use team-based learning are familiar with its great advantages and its pitfalls.There is a significant difference in how college course teams function as opposed to those inindustry. The method described here makes an attempt to simulate industry methods in theclassroom. Since engineers in industry apply for jobs, team leaders were asked to apply for therole, and team members were selected by team leaders based on an abbreviated application.The course that used this method was junior level Industrial Engineering Introduction to SystemsEngineering, taught by one instructor for three consecutive fall semesters. The project wasdesigned to require sub-teams with some specialization in different disciplines includingelectronics, mechatronics
Journal 2: Personal reflection technology 4 Implicit bias, barriers Project 1: Women in engineering profile 5 Imposter Syndrome, engineering Journal 3: Barriers and solutions identity 6 Strategies for students in engineering Journal 4: Pay gap and technology 7 Network, mentors, and sponsors Project 2: Structural and cultural barriers 8 Gendered communication, engineering Journal 5: Elevator speech communication 9 Work-life balance, family support, time Journal 6: Family-work policies management 10 Job-hunting and gender Project 3: Job Search 11 Career path and progress
Engineering at University of Colorado Boulder, where she teaches Senior Design and thermo-fluids courses. Her teaching philosophy focuses on student preparation for engineering practice – incorporating industry and alumni interactions into curricular and co-curricular activities. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Managers and Engineers: Impact of Defined Roles on Shared Leadership in Capstone DesignAbstractThe aim of this study is to learn how the assignment of project roles in engineering capstonedesign teams influences leadership skills such as accountability, communicating a vision,teamwork, role identity, and management, along with a measure of
project is open-ended and requires the students to make a series ofassumptions, depending on the data available, to complete their technical analyses. Further, thestudents must deliver their analyses through technical memoranda, reports, and presentations.This course structure follows Wiggins’ framework for authentic assessments [1, 2].The objectives of the present work-in-progress study are to assess the impact that interacting withmuseums has on the technical and professional development of the students. Two cohorts ofstudents are studied, the first cohort is currently (2022-2023 academic year) taking the aerospacestructures courses at Clarkson University, while the second cohort took the courses during the2021-2022 academic year. Two cohorts
, civil and environ- mental engineering, and general engineering. He has won several awards for excellence in instruction; most recently the Saul K. Fenster Award for Innovation in Engineering Education. His research focuses on increasing diversity in STEM education and the STEM workforce. He has received multiple grants to run workforce development training programs as well as undergraduate research experience programs to train underrepresented minority and first-generation students. He is the Founding Director of NJIT’s Grand Challenges Scholars Program. He also has worked on several research projects, programs, and initiatives to help students bridge the gap between high school and college as well as to prepare
interests are community-based learning, open-ended laboratory experi- ments, teamwork, collaborative and active learning, and Transport Phenomena computational modeling.Kelly Bohrer, University of Dayton Kelly Bohrer is the Executive Director of the ETHOS Center, a community engagement center connecting students, faculty, and staff with NGOˆa C™s around the world for technical projects as part of immersions, teaching, and scholarly activity. She also is thDr. Matthew Dewitt, University of Dayton Matthew DeWitt is a Distinguished Research Engineer at the University of Dayton Research Institute. He received his B.S. in chemical engineering from The Ohio State University and his Ph.D. in chemical engineering from
pedagogical techniques to facilitate student learning.Christopher M. StanleyDr. George D. Ricco, University of Indianapolis George D. Ricco is an engineering education educator who focuses on advanced analytical models applied to student progression, and teaching first-year engineering, engineering design principles, and project management. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Review of a Design Methodology in a Client-Based, Authentic Design CurriculumAbstractThe curriculum at a small, urban, private school is centered around a series of hands-on, client-based design courses called DesignSpine®. Projects are developed and completed through theentire
Engineering at Prairie View A&M University (PVAMU). She joined PVAMU right after she obtained her Ph.D. degree in Com- puter Engineering from Mississippi State University in 2003. Her research interests include image and video processing, data compression, wavelets, computer vision, remote sensing, and computing educa- tion. Her projects are currently funded by NSF, United States Department of Agriculture, and Department of Education.Dr. Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University Bugrahan Yalvac is an associate professor of science and engineering education in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received his Ph.D. in science education at the Pennsylvania
