ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 1 - 30 of 32 in total

← Previous
1
2
Next →

How Cultural Messages Through Experiences Influence Occupational Pursuit of Muslim Female Computer Science Students

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Maral Kargarmoakhar, Florida International University; Monique S. Ross, Florida International University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Paper ID #24654How Cultural Messages Through Experiences Influence Occupational Pur-suit of Muslim Female Computer Science StudentsMrs. Maral Kargarmoakhar, Florida International University Maral Kargarmoakhar was born and raised in Tehran, Iran. She got her bachelors degree in computer en- gineering from Tehran University. She pursued her master’s degree from Florida International University (FIU) in computer science. Currently, she is working on her Ph.D. program at FIU.Dr. Monique S. Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross, Assistant Professor in the School of Computing and Information Science and STEM

Relevance Score: 0.63040364

Board 137: Persistence of Women of Color in Undergraduate Engineering Programs

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Courtney S. Green P.E., University of North Carolina in Charlotte; Sandra Loree Dika, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; April C Smith, University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Paper ID #25920Board 137: Persistence of Women of Color in Undergraduate EngineeringProgramsCourtney S. Green P.E., University of North Carolina in Charlotte Courtney S. Green, P.E. is a lecturer and academic advisor for the Office of Student Success and Develop- ment within Williams States Lee College of Engineering at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She holds a Master of Science in Engineering with a structural engineering concentration from University of North Carolina at Charlotte in 2008. She graduated Magna Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics at Marshall University in 2004. Prior to

Relevance Score: 0.37824216

Literature Review of Counterfactual Thinking and Career Motivation Theory for Early Career Women Engineers

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Renee M. Desing, Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

bachelor’s degrees earned by women in the U.S. has remained between 18.1% and20.5% from 2000 to 2015, with women receiving 20.1% of degrees in 2015 [1]. By contrast,women’s representation in the engineering workforce has been steadily increasing since the1990’s, from 8.6% in 1993 to 14.5% in 2015 [1]. However, according to statistics from 2010,within five years of graduation, 36 percent of women who obtained engineering bachelor’sdegrees either left or never entered the field and within fifteen years after graduation, 60 percentof women who earned engineering bachelor’s degrees had left the field [2]. Despite the recentincreases, these numbers indicate that women are still underrepresented in the workforce and thatretention of women engineers in

Relevance Score: 0.018148445

Analysis of Workplace Climate for Female Faculty of Color in Computer Science and Engineering

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Ona Egbue, University of South Carolina Upstate; Arshia Khan, University of Minnesota Duluth; Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Differences and the Differences They Make” Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 325–333, 2006.[2] C. Corbett, & C. Hill. “Solving the equation: The variables for women’s success in engineering and computing”. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women, 2015.[3] L. Babcock, L., & S. Laschever, “Women don’t ask: The high cost of avoiding negotiation and positive strategies for change”. New York, NY: Bantam Books, 2007.[4] C A. Moss-Racusin, J. F. Dovidio, V. L. Brescoll, M. J. Graham, & J. Handelsman, “Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, no. 41, pp. 16474–16479, 2012.[5] S. Cheryan, S. A. Ziegler, A. K. Montoya, and L. Jiang

Relevance Score: 0.016658973

Enhancing Gender Diversity in STEM Requires Support from All

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Keith J. Bowman, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Sue Rosser, California State University System, Office of the Chancellor
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

for all.References[1] S. Reges. “Why Women Don’t Code,” Quillette, June 19, 2018 [Online]https://quillette.com/2018/06/19/why-women-dont-code/ [Accessed January 14, 2019].[2] B. Oakley. “Why do Women Shun STEM? It’s Complicated,” Wall Street Journal, July 13,2018 [Online] https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-do-women-shun-stem-its-complicated-1531521789 [Accessed January 14, 2019].[3] J. Steinke. "Adolescent girls’ STEM identity formation and media images of STEMprofessionals: Considering the influence of contextual cues." Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017):716.[4] K. H. Collins. "Confronting Color-Blind STEM Talent Development: Toward a ContextualModel for Black Student STEM Identity." Journal of Advanced Academics 29.2 (2018): 143-168.[5] S. L

Relevance Score: 0.015338235

PANEL: After #MeToo: What’s next for Women in the Engineering Workplace?

