Modeling Problems in an Introductory Mechanics of Materials Course,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 32786. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32786.[2] A. Johnson and J. Swenson, “Open-Ended Modeling Problems in a Sophomore-Level Aerospace Mechanics of Materials Courses,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 33146. doi: 10.18260/1-2--33146.[3] J. Swenson, E. Treadway, K. Beranger, and A. Johnson, “‘Let Me See What I Could Do’: Students’ Epistemic Affect When Solving Open-ended, Real-world Problems,” in Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Lincoln, 2021, pp. 1–8.[4] V. A. Debellis, “Interactions Between Affect and Cognition During
- world challenges, Higher Education Pedagogies, 1:1, 42-56, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/23752696.2015.1134195[5] N. Sattele, K. Kecskemety, and K. Parris, Analysis of the Entrepreneurial Mind-set Elements in Established First-year Engineering Labs: Analysis Process and Lessons Learned and Changes for the Future Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida. June 2019. 10.18260/1-2—32089[6] J. Bringardner, G. Georgi, and V. Bill, From Design to Reality: Guiding First-Year Students from Design to Makerspace Reality Paper presented at 2018 FYEE Conference, Glassboro, New Jersey. July 2018. https://peer.asee.org/31402[7] L. Mitchell, and L. Light, Increasing Student Empathy Through
become more prevalent as work from home conditions continue or prevail post-COVID pandemic. References1. Tang, X., Burris L.E., Hu, N., Brenkus, N., 2019. “Preparing Ethical Leaders in Engineering Research and Practice: Designing an Ethical Leadership Module,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2019.2. Valentine, A., Lowenhoff, S., Marinelli, M., Male, S., Hassan, G.M., 2020. “Building students’ nascent understanding of ethics in engineering practice,” Eur. J. Engr. Ed., 2020.3. Handley, M., Lang, D., Erdman, A.M., 2017. “First Impressions: Evaluating Students’ Performance in Demonstrating Engineering Leadership,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
: Ideas from the Visual Arts for Engineering Programs,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/34550.[19] V. R. Ruggiero, The Art of Thinking: A Guide to Critical and Creative Thought, 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc., 2012.[20] M. A. Roberto, Unlocking Creativity. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2019.[21] T. Christensen, The Creativity Challenge: Design, Experiment, Test, Innovate, Build, Create, Inspire and Unleash Your Genius. Avon, MA: Adams Media, 2015.[22] S. M. Brookhart, “Assessing Creativity and Creative Thinking,” How to Assess High. Order Think. Ski. Your Classr., no. 2010, pp. 124–152, 2010.[23] M. Karwowski, I. Lebuda, E
Professor and Director for Diversity and Inclusion in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of South Carolina. He is also the ASEE Campus Representative and a Senior Faculty Associate in the Center for Integrative and Experiential Learning (CIEL). His current educational interests include designing and implementing problem-based learning strategies for within-the-classroom and beyond-the-classroom experiences, creating and evaluating inclusive learning environments, and facilitating critical student reflection in engineering education.Gurcan Comert Gurcan Comert received the B.Sc. and M.Sc. degree in Industrial Engineering from Fatih University, Istanbul, Turkey, and the Ph.D. degree in
. Gupta’s current collaborators span from National Institute of (NIH), Oak Ridge and Idaho National labs, Ohio Aerospace Institute (OAI), Masten Space, and Materion. She has served as an ad hoc reviewer for NSF, NASA, ACS proposals, and several high impact scientific journals. She is an active member and volunteer of AIChE, ACS, NATAS, and ASEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Magnetic Field Homogeneity of Helmholtz Coil integrated with a Hotplate for High Temperature Sintering: A Multidisciplinary Senior Design Project Chaitanya Mahajan 1, Seyed Alireza Rozati 2, Anju Gupta 2
use theresults of this study to validate our data. This paper then looks beyond the queueing tool toanalyze how automated feedback mechanisms affect wait times.4 MethodsIn this section, we describe data collection from peer teaching office hours queues, the context ofthe computer science curriculum, the different types of automated feedback mechanisms, and ourstatistical methods.The raw office hours queue data contains 195251 records, and after cleaning and filtering, thereare 105941 records reflecting 17 unique courses: 2 100-level, 4 200-level, 2 300-level, and 9400-level. The records occur between September 2016 and December 2019, before theCOVID-19 pandemic began.4.1 Data CollectionOur data set was collected from two web-based
