Paper ID #17805Examining the Personal Nature of the K-14 Engineering Pipeline for YoungWomenDr. Jennifer S Gurski, Drexel University RESEARCH EXPERIENCE Drexel University, School of Education June 2016 Principal Investigator: Penny Hammrich Dissertation: Examining the Personal Nature of the K-14 Engineering Pipeline for Young Women ADMINISTRATIVE EXPERIENCE Danville Area School District, Danville, PA Director e-Learning Cyber Academy, AEDY & Home School Education 2013-present e-Learning Program Design and Im- plementation grades 6-12 Danville Area School District, Danville, PA Assistant High School Principal
Paper ID #19036Can I really do this? Perceived benefits of a STEM intervention program andwomen’s engineering self-efficacyChristina S. Morton, University of Michigan Christina S. Morton is a doctoral student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Ed- ucation at the University of Michigan. Christina has professional experience in Academic and Student Affairs, serving as an Academic Success Coach at Johnson C. Smith University and a Residential Direc- tor at North Carolina State University. Her primary research interests are in the motivation and persistence of underrepresented minorities in Science
Paper ID #24654How Cultural Messages Through Experiences Influence Occupational Pur-suit of Muslim Female Computer Science StudentsMrs. Maral Kargarmoakhar, Florida International University Maral Kargarmoakhar was born and raised in Tehran, Iran. She got her bachelors degree in computer en- gineering from Tehran University. She pursued her master’s degree from Florida International University (FIU) in computer science. Currently, she is working on her Ph.D. program at FIU.Dr. Monique S. Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross, Assistant Professor in the School of Computing and Information Science and STEM
mechanics researcher in Paris, France before returning to MIT as Assistant Director of Admissions. Currently Dr. Wendell works as a Senior Lecturer in MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering teaching design, manufacturing, and instrumentation.Dr. Andrea S. Walsh, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Andrea Walsh is a historical sociologist who specializes in the fields of women’s and gender studies, rhetoric and communication and visual media. She teaches at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the programs in Women’s and Gender Studies and Writing and Comparative Media Studies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Getting to Gender Parity in a Top-Tier
from Vanderbilt and a Bachelor of Art degree in Elementary Education from Penn State University. Currently, Nancy is pursing a Doctorate of Education at Vanderbilt University’s Peabody College in Higher Education Lead- ership and Policy.Dr. Melissa S Martiros, Anna Maria College Melissa Martiros currently serves as Assistant Professor and Director of Music at Anna Maria College. An active clinician, her recent engagements have included workshops across the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia. She is a co-author of Inclusive Piano Teaching, a blog sponsored by the Frances Clark Center for Keyboard Pedagogy, and is co-chair of the committee on special needs for the National Conference on Keyboard Pedagogy
. Amanda S. Parker, University of Colorado, Boulder Amanda S. Parker is the Director of Access and Recruiting at the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. She holds a B.S. in chemical engineering and is a graduate student in the Engineering Management Program at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her interests are in broadening participation in engineering.Beth A Myers, University of Colorado Boulder Beth A. Myers is the engineering assessment specialist for the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program at the University of Colorado Boulder. She holds a BA in biochemistry, ME in engineering management and is currently a PhD candidate studying engineering education at the
Paper ID #25920Board 137: Persistence of Women of Color in Undergraduate EngineeringProgramsCourtney S. Green P.E., University of North Carolina in Charlotte Courtney S. Green, P.E. is a lecturer and academic advisor for the Office of Student Success and Develop- ment within Williams States Lee College of Engineering at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She holds a Master of Science in Engineering with a structural engineering concentration from University of North Carolina at Charlotte in 2008. She graduated Magna Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics at Marshall University in 2004. Prior to
Paper ID #30117Mentoring Among African American Women in the Engineering AcademyJocelyn LaChelle Jackson, University of Michigan Jocelyn Jackson is a doctoral student in engineering education research at the University of Michigan and national chair of the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE). Her major work includes research in entrepreneurship, organizational leadership and behavior, and strategic planning for NSBE.Dr. Jeremi S London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State
