Partnership Program and an Instructor in the Department of Mechanical Engi- neering at the University of Colorado Boulder. She received BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineer- ing from The Ohio State University and a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. Dr. Kotys-Schwartz has focused her research in engineering epistemology, engineering student learning, retention and diversity. She is currently investigating the use of Oral Discourse Method for con- ceptual development in engineering, the impact of a four-year hands-on design curriculum in engineering, the effects of service learning in engineering education, and informal learning in engineering.Derek T Reamon, University of Colorado
professional service) but who do notor cannot commit their full and complete professional efforts to the purposes of the university ina manner typical of regular faculty” ( p 41)17.Definition of Part-time FacultyEducational researchers such as Tuckman, Caldwell, & Volger18 were among the first to definecategories for part-time faculty, which included: Semi-retireds – former full-time academics, whose focus is not about future job prospects Graduate students – full-time graduate students who teach part-time to gain experience Hopeful full-timers – individuals who teach part-time only because they have not been successful at obtaining a full-time teaching position or began teaching part-time in the
engineering for this paper is, in short, the application ofscience and math to design solutions and tools for real application in society (and in furtherscientific research). The engineering design process is more specifically devising a system,component, or process to meet desired needs. It is a process which integrates basic sciences,mathematics, and the engineering sciences to convert resources to meet stated needs.7 “The goal of engineering is to solve practical problems through the development or use oftechnologies, based on the scientific knowledge gained through investigation.”8 In the contextof energy science, scientific inquiry allows us better understand energy, and, often, we need newtools to help discover more answers. Engineers
Shashi Nambisan, PhD, PE, is Director of the Institute for Transportation and Professor of Civil En- gineering at Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. He enjoys working with students and he has taught undergraduate and graduate courses in the area of Transportation systems as well as undergraduate cap- stone design courses. Dr. Nambisan has led efforts on over 150 research projects. He has taught over a dozen undergraduate and graduate courses in various areas related to transportation systems as well as undergraduate capstone design courses. He also has been very active in leadership roles of several pro- fessional societies. Among the awards and honors Shashi has received is a proclamation by the Governor of Nevada
AC 2011-216: MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY IN UNDERGRADUATEPHYSICS STUDENT MISCONCEPTIONS AND POINTS OF DIFFICULTYJeffrey A. Jalkio, University of Saint Thomas Jeff Jalkio received his Ph.D in Electrical Engineering from the University of Minnesota and worked for thirteen years in industry in the fields of optical sensor design and process control. In 1984, he co- founded CyberOptics Corporation, where he led engineering efforts as Vice President of Research. In 1997 he returned to academia, joining the engineering faculty of the University of St. Thomas where he teaches courses in digital electronics, computing, electromagnetic fields, controls, and design
research. Done well, it enables the candidate to get graduate levelcredit while working on a project that contributes to and has a quantifiable benefit to theirindustry sponsor. For the industrial sponsor, the project is the mechanism in which a productof commercial value and impact is developed on behalf of the company. For the candidate, it isthe opportunity to apply knowledge, develop self-confidence and expertise under real-worldtime, business, performance, and quality pressure. 9The candidates write a proposal as part of the admissions process where they outline how theirproject enables them to demonstrate growth as viewed from three complementary perspectives: 1) Market Value – Specific value
the capstone laboratory course orsenior design or at best, both. Therefore, those of us that graduated prior to the introduction ofthe ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 1 would likely have received no formal teamwork trainingduring our academic studies. With the introduction of the accreditation requirement by ABET,which states that, “Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have an ability tofunction on multi-disciplinary teams.” the academic community has taken teamwork somewhatmore seriously. The “multi-disciplinary” requirement aside, demonstrating that our students“have an ability to function on teams,” is a daunting challenge on its own. Furthermore, insurveys conducted by the author, student responses reveal that many