Conference Session: PANEL: After #MeToo: What’s next for Women in the Engineering Workplace?
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jennifer J VanAntwerp, Calvin College; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Sandra D. Eksioglu, Clemson University; Joanna Wright, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

]. Thedifference was that the second study tracked not whether the woman was “employed full-time”but if she was employed in an engineering job. Thus, even seemingly simple constructs like“persistence” or “retention” for engineering women requires careful thought match data tointended research questions.Another troublesome issue of definition is what population of women to study. Some researchhas been focused exclusively on engineering, but much research is generalized to STEM(science, technology, engineering, and math), or just SET (science, engineering, and technology),S&E (science and engineering), or Tech (technology or high-technology). Some studies defineSTEM to include all the social sciences and some studies include all technology

Relevance Score: 0.014427094

Examining Gender Bias in Engineering in India

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers; Rachel M. Korn, University of California, Hastings College of the Law; Joan Chalmers Williams, University of California, Hastings College of the Law
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

can teach Silicon Valley about its gender problem. Wired. 6. Goel, S. (2007). Women in engineering in India. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences: Annual Review, 1(6), 1833-1882. 7. Anand, C. (2016). Number of unemployed women engineers in India is as high as 40%. The Hindu. 8. Why India needs women to work. (2018). The Economist. 9. Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Acadmey of Sciences, 109(41), 16474-16479. 10. Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American

Relevance Score: 0.013861103

Understanding How Female Students Navigate through Undergraduate Engineering Programs via an Examination of Their Intended and Declared Majors

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Emily Fredette, Purdue University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

accurately predict overall graduation rates 15 .A complete major pathway was created for each participant that included up to three prospectivemajors indicated in August of their first-year, the one preferred major indicated in December oftheir first-year, their subsequent declared major(s) as they progressed through the institution, andtheir earned bachelor’s degree (Figure 1). Major pathways of participants were investigated toidentify discernible trends or patterns in the data.Figure 1: Timeline of Major Pathway data collection points. Students were able to list up to threeperspective majors in August and one preferred major in December.ResultsThere were a total of 776 participants over the five cohorts, 693 (89.3%) of whom graduated with

Relevance Score: 0.013718933

miniGEMS 2018: A Mixed Methods Study Exploring the Impact of a STEAM and Programming Camp on Middle School Girls’ STEM Attitudes

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Chaoyi Wang; Michael Frye, University of the Incarnate Word
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

. Students were going to 6th grade (40.2%), 7th grade (31.5%), 8th grade (28.3%) duringthe summer. Additionally, the researchers randomly selected one or two students from eachgroup/table in camp 1 to 4. A total of 22 students presented their groups/tables to conduct in-depth interviews with us on the last day of each camp. Of the 22 interviewees, six were fromcamp 1, seven were from camp 2, five were from camp 3, and four were from camp 4. Allstudents and their guardians were required to sign consent letters.Instruments The instrument used in this study was the Middle/High School Student Attitudes towardSTEM (S-STEM) survey. This instrument was a useful tool in the evaluations of the university’soutreach projects and K-12 STEM initiative [46

Relevance Score: 0.012781862

Understanding the Intersection of First-Generation Degree Seeking Women, Engineering, and Public Universities

