,entrepreneurial, and academic experience. The interviews were conducted in the summer of2011. This study employs a grounded theory approach to produce a description of engineeringinnovativeness, an ill-defined social construct, and those internal and external factors whichencourage or inhibit innovative behavior by engineers.The purpose of this exploratory study is to inform a process to develop or adapt a measurementinstrument of engineering innovativeness or potential innovativeness so that innovativeness canbe benchmarked in student and professional engineers. A benchmark of engineer innovativenesswill enable tests of interventions that increase innovativeness attributes or skill sets in engineers,potentially benefiting society. If engineers become
design classes. This paper will outline what isbeing done at Baylor University to develop an entrepreneurial/intrapreneurial mindset in ourstudents that emphasizes creativity and innovation through the KEEN Innovator program. Thisprogram is enabling faculty to help the students learn to be creative and innovative. Highlightedin the paper will be two examples where modules on creativity and innovation wereincorporated into existing classes. Assessment and student response will be addressed.One course, entitled “Electronic Design”, introduced students to the creativity and innovationinvolved in patent process. Students were given periodic assignments linking the coursematerial to relevant patents associated with the topic under discussion. A major
paper provides an analysis of student perceptions of the application of the entrepreneurialmindset in regards to participation in capstone design projects. The goal of the analysis is toexamine the relationship between these activities and building the entrepreneurial mindset inengineering education. Student capstone design projects have been and continue to be anintegral part the engineering curriculum. Cross disciplinary and inter-disciplinary teams areformed in various projects in engineering programs. These projects can have great impact inteam building skills, self-confidence, technological knowledge, and linking theory and practice.The study for this paper involves surveys from team members of those projects in four KernEntrepreneurial
interaction with students, such as advising and monitoring student academic progress, are designed to further the student characteristics and qualities that result in a mindset for entrepreneurial thinking and performance.The overall structure may be compared to a fruit tree. The curriculum, courses, and otherprogram aspects are the trunk that supports the outcomes and objectives. The branches form thestructure of the program outcomes. Finally, the objectives are the flowering and fruition yieldedby the educational process.It should also be noted that while outcomes can and are often broadly written, from a practicalstandpoint they must be implemented in a manner consistent with the needs of employers of thegraduates. However, in
, two tools3 have been created to measure students’ familiarity with key entrepreneurialterms and concepts, and to examine students’ “entrepreneurial mindset” as reflected in a writtenresponse to a hypothetical technology-based company scenario. The first tool, which is the focusof this paper, is the Entrepreneurship Knowledge Inventory (EKI). This inventory was initiallydesigned to measure self-assessed entrepreneurial knowledge of students enrolled inentrepreneurship-based engineering courses and programs at six engineering schools located inthe Midwest. The items were initially based on a taxonomy being developed under funding bythe NCIIA entitled, Institutionalizing Entrepreneurship at Primarily Undergraduate Institutions(PUIs)4. The survey
provide innovations that contributecommercial value. For the development of entrepreneurial minded graduates, the educationalcontributions provided by general education are essential for career success.Introducing an entrepreneurial mindset in an engineering curriculum will not be accomplished byadding courses. This challenge must be addressed by making the liberal arts, social science, andbusiness topics relevant to engineering students in a practical sense that allows engineeringgraduates to commit to engaging in a world driven by more than technical facts. Professionalcompetencies and engineering skills/knowledge must be integrated, together in the same course,because that is how the graduates will engage their careers and
, and sciences. The Program’s incubator environment and resources, on-site business coaching services, academic courses, and seed funding provide a rich environmentfor developing the entrepreneurial mindset and functional skillsets in entrepreneurship. Themission of the Hinman CEOs Program is to foster an entrepreneurial spirit, create a sense ofcommunity and cooperation, and develop ethical leaders.The faculty and staff advisors interact with the client to secure funding for the projects, scopeprojects, communicate the project opportunities to students, staff projects, confirm deliverables, Page 25.422.5and make payment to the students upon
