was that after participants engagedwith facilitators at the workshop, they were provided with one year of coaching by a faculty peermentor. This was an opportunity for participants to test ideas from the workshops with a supportsystem in place and guidance as needed, all in a safe way. Coaching cut across disciplines inengineering and course levels and was successful in helping many faculty implement workshopideas [2].In 2020 nine in-person workshops were planned. The plans shifted swiftly to a remote formatdue to COVID-19 and raised several research questions aligned with this transition: 1. Does the COVID shift create long-term benefits for faculty development structures? 2. Did EM assist the faculty facilitators with the COVID
capacity, he man- aged projects ranging in size from $4 million to over $115 million and was responsible for overall project execution including budget and cost controls, procurement, safety, scheduling, quality, and client satisfac- tion. Anthony received both his Ph.D. in Planning, Design and Construction and master’s degree (M.S.) in Construction Management from Michigan State University. He received his bachelor’s degree (B.S.) from Eastern Michigan University and also holds a master electrical license in the State of Michigan. Anthony is a committee member for the Transportation Research Board - Standing Committee on Project Delivery Methods, a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, and Ronald E
interview. In the course of theinterviews, participants were asked to rate their risk tolerance and their interest in pursuing a startupon ten-point scale. The interviews were assessed (see Coding Book, Appendix A) through recordingof categorical and numerical responses for: • Immigration generation • Parents’ education • Employment during college 4 • Switch of major • Risk tolerance • Startup interestand through thematic content analysis [14] for: • Family influence on major • Career plans • Career certainty • Reasons for pursuing or not pursuing a startupThe students in the entrepreneurially oriented engineering major and the students in the
of skills and knowledge and end with documenting and presenting their work.The project engineering design stages include literature review, problem formulation andanalysis, project planning, creating design alternatives, evaluating and selecting the best designalternative.During each of the project engineering stages, challenges are compared and analyzed. Project-related challenges were ranked the highest for all comparisons performed. The study also showedthat two out of the five student outcomes were harder to achieve and faced higher challenges.When comparing how each of the course evaluation methods helped to reduce the identifiedchallenges towards each student outcome, it was found that the project-related assignmentscontributed the
,engineering has been considered a key player to plan, design, implement, and develop solutionsto address humanitarian challenges [38]. For instance, the role of engineering and technology hasthe clear role of providing resources and conditions, such as water [39]–[41] and energy [42],[43]. In the infrastructure and management domain, engineering also plays a role in creatingsolutions that address the development of livelihood conditions [44], [45], logistics [46], [47],and communication [48]–[50]. These challenges are examples of opportunities whereengineering and technology play essential roles in translating ideas into an immediate solution inthe humanitarian context.Methodology We conducted a qualitative case study [51] to explore the LED
. The opportunity to work with faculty in aregular, ongoing basis for the duration of a course term affords instructors connections thatengage them further in their teaching assignments. It also enhances their knowledgeperspective by working with other faculty to bridge content areas5.Kidd’s study also addresses potential difficulties in recruiting faculty to teach in a learningcommunity5. The factor of time required to plan and collaborate across disciplines is ofsignificance to faculty who may already be heavily scheduled. Success of student achievementand retention may also be dependent on the enthusiasm of faculty and their ability toeffectively collaborate with faculty of other subject areas5. The authors of the paper presentedherewith
COVID-19 was here for the long run, but the summeralso gave faculty an opportunity to develop expertise in on-line delivery and to plan the contentand execution of their classes. Classes in the fall at the U of A were to be taught either remotely(neither students or instructor in the classroom), in-person (instructor and students in theclassroom with significantly reduced enrollment) or in a hybrid mode (some students in-person,some students remote, instructor in-person), with a heavy emphasis on a safe workingenvironment for all. This led to most classes being taught remotely or in a hybrid mode. Butwhat about labs? © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest
