Paper ID #28117Board 9: Engineering Technology Division: Creating a New EngineeringTechnology Program Using the UbD ApproachDr. Nancy K Sundheim, Saint Cloud State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #23813Creating a New Engineering Technology Program Using the UbD ApproachDr. Nancy K. Sundheim, St. Cloud State University Nancy K. Sundheim is in the Environmental and Technological Studies Dept. where she developed and is now the director of the Manufacturing Engineering Technology program. Her
Paper ID #28129Board 21: Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineer-ing Division: Technological Literacy, Engineering Literacy, Engineers, PublicOfficials and the PublicDr. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he is an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Ireland. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. He is author of Engineering Education. research and development in Curriculum and Instruction
Paper ID #28115Board 7: Engineering Libraries Division: Effective Methods of EngineeringInformation Literacy: Initial Steps of a Systematic Literature Review andObservations About the LiteratureProf. Margaret Phillips, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Margaret Phillips is an Assistant Professor of Library Science and Engineering Information Specialist in the Purdue University Libraries. Her research areas include technical standards and engineering and technology information literacy. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
(A) students worked jointly with 12 CEstudents and 8 Construction Engineering Technology (CET) students on interdisciplinary designteams. The teams were assigned a problem statement to develop the design, and simulate theconstruction of an assigned case study, specifically a museum building. The project was developedover three stages.Project Stage 1Architecture students led this first stage of the process, developing sixteen (16) architecturaldesigns within constraints set by Civil Engineers in terms of structural/geotechnical designefficiency, and by Construction students in terms of construction feasibility, time, and cost. At thecore of the Architectural class, there was the investigation of methods of repetition and variations,used as an
for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring," Educational Researcher, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 4-16, 1984.[4] E. A. Roe and T. Bartelt, "Converting a Traditional Engineering Technology Program to a Competency-based, Self-paced, Open-entry/Open-exit Format," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, 2015.[5] T. Brumm, S. Mickelson, B. L. Steward and A. Kaleita, "Competency-based outcomes assessment for agricultural engineering programs," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 22, no. 6, p. 1163–1172, 2006.[6] R. M. Felder, R. Brent and M. J. Prince, "Engineering Instructional Development: Programs, Best Practices, and Recommendations," Journal of
State University (Fort Collins, CO, USA). She has experience working as a graduate teaching assistant for computer aided engineering, biomedical engi- neering capstone design, and biomedical engineering introductory classes. Nicole’s engineering education interests include active learning, metacognitive thinking, and the use of technology platforms. Her doc- toral research is focused on the material properties of spinal cord tissues to contribute to the understanding and treatment of spinal cord injuries.Jasmine Erin Nejad, Colorado State University Jasmine Nejad is a PhD student in the Biomedical Engineering program at Colorado State University (CSU). She completed her B.S. in Biochemistry and M.S. in Biomedical
engineering students were able to consider how the application ofengineering technology can cause violence, they struggled to engage with the politics of whatengineering work is valued and who engineering designs serve or harm. This paper seeks to add to this scholarship by producing an analysis of how studentsconstruct various stakeholders in a sociotechnical scenario, with particular attention to how theseconstructions inform students' understanding of harm from engineering in the context of thepresented scenario. The analysis finds that (i) the individual stakeholder constructions do notemerge in isolation and are instead entangled with each other, forming an ecology in which eachconstruction is informed by and informs the others; and (ii
professional engineering licenses in several states. During his professional tenure he has received awards for construction innovation, superior project performances and one of the projects, a re- build of a university campus, received industry recognition a project of the year. Dr. Austin earned his Bachelors and Masters in Civil Engineering from the University of Connecticut and University of Texas. He recently earned his Doctorate in Construction Management from the Georgia Institute of Technology where his research focus was on accelerated project deliveries (i.e., faster, more predictable fast-track construction). His publications include a selection of industry articles on concrete technology, project management