benchmark of undergraduate engineeringstudents. The goal is to better understand EMEs in relation to students, and to use these insightsand wisdom to empirically redefine the skills and educational methods necessary to reshapeengineering education.Entrepreneurially minded engineers (EMEs) are the drivers of U.S. innovation andcompetitiveness and are unique and distinctive [11]. EMEs have not necessarily started newbusinesses although they may have; they do, most often, work in established small- and medium-sized enterprises, and many work in Fortune 1000 firms [12]. The EME reflects a mindset, notspecifically an entrepreneur; they are the type of engineers who can think entrepreneurially. It isimportant to note that there is not a single type of
skills.Entrepreneurship instructors often focus on the development of the “entrepreneurial mindset”while design instructors focus on the development of “design thinking,” characteristics that havesome similarities. The role of the teacher in both areas is less likely to be a lecturer, but rather asa coach or a guide that assists students in completing a longer-term project. Many capstonecourses have an industry component and can even have an entrepreneurial component. Thepurpose of this paper is to compare the teaching beliefs and practices of instructors of capstonedesign courses and entrepreneurship courses. The following research questions will be used tocompare the beliefs of capstone versus entrepreneurship instructors: 1. What are the teaching practices
Innovation Skills and Assessing Student Learning at MUSEAbstractThis paper presents the innovation and entrepreneurship education activities of MercerEngineering Entrepreneurship Education Program (MEEEP) developed and implementedthrough Kern Family Foundation grants in 2007. How Mercer University School of Engineering(MUSE) promotes entrepreneurial mindset and develop innovation-related skills amongengineering students are presented in term of curriculum development, entrepreneurship clubactivities, recruiting and involving students and faculty, assessment of entrepreneurship courses,the challenges encountered in implementing/sustaining the program and the lessons learned.The course sequence developed and implemented
inspirational leader.”2In the past year this paradigm of collaboration has been applied in the academy in two specificinstances. Schools from the Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN) have formedtwo such networks, each with the intention of accelerating growth in the area of promoting anentrepreneurial mindset among all engineering students, and for the purpose of using thesenetworks to better benefit students and change the institutional culture at the institutionsinvolved. One network, which has members from six different universities, was formed topromote and spread innovative approaches to entrepreneurial education. The other network,comprised of four other universities, will work collaboratively to create engineering graduateswho are
education, curriculum/learning environments innovation workshops around the world. Page 17.26.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Externally Funded Postdocs and Internship Opportunities @ HP Labs Submitted by Lueny Morell, Program Manager, Strategy Team, Hewlett Packard Laboratories lueny.morell@hp.comInnovation and invention represent the livelihood of companies in a flat world. Companies mustinnovate or perish. Both advances in technology, and the entrepreneurial culture that is wellingrained in the mindset
HHDN will transform and sustain a culture of entrepreneurial-mindedness that originateswithin its member institutions and propagates to industry and corporate America through activeand collaborative cooperation between its member universities and local, national, and globalindustries.To that end, the HHDN will create, validate, and widely share a new, sustainable, educationalmodel that impacts every student producing entrepreneurially-minded engineers with a servantleader mindset by: Creating mutual value for students and clients through innovative multi-disciplinary intrapreneurial engagements, positively impacting the American economy in the process Demonstrating voluntary social responsibility through a focus on
administered by the institution. Several multi-year grants havestrengthened the program through workshops, keynote speakers, faculty curriculum awards,student venture grants, and faculty incentives to work with industry sponsored student teams.Specifically, the College of Engineering received an invitation to participate as part of a largerinitiative to develop the Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN). The invitation alsoprovided funding to develop and integrate entrepreneurial (and leadership) education across thecurriculum.The goal of KEEN is to make entrepreneurship education opportunities widely available atinstitutions of higher learning, and to instill an action-oriented entrepreneurial mindset inengineering, science, and technical
