/output, variables, assignments, expressions, branches, loops,functions, and arrays. Once learned, students are ready to transition to an industry language (ifdesired), wherein the student could focus more on syntax issues of the particular industrylanguage since the core concepts were already learned. Coral is intended as a step in learning, nota language for producing real applications (though future uses of Coral for real applications isnot beyond consideration).This paper describes the Coral language, including numerous examples of textual code andcorresponding flowchart(s). This paper also describes the Coral educational simulator, and sharesearly usage data from introductory programming students.2. Coral description and examplesThis section
: Kurtis Johnsonat UW-Platteville, Philip Armstrong at Villanova University, and Mustaki Ahmed at VillanovaUniversity. In addition, the authors are thankful for the helpful feedback about the activitiesprovided by Dr. Patricia Gallagher (Drexel University), Dr. Andrea Welker (VillanovaUniversity), Dr. Christina Curras (UW-Platteville), and Dr. Joseph Scalia IV (Colorado StateUniversity).References[1] J. Schultz, J. Wilson, and K. Hess, "Team-based classroom pedagogy reframed: the student perspective," American Journal of Business Education, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 17-24, 2010.[2] S. P. Sternberg, “Small Group, In Class Problem Solving Exercises,” in Proceeding of the 1997 Annual Conference, Milwaukee, WI, USA, June 15 -18, 1997.[3] H. G
understanding of core science content and science and engineeringpractices. The informal learning space also allows teachers and students to learn together,providing a strong bond that is essential to excite students about engineering and allow girls tofeel that STEM fields are an option for them.References[1] E. Seymour, Talking about leaving: why undergraduates leave the sciences / Elaine Seymourand Nancy M. Hewitt. Boulder, Colo.: Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1997.[2] S. L. Pruitt, “The Next Generation Science Standards,” vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 17–19, 2015.[3] “STEM Teaching Tools.” [Online]. Available: http://stemteachingtools.org/. [Accessed:2019]
presentation.Course Learning Outcomes: 1. Identify relevant topics from previous courses and then apply them to their project 2. Identify and specify design requirements from general problem descriptions 3. Communicate design ideas and information 4. Demonstrate creative thinking 5. Display information gathering skills 6. Demonstrate oral and written communication skillsTraits: Upon successful completion, students should have the following attitude(s)/traits: Confidence in their ability to design. Confidence in their ability to communicate technical information effectively.Our senior design course is structured as a collection of independent or group student projects.This capstone course is offered every semester
Identify appropriate materials and construction methods Design a system or process to solve technical problems Apply an appropriate mastery of the knowledge, techniques, skills, and tools of the disciplineAccreditation assessment: Student outcomes – An ability to design systems, components, processes, procedures, or programs meeting specified needs for broadly-defined engineering, technical, or scientific problems appropriate to Construction Management Engineering Technology [11] Performance Indicators Method(s) of Assessment Target for Performance Students will be able to Faculty members will complete 70% of students score 75% or design and install a full‐ the group dynamics
standard levels. They recommend building these kinds of rubrics from the outside in– that is, for each criterion, describe the highest standard level, then the lowest standard level,and then fill in the middle level(s). They note that this kind of rubric becomes more difficult togenerate with the more levels one desires. Stevens and Levi also present what they call a“scoring guide rubric,” which focuses more on the criteria and presents only the description ofthe highest standard level. Exploration of the use of rubrics in chemical engineering has beenpresented previously. Newell et al. [3] suggest applying four standards levels, rather than three orfive, to avoid there being a middle or “neutral” option.MethodsDevelopment and Implementation of
Control Laboratory. Inaddition, we would like to extend our deepest appreciation to all the MSOE support personneland our industrial partners for their dedication and generous donations. This work was supportedwith contributions from the NFPA Education and Technology Foundation and MSOE's OttoMaha Endowment Fund.References[1] N. F. P. Association, "Annual Report," 2017.[2] R. K. a. Robert MacCurdy, "Printable Hydraulics: A Method for Fabricating Robots by 3D Co-Printing Solids and Liquids," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Stockholm, Sweden, 2016.[3] C. S. e. al., "Additive manufacturing for agile legged robots with hydraulic actuation," in International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), Istanbul
on 10 years of sponsored senior design projects: Students win–clients win!” The Journal of Systems and Software 80 (2007) 1209–1216. [6] Cliff Mirman, “Pathways for Integrating Industry into an Engineering Technology Program”, Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, San Antonio, TX. [7] Kornecki, A.J., Khajenoori, S., Gluch, D., Kameli, N., 2003. “On a partnership between software industry and academia.” Proc. of the 16th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, Madrid, Spain, pp. 60–69. [8] Otieno, A. and Mirman, C., 2003, “Engineering Technology Capstone Experience: An Industry Based Partnership,” Proc. CIEC 2003 Conference
