcase events: Faculty and staff have been actively engaged in telling ‘our’ story internally within the College and University and externally. This has included poster showcase events, serving as host to a national conference, and much more. c) Searches for faculty and staff hires: Current
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sreerenjini C. Nair, University of the Incarnate Word; Michael Frye, University of the Incarnate Word
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
12 African-American 2 9th Grade 6 Asian 2 For 2016, the ninth graders shown in Table 2 were miniGEMS Peer Mentors. All thepeer mentors participated in the 2015 miniGEMS camp and had the opportunity to share theirexperiences and, acting as group leaders, provided further assistance to the 2016 campers for theduration of the camp.miniGEMS Program Content Each day of the camp was different and fun-filled with interesting and engaging studentactivities that emphasize active learning with minimal lectures and extensive collaborativelearning. The purpose was to encourage the students to actively participate in the camp andthereby to
Conference Session
K-12 Programs for Girls and Young Women
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Susan Burkett, University of Arkansas; Claire Small, Springdale High School; Charles Rossetti, University of Arkansas; Bryan Hill, University of Arkansas; Carol Gattis, University of Arkansas
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Hispanic population. School counselors and teachers were asked to helpidentify students and encourage them to apply. An overview of the camp was given to parentsand students in both English and Spanish. Twenty-four girls were selected from forty-oneapplicants. Daily activities and assignments were modeled after activities in the pre-engineeringhigh school program. The girls gained experience and confidence while building andprogramming an elevator, racing remote controlled cars, designing a product using a 3Dmodeling program, programming small robots and participating in a field trip to a localcompany. The participants enjoyed the camp, formed friendships with their peers, expressedinterest in science/engineering, and look forward to follow-up
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Curricular Programs
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Claire Lynne McCullough P.E., University of Tennessee, Chattanooga
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
awareness of complex social issuessuch as the digital divide and the associated gender gap in computer professions.Several strategies are have been used to cover this course material. The first was the standardreadings and lectures on the gender gap in STEM fields. However, this did not lend itself well toassessment of the student awareness as an outcome, as reading and listening to lectures are notquantifiable.The next approach tried was an assignment using an Implicit Association Test to gauge studentattitudes toward the gender and science. This assignment, detailed in an earlier paper,1 askedstudents to read a relevant chapter of the course text, then to write a paragraph on why they thinkthat there are so few women in engineering, the sciences
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Strategies Beyond the Classroom
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Reneta Davina Lansiquot, New York City College of Technology; Hong Li, New York City College of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
University after completing her M.S. in Integrated Digital Media at Polytechnic University (now NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering). Her mixed-methodology research, focusing on interdisciplinary studies, has been presented at numerous na- tional and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed book chapters and articles in journals on topics as varied as technical writing, the future of science education, game design, virtual reality, and problem solving. Her first book is entitled Cases on Interdisciplinary Research Trends in Science, Tech- nology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Studies on Urban Classrooms (Information Science Reference, 2013).Dr. Hong Li, New York City College of Technology Hong Li is
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Curricular Programs
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephen Secules, University of Maryland, College Park; Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
enabled success, circumventing unsupportive advisors,combating isolation using peer networks, consciously demonstrating abilities to counteractdoubt, finding safe spaces for their whole selves, getting out to stay in STEM, remembering their Page 26.1582.2passion for science, and engaging in activism.” Note that navigating the system is also one ofthe three dimensions of becoming an engineer noted by Stevens et al6.While most of Ko et al.’s coping strategies primarily involve taking action, “remembering theirpassion for science” and “demonstrating abilities to counteract doubt” are primarily internalpsychological acts. In this paper, we build on
Conference Session
Faculty Career Development
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarah Miraglia, Syracuse University ; Sharon W. Alestalo, Syracuse University; Shobha K. Bhatia, Syracuse University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
areable to focus on smaller groups of WiSE-FPP Associates. WiSE Associate cohorts areconsistently diverse; on average 45% of all participants are international students, including (butnot limited to) students from China, Turkey, India and eastern European countries. The diversityembedded in the WiSE program mirrors the increasing diversity of the professional world. Theinterdisciplinary mix provides an additional layer of skill and knowledge necessary for successas associates become more familiar and comfortable with peers from outside their discipline. Page 25.1481.5In the midst of its fifth year, WiSE-FPP is an active and growing program, whose
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retaining and Developing Women Faculty
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Theresa M. Vitolo, Gannon University; Karinna M Vernaza, Gannon University; Lori D. Lindley, Gannon University; Elisa M. Konieczko, Gannon University; Weslene Tallmadge, Gannon University
Tagged Topics
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions
Engineering and Public Policy, Women in Engineering
Each (points) (points) (points) (points) (points) Item Professional, Peer-Reviewed & Communicated External Grants received 5 larger than $50,000 Published International Journal articles / Book 5 Chapters Published Articles; National or International 4 12 4 Conference Paper/Proceedings External grants received less than $50,000 but 4 more than $20,000 External grants received 3 6 6 less than $20,000 Research/poster presentations given at 3
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Coleen Carrigan, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Saejin Kwak Tanguay, University of Washington; Joyce Yen, University of Washington; Julie Simmons Ivy, North Carolina State University; Cara Margherio, University of Washington; Eve A. Riskin, University of Washington; Christine S. Grant, North Carolina State University; M. Claire Horner-Devine, University of Washington and Counterspace Consulting
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Kwak Tanguay is a Ph.D. Candidate in Multicultural Education at the University of Washington. Her research examines how educational policy & practice, curriculum, and instruction mediate cross- racial and cross-ethnic peer relations among students, and how these peer relations shape students of color’s educational experiences, trajectories, and access to opportunities.Dr. Joyce Yen, University of Washington Joyce Yen, Ph.D., is the Director of the ADVANCE Center for Institutional Change at the University of Washington where she focuses on advancing women and underrepresented minority faculty in STEM fields and leading faculty professional development programs. Her diversity and faculty work has received over