Powered by www.slayte.comIntroductionA recent review by Pierrakos et al. (2019) put forward an alternative framework for engineeringethics education grounded in character education and virtue ethics. This work argued that thecurrent focus of engineering ethics towards consequentialism (outcomes) and deontology(obligation) could contribute to the limited improvement (and in some cases decline) seen inengineering students’ engagement with and commitment to public welfare. Examples cited aspotential consequences of these trends in emerging engineering professionals included the rigidinterpretation of ethics and in the lack of consideration for the broader societal impacts of theirdecision-making (Pierrakos, 2019).Character education, as an
interprofessionalskills that allow them to appreciate, understand, and integrate perspectives from outside theirfield to solve modern societal problems requiring a multidisciplinary approach (Carrico et al.2020; Shuman et al. 2005; Nagel et al. 2017; Ricther & Paretti 2009; Almeida 2019). Studentslacking such an ability to relate an interdisciplinary subject to their own field of expertise andfailing to value contributions of multiple technical and non-technical fields to an interdisciplinaryproblem have been identified as the key learning barriers to interdisciplinarity in engineeringclassrooms (Ricther & Paretti 2009). Whereas engineering teams can be interdisciplinary (e.g.,structural engineer collaborating with a geotechnical engineer) or
. C., Oct. 27-30, 2010.[11] R. Dou, Z. Hazari, K. Dabney, G. Sonnert, and P. Sadler, “Early informal STEM experiences and STEM identity: The importance of talking science,” Science Education, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 623-637, 2019.[12] M. R. Kendall, M. Denton, N. H. Choe, L. M. Procter, and M. Borrego, “Factors influencing engineering identity development of Latinx students,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 173-180, Aug. 2019.[13] A. Godwin, G. Sonnert, and P. M. Sadler, “The influence of out-of-school high school experiences on engineering identities and career choice,” presented at the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 14-17, 2015.[14] J. D. Cribbs, C. Cass, Z. Hazari, P. M. Sadler
learned during the introduction ofthe new labs will be discussed.IntroductionThis work is a continuation of a work in progress paper submitted to the 2021 ASEE conference[1]. The original paper discussed the details of the redesign of a measurements and analysis labcourse in order to allow for at home experimentation for students who were not able to be oncampus due to the COVID pandemic. This lab was run in a hybrid format where every lab teamhad both online and on campus students. Kits were sent to all students to allow them to performtheir part of the experiment at home if necessary. Lab analysis questions could only be answeredby combining at home and on campus data to promote positive interdependency betweenstudents. The course in question
first year and were selected based on financial need, academic ability, andletters of recommendation. All participants participated in a first-year general engineering courseduring their first semester before taking discipline-specific classes. Data collection for cohort 1started in the Fall of 2019 and for cohort 2 in the Fall of 2020; for this study, cohort 1 had justfinished their second year, and cohort 2 had just finished their first year. Table 1 listsparticipants’ pseudonyms, self-reported demographic information, and major at the time of thelast interview. This sample’s composition supports the transferability of the findings to similarpopulations enrolled in undergraduate engineering programs but cannot speak to theexperiences of
Paper ID #37629Industry Hubs: Integrating Industry Perspectives in DesignEducationChristopher Rennick (Engineering Educational Developer) Christopher Rennick received his B.ASc. and M.ASc. in electrical engineering from the University of Windsor, in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. Chris is currently a Ph.D. candidate in Management Sciences at the University of Waterloo studying students’ design skill development. Chris was awarded the Canadian Engineering Education Association Engineering Education Graduate Student Award in 2019 for his contributions to the field. Since 2010, Chris has been a member of the
- Robo: Empowering Gifted High School Students with Robotics," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2019.[16] J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick and A. Farhadi, "You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection," in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, 2016.[17] J. Redmon and A. Farhadi, "YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger," in 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, 2017.[18] J. Redmon and A. Farhadi, "YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement," 2018. 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, June 26-29, 2022 Wang
libraries of focus: Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX Copyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 22.1 TaichiTaichi is a high-performance programming language embedded in Python for computer graphicsapplications. The design goals are:● Productivity and portability: easy to learn, to write, and to share● Performance: data-oriented, parallel, mega-kernels● Spatially sparse programming: save computation and storage on empty regions● Decouple data structures from
