technical knowledge and merit based scholarship sets the ground work for a disengagementof students and pushes out those with a wider world view. The study that Cech [17] conductedshowed that students in universities actually decrease in their feelings of social engagement andresponsibilities as they progress through their education. While the changes are small, they aresignificant and point to a larger problem with undergraduate education and the socialization ofengineers.Engineering IdentityThe development of an identity as an engineer has begun to be considered a factor in theformation of a professional engineer. Capobianco, French and Diefes-Dux [18] looked at theconnection of a student’s ability to identity as an engineer and their persistence
identity in the professional formation of engineers and a diverse, transdisciplinary engineering workforce.Hannah Wilkinson, Utah State University Hannah Wilkinson is a graduate student in Engineering Education at Utah State University. She received a B.S. in Chemical Engineering in from the University of Utah and a M.S. in Engineering Education from Utah State University.Samuel Shaw, Utah State University Samuel Shaw is an undergraduate student in Mechanical Engineering at Utah State University.Allison Miles, Utah State University Allison Miles is an undergraduate student in Mechanical Engineering at Utah State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 CAREER: ‘Support our
California San Diego & San Diego StateUniversity3 Associate Teaching Professor in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of California Irvine4 Teaching Professor in Cell and Developmental Biology at the University of California San Diego5 Associate Teaching Professor in Chemistry and Biochemistry at the University of California Santa Cruz 2 AbstractLatine and Hispanic engineering students rarely see a faculty member whose background mirrorstheir own. The NSF AGEP (Alliances for Graduate Education and The Professoriate) HiringInterventions for Representation and Equity (HIRE) project
threads are cross-departmental pathways of classes and projects inareas that address the “new machines and systems” of the future and that are likely to play a major partin impacting the world when the students graduate. By participating in the pilot, students will earn an SBdegree from the department they are majoring in and a NEET Certificate naming the thread, within theusual four-year duration. NEET has launched two additional pilot threads in Fall 2018: AdvancedMaterials Machines (covering materials science and engineering and mechanical engineering) and CleanEnergy Systems (covering nuclear science and engineering, civil and environmental engineering andmechanical engineering).The NEET approach and curriculum developed over more than nine
, by studying inclusivity,equity and power in educational systems we found ourselves in the position of asking people tochange. Some changes seem small (e.g. asking someone to edit their vocabulary by adding orremoving a word or phrase), and some seem larger (e.g. asking a School to establish policies toenforce an inclusive culture for graduate students) but the common element is that we areworking to get people to align to our vision.RecommendationsWe have three recommendations for people in engineering education who are beginning toengage in social justice reform.Take action where you can and expect and accept mistakesA primary inspiration for this paper was that we felt unprepared for the particular challenges weencountered. We found
in a student’s decision as to where to attendand what to study. Many other successful programs focus on younger students to intervene incritical decision making times.For this project we paired schools that have been a part of ongoing K-12 outreach programs withadditional schools that have a larger percentage of underrepresented groups in their generalpopulation. In the initial pilot, participating High Schools sent two teachers and six students tothe STEM-Discovery camp. Teachers were urged to select student teams that balance academicdisciplines with roughly half having interests in science/math and the other half in other fields.Teacher workshops were used to guide teachers through the engineering design process, as wellas the content
their families is correlated with increases inacademic success, as measured by retention, progression (GPA and courses completed), and 4- to6-year graduation rates, for both computer engineering and computer science students. We havedemonstrated these effects in a dually designated Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI) and AsianAmerican and Native American Pacific Islander-Serving Institution (AANAPISI) and have doneso as a pilot study for other, including similar, institutions as well as other STEM fields.AcknowledgmentsThis work was funded in part by NSF Grant #1742607.References[1] Fernández, E., Rincón, B. E., & Hinojosa, J. K. (2021). (Re)creating family and reinforcing pedagogies of the home: How familial capital manifests for