addition, the authors are very thankful for the help from theinstructor and students participating in the English 202C and EDSGN 100 classes. Finally, theauthors would like to thank the Penn State Office of Engineering Diversity for providing supportfor travel. Page 25.1019.12References[1] B. Amadei, R. Sandekian, and E. Thomas, "A Model for Sustainable Humanitarian Engineering Projects," Sustainability, vol. 1, pp. 1087-1105, 2009.[2] K. Mehta, S. Zappe, T. Colledge, Y. Zhao, "eplum Model of Student Engagement: Expanding Non-travel Based Global Awareness, Multi-disciplinary Teamwork and Entrepreneurial Mindset Development
: Creating Linkages between Business and EngineeringAn innovative program at this University has proven to be an excellent vehicle for permittingcollaboration between Engineering and Business faculty and students. Students are given theopportunity to develop exciting new products and to pitch their ideas and designs to seniorleaders of regional corporations. The Ideation Challenge provides this vehicle. In addition todriving students to perform their best in front of leaders of industry, it is an outlet for innovationand creativity, the first steps in the entrepreneurial mindset. This year, for the first time, theIdeation Challenge will have a second phase. The second phase will be to take one of thoseinnovative ideas to the point where it is a
on organizational culture and the learning organization o Leadership principles and practice, diversity, global collaboration, sustainability, innovation, ethics, judgment, and moral courage o The entrepreneurial mindset and problem solving o Develop understanding of the importance of leadership in achieving goals o Applying leadership in diverse engineering contexts o Learning that individuals can lead from all levels in the organizationLearning outcomesOne major learning outcome is to be able to differentiate between leadership and management.Students should understand the theory behind the practice of management and leadership, and tobroaden their understanding of themselves and their leadership potential. One program (IowaState
into engineering, and engineering in K-12.Dr. Robert E. Kleine III, Ohio Northern University Page 25.317.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Closing the Assessment Loop: A Faculty Training ProtocolFaculty members desiring to integrate activities that cultivate in students elements of theentrepreneurial mindset into their courses – such as effective collaboration in a team setting orcritical & creative thinking applied to ambiguous problems – benefit from criteria to guidedevelopment of those activities1,2. Faculty members also need criteria for assessing
AC 2012-3387: ENHANCING CROSS-CULTURAL INTERACTION IN COURSESWITH A LARGE COMPONENT OF VISITING STUDY ABROAD STU-DENTSDr. Alex Friess, Rochester Institute of Technology, Dubai Alex Friess holds a Ph.D. in aeronautical engineering and a B.Sc. in physics from Rensselaer Polytech- nic Institute (Troy, N.Y. 1997), and has served as Associate Professor of mechanical engineering at RIT, Dubai, since 2009. In addition to undergraduate activities, he teaches in the sustainable energy concen- tration of RIT, Dubai’s mechanical engineering master’s program. Friess’ industrial and academic career spans a variety of consulting and entrepreneurial activities in Europe, Asia, and Africa, most notably as founding faculty in
engineering plastics were by manufacturers. Page 25.252.5The point for engineering educators interested in entrepreneurship perspectives for studentsis that those students will need the basics of innovation and entrepreneurship no matter wheretheir careers are going to take them. Innovation is not just something that R&D departmentsdo.Innovation is a skill and it does not require extensive training, capital investment, orfacilities. It does require a mindset of being innovative with the available resources. Indeed,resource constraints are often the best motivators for innovation. Rose-Hulman Ventures haslearned that input from all sources is
“The Future of Engineering Education,” NASA Research Brief, Vol. 3, Issue 1, January 29, 20105 “Why Accreditation Matters,” Accrediting Board for Engineering and Technology, www.abet.org6 “The Future of Engineering Education, II. Teaching Methods That Work,” R.M. Felder, D.R. Woods, J.E. Stice,A. Rugarcia, Chemical Engineering Education, Volume 34(1), 2000, p. 26.7 Fry, C., Jordan W., Leman, G., Garner, B., Thomas, B., “Bringing Innovation and the Entrepreneurial Mindset(Back) Into Engineering: the KEEN Innovators Program,” 2010 ASEE National Conference & Exposition,Louisville, KY, June 2010.8 Fry, C., Jordan W., “Engineering Education the Entrepreneurial Mindset at Baylor University,” 2011 ASEENational Conference & Exposition
• fabrication facilities • industry internships Capstone Yr • competition teams Capstone Project • entrepreneurial activities • service learning
