://peer.asee.org/collections/2017-asee-annual-conference-exposition.[8] Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; Salt Lake City, UT; June23-27, 2018; at https://peer.asee.org/collections/2018-asee-annual-conference-exposition.[9] Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; Tampa, FL; June 15-19,2019; at https://peer.asee.org/collections/2019-asee-annual-conference-exposition.[10] Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access; Virtual only;June 22-26, 2020; at https://peer.asee.org/collections/2020-asee-virtual-annual-conference-content-access.[11] Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access; Virtual only;July 19-26, 2021; at https://peer.asee.org/collections
Postdoctoral Research Diversity Fellowship (SBPRDF) program in 2010and selected the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) to administer it. The SBPRDFplaced postdoctoral Fellows with high-tech start-up companies, allowing Fellows to learn to collaborate ina multidisciplinary environment and develop an understanding of the expectations and constraintsinvolved in successful entrepreneurship. In return, the Fellows applied their academic expertise to theimportant work of product realization in a globally competitive market.In 2019 NSF/IIP (Industrial Innovation and Partnerships) selected ASEE to administer the InnovativePostdoctoral Entrepreneurial Research Fellowship (IPERF) program as a successful extension to theprevious SBPRDF grant. The
critical step in understanding the results and basis of genderinequities that may otherwise be lost in datasets [2]. This is particularly true for students withnonbinary or transgender identities who are often understudied or overlooked entirely [3], [4]. In thispaper, we present an analysis of gender reporting practices in papers published in the proceedings ofthe American Society for Engineering Education Gulf-Southwest (ASEE GSW) conference to assessour community’s progress toward transparent reporting. MethodsWe downloaded papers from the ASEE PEER website (https://peer.asee.org) from the 2019, 2020,and 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference collections. All papers in each yearlycollection were
York: Peter Lang, pp. 51-63.Neeley, K.A. (2015). Communication as Both the Ultimate Interdisciplinary Subject and a Field of Specialization Encompassing More Than Technical Writing: Communication Instruction Across Divisions. Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education.Neeley, K. A. & Norback, J.S. (2016). Communication Across Divisions: Overview, Trends, and Implications Based on the ASEE 2015 Conference. Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education.Neeley, K., & Norback, J.S., & Bennett, C. & Laugelli, B. (2020). Communication Across Divisions: Trends Emerging from the 2019 Annual Conference of ASEE and Some
statistics and simulation modeling. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Mapping ASEE Engineering Leadership Development Research through an AI-enabled Systematic Literature ReviewAbstractResearch in engineering leadership (EL) has seen substantial growth due to the increasedrecognition that engineering students’ leadership development is essential to their holisticdevelopment as engineers [1]. To support the continued growth of this nascent field, it is vital toexamine its history and identify growth opportunities that accelerate EL development andbroaden its impact. Identifying, codifying, and synthesizing the previous
in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Marisa K. Orr (Associate Professor) Marisa K. Orr is an Associate Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Joe Roy (Director of Institutional
directly related to student motivation. Students heavily preferredand favored the two hands-on learning assignments. It is concluded that instructors should moveforward with the reimagining of the chemical engineering introductory course by including moreexperiential learning opportunities that reinforce key learning concepts and moving away from theclassic passive learning structure. In the future, the course instructors should seek more opportunitiesto engage with students in the introductory course. This action should lead to achieving DFW ratesseen before Fall 2019. Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX
been working in ET and other programs as well. Additionally, by involving thestudent in the process of generating more information about the factors that make them leavetheir program. Implicit should be the study of factors impacting enrolment of minorities andwomen as well.References[1] W. W. Buchanan, “A Brief History of Engineering Technology and a Case for Applied Engineering”, in 2018 Gulf Southwest Section Conference, 2019.[2] A.M. Lucietto and S. E. Leach, “Main Campus and Remote Campus Engineering Technology Students: How Are They Different?”, 2017. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2—27905.[3] National Academy of Engineering. 2016. Engineering Technology Education in the