worked as the Education Project Manager for the NSF-funded JTFD Engineering faculty development program, as a high school math and science teacher, and as an Assistant Principal and Instructional & Curriculum Coach.Dr. Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University Ann F. McKenna is the Vice Dean of Strategic Advancement for the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University, and is a professor of engineering in the Polytechnic School, one of the seven Fulton Schools. Prior to joining ASU, she served as a program director at the National Science Founda- tion in the Division of Undergraduate Education, and was the director of education improvement in the McCormick School of Engineering at Northwestern
utilizecompetencies developed in the first three years of the curriculum in the solution of a complexdesign problem.Educational excellence requires exposing students to the current edge of research. To ensure thatstudent projects are along the same trajectory that the industry is moving, educators mustcontinually introduce emerging techniques, practices, and applications into the curriculum. Thefields of Internet of Things (IoT) and Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) are growing rapidly, andthere is increasing interest in providing undergraduate students with a foundation in these areas.This paper presents IoT and WSN projects that our undergraduate computer and electricalengineering students have done in their senior capstone course in wildfire
(CSUB). He recei ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 CORE FEATURE EXTRACTION WITH COMPUTER VISIONI. Introduction This work details the senior project capstone experience of a group of undergraduatestudents at the California State University, Bakersfield (CSUB), a medium-size, comprehensive,Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI). The work is novel and potentially commercializable in thefield of energy conversion and petrochemical extraction. A thorough description of theirmethodology is provided, and their results show promise. In addition, we discuss the curriculumand project management structure that enabled an undergraduate senior project group to interfacewith oil and gas companies to
specialized fields and address the needs of a quickly evolving environment [3].Research regarding these interdisciplinary product teams found that they can improve projectperformance especially regarding meeting budget costs and developing a quality product [4]. Inaddition, when individuals face challenges in a team environment when trying to produce asuccessful output, they have opportunities to improve their project management skills, develop abroad perspective on problem solving, expand their social and business networks, and buildresilience [3]. These qualities to manage a team are coveted by many in industry, especially atthe management level [8].However, having students participate in academic teams to solve a problem or complete a projectdoes
Education, 2023 TUNING THE PARAMETERS: A MARITIME-TUNED MACHINE LEARNING COURSE0: AbstractIn machine learning (ML) education, the choice of which datasets to utilize for studentassignments and projects is critical for student success and meeting course learning outcomes.Poorly chosen datasets leave students disinterested and questioning the applicability of ML inreal-world situations specific to their intended endeavors post academia. Additionally, somedatasets demand much effort for preprocessing and a steep learning curve for understanding,which detracts from the ML experience and leaves students frustrated. As maritime and marineengineering programs expand to include ML in their curricula with the plan of
Storage Rack ProtectionRobert J. Michael David GeeDept. Mechanical Eng. Dept. Mechanical Eng.Gannon University Gannon UniversityErie, PA 16413 Erie, PA 16413michael011@gannon.edu gee004@gannon.eduMark KurchenaDept. Mechanical Eng.Gannon UniversityErie, PA 16413kurchena001@gannon.eduAbstract: This paper reports on a multi-year engineering design project involving undergraduateengineering students. The project involves the design, development, and prototyping of a nextgeneration pallet rack column guard. The guard allows for the engagement and protection of astorage rack upright (column) from an impact force by an external object such as
determined as an “engineering”.Developing Collaborative PartnershipsAn increasingly interconnected global economy demands collaborative opportunities andpresents unique challenges, compounding the need for broadly educated engineers that are well-versed in intercultural competency. OSU’s Humanitarian Engineering program equips graduatesto meet these challenges through community-engaged learning and high impact educationalexperiences.In preparation for equity-minded and ethical collaborative engagements, the partnership structureand relationships have been carefully and thoughtfully established over multiple years inresponse to past project and partnership challenges. At times, well-intentioned university-forgedrelationships with partner communities