Conference Session
WIED: Curricular Undergraduate Student Programs
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kristen B. Coletti, Northeastern University; Emily Olina Wisniewski; Rachel Lauren Shapiro, Northeastern University; Paul A. DiMilla, Northeastern University; Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University; Melinda Covert, Northeastern University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
engineering during the freshman year is a majorpriority. Successful programs designed to support these students should have potential impact Page 24.323.2beyond just courses in general chemistry for engineers, including developing freshmen skills intime management, studying at the college level, and problem solving necessary for subsequentsuccess in their college studies.Supplemental instruction is a common instructional technique used at many universities to helpfreshman adjust to and succeed in college courses. Supplemental instruction in general consistsof peer tutoring, instructor office hours, review sessions, study groups, and other programs
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
?Three distinct phases of a woman’s journey were examined. First, a sample of women who havealready completed an undergraduate engineering degree from a public university was studied.Secondly, women in their upper division year of their undergraduate degree program were askedto reflect on their experiences over their undergraduate career. Both of these groups of womenwere asked questions from the same interview protocol. Finally, classes were observed anddiscourse was analyzed in gatekeeper courses to understand the interaction of women and theirprofessors as well as women with their peers, both male and female. The lens of Feminist PostStructuralism and of Sense-Making allowed the critical analysis to shine a light on theunderlying cultural
Conference Session
Poster Session
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lari Garrison, University of Washington; Reed Stevens, University of Washington; Portia Sabin, University of Washington; Andrew Jocuns, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
and technical writing, oh wait, wait, and English 131. And after that, you can apply to aerospace engineering program. …Uh, the process, I believe you have to pick up an application, write an essay, send in a transcript and, I’m not quite sure what else, probably recommendations from teachers. (Jane freshman year)Students were familiar with the stated “nuts and bolts” of the admission. They would have tosubmit to apply to their majors, an application, an essay, their transcripts and possibly letters ofrecommendation. Knowing what they had to submit however was different from knowing howthese submitted documents would be used to judge them. Furthermore, knowing what to submitwas not enough to alleviate the uncertainty
Conference Session
Undergraduate Student Issues: Culture
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rosalyn S. Hobson, Virginia Commonwealth University; Cindy Jong, University of Kentucky; Donna Joy Dockery; Mary Hermann, Virginia Commonwealth University; Teresa Jones Carter, Virginia Commonwealth University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
careers and career decision option, education, care giving and familial support. Support & Examples of support and encouragement friends provided for the Encouragement choices and decisions the subjects made.Friends/Peers Competitors & Examples of peer competition sometimes with males in particular Barriers and the barriers that arose because of peer influences Aspirations, Personal aspirations, interests, and predilections that motivated the Interests, & subjects to pursue or not pursue a STEM career . Career satisfaction Satisfaction and the factors
Conference Session
Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Agnes G d'Entremont, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Hannah Gustafson, University of British Columbia
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering
.Student ratings of male and female instructors are likely influenced by the genderedexpectations of the rater12. Two straightforward examples of gendered expectations are thatstudents are more likely to assume a male instructor holds a PhD as compared with a femaleinstructor13 and are more likely to refer to male instructors as “Doctor” or by their last namewhen writing evaluations of their instructors14. Each of these examples shows that the status andcredentials of female faculty are discounted. Female professors may be expected to be morecaring and nurturing than male professors, given that these traits are considered morefeminine12. Even though female instructors had more meetings with students outside of classhours, students were more likely
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Faculty and Gender Issues
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kacey D. Beddoes, Oregon State University; Corey T. Schimpf, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
education research, interdisciplinarity, peer review, engineers’ epistemologies, and global engineering education.Mr. Corey T Schimpf, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alice Pawley is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Gender, Women’s and Sexuality Studies Program and the Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. She was co-PI of Purdue’s ADVANCE program from 2008-2014, focusing on the underrepresentation of women in STEM faculty positions. She runs the Feminist Research in Engineering Education (FREE, formerly RIFE, group), whose diverse projects and group members are
Conference Session
Women In Engineering Poster Session / WEPAN Knowledge Center / Women in Engineering Poster Session
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
C. Diane Matt, WEPAN Inc.; Jenna Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University; Jane Langeman, Langeman Consulting; Lori DuBois, DuBois Information
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
through Browse and Search interfaces.Information resources are annotations forresource types such as articles, books,literature reviews, U.S. national reports ornarrative profiles of organizations, programsand projects, database tools.The WEPAN Knowledge CenterInformation Repository and ProfessionalCommunity platform is an effectivemechanism for disseminating grant-relatedinformation resources and connecting thepeople responsible for creating them withboth their peers and the public outside theproject silos that currently exist. Page 15.425.4Figure 2. Example of Annotated Resource.Information resources can be accessed from the annotations and
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Erica Haugtvedt, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology; Duane Lewis Abata, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
workingprogram for use as an assignment for students in beginning computer classes.Ada Lovelace: A Short BiographyAda Lovelace was the only legitimate daughter of George Gordon Lord Byron, the famous poet,peer, and politician [4]. Lord Byron achieved an immense reputation for his poetry and playboyantics in his own lifetime and is still regarded as one of the most important British Romanticpoets. Shortly after Ada’s birth, Lord Byron separated from his wife [4]. He died tragically ofdisease while fighting in the Greek War of Independence in 1824, when Ada was eight years old[4]. In 1833, the novelist Edward Bulwer Lytton wrote of Byron’s death: “When Byron passedaway, we turned to the actual and practical career of life: we awoke from the morbid