was elected by the ASEE membership.MR: Shortly after being awarded tenure, I was invited to the NSF-supported meeting in fall 2000that initiated the formation of WELI. At that meeting, I realized that moving into academicleadership was an option I should be open to and that change in my mindset led to a number ofchoices in the years that followed that brought me to my current position.By spring of 2002, I was nominated by the members of my department to serve as DepartmentHead and I served in that role until spring 2006. During that time, I attended a department chairtraining workshop run by the American Council on Education as well as a number of ASCEmeetings for department chairs. I also was elected to service on the faculty committee
(Gibson, Kozmetsky, & Smilor, 1992). As a result, the paradigm of the university has been changing. A 2002 report by Tornatsky, Waugaman, and Gray reinforced the critical importance not only of Stanford University but also several other research universities, such as Georgia Tech in Atlanta, Georgia; Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio; and Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in creating dynamic technology centers. The authors point out that research universities are becoming more innovative and entrepreneurial by taking on new roles in a knowledge economy. And other reports have shown how the research university has become more engaged in the venturing
” (such as Peace CorpsMaster’s International Programs at Michigan Tech and MIT D-Lab) or “design for the other 90percent” (such as Stanford University Entrepreneurial Design for Extreme Affordability).Furthermore, engineers are working to change the conversation so incoming engineering studentsembrace messages that “engineers make a world of difference” and “engineering is essential toour health, happiness, and safety.”11 Effectively organizing engineering education around globalproblems requires taking greater notice of Schumacher’s and Polak’s exhortations.This paper explores Schumacher’s and Polak’s legacies on engineering practices in developingcountries and in engineering education. ITDG, through reorganization as Practical Action, andIDE
Engineer of 2020. 2004, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.2. Kisenwether, E. & Matson, J. V., Launching an undergraduate engineering entrepreneurship program. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education. 2002. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.3. Mann, C. & High, K.A., A pilot study for creativity experiences in a freshman introduction to engineering course. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education. 2003: Nashville, TN.4. Reid, K.J. & Ferguson, D.M., Enhancing the entrepreneurial mindset of freshman engineers. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Society for Engineering
perennialchallenge.Bibliography1. http://students.sae.org/competitions/bajasae/about.htm2. http://students.sae.org/competitions/bajasae/rules/bsinfo.htm3. Arif Sirinterlikci and Tony Lee Kerzmann, “Active Learning Through SAE Baja Competition”, ASEE AnnualConference, 20114. Saeed Foroudastan, “Enhancing Undergraduate Performance through Peer-Led,Team-Learning (PL-TL)”, ASEE Annual Conference, 20095. Donald M Reimer, Ahad Ali, Lawrence, Sabah Razouk Abro, “Relationship Between Student CompetitiveActivities and the Entrepreneurial Mindset”, ASEE Annual Conference, 20116. Craig Hoff, Gregory Davis, “Using the SAE Collegiate Design Series to ProvideHands-on Team Project Experience for Undergraduates”, ASEE Annual Conference, 20067. Brian Novoselich, Joel Dillon, “Two is
engineering design project. At thattime, engineering students were entering their sophomore and higher-level courses with twoperceived deficits: they were untrained in the sorts of communication skills that their upper-division engineering courses, internships, and future careers would demand of them, and theywere unacquainted with the methods and mindset characteristic of engineering. A team oftechnical and communication faculty set out in 1991 to design a class to remedy this situation.The course was designed with a significant technical communication component with theintention of ultimately implementing this course, for engineering students, in place of theuniversity-wide first year writing requirement.The first iteration of the course was
ofpositive change that are related to global competence are: entrepreneurial outlook; globalmindset; social responsibility; emotional intelligence; and proactive learning10. Page 25.490.5 Figure 3: AIESEC Global Competency Model in 201110.Global competence can also mean, “having an open mind while actively seeking to understandcultural norms and expectations of others, leveraging this gained knowledge to interact,communicate and work effectively outside one’s environment”11. However, global competencydiffers for people in various professions. It may not necessarily mean the same thing for foreignlanguage teachers, church