,encouraging problem solving, and identifying skill weaknesses among participants in botheducational and workplace settings [1]. Historically, practitioners have also used this model tosupport peer-to-peer learning, in which community members learn from and encourage eachother [2], in both teacher education [1] and technology use [3], two paramount components of acollaborative makerspace like the BeAM Makerspace. CoP research shows that peer-to-peerlearning paired with product-based work yields better knowledge retention and personalaccountability amongst users [2][4]. Eager to encourage these outcomes in its own staffmembers, the BeAM Makerspace designed CoPs that would incorporate adaptiveteaching-projects to improve both the collaboration between
, Architectural Technology, and a Master’s in Facility Management. His field experience includes residential and light commercial construction. He has been an architectural designer as well as superintendent for single and multi-family residential construction projects. Mr. Ray worked as an engineering design manager in the Building Components Manufacturing Industry for over fifteen years.Elizabeth Freije, Indiana University–Purdue University, Indianapolis Elizabeth Freije is Program Director and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Technology at Purdue University, Indianapolis. She received her BS in Computer Engineering Technology with a minor in Mathematics. She received her Masters in Technology at Purdue
changes to anarchitectural engineering program in the Midwest. Responses were collected across 52 closedand eight open-ended items to gain an industry perspective on the relative importance of coursetopics in the curriculum, the selection of Architectural Engineering (AE) degree concentrationoptions, the format of graduate degree capstone projects, and the factors that AE&C employersconsider when hiring graduates and experienced employees. The curriculum changes inspired bythis survey are presented together alongside the program’s previous AE curriculum to morethoroughly characterize the program attributes that are desired by the AE&C industry.IntroductionThe Architectural Engineering (AE) program considered in this study is at the
program onthe students’ affective and learning experience. To this end, a survey was administered to theeight students who participated in the program, after completion of the projects. All studentsparticipated in the survey, and the results revealed that 62.5% of the students reported beingextremely satisfied with the robotics program, including working with their peers and interactingwith the faculty. The students expressed that they found the academic program experienceenjoyable and useful in helping them to identify their future college interests and majors.IntroductionEducational robotics offers a stimulating and enjoyable environment for young individuals, whilesimultaneously introducing them to technological advancements. A growing number
biggerpicture, we set the students up for success at university and beyond.2. Formulation of the ProjectThe Chemical Engineering department at our university has been actively involved in researchand partnerships with diverse industries, federal/state agencies, and foundations. Ourcollaborations with Nestle, Campbells, Domino Sugar, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, ExxonMobil,Sunoco, Dupont, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Pennakem, Bristol Myers Squibb,Valero Energy Corporation, Novartis, U.S. Department of Energy, and U.S. Army has been veryfruitful and has positively impacted the industrial partners.Our student-faculty-industry collaboration program involves creating student and faculty teamsto solve real-world problems. These projects involve a multi
batch” and due at the end of the subsequent week. c. Homework grading: Homework grading is completed within a week after the homework is collected. d. Project work: Engineering courses commonly contain projects to tie together topics. In our model, each module has a culminating project that is assigned at the completion of module information delivery. The project has the following processing times: i. A project duration of three weeks. ii. Grading time is one-third of the project length (i.e. one week). e. Exams: The instructor has a choice of giving either a “topical module exam” (based solely on course information and homework), or a “comprehensive module exam” (that
projects and civil-military community re- construction projects. As the Engineer Director of Army South, she managed all engineering-related programs across the Caribbean, Central, and South America.Dr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Military Engineers: Unlikely Social Justice Warriors – Military Training that Supports Community NeedsAbstractThe
tissues. Prior to that, he completed his PhD in Electrical Engi- neering at the University of California Berkeley and his BS in ECE at The Ohio State University. He first discovered the joys of teaching as an undergraduate TA with tOSU’s first-year engineering program, and he has been engaged with curriculum development and teaching projects ever since.Allison Connell Pensky, Carnegie Mellon University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Impact of Electronics Design Experience on Non-majors’ Self-efficacy and IdentityAbstractBefore the advent of the internet, electronics hobbyists embarked on lifelong learning journeyswith instructional books such as
