in their schools, offering themhands-on experiences and mentorship that spark interest in STEM careers. Remember,your students and theirCoNECD Presentation 2025 Acker Coley Johnson Sims Page 9 of 24parents/guardians are some of your best tools for spreading the word.3. School-Based Outreach: PEER WISE maintains strong connections with local schools, working closely withadministrators and educators to identify talented students from underrepresentedgroups. By presenting at school events, conducting workshops, and providing resourcesto educators, PEER WISE ensures that students are aware of the opportunities availableto them. 4. Targeted Outreach Programs
of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference TheUniversityofTexasatArlington,Arlington,TX Copyright ã 2025, American Society for Engineering Education 2 Welcome LettersWe created a Welcome Letter that highlighted university and departmental resources, such as healthand safety offices, career support services, facilities for personal growth and relaxation, and keystudent organizations. The Welcome Letter introduced the idea that graduate students join a researchlab through which they will form mentoring relationships with faculty and other lab members. Inkeeping with prior research on the ways in
address thefindings of an ongoing project on the incorporation of sustainability.The research survey findings can be categorized under key areas of relevance to engineeringcurricular revisions. 1. Foundation: Early exposure ensures that sustainability becomes a core part of their engineering mindset and approach to problem-solving throughout their education and career. 2Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2024, American Societyfor Engineering Education 2. Interdisciplinary Thinking: MET-1100 is the gateway course for all engineering disciplines at Tri-C. Sustainability is inherently
about their commitment to diversity. Once accepted, students receive a$500 scholarship each semester for a total of 8 semesters.The programs’ goals were to support students’ academic success, support students’ professionaland career development, and to provide community building to support the students’interpersonal development. The learning objectives and outcomes were designed to help retainfirst- to second semester and first- to second-year students, help participants to complete theirdegrees within 6 years, help students to engage in at least one experiential learning opportunity(internship/co-op, undergraduate research, study abroad, or other), and to help students connectwith a faculty member who cares about them
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Enhancing job-readiness through short courses: A case study in Power Engineering Enhancing job-readiness through short courses: A case study in Power EngineeringAbstract This paper proposes the development and delivery of a short course in collaboration betweenacademia and the power system industry. This short course aims to provide hands-on trainingfor students and early career power system engineers to become familiar with the softwarepackage - PSCAD™/EMTDC™. This extra-curricular skill development program benefitsboth students and industry professionals in the field of power engineering. By surveying theparticipants during the short course, the
Total 10 2 24. Results4.1. Findings from RQ1: What is the current state of the cultural climate for women studying engineering at the university level?There were three common themes from the survey data indicating the current state of the culturalclimate: (1) tension felt by peers regarding academic and career accomplishments, (2) instances ofovert and covert sexism, microaggressions, and gender biases, and (3) feelings of isolation andlack of ability by women.4.1.1. Tensions between GendersFigure 3 and Figure 4 show that 60% of our female survey participants report feeling tension fromtheir male peers regarding their academic accomplishments sometimes–always, and 79% feeltension from
Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Director of the Center for Ad- vanced Computation and Telecommunications and formerly Associate to the Dean for Research and Grad- uate Study at the University of Massachusetts at Lowell. He received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from New York University, a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Polytechnic Institute of NewYork, and a Ph.D. in Acoustics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Upon graduation he became an Assistant Professor of Engineering Science and Mechanics at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. In 1987 he joined the Department Electrical and Computer Engineering at UMASS Lowell as its Analog Devices Career Development
, professional-track faculty who are evaluatedprimarily on their teaching. EIF are often not on a tenure-track but may be on a promotion track,depending on their department and institution. The career trajectory toward EIF positions isvaried, and those varied academic and career experiences of EIF can enrich students' classroomexperiences. Over the last twenty years, there has been an increase in the number of professional-track faculty in higher education. This increase is attributed to the need for subject-matterspecialists who can bring extensive content knowledge and, in some cases, industry experienceto the classroom. With the rise in the number of faculty in these roles and the number of postedpositions for instructional faculty in engineering
helping students engage indiscussions of engineering research’s impact on society. However, we have yet to find anexample of an introductory level course that discusses these topics geared toward theprofessional development of graduate engineering students within a broad range of career andresearch interests. Thus, we sought to develop a course that would help graduate studentresearchers understand the terminology around inequities and justice; interrogate well-knowncases of engineering research across a range of applications, technology, and higher educationbias and discrimination; reflect and discuss how their own research areas impact society; andform a plan for how they may address or actively prevent potential injustices. The course
slow its inclusion into this field of study. This paper proposes the Dataying framework to teach data science concepts to young children ages 4–7 years old. The framework development included identifying K–12 data science elements and then validating element suitability for young students. Six cycled steps were identified: identifying a problem, questioning, imagining and planning, collecting, analyzing, and story sharing. This paper also presents examples of data decision problems and demonstrates use of a proposed Insight- Detective method with a plan worksheet for Dataying.IntroductionThe expected growth of data science careers worldwide over the next ten years means thatstudents of all ages