engineering coursework Engineering undergraduate students are well prepared technically, but lack broadersuccess skills when they graduate. Evidence of this imbalance follows. These “Major ResearchFindings” are evidence of the importance of business success skills as a supplement to standardengineering coursework. Major research and findings are taken from a National Society of Professional Engineerspublication entitled Engineering Education Issues: Report on Surveys of Opinions byEngineering Deans and Employers of Engineering Graduates on the First Professional Degree.1 “Preparedness for Practice: Engineering deans and employer respondents were asked torate new engineers’ preparedness for practice in eight areas and then indicate
between conceptual and preliminary design. This as-pect of aesthetic design is not familiar to engineers, but its understanding is essential to success-ful collaboration. In practice engineers are typically not privy to this phase of the design and as aresult are lacking a basic understanding of the design vision, which impacts their ability to con-tribute to the subsequent design phases. Page 22.148.7Preliminary Design PhaseThis and the following phase of the project were set up to work as a progressive competition. Byforming the interdisciplinary teams for this phase based on students’ interest in a particular de-sign, our intention was to
AC 2011-2431: TEAM TEACHING THAT GOES THE DISTANCE: TEAMINSTRUCTION FOR A BROADCAST INTRODUCTORY ENGINEERINGCOURSEAngela Minichiello, Utah State University Angela (Angie) Minichiello, Principal Lecturer in the Department of Engineering and Technology Edu- cation at Utah State University, instructs core engineering courses at the Brigham City Regional Campus. Angie is a registered professional mechanical engineer and has over 15 years industry experience as a practicing engineer. She holds a BSME degree from the United States Military Academy at West Point and a MSME degree from Georgia Tech. Her research interests include adult learning theory, blended learning techniques, and improved methods for technology based
library. These units,created by engineering graduate students and reviewed by engineering faculty, are user-friendlymaterials for K-12 teachers, designed to impact K-12 student’ science and mathematicsknowledge and their awareness of engineering as a possible career 20. The designers have shownsignificantly higher learning gains in experimental groups using the ITL Program materialscompared with control classrooms. The vision statement of the ITL Program, adapted from theNational Academy of Engineering and National Research Council, is ―To create a K-12 learningcommunity in which students, K-12 teachers and the College of Engineering and Applied Scienceexplore, through hands-on doing, the role of engineering and innovation in everyday life. And
doctoral degree in Civil Engineering from Texas A&M University. His research focus is on development of innovative chemical and biological sensors for water quality measurements, oil spill monitoring and environmental assessment in coastal areas. Dr. Ojo has been involved with design and implementation of observing systems using an end-to-end systems approach.Peiyi Lin, Teachers College, Columbia University Peiyi Lin is a doctoral candidate in the program in Communication, Computers, Technology and Educa- tion at Teachers College, Columbia University. She has an M.A. in Educational Leadership from Eastern Michigan University. Her research interests include the role of school administrators in teacher profes
. Page 22.100.127. See the website www.dacum.org8. Erin Lamos, et al, “A Sharper Focus On Technical Workers How to Educate and Train for the Global Economy”, NGA Center for Best Practices, 444 N. Capitol Street, Suite 267, Washington, DC 20001, June 2010.9. Steve Clark, “Developing a Competency-based Curriculum tailored to Industry's Needs. The DACUM Process: Design; The Delphi Method: Validation; The Results”, Alternative Energy: Training the Workforce of the Future, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, June 2, 2004.10. Berta Lloyd, Terryll Bailey, “Renewable Energy Program Development Study and DACUM Report”, Shoreline Community College, 2007.11. Engineering Accreditation Commission, “Criterion 3. Program Outcomes”, Criteria
• Network of engineering alumni • Small class size • Opportunities for summer research • Opportunities for leadership • Graduate schoolThe model builds on UND’s established leadership in undergraduate distance engineeringeducation. A 2007 study2 from Stevens Institute of Technology states, “only UND offers ABET Page 22.64.4accredited degrees in the traditional disciplines of chemical, civil, electrical and mechanicalengineering.” Because UND has been delivering distance engineering courses for 20 years, ithas solved or mitigated many of the distance engineering concerns discussed in the
AC 2011-1452: SPECIAL SESSION: MOVING TOWARDS THE INTENDED,EXPLICIT, AND AUTHENTIC: ADDRESSING MISALIGNMENTS IN EN-GINEERING LEARNING WITHIN SECONDARY AND UNIVERSITY ED-UCATIONKevin Anderson, University of Wisconsin-Madison Kevin Anderson is a Ph.D. candidate in the Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His research focuses on primary through university STEM education policy and practice, and the alignment of education with professional practice. He previously taught science and math at the secondary level and earned the distinction of National Board Certified Teacher.Sandra Shaw Courter, University of Wisconsin, Madison Sandra Shaw Courter is PI for the ”Aligning