Your Hand, a multidisciplinary collaboration between engineering and the artsAbstract: Raise Your Hand is an immersive, interactive sensor-driven dynamic art exhibit.Vision tracking software changes the video projections, mechatronics, and music composition inresponse to the height of a visitor’s raised arm. The 1 ½-year project brought together studentsand faculty from computer engineering, computer science, electrical engineering, industrialdesign, mechanical engineering, literature, media and communication, computational media, andmusic technology. Further, students were integrated into the project in different forms, includingcapstone design teams, Vertically Integrated Project (VIP) students, undergraduate research
Wisconsin-Platteville, the Measurement and Instrumentation course coversthe design and development of products containing multiple sensors and actuators. Students inthis course work in teams to collaboratively develop these products. While each team member isresponsible for their individual parts of the project, the integration of these parts requires asignificant amount of teamwork. In this study, we propose indirect evaluations of teamwork byassessing the functionality and quality of the product, team presentation, and project report. Weinvestigated 9 final projects involving 31 students and compared the indirect team evaluationwith peer evaluations. The details of our findings will be discussed. Based on our findings, weconclude that peer
GraphicsAbstractThis evidence-based practice describes the incorporation of an original design project coupledwith the use of a makerspace into the Engineering Design Graphics curriculum. This designproject has given students more of a connection to engineering work and provides a strongfoundation for developing an engineering identity. This is further enhanced through the use of amakerspace environment which enables students to fabricate, inspect, and iterate their designs.The measurable outcomes for the current project will focus on student engagement and perceivedlearning gains. The results of a survey measuring students’ perspectives on the value of thecourse project work on their learning will be presented. The objective of this paper is todisseminate
allows cross-institution and interdisciplinarycollaboration on novel design projects and 2) to build students’ technical and collaboration skillsthat will be useful for careers at the intersection of cybersecurity and autonomous systems.Students learned core cybersecurity concepts using closed-ended assignments and expanded theirresearch and design skills with an open-ended design project. Throughout this process, theylearned how to collaborate with other teammates through modern collaboration tools, such asGithub, Google Drive, and Discord. Our student survey indicates that this pilot program achievedits goals and indicates that future iterations should refine the program’s structure and processes.Keywordsexperiential learning, capstone
Performance Evaluation of an Ongoing Integrated Program for Recruitment, Retention, and Graduation of High- Achieving, Low-income Engineering StudentsAbstractThe present paper reports an update on an NSF-funded S-STEM program currently in its lastyear at the University of Illinois Chicago. Lessons learned during the project implementation arealso listed in the paper. A summary of the paper materials will be presented at the ASEE 2023Annual Conference and Exposition as part of the NSF Grantees Poster Session.The project's objectives are 1) enhancing students' learning by providing access to extra and co-curricular experiences, 2) creating a positive student experience through mentorship, and 3)ensuring successful student placement in
ETD 315 Mini-Grants Revealed Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology (retired); Hadi Alasti, Purdue University Fort Wayne; Maurizio Manzo, University of North Texas; T. Sean Tavares, University of New Hampshire; Paul McPherson, and Margaret Phillips Purdue UniversityAbstractEvery two years, the Engineering Technology Division solicits proposals for mini-grants,matching grants that help fund projects beneficial to the larger engineering technologyeducational community. This session features a brief explanation of the grant process(application, evaluation, and
Paper ID #38690Skillsets of Top-Performing Specialty Field Leaders: A Study of SiteSuperintendents, General Foremen, and Crew Leaders in the Sheet Metaland Air Conditioning TradesTolulope Ibilola OgundareRebecca Kassa, University of Kansas PhD Student in the department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering at the University of Kansas. Specializing in Construction Engineering and Management.Dr. Omar Maali, City of Lawrence, Kansas Omar Maali, Ph.D., PE., PMP., is a Senior Project Engineer at the City of Lawrence, Kansas. He has a PhD in the Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering department from the