member of ACM, ASEE and IEEE.Brenda S. Faison Ph.D., North Carolina A&T State University Biography: Brenda S. Faison, Ph.D. Born in North Carolina, Dr. Brenda S. Faison is Chief Creative Officer of Brenda Faison and Associates, LLC; and iDesignbase, LLC. She studied Visual Communication in North Carolina Central University’s Department of Art in Durham, receiving her B.A. degree in 1980. She obtained her master’s degree in 1984 from North Carolina State University’s College of Design at Raleigh, focusing in the area of Visual Design. In 1995, she earned her Ph.D. focusing in Computer Graphics in the Arts and Design, studying at the Advanced Computing Center for the Arts and Design (ACCAD), through the
Manufacturing & Mechanical Engineering Technology department at RIT. She serves as the Faculty Associate to the Provost for Women Faculty and is co-PI for RIT’s NSF ADVANCE project. Her research interests include: characterization of biodegradable plastics and environmental consideration in materials selection for production design, the impact of technology paired with active learning pedagogies on student learning, and effective strategies for increasing gender diversity in STEM disciplines.Prof. Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Maureen Valentine, P.E., has been a faculty member at RIT for more than 23 years. She held the position of Department Chair for the Department of Civil Engineering
Paper ID #28285Computing Pathways: A quantitative inquiry into the dynamic pathways ofstudents in computing with gender comparisonsMrs. Maral Kargarmoakhar, Florida International University Maral Kargarmoakhar was born and raised in Tehran, Iran. She got her bachelors degree in computer en- gineering from Tehran University. She pursued her master’s degree from Florida International University (FIU) in computer science. Currently, she is working on her Ph.D. program at FIU.Mrs. Monique S Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross earned a doctoral degree in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She has a
related to Thermodynamics, engineering and public policy, engineering education, and gender in engineering and science. She is the co-author on an engineering textbook, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, which is used worldwide in over 250 institutions. Dr. Bailey is the Principal Investi- gator (PI) for the RIT NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant. The goal of this large-scale ($3.4M), multi-year university-level organizational transformation effort is to increase the representation and advancement of women STEM faculty. At the university level, she serves as Senior Faculty Associate to the Provost for ADVANCE and co-chairs the President’s Commission on Women.Prof. Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester
assurance. To date, scholarships to RIT students total more than $800,000.Prof. Maureen S. Valentine PE, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Maureen Valentine, P.E., has been a faculty member at RIT for more than 21 years and held the position of Department Chair for the Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Environmental Management, and Safety from 2000 to 2007. She is currently the Associate Dean of the College of Applied Science and Technology and co-PI on the AdvanceRIT initiative. Her scholarly activities recently have focused on women in technology programs and the female faculty who teach them.Prof. Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Professor Dell is an associate professor in the
apawley@purdue.edu.Dr. Shawn S Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus SHAWN JORDAN, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of En- gineering at Arizona State University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use of context in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010) and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Com- puter Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and
Paper ID #22417Women’s Motivation to Pursue Engineering Education and Careers: a CaseStudy of MalaysiaMs. S. Zahra Atiq, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Zahra Atiq is a PhD candidate at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is interested in learning about the non-cognitive/affective and individual/demographic factors that impacts students in STEM courses. Specifically, she is interested in understanding the emotions students’ expe- rience while learning computer programming. She is interested to understand women’s participation in computer science and engineering.Sarah
Engineering and Director of the ADVANCE Center for Institutional Change. With ADVANCE, she works on mentoring and leadership development programs for women faculty in STEM. She was awarded a National Science Foundation Young Investigator Award, a Sloan Research Fellowship, the 2006 Hewlett-Packard Harriett B. Rigas Award, and the 2018 ECEDHA Diversity Award. She is a Fellow of the IEEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #23624Dr. Christine S Grant, North Carolina State University Dr. Christine S. Grant joined the NC State faculty in 1989 after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. (Geor