, Salt LakeCity, Utah. Jun. 2018.[3] Yoritomo, J. Y., Turnipseed, N., Cooper, S. L., Elliott, C. M., Gallagher, J. R., Popovics, J.S., Prior, P., and Zilles, J. L. “Examining engineering writing instruction at a large researchuniversity through the lens of writing studies,” in Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE AnnualConference, Salt Lake City, Utah. Jun. 2018.[4] Hanson, A. J., Lindahl, P., Strasser, S. D., Takemura, A. F., Englund, D. R., and Goldstein, J.“Technical communication instruction for graduate students: The Communication Lab vs. acourse,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, Ohio. Jun. 2017.[5] R. Day Babcock and T. Thonus, “A sample research question: What is a successful tutorial?”in Researching the Writing
girls who alsohad a passion for engineering. Meeting the other Ambassadors in video discussions in early falland then being at the SWE Conference a short time later boosted her confidence in herself assomeone who could be an engineer. One of her peers gained confidence at the SWE Conferenceas well. She was bolstered by meeting female college students majoring in Engineering andfemale adult professionals working in Engineering at SWE. As she described it, she came to seeher future self in them. “I've gotten more excited about just my identity as an engineer.”One Ambassador described gaining confidence because she was taking on the role of teachingand guiding other girls in learning about engineering. She felt motivated because she knew
different groups on the map, shown inFigure 3. This will include recruiting students from different parts of the maps in order to conductlongitudinal interviews about engineering pathways and the negotiation of identities as engineers.This corresponding qualitative work will build upon this study’s existing quantitative results andwill inform additional studies with the insights recorded.ConclusionThis paper described the key model parameters that researchers must consider in using a newstatistical method, Topological Data Analysis (TDA). We also presented how TDA can be usefulto characterize students’ latent diversity from a survey study of 3,711 first-year engineeringstudents’ incoming attitudes, beliefs, and mindsets at 32 ABET-accredited
Paper ID #20327Encouraging Young Women to Pursue Engineering: 25 Years of SummerCamp Successes and ChallengesDr. Jessica J. Lofton, University of Evansville Dr. Lofton is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Evansville, and the Director for the OPTIONS in Engineering summer camps for middle school and high school girls. After earning her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Evansville, she completed her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Illinois, with a graduate minor in College Teaching. She is a faculty advisor for the student chapters of
that involved combining fiveeducation best practices of recruitment, formal mentoring through peer mentors, summer campengineering math preparation and workshops, academic year stipends, and summer internships atlocal and regional companies.The Just in Time Math (JITM) strategy was implemented to increase the interaction betweenfreshmen and engineering faculty and peers during the first semesters of study. As a result, moreengineering students have shown greater enthusiasm for the field of engineering which resultedin better retention and graduation rates. The JITM course included lecture, lab and recitationcomponents and an application-oriented, hands-on approach. The JITM course addressed mathtopics specifically used in the core entry-level
Instructional Diagnosis): Tapping Student Perceptions of Teaching" in E.C. Wadsworth (ed)., Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press, 1988.[9] J. Kulik, "Student Ratings: Validity, Utility and Controversey," New Directions for Teaching and Learning, pp. 9-25, 2001.[10] A. Sherry, C. Fulford and S. Zhang, "Assessing Distance Learners' Satisfaction with Instruction: A Quantitative and Qualitative Measure," The American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 4-28, 1998.[11] L. M. Blaschke, "Using social media to engage and develop the online learne in self-determined learning ," Research in Learning Technology, vol. 22, 2014.[12] S. Wickramasinghe, and W. Timpson, "Mid-Semester student feedback enhances student learning
leadership learning opportunities and experiencesof undergraduate engineering students as a whole. Our study fills this gap by examining how1203 undergraduate engineering students at a large, Canadian, research-intensive university haveused non-formal learning spaces—co-curricular and extra-curricular activities—to hone theirleadership and engineering skills and identities. Our quantitative analysis of survey resultssuggests that explicit leadership programing, student government and industry-basedprofessional development activities were most effective at helping engineering students developtheir leadership skills. When it came to catalyzing their engineering skills development, wefound that internships, design competitions and professional
faculty mentorship, the pathway into and through graduate education, and gender and race in engineering.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an associate professor in the Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Cornell University. She is also the Engineering Workforce Development Director for CISTAR, the Center for Innovative and Strategic Transformation of Alkane Resources, a Na- tional Science Foundation Engineering Research Center. Her research focuses on how identity, among other affective factors, influences diverse students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and