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Underserved Students in the CSU Moving Beyond Race and Economic Status to Close Equity Gaps. Rethinking the Gap. [online] Long Beach, CA: CSU, pp.1-12. Available at: http://www.dashboard.csuprojects.org/rethinkingthegap/Historically-Underserved-Student- Factor-Model.pdf [Accessed 30 Jan. 2019].[4] French, B. F., Immekus, J. C., & Oakes, W. (2003, November). A structural model of engineering students’ success and persistence. In Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003 33rd Annual (Vol. 1, pp. T2A-19). IEEE.[5] Lichtenstein, G., McCormick, A. C., Sheppard, S. D., & Puma, J. (2010). Comparing the undergraduate experience of engineers to all other majors: Significant differences are programmatic. Journal of Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.012523617

Learning in Informal Environments through Engineering Activities through the Partnership with the Girl Scouts

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University; Otilia Popescu, Old Dominion University; Carol L. Considine, Old Dominion University; Karina Arcaute, Old Dominion University; Krishnanand Kaipa; Stephanie G. Adams, Old Dominion University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

cookie sale," San Diego State University, 2013.[6] L. S. Anderson and K. A. Gilbride, "Discover engineering girl guides conference: Helping girl guides achieve their ‘engineer’badge," in Proc. 2003 National Conference Society of Women Engineers, SWE 2003, 2003.[7] K. E. Schmahl, "Introducing engineering to girl scouts," age, vol. 1, p. 1, 1996.[8] J. M. Trenor, S. L. Yu, C. L. Waight, K. S. Zerda, and T. L. Sha, "The relations of ethnicity to female engineering students' educational experiences and college and career plans in an ethnically diverse learning environment," Journal of engineering education, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 449-465, 2008.[9] A. R. Brown, C. Morning, and C. Watkins, "Influence of African

Relevance Score: 0.012224344

Board 135: Reflecting on 20 Years of the Attracting Women into Engineering (AWE) Workshop

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mahaa Mayeesha Ahmed, Rowan University ; Melanie Basantis, Rowan University; Kauser Jahan, Rowan University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

conclusion of the workshop, theparticipants were further asked to rate the overall workshop on how the components of the entireproject came together. Over the years, participants have strongly agreed that they had a betterunderstanding of engineering careers. Most participants have also agreed that they understoodthe importance of learning science and mathematics. During the early years of the program, inaddition to participant feedback, a surveys were also given to the parent(s)/guardian(s) of theparticipants.2.0 Hands-on Engineering ActivitiesThe AWE program provides exposure to engineering disciplines via hands-on activities that areled by engineering faculty in addition to undergraduate and graduate students in engineeringlaboratories as well as

Relevance Score: 0.011807378

Girl Scouts STEM Day

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jiahui Song, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Douglas Eric Dow, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Joseph F. Santacroce P.E., Wentworth Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

common goal of increasing the number of female professionals in the STEMfields.After completing Girl Scouts STEM Day grogram, students reflected that the workshops wereinteresting and they enjoyed STEM fields. Our future direction would be to track the number ofstudents who enroll in STEM fields for college after they finish Girl Scouts STEM activies.References:[1] Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C., and Adiguzel, T., "STEM Related After-School Program Activities and AssociatedOutcomes on Student Learning", Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 309-322, 2014.[2] Ma, G., and Ma, L., "Retaining Female Students in a Robotics Program", Proceedings of the 2017 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education conference and exposition, 2017.[3] Crowe, S

Relevance Score: 0.011432445

A Systematized Review: Gender and Race in Teamwork in Undergraduate Engineering Classrooms

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

though males rated the females’leadership competency higher comparing to the females’ ratings of males, male students stilldid not believe in the leadership ability of female students as much as females themselvesbelieve.Based on the Rowan-Kenyon et al. [19]’s study, if a female student could lead a team, itwould be useful for teams because females tend to define leading as facilitating team andhaving the responsibility toward teams. This may cause conflict with male notions ofleadership, so some instruction may be necessary to legitimize alternative approaches toleadership. In addition, the last two studies in this section proved in teams that are led bystudents, underrepresented students showed better performance. These results highlight