Non-white 290 (84.5%) 53 (15.5%) 280 (81.6%) 63 (18.4%)Table 2: Demographics of Fall 2019 start-of-semester survey FTIAC respondents Male Female White Non-white 77 (74.0%) 27 (26.0%) 92 (88.5%) 12 (11.5%)Table 3: Demographics of all Fall 2020 CEAS FTIACs 2 Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering Education Male Female White Non-white 273 (78.9%) 73 (21.1%) 260
twounderwater LED (Light-Emitting Diode) lights to identify objects in a dark environment fornavigation. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition This ROV supports two configurations of the manipulators. One of them is to use a singlemanipulator to perform a relatively simple grip and release task. Another one is to use two 3-axisrobot arms (3DOF) as the manipulators. The base frame of this underwater robot consists ofaluminum extrusions. This dimension of this base frame of the underwater robot is 40 cm x 35cm x 25 cm. This ROV development capstone project was concluded in Spring 2019. This project wascompleted before COVID-19. This team
Mechanical Engineering Instructor of the year award, 1999 ASEE- GSW Outstanding New Faculty Award. Dr. Manteufel is a Fellow of ASME with teaching and research interests in the thermal sciences. In 2015-2016, he chaired the American Society for Engineering Education Gulf Southwest section and in 2018-2019 he chaired the Academy of Distinguished Teaching Scholars at UTSA. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Texas.Amir Karimi Amir Karimi is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA). He received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kentucky in 1982. His teaching and research interests are in thermal sciences. He has served as the Chair of Mechanical
lecture-style instructional mode. In 2019, aware of the documented benefitsof the flipped classroom model, the author restructured the course to implement a flippedinstructional mode, creating a library of pre-lecture videos and accompanying in-class learningexercises in hopes of increasing student engagement and creating more opportunities to interactwith the students. In fall 2020, like many other instructors, the author found herself movingclasses online as a result of COVID-19 [9] [10] [11], though unlike her other classes that existedonly on paper in three-ring binders, the existing pre-lecture videos and course structure forStatics and Mechanics of Materials allowed the author to adapt it to online learning with relativeease.Thus, over a
saw more growth in the CS and Cybersecuritycourses and classes offered when compared to non-Title I schools, indicating that the Project hadmore of an impact on Title I schools (Table 2). When we examined AP CSP courses in particular,the evidence indicates that Title I schools had a much greater increase in the total number ofMcGill, Thompson, et al ASEE 2022Figure 4: Changes prior to and after the JROTC-CS intervention, asked as a separate question(n=14) independent of questions aksing actual enrollment numbers, which leads to a slight differ-ence in evidence reported by the schools. Table 1: Changes in courses, classes, extracurricular activities between 2019-20 and 2020-21
Mentoring, the Award for Leadership, and a 2019 award from the College of Engineer- ing as an Outstanding Faculty Mentor of Engineering Graduate Students. In 2020 she won the Sterling Olmsted Award from the Liberal Education/Engineering and Society Division of ASEE. She is president of Purdue’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors (2020-22). She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and recently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Matthew W. Ohland is
distribution.Bibliography[1] Li, H., & Jin, K. (2021). An innovation framework to integrate engineering standards into industrial engineeringgraduate curriculum [Article]. Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing Systems, 5(2), Article 707.https://doi.org/10.1520/SSMS20200012[2] LaMack, J. A., Fennigkoh, L., & Licato, P. (2019). Work in progress: Improving student views of medicaldevice standards through implementation in a first-term biomedical engineering course. 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition[3] Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology. (2021). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,2021 – 2022. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2021-2022/#GC5[4] Phillips, M