Love Identity and Ignore Inequality. New York: Metropolitan Press. Pawley, A.L. (2017). “Shifting the “Default:” The case for making diversity the expected condition for engineering education and making whiteness and maleness visible.” Journal of Engineering Education, 106:4, 531-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20181 Roberston, R.V & Mason, D. (2008). “What Works? A Qualitative Examination of the Factors Related to the Academic Success of African American Males at a Predominately White College in the South.” Challenge: A Journal of Research on African American Men, 14:2, 67-89. Seron, Carroll, Silbey, Susan S., Cech, Erin, and Rubineau, Brian (2016). “Persistence is Cultural: Professional
activities, living-learning communities, internships, etc.Research by Cech [33] characterized a culture of disengagement in engineering education. Thismight be expected to diminish commitment to sustainable engineering. However, educationalmodels such as Vanasupa et al.’s Four Domain Develop Diagram (4D) [34] indicate conditionsthat might impact affective domain learning, including social aspects of learning, motivation,context, and autonomy. Thus, it is difficult to predict how college might change students’attitudes toward sustainable engineering. Engineering students might become more or lessfavorable in their attitudes toward sustainable engineering, as a result of both formal curriculumand hidden curriculum.Research QuestionsGiven the new
legal representative of the recipient of the human-powered vehicle. • Formalize partnership relationships: Faculty course coordinator performs project management tasks for course project; recipient becomes known as the user; the recipient(s)’ legal representative becomes known as the client; and the first partner is the partner coordinator. • Vet all users and clients through their engagement in the Overcoming Barriers program run by the partner coordinator through the academic year. Users and clients are chosen by prior commitment in the Overcoming Barriers program, and agreement to at least one year of forthcoming commitment during the design-build process of the human-powered vehicle
Education and Outreach Programme.” European Journal of Engineering Education,vol. 42, no. 6, Jan. 2017, pp. 632–643.[3] Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's mathperformance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.
: Case Studies and BestPractices, M. K. Hensley and S. Davis-Kahl, Eds. Chicago: Association of College and ResearchLibraries, 2017, pp. 157-172.
Proceedings. 3. Rapinder S. Sawhney, Sima Maleki, Joseph H. Wilck, and Pedraum Hashemian (2013) “Center for Productivity Innovation's Student Project with Industry Program at the University of Tennessee, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering,” INFORMS Transactions on Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.1120.0100 4. Ted Eschenbach (2010) “Why engineering economy professors should teach introductory corporate finance,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. 5. Heather Nachtmann, Kim L. Needy, Jerome P. Lavelle, and Ted G. Eschenbach (2008) “How Do Engineering Managers Teach Engineering Economy?,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEM National Conference. 6. Ted G. Eschenbach and Neal A. Lewis (2019) “Risk
”, Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, June 14-17, 2015, Seattle, WA[8] Hyeoun-Seong Kim, Sangmi-Park, Sunju-Han, Leen-Seok Kang, “AR-based 4D CADsystem using marker and markerless recognition method”, Procedia Engineering 2017; 196:29 – 35[9] Tumkor Serdar, “Mixed Reality Tools in Engineering Drawing Course”, Proceedings of the2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 26-29, 2016, New Orleans, LA[10] Michael Fosmire, Amy S. Van Epps, Nastasha E Johnson, “Badging Your Way toInformation Literacy”, Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June14-17, 2015, Seattle, WA[11] Rob van Roy, Sebastian Deterding, Bieke Zaman, “Collecting Pokémon or receivingrewards? How people functionalise badges in
international educational experience, a greater richness ofexperiences in domestic offerings can bring some of the benefits of study abroad programs tothose domestic offerings.References[1] United Nations. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: OurCommon Future. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf[2] Allen, D., B. Allenby, M. Bridges, J. Crittenden, C. Davidson, C. Hendrickson, S. Matthews,C. Murphy, D. Pijawka. Benchmarking Sustainable Engineering Education. Center forSustainable Engineering.http://syracusecoe.org/csengine/images/allmedia/BSEE_Final_Report_31Dec08_No_Appen_D.pdf[3] Cisneros-Donahue, T., K.A. Krentler, B. Reinig, K. Sabol. Assessing the Academic Benefitof Study Abroad. Journal of Education and
), Introduction to Public Health for Environmental Engineers: Results from a Three-year Pilot Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/30720 7. Monahan, T., and Fisher, J.A., 2010, “Benefits of ‘Observer Effects’: Lessons from the Field,” Qualitative Research 10(3):357-376. 8. Chickering, A.W., and Gamson, Z.F., 1987, “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education,” Bulletin of the American Association for Higher Education (AAHE). 9. Lieb, S., 1991, “Principles of Adult Learning,” Phoenix, Arizona: Vision – South Mountain Community College 10. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, 2015, “Criteria for