, Secondary STEM Education, K-12 Outreach, Research Experience for TeachersBackgroundThere have been recent and rapid advancements in engineering research on data analytics theoriesand methodologies, enabled and driven by smart and connected technologies, to maintain andimprove our health, infrastructure, and communities [1]. Compared to the growth in analyticsresearch, curriculum development in the K-12 and higher education environments are often muchslower and do not reflect this growth [2]. Current curricular data analytics lesson plans forsecondary schools mainly focus on the ready-to-use applications and resources such as MicrosoftAccess and Excel, while leaving out the deep understanding of the ideas and theories [3]. Othersuse infographics to
Dr. Elaine R. Millam, is an executive coach and educator specializing in leadership development, organi- zational effectiveness and character-based practices for leaders and teams. Her work focuses on helping clients (businesses and individuals) achieve positive, long-term change in leadership behavior as well as plans for realizing their future vision. She earned her PhD in Organizational Leadership at the University of St. Thomas, has two Master’s degrees in Industrial Relations and Educational Psychology from the University of Minn. Beyond her degrees, she has certifications in multiple leadership assessment tools. Elaine has over 20 years of experience as an executive in Human Resources and Organizational Devel
materials for the capstone class included an AmericanInstitute of Architects consulting agreement with attached exhibits (prime agreement,architectural program, and the architectural solution) and a sample solution for a comparablebuilding. The course materials were shared through the Moodle LMS. At the end of the courses,the student received a final comprehensive PDF coursepack of the materials.The introductory lecture courses were commonly taught in a classroom and the capstone coursewas taught in a design studio. The classroom capacity was about 45 students with the typicalclass size either 18 or 36 depending on the number of sections. The floor plan proportion wasapproximately 1½:1 (width:depth). The room had one whiteboard of about twenty-feet
has completed 18 post graduate credits toward his doctorate degree from Point Park University, Pittsburgh, Pa. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Road to Strengthening 2-year Hispanic-Serving Institution Participation in the NSF ATE Funding ProgramAbstractHSI ATE Hub is a three-year collaborative research project funded by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) that joins two successful programs. Mentor-Connect mentors 2-year collegefaculty to develop competitive proposals for the NSF Advanced Technological Education (ATE)Program, and KickStarter facilitates strategic STEM assessment and planning to drivecompetitive STEM proposal
/engineering curriculum for thefollowing school year. In line with NSF goals, the program offers strong support in curriculumdevelopment, thanks to the introduction of a “mentor teacher”, who is a former RET participant(who attended the program twice) with expertise in curriculum development. The mentor teacherserves as a role model and helps during the lesson design. NASCENT organizes weekly cohortmeetings where teachers share their ideas, receive feedback on their lesson plan and networkwith other RET participants and NASCENT faculty and staff. Cumulatively, NASCENT has supported 51 teachers over the past seven years, affectingan estimated 5,000 students. To date, these teachers created 33 lessons posted on the NASCENTwebsite, 8 of which have
limited to students enrolled in oneengineering course.The first administered survey, intended for Cohort 1, consisted of ten open-ended questions. Question 1: Mention the importance of delegating responsibilities and meeting frequently with your group members? Question 2: What did you learn about leadership roles and communication in a group setting? Question 3: How did you manage different ideas and opinions in the group? Question 4: What were the challenges of working in a group setting? Question 5: What was the planning process of developing and completing your project ideas? Question 6: After your experiences with the project, would you prefer group work, or independent work, and why? Question 7: Do you feel your ability
; • an overview of the process by which this task committee has reviewed the current CEPC and formulated the update; • the current draft CEPC update (as of February 2021); • a detailed explanation and justification of the proposed CEPC changes; • the task committee’s plan to solicit, obtain, and assimilate feedback on the draft CEPC update from a broad array of stakeholders; and • a summary of the remaining tasks required to complete the criteria development and approval process, along with the associated timeline.The authors of this paper are currently serving as the Chair, Secretary, and ASCE Staff contactfor the ASCE Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee.BackgroundSince 2002, the American Society of Civil
. Contact Hours: 2 Lecture, 2 Lab. ENGR 400 - Engineering Capstone I - Senior engineering project selection, planning, and development. Emphasis will be placed on defining project requirements, developing project work breakdown structure, conceptual designs, and working prototypes. 1 Lecture, 4 Lab. ENGR 450 - Engineering Capstone II - Senior engineering project design, development, fabrication, and testing. Emphasis will be placed on iterative design processes, project management and execution, fabrication and testing. 1 Lecture, 4 Lab.The PBL sequence of courses provided the participants with an opportunity to learn projectmanagement, technical communication, teaming, and problem-solving skills while