University Hall is currently professor and head of the Construction and Operations Management department at South Dakota State University. She also serves the JJ Lohr College of Engineering as program coordinator for the professional masters degree in Engineering.Dr. Albena Yuliyanova Yordanova, South Dakota State Univeristy Education: University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa; Doctor of Technology with emphasis in Sus- tainable Design & Construction (2016); University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri ; Master of Arts in Architectural Studies (2005); Institute of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Sofia, Bulgaria; Profes- sional Diploma in Architecture (1991). Currently teaching at South Dakota State University
University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program, and in the Chemical & Biological Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutioniz- ing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two- strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists
DesigningCollege Courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2013.[4] M. Menekse, G. Stump, S. Krause, M. Chi, “Differentiated Overt Learning Activities forEffective Instruction in Engineering Classrooms.”Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102 (3),pp. 346-374, 2013.[5] – C. Spezia, D. Thomas, “Tool, Techniques and Class Experience with On-DemandMultimedia Content in an Electric Machines Course,” in Proceedings of the 2012 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. June 10-13, 2012, SanAntonio, Texas, American Society of Engineering Education, 2012.[6] H. Sheybani, G. Javidi, “Teaching an Online Technology Course Through InteractiveMultimedia,” in Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education
Paper ID #28110Board 1: Aerospace: Inclusion of Sustainability Analysis in a National Air-port Design CompetitionProf. Mary E. Johnson, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Mary E. Johnson earned her BS, MS and PhD in Industrial Engineering from The University of Texas at Arlington. After 5 years in aerospace manufacturing, Dr. Johnson joined the Automation & Robotics Research Institute in Fort Worth and was program manager for applied research programs. Fourteen years later, she was an Industrial Engineering assistant professor at Texas A&M - Commerce before joining the Aviation Technology department at Purdue University
Paper ID #28119Board 11: Instrumentation Division: Student’s Participation to Improve For-mula SAE CarDr. Masoud Fathizadeh P.E., Purdue University Northwest Masoud Fathizadeh – PhD, PE Professor Fathizadeh has been with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Purdue University Calumet since 2001. He has worked over 15 years both for private industries and national research laboratories such as NASA, Argonne and Fermi National Laboratories. Dr. Fathizadeh has established his own consulting and engineering company in 1995 spe- cializing in power system, energy management and automation systems. During
Paper ID #28125Board 17: Military and Veterans Division: The Evolution of College CreditRecommendations for the United States Army by the American Council onEducationMr. George D Ford P.E., Western Carolina University Dr. George Ford P.E. is the Director of Mississippi State’s Building Construction Science (BCS) pro- gram. Dr. Ford has 15 years of industrial experience including corporate work, and 16 years of teaching experience at the post-secondary level. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
leadership as an undergraduate student (sophomore) in 2014. He is also a member of the mathematics, education, and engineering honor societies: Kappa Mu Epsilon, Kappa Delta Pi, and Tau Beta Pi respectively. He has extensive experience in curriculum development in K-12 and creates material for the Technology Student Association’s annual TEAMS competition. David has co-authored two texts related to engineering, Principles of Applied Engineering for Pearson-Prentice Hall and Introductory Engineering Mathematics for Momentum Press. His research interests include: model/method transferability, threshold concepts to inform curriculum development, information asymmetry in higher education processes (e.g., course articulation
, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Rosario A. Gerhardt is Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. In addition to her engineering research interests, she is also interested in improving diversity at the K-12, undergraduate, graduate and faculty level. She has been primary organizer as well as a faculty mentor for several Future Faculty Workshops. She also worked in the Office of Institute Diversity at Georgia Tech on a part-time basis from 2011-2015. She was named Senior Goizueta Faculty Chair in 2015.Dr. Jennifer Tygret, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Running head: IMPACT MENTORING
Paper ID #28114Board 6: Energy Conversion and Conservation Division: Improving VerticalAxis Wind Turbine (VAWT) PerformanceDr. Patrick A. Tebbe P.E., Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Patrick Tebbe is a professor and chair of the Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato. Dr. Tebbe received B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering as well as the M.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri–Columbia. He is currently a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), student branch advi- sor for the American Society of Mechanical