. Nature Communications, 10(4470), 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12154-0.[10] Bin Zhou, Yan Li, Rebecca Halpin, Erin Hine, David J. Spiro, and David E. Wentworth. PB2 residue 158 is a pathogenic determinant of pandemic H1N1 and H5 influenza a viruses in mice. Journal of Virology, 85(1): 357–365, January 2011. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01694-10.[11] Sushil K. Chaturvedi, Jaewan Yoon, Rick McKenzie, Petros J. Katsioloudis, Hector M. Garcia, and Shuo Ren. Implementation and assessment of virtual reality experiment in the undergraduate thermo-fluids laboratory. In Proceedings of the 119th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, number AC 2012-3412, San Antonio, TX, USA, June 2012.[12] Jeremy F
mobile robots, including an UAS introduction module.• The UAS module in the Robotics Lab class is introduced in Spring 2020. Therefore, most of the students enrolled in the Spring 2020 Robotics Lab course have introductory knowledge about the UAS system when taking the Fall 2020 Flight Control course. In addition, Spring 2020 Robotics Lab was affected due to COVID-19.• The UAS module was not introduced in 2019 Spring Robotics lab. Thus, the students enrolled in Fall 2019 Flight Controls course did not have prior knowledge on the UAS system.• We thus present the implementation of UAS module in a junior level robotics lab which preceded the senior level Flight Controls course in following Fall semester, when the same
present their work andsubmit a written report. This supported the assessment of outcome “3” (communication skills) aswell.ABET Student Outcome “3” assessment – effective communication:The EMAU vector was constructed from student performance in the mini impact lab projectpresentations and written reports. Average score of 2.93 is above the threshold of 2.67 andsatisfactory. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 35748AcknowledgementsThe author wishes to thank his former students at Mount Vernon Nazarene University for theircontribution to the success of this lab in Spring of 2019 in the Machine Component Designcourse. Some of the lab setups as
1.0 – 2.59ResultsDemographics of the LDP students as listed in Table 2. Students’ success in the LDP wasassessed each year using three constructs: 1) Leadership Self-efficacy, 2) Motivation to Lead,and 3) Grit. Student scores and results for each construct are presented by academic year. Inaddition, survey responses and focus group data gathered from students, mentors and communityleaders to provide insight on the value and quality of the program are presented.Table 2. Demographics of LPD Completers in Academic Years 2018-2021 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 Female 8 9 6 Male 19 16 10 STEM 15 14
University of Texas Sys- tem Regent’s Outstanding Teaching Award and the 2013 UTSA President’s Distinguished Achievement Award for Teaching Excellence, the 2010, 2014, 2018 and 2019 College of Engineering Student Council Professor of the Year Award, 2008 Excellence in Teaching Award for College of Engineering, and 2004- 2005 Mechanical Engineering Instructor of the year award, 1999 ASEE-GSW Outstanding New Faculty Award. Dr. Manteufel is a Fellow of ASME with teaching and research interests in the thermal sciences. In 2015-2016, he chaired the American Society for Engineering Education Gulf Southwest section and in 2018-2019 he chaired the Academy of Distinguished Teaching Scholars at UTSA. He is a registered
Conference, Virtual Conference, Jul. 2021. doi: 10.18260/1-2--36670.[3] C. O. Stewart, “STEM identities: A communication theory of identity approach,” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 148–170, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1177/0261927X211030674.[4] J. Rohde et al., “Design Experiences, Engineering Identity, and Belongingness in Early Career Electrical and Computer Engineering Students,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 165–172, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TE.2019.2913356.[5] M. Darbeheshti and D. Edmonds, “A Creative First-year Program to Improve the Student Retention in Engineering,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah, Jun. 2018, p
curricula,” Transactions of the ASABE, 55(6), 2371-2378, 2012.[2] VanDeGrift, T. and Liao, S., “Helping First-Year Engineering Students Select a Major,” Paper presentedat the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 24 -28, 2017.[3] Brozina, C., and Meyers, K., “Engineering Major Discernment: A Model for Informing Students andOffering Choice,” Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June16-19 2019.[4] Lent, R., Brown, S. D., and Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual Supports and Barriers to Career Choice: ASocial Cognitive Analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47 (1), 36 – 49.[5] Lent, R.W., Schmidt, L., Schmidt, J., and Pertmer, G., “Exploration of Collective Efficacy Beliefs inStudent