algorithm designs and produce graduates who fill a need throughout the countryin the design, engineering and development of new computer components, software, systems andproducts. However, in the light of an increasing demand and a declining pool from which toselect, employers often indicate there is an unmet need for graduates with the technical andcomplex thinking skills necessary for careers in the design, application, installation, operation,maintenance and security of computer and/or network systems to support industry. Whilestudents who earn a two-year technical degree such as an Associates of Applied Sciences (AAS)in computer or information technology can meet some of these industry needs and can betechnically competent, they do not have the
AC 2011-8: MENTORING WITH INDEX CARDS: AN EARLY INTRO-DUCTION TO FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT FOR NEW FACULTYJohn K. Estell, Ohio Northern University John K. Estell is a Professor of Computer Engineering and Computer Science at Ohio Northern Univer- sity. He received his doctorate from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His areas of research include simplifying the outcomes assessment process, first-year engineering instruction, and the pedagog- ical aspects of writing computer games. Dr. Estell is a Senior Member of IEEE, and a member of ACM, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and Upsilon Pi Epsilon.Nathaniel Bird, Ohio Northern University Nathaniel Bird is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Computer
AC 2011-750: ”IT’S GONNA BE A LONG TRIP.”- A STUDENT’S EXPE-RIENCE WITH ENGINEERING ABROAD.Tiago R Forin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tiago Forin is currently a third year student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received his Bachelors degree in Civil Engineering from Florida State University in ’06 and his Masters degree in Environmental Engineering from Purdue University in ’08. While in the School of Engineering Education, he works as a Graduate Research Assistant in the X-Roads Research Group and has an interest in cross-disciplinary practice and engineering identity development
studies we have continued to improvelearning effectiveness through changes in the computer agent design27. Important innovationsinclude offering students control over the timing of feedback16, using social strategies motivatedby the field of collaborative group work1, 10, and developing agents that demonstrate alignmentwith student goals17.The underlying thesis of this research is that offering a dynamic self-paced learning environmentfor student use outside of the lecture room is the best practical means for integratingsophisticated design and analysis experiences into undergraduate engineering curricula.Furthermore, the machine-monitored internet chat-based tutorial environment we use to achievethis goal offers an excellent opportunity for
students to design and develop an energy harvesting prototype that will be used to power health monitoring systems.Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy Dr. Dan Jensen is a Professor of Engineering Mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy where he has been since 1997. He received his B.S. (Mechanical Engineering), M.S. (Applied Mechanics) and Ph.D. (Aerospace Engineering Science) from the University of Colorado at Boulder. He has worked for Texas Instruments, Lockheed Martin, NASA, University of the Pacific, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and MSC Software Corp. His research includes development of innovative design methodologies and en- hancement of engineering education
- neers of Alberta, and the Medal of Distinction for Engineering Education from the Canadian Council of Professional Engineers. Dr. Sundararaj’s main research interests are in polymer blend and nanocomposite structure generation in twin-screw extruders, and modeling of polymer processes. In 2003, he received the prestigious Polymer Processing Society’s Morand Lambla Award for research in polymer processing and in 2006, he received the Humboldt Research Fellowship (Germany). He has won three best paper awards and has given over twenty (20) plenary and keynote presentations at major conferences. His interests outside work include basketball, gardening and chess.John A. Nychka, University of Alberta John was an assistant
becomes imperative that research is done to documentopportunities, issues, and effectiveness of the implementation of theoretically based pedagogicaltools in real classrooms settings with typical instructors.BackgroundIn order to observe, quantify, and research these relationships, an instrument for measuringclassroom and instructor dynamic must be used. The Reformed Teaching ObservationProtocol1,2 (RTOP) is a tool that assesses to what extent a given instructor's classroom behaviorsalign with research-based best-practice principles of classroom practice that promote studentengagement and effective teaching and learning. It gives researchers a valid and reliablequantifiable insight as to how “reformed” the instructor’s actions are based on best
. In addition, Jones developed methods to use fuzzy set theory and soft computing techniques to capture information about complex systems. The educational aspects and the students of the BSE department have been a focus for Dr. Jones. He was instrumental in developing the BSE curriculum. Dr. Jones is a leader in presenting the department to recruits, the public, and the university at large. He has developed a number of courses at all levels of the curriculum. His most lasting contribution has been the development of a junior level course in heat and mass transport that incorporates particular considerations for biological systems. Further, he has developed and maintained a productive senior capstone design