) for the RIT NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant. The goal of this large-scale ($3.4M), multi-year university-level organizational transformation effort is to increase the representation and advancement of women STEM faculty. At the university level, she serves as Senior Faculty Associate to the Provost for ADVANCE and co-chairs the President’s Commission on Women.Prof. Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Professor Maureen Valentine, P.E. has been a faculty member at the Rochester Institute of Technology for 23 years. She has served in many rolls, including teaching faculty, Department Chair, Director of Women in Technology and Associate Dean of the College of Applied Science and
Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (COS) Dr. Carol Marchetti is an Associate Professor of Statistics at Rochester Institute of Technology, where she teaches introductory and advanced undergraduate statistics courses and conducts research in statistics education, deaf education, and online learning. She is a co-PI on RIT’s NSF ADVANCE IT project, Connect@RIT, and leads grant activities in the Human Resources strategic approach area.Prof. Maureen S. Valentine PE, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Maureen Valentine, P.E., has been a faculty member at RIT for more than 21 years and held the position of Department Chair for the Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Environmental Management, and Safety
):902–18.4. Diekman AB, Brown ER, Johnston AM, Clark EK. Seeking congruity between goals and roles: a new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychol Sci. United States; 2010;21(8):1051–7.5. Cheryan S, Master A, Meltzoff AN. Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Front Psychol. 2015;6:49.6. Ridgeway CL, Correll SJ. Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations. Gend Soc. 2004;18(4):510–31.7. Charles M, Bradley K. Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries. Am J Sociol. 2009;114(4
. 12, 2018.[2] L. Wimsatt, A. Trice, and D. Langley, “Faculty Perspectives on Academic Work and Administrative Burden: Implications for the Design of Effective Support Services.,” Journal of Research Administration, vol 30, no. 1, pp. 77–89, 2009.[3] K. M. Hannum, S. M. Muhly, P. S. Shockley-Zalabak, and J. S. White, “Women leaders within higher education in the United States: Supports, barriers, and experiences of being a senior leader,” Advancing Women in Leadership, vol. 35, pp. 65–75, 2015.[4] E. Judson, L. Ross, and K. Glassmeyer, “How Research, Teaching, and Leadership Roles are Recommended to Male and Female Engineering Faculty Differently,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 1025–1047
Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187-1218.Chang, M. J., Sharkness, J., Hurtado, S., & Newman, C. B. (2014). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 555-580.Collins, D., Bayer, A. E., & Hirschfeld, D. A. (1996). Engineering Education for Women: A Chilly Climate? Women in Engineering ProActive Network.Crenshaw, K. (1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stan. L. Rev., 43, 1241.Cross, K. J., Clancy, K. B., Mendenhall, R., Imoukhuede, P., & Amos, J. R. (2017, June). The double bind of race and gender: A look into the experiences of
bachelor’s degrees earned by women in the U.S. has remained between 18.1% and20.5% from 2000 to 2015, with women receiving 20.1% of degrees in 2015 [1]. By contrast,women’s representation in the engineering workforce has been steadily increasing since the1990’s, from 8.6% in 1993 to 14.5% in 2015 [1]. However, according to statistics from 2010,within five years of graduation, 36 percent of women who obtained engineering bachelor’sdegrees either left or never entered the field and within fifteen years after graduation, 60 percentof women who earned engineering bachelor’s degrees had left the field [2]. Despite the recentincreases, these numbers indicate that women are still underrepresented in the workforce and thatretention of women engineers in
inengineering specifically [12-15, 28-29, 31-33, 38]. There were cross-cultural differences in the studies’ findings. In the study from UAE[26], women with higher SES were less likely to choose STEM majors and careers (Fig. 1),unlike in the US and UK where studies found higher SES to significantly impact the likelihoodof persisting in and choosing a STEM major, respectively [22, 24]. In Caspi et. al.’s study [16] inIsrael, they found no gender difference in ninth grade students’ choice of a STEM major whereasgender differences were found early on (i.e., prior to intervention) in STEM attitudes in USstudents [13]. Fig. 1 Likelihood of persisting in and choosing a STEM major Importantly, these studies support the