space propulsion. He received BS, MS, and PhD degrees from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor, and was a research engineer at Starfire Industries LLC before returning to academia as an assistant professor of aerospace engineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology. In 2017 he joined the faculty of aerospace engineering at the University of Illinois. He has published over 150 journal and conference papers on space propulsion and he regularly teaches 200 students a year in his senior-level aerospace propulsion course. He was recipient of the University of Illinois Provost Award for Excellence in Under- graduate Teaching in 2023. ©American Society for Engineering
to Inform First-Year Bowman, T. A. Seifert, G. C. Wolniak, E. T. Advising Practices and Policies at Northwestern Pascarella, and P. T. Terenzini, “How college University's McCormick School of Engineering,” affects students: 21st century evidence that higher Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference education works”, Vol. 3, 2016. & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 2017, https://peer.asee.org/29143[2] L. D. Patton, S. R. Harper, and J. Harris, “Using critical race theory to (re)interpret widely studied
andreflect on their community’s strengths and concerns through imagery, fostering critical dialogueand knowledge-sharing [1]. While popularly utilized in medicine, social sciences, and education,its application in engineering education [2–5] and computer science education [6–8] is relativelynew and underexplored. This position paper aims to bridge this gap by presenting acomprehensive account of a pilot study that introduces photovoice to computer science students,showcasing the method’s merits and contributions. It will outline implementation and adaptationof the method’s steps, obstacles faced during its duration, the value derived from the emergentthemes from visual artifacts developed from participants, and the holistic value derived fromactive
graduates prepared to engage in entrepreneurial and intrapreneurialactivities?The research team is pursuing these questions through a multi-method approach, includingqualitative and quantitative methods. The work meets the requirements of Design andDevelopment Research, as specified by the Common Guidelines for Educational Research in thatit contains: 1) Development of a solution based on a well-specified theory of action appropriateto a well-defined end user; 2) Creation of measures to assess the implementation of thesolution(s); 3) Collection of data on the feasibility of implementing the solution(s) in typicaldelivery settings by intended users; and 4) Conducting a pilot study to examine the promise ofgenerating the intended outcomes [22].Theory
: 1) Development of a solution based on a well-specified theory of action appropriateto a well-defined end user; 2) Creation of measures to assess the implementation of thesolution(s); 3) Collection of data on the feasibility of implementing the solution(s) in typicaldelivery settings by intended users; and 4) Conducting a pilot study to examine the promise ofgenerating the intended outcomes [22].Theory of ActionHuman capital theory is a theory of investment in human capital, or the abilities and skills,acquired through investment in education and training, of any individual, that enhance potentialincome earning [23]. Human capital models examine how students make cost–benefit analysesand subsequent decisions on whether to attend and persist
Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 24, no. 2, 2018, Accessed: Feb. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.dl.begellhouse.com/journals/00551c876cc2f027,4c37811e62eac771,359bf188 17ac4bed.html[19] L. N. Fleming, S. E. Burris, K. C. Smith, L. B. Bliss, I. N. Moore, and F. Bornmann, “Beyond persistence: Graduate school aspirations of Hispanic engineering students at HSIs,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 24–228. Accessed: Feb. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/beyond-persistence-graduate-school- aspirations-of-hispanic-engineering-students-at-hsis[20] M. G. Cuellar and A. M. Gonzalez, “Beyond the Baccalaureate: Factors Shaping Latina/o Graduate
success for underrepresented students in the STEM fields[13-15]. Investigating academic self-concept can provide a conceptual tool to understandstudents’ perceptions of their academic identity, their perceptions of their capabilities within theacademic discipline and how they overcome academic challenges.Complementing undergraduate enrollment numbers, women have been shown to demonstrate ahigher academic self-concept in biology and medicine as opposed to engineering and math [14].According to the National Science Foundation, men earned approximately 75% of theengineering, mathematical and computer science bachelor’s degree in 2020 [6]. Men alsodemonstrate higher levels of academic self-concept [16]. Given the reported lower levels ofacademic self
master’s degree than prior to doingresearch, and 50% reporting being “much more likely” to pursue a PhD. Many of the studentspresented their research at professional conferences. This project also led to a National ScienceFoundation Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (EFRI) Research Experience andMentoring (REM) award in collaboration with Harvard University and Bunker Hill CommunityCollege to pilot a model to engage students from underrepresented backgrounds at these partnerinstitutions in undergraduate research [13], [14], [15].Grainger Engineering Graduate Student Diversity Ambassadors Program, 2022 – 2024, PI:StaffDescription: This project established the first cohort of the Engineering Graduate StudentDiversity Ambassadors