Relevance Score: 0.011201462

Assessing the Networking Preferences and Resource Satisfaction among Engineering Faculty in the California State University System

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lalita G. Oka, California State University, Fresno; Kimberly Stillmaker P.E., California State University, Fresno; Constance Jones, California State University, Fresno; Arezoo Sadrinezhad, California State University, Fresno; Maryam Nazari, California State University, Fresno
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Connections, ASEE, Ed., 2018.[2] California State University, "Student Success Dashboard," ed, 2019.[3] C. Corbett and C. Hill, Solving the equation : the variables for women's success in engineering and computing. Washington, DC: AAUW, 2015, pp. xi, 141 pages.[4] E. P. Bettinger and B. T. Long, "Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students," The American Economic Review, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 152-157, 2005.[5] NAP, Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. National Academies Press Washington, DC, 2007.[6] P. Gallagher, S. Alestalo, S. Bhatia, A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, and S. Soundarajan, "Geotechnical Women Faculty

Relevance Score: 0.011201462

Learning Experiences and Self-efficacy of Minority Middle-School Girls during a "Bio-char Modified Cement Paste" Research Program at an HBCU

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Andrea Nana Ofori-Boadu, North Carolina A&T State University; Dongyang Deng, North Carolina A&T State University; Cheryl Monique Stevens, North Carolina A&T State University; Kayla Gore; Iyshea Borders-Taylor, North Carolina A&T State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

-term, this would improve women representation in the male-dominated engineering and technology careers.References 1. T. McKoy, M. Hammond, C. Armwood, and S. K. Hargrove, “Persistence of African American Females in Engineering: The Identity Factor,” [Online]. Available http://zone2.asee.org/papers/proceedings/3/200.pdf [Accessed February 3, 2019] 2. National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education “Women and STEM: Preparing for a technology-driven economy, Title IX at 45: Advancing opportunity through equality in education,” Washington, DC: National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education, 2017, [Online]. Available https://www.ncwge.org/TitleIX45/Women%20and%20STEM.pdf [Accessed June 20, 2018

Relevance Score: 0.010945733

From Feminist Hacker Meet-ups to Engineering Educators: Implications of Social Movements in Technology for Change-making at the Level of Higher Education

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Ellen K. Foster, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) ; Donna M. Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

enact, and further establish a change-making campaign within thediscipline. The implications of visionary futures for how the world of technoscientific practicemight be otherwise via the grassroots organizing of feminist hackers and OSH groups is thusfertile ground for thinking through the leveraging of resources, expanding mindsets, tactics forshifting power dynamics, and continuing conversations as a mode toward energizing amovement.References[1] P. Brown, “Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination: Lay and ProfessionalWays of Knowing,” Journal of health and social behavior, vol. 33 , pp. 267-81, 1992.[2] S. Epstein, Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge . Berkeley:University of California Press, 1996.[3] K

Relevance Score: 0.010478009

“They Don’t See Girls”: Construction of Identities in a Maker Program

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sagit Betser, University of California, Davis; Lee Michael Martin, University of California, Davis; Rebecca Ambrose Ph.D., University of California-Davis
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

. Recognition was also central in Barton et al.’s [8]longitudinal study tracing the identity work of girls from nondominant backgrounds. They foundthat girls imagined for themselves possible futures in science when their identity work wasrecognized and scaffolded while they engaged with science in formal and informal learningsettings. These studies contribute to a growing realization of the complex work girls face inconstructing and sustaining a disciplinary identity in STEM. These researchers, along withothers, call for further studies to enrich our understanding of the aspects of identity construction,especially with regards to the interaction between gender, ethnicity, and STEM in the transitionto adulthood.One avenue that holds promise to transform

Relevance Score: 0.009700752

Transforming the Associate-to-Full Promotion System: Wrestling with Strategic Ambiguity and Gender Equity

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Chrysanthe Demetry, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Elizabeth Long Lingo, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.009334552