Delivered Course”, in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017 [8]. Devanshi Shah, Elisabeth Kames, et. All, “Examining the Differences in Student Motivation for Industry Projects and Non-Industry Projects in Senior Capstone Design”, in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019 [9]. Savage, Nick, et al. “Motivation of Engineering Students in Higher Education.” Engineering Education, Vol. 6, 2011 [10]. Gero, Aharon, and Gershon Abraham. “Engineering Preparatory Programs: Students’ Academic Motivation.” In Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), Queen’s University Library, Nov. 2018. [11]. Malek Mohammadi, A., & Hajrasouliha, A., & Cleary
. While beneficial because they arerequired courses, lab and design course instructors generally have limited time to get in depth,instead focusing on lower order thinking skills [9] such as remembering and understanding. Thisis one of the major issues with current process safety resources, according to a presentation byCarter et al at the 2019 ASEE National Conference [10]. Additionally, other process safetyresources, such as the SAChE Certificate Program, have historically been a large timecommitment for students and, while focusing on a lot of different topics, have mostly focused oneducating students to Bloom's “understanding” level of thinking rather than encouraging studentsto integrate or apply the knowledge to higher-level pedagogical
development.Details for each of these steps are included in this paper, as well as key lessons learned by theevaluation team. A second paper (Jordan et al., 2022) will explore the findings and the lessonslearned on the evaluation from the perspectives of the members of The Center.Initial conversation, scoping, and goals for the evaluationInitial conversations with The Center on the evaluation began in 2019. The evaluation team wasfirst approached at the 2019 ASEE Conference. The team then visited The Center in the fall of2019 to generate a more specific plan for the evaluation. The time spent during the meeting wasused to generate guiding evaluation questions, identify stakeholders, and possible data sources. Inaddition, further opportunities for
: Persistence, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education. E. Seymour, A. B. Hunter, Eds. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2019.[24] B. N. Geisinger, and D. R. Raman, “Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914-925. [Online]. Available: http://www.rise.hs.iastate.edu/projects/CBiRC/IJEE- WhyTheyLeave.pdf[25] A. Godwin, D. Verdín, B. B. McIntyre, R. A. Baker, and T. J. Milton, J. T. Yeggy, “Board 51: CAREER: Actualizing latent diversity: Building innovation through engineering students’ identity development” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. Jun. 2018. [Online
-year students have the option of participating in additional group advisingsessions led by upperclassmen program participants. All students can apply for funds to addressepisodic financial crises that may impact student success. Through the combination of thesummer program and the term-time support, RESP aims to ameliorate any obstacle to studentsuccess and support students in achieving their goals.The Current StudyThe current study analyzes data collected during the 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20school years as part of an on-going research project funded by an NSF S-STEM grant exploringthe efficacy and impact of an anti-remedial, comprehensive summer bridge program on STEMretention. These longitudinal data reflect students
). “Student Performance Improvement using Interactive Textbooks: A Three-UniversityCross-Semester Analysis.” Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24760[6] Pohl, L. M., and Walters, S. (2015). “Instructional Videos in an Online EngineeringEconomics Course.” Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle,Washington. 10.18260/p.24316[7] Yim, S. M., Lowrance, C. J., and Sturzinger, E. M. (2019). “Effects of YouTube Video as Pre-Lecture Preparation.” Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa,Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32697[8] Bringardner, J., & Jean-Pierre, Y. (2016). “Video Instruction to Complement All LearningStyles in a First-Year
Education Conference Proceedings, San Jose, CA.[5] Scheidt, M., Godwin A., Senkpeil, R., Ge, J., Chen, J., Self, B., Widmann, J., and Berger, E., (2018), “Validity Evidence for a Survey Measuring Engineering and Computing Students’ Non-Cognitive and Affective Profiles,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.[6] Scheidt, M., Godwin A., Berger, E., Chen, J., Self, B., and Widmann, J., (2019),“Validity Evidence for the SUCCESS Survey: Measuring Non-Cognitive and Affective Traits of Engineering and Computing Students (Part II)’,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL.[7] Grigorian, C., Kerfs, M., Gee, J., Widmann, J., Chen, J., and Self, B., (2021), Update on the Role of