Project for Civil Engineering Freshmen to Enhance Their Entrepreneurial MindsetIntroduction In a 1972 article entitled, “Mickey Mouse for Mayor!” [1] Peter Blake said, “…it is WaltDisney Productions, and not our innumerable U.S city planning agencies and experts, that hasreally created the first, great, vibrant New Towns in America.” Walt Disney Imagineering,which is responsible for the design and construction of Disney projects, seems to understand thedesign process better than most. One might say they are particularly entrepreneurial in theirmindset and approach. They exhibit curiosity and creativity; they connect various disciplines toaccomplish major tasks; and they undoubtedly create value with nearly every project
categories were assessed using hours per week, such ascommunity hours, supervised hours, and special access hours. It also included focus and plans toexpand, a unique look at a makerspace's growth.Compared to existing literature, the goal of the proposed novel taxonomy is not to be used as adirect, objective ranking system. However, the proposed dimensions and categories would leadto the creation of a well-defined vocabulary to help identify the commonality and differencesacross various makerspaces. For example, research focusing on a makerspaces' contributions inthe development of leadership qualities, aspects of the culture category would likely be weightedhigher than others. A different research effort, such as the impact on local
faculty provided some wonderful insights about how theytaught their courses and where the library could fit into that picture. However, as the authorserves as the liaison to engineering, not business, a similar study with engineering faculty at UBwas planned. Since every interview conducted with business faculty had been a brand newacquaintance, the author aimed to interview engineering faculty who had never requested alibrary resources guest lecture in their classes. This study intended to better understand how thelibrary and the engineering librarian, the author of this paper, could better support faculty in theirteaching, even if library resource instruction was not a direct part of the course.Literature ReviewExploring how engineering faculty
Case-Based Learning: A Creative Experience in Comparison to Traditional Teaching Methods Waddah Akili Geotechnical EngineeringA b s t r a c tThis paper describes the steps taken in planning, developing, and executing a case study/ casehistory course in geotechnical/ foundation engineering at an international university. The paper ed : a ab e a ec e a a ed a ; e a a ecourse; and the results of evaluating the effectiveness of this approach versus traditionallecturing. Problems and challenges that could arise when offering the course for the first time arealso addressed. Embedded in this
: Community ofInquiry Framework, Tuckman’s Model of Teamwork, and assessmentmethodologies. The idea is to simulate an industrial experience in a modularapproach by introducing a structured weekly meeting to support the T&Lpedagogy used and to accomplish this without sacrificing the technical content inthe course. Furthermore, these modules include team building exercises alongwith a special leadership role that rotates weekly. A plan for implementation isdiscussed in this paper. Overall, the proposed OLT framework focusses onemulating an industrial teamwork environment in the university setting to add tostudent experience. It can be used by the wider academic community as a guidefor designing engaging online courses comprising of teamwork and
concepts and items introduced. All SURI mentors presented their research plan on the first day of the summer research. Students either singly or in groups researched their problems. As shown in Table 3, we had 5 teams and 4 individual researchers. In fact, except groups 6, 8, and 9, other individual researchers are just changed the data. Groups 3, 4, and 5 essentially applied deep learning to their own data on air quality, safety, and traffic parameters. Each week, the students were introduced to new machine learning topics, participated in update meetings, and a Friday journal meeting with all SURI participants to present their progress and see the other teams’ progress. Students
Analysis Plan, Health and Safety Plan, Quality Assurance ProjectPlan, and a Project Work Plan) is provided. The course is also an opportunity to provideinformation to the students regarding professional development activities (e.g., resumes, careerplanning). Faculty personnel provide limited formal presentations and function more in the roleof “Team Supervisors”.Table 1: Generic Syllabus for Fall Pre-Capstone CourseWeek Class Topic1 1 Personality tests Faculty Presentation - Personality types 2 Guest Speaker - Career Services Information Faculty Presentation - Introduction of Spring Capstone Project2 3 Faculty Presentation
work15 in an environment that mimics the actual construction management process. ¾ To integrate within the revised course the following topics: Construction Terminology and Accreditation, Ethical Dilemmas, Resume and Career Plan, Engineering and Tech Expo (visit and summary paper), Professional & Trade Organizations, and Guest Speakers.MethodologyThe basic methodology for the development and delivery of the revised CM&E 111 is presentedbelow. ¾ The author attended the ACCE2 Mid-Year Meeting held in Phoenix (February 2012) to discuss first-year construction management courses with construction management program directors at the Baccalaureate Program Chairs Meeting. Approximately forty- five (45) ACCE