understanding of the research process. Theseopportunities can be incredibly effective, particularly in the encouragement of students to attendgraduate school or otherwise further pursue careers in STEM fields [8], [9]. Hence, REUprograms have been promoted in recent years as a method of creating a sustainable pathway tograduate school [9]. Literature shows that undergraduate research is strongly associated with improvement ofthe undergraduate education experience [10], [11]. Specifically, participation in undergraduateresearch decreases attrition rates [12] and increases rates of graduate education [13] for allstudents, particularly underrepresented and minoritized students. In addition, undergraduateresearch scholarship is related to the
an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Educa- tion / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions, specifically on design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Prof. Eva Chi, University of New Mexico Eva Chi is a Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biological
Berkeley’s public science center, where she evaluated STEM education programs for all ages. Several studies focused on expanding diversity, access, and inclusion in pre-college engineering education, with attention to changes in participants’ skills, attitudes, and career interests. She earned her B.A. in Anthropology with a minor in Education from UC Berkeley and an M.A. in Museum Studies: Specialization in Education and Interpretation from John F. Kennedy University. Her Master’s Project focused on culturally responsive evaluation practices.Ms. Gennie Miranda, UC San Diego Gennie B. Miranda serves as the Director of Operations in the IDEA Engineering Student Center, Jacobs School of Engineering at UC San Diego, with
reform needed thatconnects creativity to engineering in an atmosphere that welcomes diversity. Introduction Engineering is a creative and diverse profession integral to the sustainability of a rapidlyevolving economy, and a field where the diversity and perspectives of women engineers isessential [1], [2], [3]. This study examined the creative self-efficacy (CSE) of undergraduatewomen engineering majors, their beliefs about creativity, how they describe themselves ascreative, and their lived experiences that influenced them to choose engineering as a career path.ABET [4] highlighted the significant connection of creativity in engineering curriculum to theengineering profession. The creative
undergraduate students. During 2018- 2020, she collaborated with Dr. Kavitha Chandra to utilize participatory action research (PAR) as an evaluation approach for the Research, Academics, and Mentoring Pathways (RAMP) summer program for first-year women engineering students.Prof. Kavitha Chandra, University of Massachusetts Lowell Kavitha Chandra is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Professor of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering in the Francis College of Engineering at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. She directs the Research, Academics and Mentoring Pathways (RAMP) to Success program that aims to estab- lish successful pathways to graduate school and interdisciplinary careers for new undergraduate
is a professor in the Department of Mechanical and Materials Technology at the Instituto Federal de Educac¸a˜ o, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia da Bahia. He is a mechanical engineer and holds Master’s degree in mechanical engineering, and a PhD in Engineering Education. He has been teaching at different levels, from the first year of technical high school to the final year of mechatronic engineering course, since 1995. He also has considerable experience in the design and implementation of mechatronic and production engineering courses. His non-academic career is centered on product development and manufacturing processes.Dr. Alberto W Mello, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Ph.D. in Aerospace from the
interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.” American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Centrality of Black Identity for Black Students in Engineering: A Reflection on Methods and TheoryKeywords: Race/ethnicity, Black identity, undergraduate programsIntroductionThe recent emphasis on increasing the number of engineering graduates has been coupled withgreater concern about the lack of diversity in engineering fields. However, despite
grassroots, while also informing policy. Three thrusts that define her research interests at the intersections of engineering, technologies, and education include, ways of thinking that address complex educational challenges, democratization of K-12 engineering education, and online and technology-based learning.Dr. Stacy S Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University Stacy Klein-Gardner’s career focuses on P-12 science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, particularly as it relates to increasing interest in and participation by females and URMs and teacher professional development. She is an Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Vander- bilt University where she is serving as the external evaluator
professionalwas done by first hosting two workshops in which mentors development event each semester to help PINC studentsfrom the same course discussed issues they were facing meet individuals in the CS workforce that can act aswith their particular students. This was then followed by a potential role models as well as provide examples ofsession in which mentors were mixed across different interesting career possibilities. We invited external guestcourses and academic levels with the goal
Campus study is to address the urgentneed to expand the pool of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) graduates,especially African American, Native American, and Hispanic students. Long-term improvementsin the pipeline of a diverse STEM workforce start with sustaining effective bridge programs thatcan produce more Engineering baccalaureates. To improve retention in Engineering, this studywill conduct academic enrichment programs for racially underrepresented Engineering studentsat three points in their career at the Penn State—entering freshmen, rising sophomores, and risingjuniors. The goals of the study are to (a) increase retention in Engineering among raciallyunderrepresented students in the Penn State system, (b) develop long