member at CU since 1996, serving in various roles including Faculty Director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program (2014-2017), Director of the Environmental Engineering program (2006-2010), and ABET Assessment Coordinator for the CEAE Department (2008-2018). Bielefeldt is active in the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), serving on the Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee (2019-2022) and the Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee (2016-2018). She is the Senior Editor for the International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering (IJSLE) and a Deputy Editor for the ASCE Journal of Civil Engineering Education. Her research focuses on engineering education, including ethics, social
papersattempted to answer this question. None of them was able to answer it unambiguously.In summary, there is strong evidence that both students and faculty find this approach lessstressful and prefer it. There is also evidence that it really does improve students’ metacognition:they invest more thought in their answers, and improve their self-evaluation skills. These factorsshould lead to an increase in learning, but so far, none has been demonstrated. In any case, apractice favored by both students and instructors is unlikely to fade away, so the future maybring more evidence of its effectiveness.8. References[Unless otherwise indicated, all references are from the ASEE Annual Conference proceedings (AnnualConference and Exposition, 2013–2019, Virtual
comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8319–8320, 2014.[13] A. Dallal and R. M. Clark, "Progressive Use of Active Learning in Electrical Engineering Courses," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[14] C. C. Bonwell and J. A. Eison, "ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education," 1991.[15] M. Weimer, Learner-centered teaching : five key changes to practice. John Wiley & Sons, 2002.[16] R. Felder, "Random thoughts... Hang in there! Dealing with student resistance to learner- centered teaching," Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 131–132, 2011.[17] L. D. Fink, Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses
skills and knowledge from more basic course works.AcknowledgementThis work has been supported by the US Department of Education under the joint MSEIP Programwith the University of Texas at El Paso, PR/Award No.: P120A180101. The authors wish to expresssincere gratitude for their financial support.Bibliography 1. Chiou, R., & Mauk, M. G., & Tseng, T. B. (2019, June), “A Senior Design Project: The Design of an Experimental Carbon Dioxide Capture System for Enhancing Student Learning on Green Energy Manufacturing,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 2. Pecen, R., & Yildiz, F. (2019, June), A Smart Grid Implementation for an Engineering Technology Curriculum,” 2019 ASEE Annual
Development of Five SIMSIn 2017, the year of “BaahuBali-2”, the author developed Five Simplified Integrated Methods ofSolution (SIMS) [4] to solve the basic ten types of vector systems with two or three unknowns inplanar mechanics. Naming the earlier Vector Rotation Theorem as SIM3, he presented them atthe ASEE 2019 Conference, Tampa, FL. One of the paper reviewers commented“Very interesting study to convert sometimes nonlinear and convoluted set of equations intolinear and single variable (unknown) equations. This study is definitely of value to those whochoose to adopt in their teaching of Mechanics and Kinematics courses.”For the use of SIMS, a plane vector is classified with unit vector e with polar angle (θ), asC1. Known vector with known
. A., Tsai, J., Boll, A., Blacklock, J., & Johnson, K. (2019). Pain and gain: Barriersand opportunities for integrating sociotechnical thinking into diverse engineering courses. InProceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds weneed. The MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing amongfive approaches. SAGE Publications.Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic,and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268-291.Faulkner, W. (2007). ‘Nuts and bolts and people
Cybersecurity Research Experience for Undergraduates Program,” Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019,.[37] J. Straub, “Evaluation of the Second Year of a REU Program on Cyber-physical System Cybersecurity,” Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Jun. 2020. Appendix 1 – Outcomes by Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Figure A1. Interest in employment in field of participation (prior year data from [34]). Year 1
infrastructure. 4G-LTEoffers up to 20 times the capacity of 3G but without any network improvement, 4G network mustreach its maximum. The 5G was introduced in the late 2010 as new generation radio (NGR) or simply new radio(NR) and deployed by cellular phone companies worldwide in 2019. It has up to 400 MHz channelsand uses OFDM based air interface technology. It was on a high demand for data subscription and Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX Copyright 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 4data consumption. 5G networks are expected