engineering settings.MethodsThis study analyzes student survey data using statistical methods in a quantitative researchdesign. Students in seven, large undergraduate engineering courses representing four differentengineering majors self-reported demographic information and emotional engagement as part ofa larger study that explored different factors which may inform student engagement inengineering classrooms.ParticipantsThe sample population in this study consisted of 781 undergraduate engineering studentsrecruited in the last two weeks of the term. Self-reported ethnicity included Asian (47%), Black(3.5%), Hispanic (3.5%), White (41%), Pacific-Islander (less than 1%), Native American (lessthan 1%), and Other (3%). 24% of the sample were female, 75
and ContextResearch design. This pilot study employed a convergent parallel mixed methods approach [31]to analyze counselors’ reactions and ongoing professional development needs with regard topreparing and informing students about science and engineering career pathways. Pilotqualitative and quantitative data were collected simultaneously to determine school counselorpractices and constraints related to STEM advisement.Conceptual framework. The theoretical basis for the professional development design isderived from two psychosocial theories that explain academic and career choices. The theory ofplanned behavior suggests that students make academic decisions based upon their self-efficacyand sense of controllability [32]. That is, career
itself to “topic-chaining” instruction which has been found to be particularly effective for URMs [21] -[25].Topic chaining pertains to the need to build towards complex topics by relating previous learningexperiences to future ones while also introducing relevant context. MethodsThe current case study is part of a larger National Science Foundation (NSF) grant funded(1734878) study concerning engineering identity development among middle school youth andpostsecondary engineering students in a summer intervention program. The study alsoinvestigates how early-career math and science teachers draw upon content learned in theprogram to adopt culturally responsive STEM pedagogy for application in their
California, Irvine and is working on a Masters in Science Education at California State University Long Beach. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Breaking Through the Obstacles: Strategies and Support Helping Students Succeed in Computer ScienceIntroduction and MotivationNot only that there is a continuously growing number of students who want to study computerscience (CS) but also there is a large need for CS graduates. The computing jobs are crucial forthe development and growth of the economy worldwide. For example, the data from theIntegrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) [1] by the U.S. Department ofEducation’s National Center for Education Statistics
. Schneider graduated from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in chemical engineering in 1999, attended Columbia University Film M.F.A. Program in 2001, and earned his master’s and Ph.D. from Cornell University in mechanical engineering with a concentration in controls & dynamics in 2007. David has taught at both Columbia University, where he was the highest student-rated instructor in the College of Engineering, and at Cornell University where he is now the Director of M.Eng. Studies for Systems Engineering, the largest M.Eng. program at Cornell. As a faculty member in systems engineering, David has focused largely on industry collaborations, ad- vising over 1200 professional M.Eng. students, and over 1000 students
characterize STEM careers as unworthy of literate andcreative individuals [2]. Does she have a good point? During the last two decades substantial efforthas been expended towards reconciling developing students with what can be broadly defined asSTEM identities. Considerable recent research broadly on STEM identities [e.g. 3-21], includingseparate considerations of science, engineering and math identities, has focused on the identitiesof groups and intersectionalities underrepresented in STEM disciplines and careers. But, someresearch also suggests that merely inserting a STEM label, e.g. science or scientist, into adiscussion unleashes implicit biases of gender, race and ethnicity in middle school children [14].Surveys to assess self-efficacy and
and engineering projects. She also co-directs the Welcome Project (welcomeproject.valpo.edu), a first-person story collection about identity and inclusion.Dr. Jeffrey Dale Will, Valparaiso University Will completed his B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign and has been a full-time faculty member in the Electrical and Computer Engineering De- partment at Valparaiso University since August of 2001. He teaches courses in senior design, computer architecture, digital signal processing, freshman topics, and circuits laboratories and is heavily involved in working with students in undergraduate research. Will is also a 2013 recipient of the Illinois-Indiana ASEE