not important in promoting or supporting the shared concepts. CourseLearning Concept Maps and Team Reflections reveal the students’ perspective on what mayhave supported making the connections and which approaches were less effective. In looking atthese course concept maps, for example, similar shared concepts are represented as on the SMELConcept Maps at the beginning of the course – communication (5 occurrences), teamwork (3),and leadership (3). One important, new concept also emerges, however – career connections.All 5 groups represent ties to careers on the final course concept map. These connectionssuggest that considering social media, engineering and leadership in the context of future goalsand of defined careers adds a specific
People (3 principles) and Profit (1principle).Many students favored improving waste prevention (recycle, reduce, reuse) as the principle ofsustainability that would dominate their role as engineers in contributing to sustainable practice.29 of 94 classifiable responses were coded within this principle. Some responses were quitesimple and general such as: "Not wasting a lot of paper or electricity" (Female, Caucasian)Other students attempted to connect their career interests within their chosen major to reducingwaste. For example, one student voiced this inherent opportunity: "I want to work with nanotech so I guess making a lot smaller technology would mean less trash" (Male, Caucasian)Another student did the same with
Studies at Kansas State University beginning Fall 2019. Sean’s primary research interests exist at the intersec- tions of organizational communication, new media, gender, and organizing. Within engineering contexts, Sean has examined career issues within the engineering discipline regarding (1) new faculty experiences throughout their on-boarding and (2) educational cultures that impact the professional formation of engi- neers, which was funded by the National Science Foundation. Both projects have been published in the Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education. He has also served as a series editor, contributed to trade publications, and facilitated workshops related to higher education
(~three times as likely).18As elaborated upon below, there has been sparse research conducted on non-traditional collegestudents, and in particular those who have career paths in engineering and science. It is howeveruseful to note the important work of Rosenbaum and his colleagues who have studied suchstudents.18 These researchers determined that in general, community colleges performed poorlyin terms of providing out-of-class support to non-traditional students. Our study metrics, buildupon the work of Deil-Amen, Rosenbaum and colleagues in addition to a pilot communitycollege engineering and science study.What must be better understood about community college support for studentsCommunity colleges have taken on a “demand absorbing” role, which
, 2017Teaching the Nature of Engineering in K-12 Science Education by Brian D. Hartman, Randy L, Bell, and Larry FlickNATURE OF ENGINEERING FOR K-12 EDUCATION 2Introduction Engineering has been increasingly promoted in K-12 science education throughnational and state standards. Arguments for including engineering in K-12 scienceinclude improving science and mathematics learning, increased engineering awareness,experience with design, increasing interest in engineering as a career, and increasedtechnological literacy (National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council,2009). The National Research Council (NRC) has now extended this position byincluding
economics, even though I'm taking the class.... It would be easier for me if I had someone else right now from economics.” - Xena “I am definitely, I feel pretty behind in terms of planning out my academic [career].... I have my transfer credits, they haven't all been aligned or something like that. The other negative is that I'm going to have to take the qualifying exam here…. Different teachers, different textbooks, different emphasis. I'm pretty worried about that….I usually rely on students to tell me about [opportunities], and I don't know too many people here…. I haven't done much preparing, honestly. I don't have a very clear plan.” - XenaThe number of hurdles she faced were intimidating
commit to academictasks, as well as persevere during challenging academic tasks. Research has connected efficacybeliefs to educational processes and outcomes such as academic major selection, scholasticachievement, persistence, and long-term, post-graduation career decisions.20-24 2Most of the literature on academic self-efficacy comes from the field of educational psychology.However, engineering education literature has embraced the value of promoting high academicself-efficacy, especially when promoting engineering students’ academic goals, success, andcareer interests. For example, based on findings from an engineering education study
), the Baccalaureate and Beyond 2008/2009 (B&B), and the Career/TechnicalEducation (CTE) Statistics. Each of these datasets is produced and distributed by the Departmentof Education’s National Center for Education Statistics.The labor market datasets used in the study were the American Community Survey (ACS), theCurrent Population Survey (CPS), the Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) database, andthe National Survey of College Graduates (NSCG). These data are made available by a variety ofgovernment agencies and present the STEM workforce generally and engineering techniciansand technologists in particular in varying degrees of detail.The survey of educational programs was conducted by the NAE. The survey of employers wasconducted by
Paper ID #26300Negotiating Identity as a Response to Shame: A Study of Shame within anExperience as a Woman in EngineeringMs. Mackenzie Claire Beckmon, Harding University I am an undergraduate psychology major anticipating graduation in December of 2019. I am a member of the Beyond Professional Identity research group based in Harding University located in Searcy, Arkansas. I plan to further my studies in psychology through attending a graduate program for school or child psychology. It is my hope that these processes can lead to a career as both a researcher and practitioner.Dr. James L. Huff, Harding University Dr
. He received his PhD in biomedical engineering from Drexel University and was an NSF Graduate STEM Fellow in K-12 Education (GK-12).Dr. Diane C. Bates, The College of New Jersey Dr. Diane C. Bates is a Professor of Sociology, with research interest and expertise in education in quantitative methods and retention in higher education in STEM disciplines.J. Lynn Gazley, The College of New Jersey J. Lynn Gazley is Associate Professor of Sociology at TCNJ. Her research interests focus on diversity and inclusion in the sciences, and how these processes shape scientific knowledge-making. She has served as a Research Associate and Visiting Scholar with Northwestern University’s Scientific Careers Research and Development