and Automation As program faculty began researching existing robotics platforms and software toimplement in these courses, it became immediately apparent that a wide gap exists between whatwe define as “robotics toys” and “industrial robotics.” The realization of this educational chasmsparked an entire new set of pedagogical challenges and research. This paper chronicles ourjourney from concept to initial implementation.Pedagogical ApproachCurriculum development for the RAM course sequence began with an overall plan of increasingpedagogical complexity throughout the course sequence. The idea started with a progressionfrom simple robotics fundamentals in the introduction course (ETSC 277), to more complextopics in the advanced course
stakeholders called IDEA Teams (Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, andAccess). Professional development sessions focus on engineering project implementation andcreating equitable and inclusive STEM environments. As outcomes of the initial 10-day trainingsession, members of these teams develop action research for equity projects (AREPs) in theirhome schools with the purpose of creating more equitable and inclusive STEM environments.Additionally, they plan for the implementation of informal STEM-enrichment clubs in theirschool settings. Networked Improvement Community (NIC) meetings were held virtually eachmonth throughout the first school year to allow IDEA Teams to discuss their progress onimplementation of their AREPs and STEM clubs. In addition to the
collaboration. Dr. Khan is the Chair of ASEE Midwest Section.Dr. Mohamed Ibrahim, Arkansas Tech University Mohamed Ibrahim, PhD Associate Professor of Curriculum and Instruction College of Education Arkansas Tech University (479) 964-0583 ext. 2452Dr. Syed Ali Haider, State University of New York at Fredonia American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Performance Prediction of Computer Science Students in Capstone Software Engineering Course through Educational Data MiningAbstractEducational data mining has been extensively used to predict students’ performance in universitycourses to plan improvements in teaching and learning processes, achieve academic
institutes. Professionaldevelopment facilitators have been forced to rethink the model for STEM focused professionaldevelopment. Virtual professional development with a STEM focus faces challenges that are notencountered in traditional face to face settings. These challenges require creative practices toovercome obstacles faced during implementation. (Brasili and Allen 2019)Program DetailsSTILE-Ed Summer STEM Institute provided teachers with five days of interactive instruction onusing the virtual Harvard LabXchange simulation platform for Biology and Physics, and alsoincorporated 3D Design & Printing and Computer Science. On the sixth day, teachers prepared aLabXchange pathway to use as a lesson plan for their students. Fourteen teachers
surveys by students deciding whether to apply to TPP, 53% were“exploring teaching” and 27% professed “to go into teaching after working in industry,” and13% said they were “interested in becoming a teacher immediately after graduation.” In contrast,out of the current TPP students interviewed, 13 of the 16 students (81%) intend to teachsecondary school at some point. In fact, four TPP students indicated that they had matriculated toWPI because of the TPP. With these data, we see that the students who end up doing the TPP arequite committed to teaching. Because many of our TPP students plan to wait before becoming teachers in the classroom, itwas important to understand why. They were asked in the interview what they wanted to learnfirst before
Swarms with Distributed Swarm Control 3. Enhancing Security of Cloud-Connected UAS ServicesStudents were placed onto teams based on their prior course experiences and the projectrequirements. Common resources were provided for all students to train them in conductingresearch. Teams were then tasked with developing a more comprehensive research plan for theirspecific project and carrying out that plan throughout the 2020-2021 academic year.Students completed a pre-survey at the start of the project and a mid-project survey shortly afterthe winter break. The surveys combined project specific skills questions as well as relevantquestions from the Undergraduate Research Student Self-Assessment (URSSA), an NSF-fundedassessment tool to measure
Andriessen’s[4] dual purpose of DBR model as illustrated in Figure 1. The focus of the program design isprogressive refinement through the problem statement; defining the design and learningobjectives; planning (project management) of the curricular design, development of thecurricular ideation and selection of a design for initial implementation; and ultimately acontinuously reformed model with a curricular model improvement process. The focus of theresearch design is to establish the research questions; identify the learning theories applicable tothe research work; design of the research work that influences the curricular implementation andimprovement; and ultimately to disseminate what is learned and add to the body of knowledgeon engineering