research teams, she has published over 30 peer-reviewed articles and received over $3.4 million in grant funding from organizations such as the National Science Foundation and the U.S. Department of Education Javits Grants. Dr. Rambo-Hernandez was the District Teacher of the Year in Coppell, Texas, in 2006 and received the National Association of Gifted Children’s Early Scholar Award in 2019. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work in Progress - Persistence and the Pandemic: Retention of HistoricallyUnderrepresented First-Year Engineering Students Before and After COVID- 19MotivationThis
. Macatangay, and A. Colby, "Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field," Jossey-Bass, 2009.[4] E. Dosmar and B. A. Nguyen, "Applying the Framework of Fink's Taxonomy to the Design of a Holistic Culminating Assessment of Student Learning in Biomedical Engineering," in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, ASEE 2021, July 26, 2021 - July 29, 2021, Virtual, Online, 2021: American Society for Engineering Education.[5] A. Hossain and M. A. Zahraee, "Experiential learning of students through prescriptive laboratory experiments versus open-ended laboratory assignments," in 126th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Charged Up for the Next 125 Years, ASEE 2019, June 15, 2019 - June 19, 2019
See Catalano (2014) 3 ASEE 2022freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work andeducation, among other civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights. "Everyone is entitledto these rights, without discrimination," the Declaration reads (United Nations (UN), 2019), andthis consensus has in turn been accepted by most countries worldwide. The ethical philosophy thatgrounds human rights is debated but is frequently cited as being based on the concepts of humandignity, adherence to non-discrimination, and equality. Given that the
2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work-in-Progress: Do International Peers Boost Team-Based Learning Effectiveness in Undergraduate Engineering Education?Keywords: team-based learning, cultural diversity, first-year engineering Students learning in teams have long been viewed as an effective pedagogical tool inundergraduate engineering education (e.g., Felder & Brent, 2016; Wankat & Oreovicz
2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 36040 Correlation between the Course Knowledge Survey Results and Student Performance in a Civil Engineering Course Suresh Immanuel, Ph.D., P.E. University of Evansville ss476@evansville.eduIntroductionA commonly accepted assessment instrument used for both diagnostic and formative purposes isthe concept inventory, which refers to any kind of research-based assessment technique thatmeasures conceptual understanding in a subject (1). The usage of concept inventory helps theinstructors to measure their teaching effectiveness and determines if
: February 7, 2022].[4] J. B. Napp and A. Sabharwal, “Academic libraries and the strategic vision for diversity in higher education,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32024. [Accessed: February 7, 2022].[5] R. Koury, J. L. Semenza, and S. Shropshire, “A survey of diversity and inclusiveness initiatives at Carnegie Doctoral Research Institutions libraries,” Library Management, vol. 40, no. 1/2, pp. 23-33, 2019.[6] D. Fife, M. N. Stephens, A. Lyons, and M. Huang, “Leader responsibility for diversity, equity, inclusion & justice in academic libraries: An exploratory study,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 47
/10.18260/1-2--17913.[35] K. Mallouk, B. D. Oestreich, S. Streiner, K. D. Dahm, & C. A. Bodnar. "Fostering curiosity, creating value, and making connections in first-year students through product archaeology," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Tampa, FL, 2019. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32857.[36] B. Oestreich, C. Bodnar, K. Mallouk, K. Dahm, & S. Streiner. "Reverse Engineering Consumer Products from a Sustainable Engineering Perspective," 2019. Retrieved October 6, 2021, from https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/497.[37] B. Oestreich, C. Bodnar, K. Mallouk, & S. Streiner. "Product Archaeology: Digging Into Consumer Products," 2020. Retrieved October 6, 2021
should be built into the course forstudents to watch the videos as assigned. In 2021, the instructor modified the summary in thefirst 5-10 minutes of class to mimic a mini-lecture in response to the rate of video viewership.Although the instructor repeatedly encouraged students to take notes and review the onlineexample problems, only about 30% of students reported doing these Always or Often in 2019,whereas approximately 55% reported taking notes in 2021. Students were also more likely to © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 31629watch videos more than once in 2021. Students have been conditioned to passive learning for themajority of their