different cultureswhich impacted women’s participation. Although all engineering disciplines exhibited amasculine culture, chemical engineering had a less “macho” culture that allowed for differentforms of masculinity and was more welcoming to women. The author also suggests that womenmight be drawn to this major because “a reliance on prior practical knowledge or tinkeringexperience did not seem as essential.”Lyon 11 studied 19 women engineering students at a research university for a year. During thatyear, women were asked participate in interviews and focus groups, to be observed, and to keepa journal of their feelings about being in the major. Students were all undergraduates, first yearthrough senior, and three were chemical engineering majors
Courses Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2011, American Society for Engineering Education 107 b. Phase Rubric specifically designed for Fall 2010 courses b) Industry & Student Surveys to ensure continuous improvement of rubrics and the industry members participationThe case study involved several steps. The first step was to perform a literature review in orderto determine best practices of incorporating industry participation in the assessment of studentprojects. As anticipated, these courses leveraged active participation into a formal
populations in higher education, more specifically in STEM disciplines, and cultural practices and their impact on education for Hispanic students.Elsa Gonzalez, Texas A&M University Elsa M. Gonzlez y Gonzlez is Visiting Assistant Professor and Research Associate in the department of Educational Administration and Human Resources at Texas A&M University. She is currently the Managing Editor of the International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE). She received her PhD from Texas A&M University in 2004, and her Master in Business Administration from the National University of Mexico (UNAM) in 1998. She teaches Naturalistic Inquiry, College Teaching and Administration in Higher Education in the
be scientists and engineers for two days and to interact with graduatestudents on a college campus. In addition, the summer camp provides graduate fellows anopportunity to practice conducting activities with kids and communicating science andengineering to a broader audience. IMPACT LA is a National Science Foundation (NSF)Graduate STEM Fellows in K-12 Education (GK12) Program that partners graduate fellowsconducting master’s research in engineering and science with math and science middle and highschool teachers in the East Los Angeles (East LA) area.1 During the year, the graduate fellowsare visiting scientists and engineers, bringing their research into the classroom. The summercamp is the culmination of the summer workshops that are
assessment to improve teaching practice or student learning.But there are also significant differences between the issues facing K-12 and University faculty,primarily due to the nature of the established criteria for the two populations. Indicators of K-12content standards, aligned with teachers’ instructional objectives, specify very discrete skills andknowledge that students are expected to achieve at identified grade levels, with perceived weakor non-existing connections between them within a grade level or between grade levels.Acquisition of these skills and knowledge are usually measured through standardized state-wideassessments, which at best provides discrete aspects or chunks of student performance. This cancreate an apparent fragmentation
, andretention of underrepresented groups in science and engineering.The NAE has also developed a web site for girls: http://www.engineergirl.org/ that contains sections onWhy Be An Engineer, Fun Facts, Cool Links, Cool Readings, Great Achievements, and an EngineerGirlEssay Contest http://www.engineergirl.org/?id=3821. It also has a site for Women EngineerWEPAN has developed a web portal for their WEPAN Knowledge Center as an online resource forresearch, best practices, and professional communities dedicated to advancing all women in engineering.The reources are organized by Research & Reports, Assessment & Practice, Data & Statistics, Policy &Law, Profiles (Organizations, Programs, Projects, Initiatives and Tools), Cohorts, Resource
AC 2011-1475: INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCES OF A US UNDERGRAD-UATE STUDENT IN EXCHANGE PROGRAMS IN FRANCE AND BRAZILMr. Gary Braun Riggins, Virginia Tech Gary is a graduating senior in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech. He has studied abroad in France and Brazil and spent a summer in India on an an academic project.Vinod K Lohani, Virginia Tech Vinod K Lohani is a professor in the Engineering Education Department and an adjunct faculty in the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech. His research interests are in the areas of knowledge modeling, water and energy sustainability, engineering learning modules for freshmen, and international collaboration. He led a 5-year DLR/NSF project at