academicsettings, was found to be significantly (p<0.05) different for males and females. This isconsistent with the results from Rodriguez & Esparrago [21]’s study which used the intrinsicmotivation inventory to determine that male and female students have significant differences inhow they are motivated by choice. Their study, which used a pretest/posttest design to study theimpacts of a multinational design project on motivation, found that female students did notexperience a reduction in their choice score after the design project. It is possible that the resultsof the current study describe consistency in the female student’s motivational scores alongside adecrease in overall academic motivation for males although this cannot be determined for
Differences and the Differences They Make” Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 325–333, 2006.[2] C. Corbett, & C. Hill. “Solving the equation: The variables for women’s success in engineering and computing”. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women, 2015.[3] L. Babcock, L., & S. Laschever, “Women don’t ask: The high cost of avoiding negotiation and positive strategies for change”. New York, NY: Bantam Books, 2007.[4] C A. Moss-Racusin, J. F. Dovidio, V. L. Brescoll, M. J. Graham, & J. Handelsman, “Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, no. 41, pp. 16474–16479, 2012.[5] S. Cheryan, S. A. Ziegler, A. K. Montoya, and L. Jiang
GRIT with retention-to-graduation with the correlation of admissions variables to retention-to-graduation. Admissions variables were originally selected because they predict retention; the study will examine whether GRIT is more, less or additionally predictive of student success.Introduction“Let me tell you the secret that has led to my goals. My strength lies solely in my tenacity.”Louis PasteurThe Grit Scale was developed by Dr. Angela Duckworth in 20071 to measure the personalitytraits of perseverance and passion for long-term goals. In Duckworth 20092 The Short Grit Scale(Grit–S) was shown to have internal consistency, validity and improved psychometric properties.Various studies have associated GRIT, as measured by the Grit-S scale, with
research questions, we decided to examine defining characteristics ofindividuals identified by our participants as exemplary engineering leaders. It was at this point Page 26.815.2that we noticed a significant over-representation of men in the pool of highly esteemed leaders.In this paper, we use a factor analysis and Chi-Square Goodness of Fit test to examine onepossible reason for this disparity—a gender difference in engineers’ leadership aspirations. Wethen use a focused literature review to hypothesize two alternative explanations for our finding. T ABLE 1 : S AMPLE C HARACTERISTICS Category Sub-Categories
for all.References[1] S. Reges. “Why Women Don’t Code,” Quillette, June 19, 2018 [Online]https://quillette.com/2018/06/19/why-women-dont-code/ [Accessed January 14, 2019].[2] B. Oakley. “Why do Women Shun STEM? It’s Complicated,” Wall Street Journal, July 13,2018 [Online] https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-do-women-shun-stem-its-complicated-1531521789 [Accessed January 14, 2019].[3] J. Steinke. "Adolescent girls’ STEM identity formation and media images of STEMprofessionals: Considering the influence of contextual cues." Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017):716.[4] K. H. Collins. "Confronting Color-Blind STEM Talent Development: Toward a ContextualModel for Black Student STEM Identity." Journal of Advanced Academics 29.2 (2018): 143-168.[5] S. L
throughout the search process. In addition, she runs a faculty develop- ment and leadership program to recruit and support diverse PhD students who wish to pursue academic positions in engineering or applied science after graduation. Dr. Sandekian earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at CU Boulder in 1992 and 1994, respectively. She went on to earn a Specialist in Education (Ed. S.) degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies in 2011 and a Ph.D. in Higher Education and Student Affairs Leadership in December 2017, both from the University of Northern Colorado. She is a Founding Leader of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for LGBTQ
facilitator was aloneduring the second focus group. Although a small group, we gained valuable insights into ourquestions as the participants engaged in conversations with one another as well as the facilitator.During each session, notes were taken including verbatim comments as well as the nature of theconversation. A voice recorder was used as back up and furnished the ability to transcribehighlighted sections of the focus group that corresponded to emergent themes from the surveyfor the analysis.18 These qualitative data were added to the open-ended responses on the surveyand descriptively coded19 with the assistance of NVIVO software. Where we have excerptedquotes from the data, survey narratives (S) or focus group (F) are indicated for