Need Satisfaction and Need Frustration among Women and Men Faculty in Engineering: A Self-Determination Perspective

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Jennifer J. VanAntwerp, Calvin College; Joanna Wright, University of Washington; Lauren Summers, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation. The authors also wish to thank Dr. Rebecca Bates, Dr. TamaraFloyd-Smith, Dr. Melani Plett, and Dr. Nanette Veilleux for their help in recruiting interviewparticipants for this project.References[1] S. Fayer, A. Lacey, and A. Watson, “Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) occupations: past, present, and future : Spotlight on Statistics: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,” U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics, Jan. 2017.[2] D. J. Nelson and C. J. Brammer, “A national analysis of minorities in science and engineering faculties at research universities,” Oklahoma University, Norman, Oklahoma, Jan

Relevance Score: 0.009334552

Inspiring Middle School Girls into Engineering and Technology Fields

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mir M. Hayder, Savannah State University; Asad Yousuf P.E., Savannah State University; Bryan Knakiewicz, Savannah State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

/dt17_318.30.asp (accessed on Jan 25, 2018)7. Yoder, B. L. (2015). Engineering by the numbers. American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved from https://www.asee.org/papers-and- publications/publications/14_11-47.pdf.8. Ziegler, L., Nairn, K., Crumley, J., Bacon, P., and Yost, S. (2012), ‘Program developed to encourage and recruit women in computer science, mathematics and physics, ASQ Higher Education Brief, Vol. 5, No 3, Jun 2012.9. Welsh, J. (2013), ‘These are the 7 Things Keeping Women out of Science Career,’ Business Insider. 16 Oct 2013. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/7-things-keeping- women-out-of-science-2013-1010. Ceci, S. J. and Williams, W. M. (2007), ‘Why Aren’t More Women in Science: Top Researchers

Relevance Score: 0.009145956

A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Pre-College Preparation and Use of Supplemental Instruction during the First Year on GPA and Retention for Women in Engineering

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Bradley Joseph Priem, Northeastern University; Caroline Ghio, Northeastern University; Hannah Boyce, Northeastern University; Sydney Anne Morris, Northeastern University; Emma Kaeli, Stanford University; Tyler Byrne Cole, Northeastern University; Paul A. DiMilla, Northeastern University; Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.00808396

Increasing Graduate School Enrollment of Female Industrial Engineers through CUREs

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Leslie Potter, Iowa State University; Richard Stone, Iowa State University; Devna Fay Popejoy-Sheriff, Iowa State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

changingfrom 6 to 1 and 7 to 5 for F’16 and S’17, respectively [14].There appears to be general consensus in the literature that a CURE pedagogy leads to positivelyinfluencing students about their choice of major, thereby possibly increasing retention. There isalso an expectation that it encourages more female students to enroll in graduate school. Theauthors’ specific findings indicate a positive impact of research experiences on graduateenrollment. Given these findings, the following research questions were formed with respect tothe industrial engineering major: 1. Does having a CURE experience inspire more female industrial engineering students to stay in the major? 2. Does having a CURE experience inspire more female industrial engineer

Relevance Score: 0.008002711

Influences of Female/Women Engineering Professionals at the Workplace, Home, and Community

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: John M. Mativo, University of Georgia; Uduak Z. George, San Diego State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

bright and dark sides of leadership: Transformational vs. non-transformational leadership in a non-Western context," Leadership, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 107-133, 2013.[12] B. M. Bass and P. Steidlmeier, "Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior," The leadership quarterly, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 181-217, 1999.[13] M. Dellaert and S. Davydov, Influencing: The skill of persuasion - Building commitment and getting results: White Paper: Center for Creative Leadership, 2017.[14] J. French and B. n. Raven, "Understanding Power," ed. https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_56.htm, (nd).[15] C. G. Murphy and T. Hicks, "Academic Characteristics among First-Generation and Non-First