University (United States), Universidad Nacional deIngenieria (Peru), 100,000 Strong in the Americas, Partners of the Americas, and Foundation,Department of State (United States), and Association of International Educators (NAFSA).References[1] https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ [Online][2] J. Adams, "The Fourth Age of Research," Nature, Vol. 497, May, 30, 2013.[3] A. L. Freeman, J. V. Urbina, and S. Zappe, “Engineering Pathways fellows: Four years of successful retention initiatives and international collaboration”, Conference proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, June, 2017.[4] C. Drew, “Why science majors change their minds (It’s just so
been sponsored by major government organizations such as DARPA, OSD, ARL, ONR, AFOSR, DHS S&T, DTRA, NIST, DOE, and NASA as well as by major aerospace companies such as Boeing, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon. He is an elected Fellow of AAAS, AIAA, IEEE, IETE, INCOSE, and SDPS. His recent awards include the 2014 Lifetime Achievement Award from the INCOSE and INCOSE-LA, the 2013 Innovation in Curriculum Award from the Institute of Indus- trial Engineers, the 2012 Exceptional Achievement Award from INCOSE (Los Angeles Chapter), and the 2011 Pioneer Award from INCOSE. He is also the recipient of the 2000 and 2004 Developer of the Year Awards from the Technology Council of Southern California. He is the Co-Founder
students’ input for the overall assessmentof the different curricular approaches in the courses.References[1] Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. “School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective”, Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23, 2013.[2] M. Paretti & K. Cross, “Assessing First-Year Programs: Outcomes, Methods, and Findings:” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2011.[3] Chen, X, “STEM Attrition: College Students' Paths into and out of STEM Fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001”. National Center for Education Statistics, 2013.[4] Kilgore. D., Atman. C. J
] Passaw, H.J., & C.H. Passaw. 2017. “What Competencies Should Undergraduate EngineeringPrograms Emphasize? A Systematic Review.” Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 106., No. 3,pp.475-526.[2] Conrad, S. 2017. “A Comparison of Practitioner and Student Writing in Civil Engineering.” Journalof Engineering Education. Vol. 106, N0. 2., pp. 191-217.[3] ABET, 2017. “EAC Mapping C3 A-K to C3 1-7” Accessed online at: http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/C3_C5_mapping_SEC_8-15-2017.pdf On Feb 15, 2017.[4] Jarvie-Eggart, M., Fiss, L. K., Kitalong, K.L. 2018. “Work-in-Progress -- Comparing First YearEngineering Students’ Math and Verbal ACT Scores and Performance in Introductory Engineering andComposition Courses.” American Society of
Performance in Construction Management Curricula. Journal of ConstructionEducation. 5(3), 272-287.[6] Wandahl, S., Olsen, W., and Ussing, L.F. (2011). Relevance of Academic Internship to theQuality in Construction Management Education. International Journal of Engineering Education27(5), 1046-1053.
thiswork is graciously provided by NSF Project 1730693.References[1] U.S.Census Bureau. Most children younger than age 1 are minorities, census bureau. URL https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/population/cb12-90.html.[2] National Academy of Sciences. Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing america for a brighter economic future. The National Academy Press, Washington, DC.[3] S. Olson and D.G. Riordan. Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees. in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Report to the president. Executive Office of the President.[4] C. Hill, C. Corbett, and A. St Rose. Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
learning styles and also lessons that were more focused,technical, and shorter in duration.References:[1] A. Feldman, K. Divoll, and A. Rogan-Klyve, “Research education of new scientists:Implications for science teacher education,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching: TheOfficial Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, vol. 46, no. 4, pp.442-459, 2009.[2] M. M. Pop, P. Dixon, and C. M. Grove, “Research Experiences for Teachers (RET):Motivation, Expectations, and Changes to Teaching Practices due to Professional ProgramInvolvement,” Journal of Science Teacher Education, vol. 21, no. 2, pp.127-147, 2010.[3] S. Yavuz, “Who are the Science Teachers that Seek Professional Development in ResearchExperience for Teachers
firewall in the DMZ. Thefirewall must be configured to allow inbound and outbound VPN traffic to flow between theserver and client [14]. For this project, the VPN is located on the Rock64 #3 which is configuredwith OpenVPN via the PiVPN package [15].The second security issue is how to allow requests for web pages to leave the trusted networkand be able to receive responses from the untrusted network. To protect the trusted network,Rock64 #4 is configured as a proxy server. Squid is used direct web traffic between the trustedand untrusted zones while SquidGuard is used for blacklisting web pages the business deemsinappropriate [16] [17]. The Rock64’s Gigabit Ethernet controller provides enough bandwidthfor quick access.The other two Rock64 systems
new laboratory assignments. Based on improvement in student grades andpositive feedback from students in a survey, the laboratory activities seem to enhanceengagement and learning. The laboratory exercises helped the students develop a practicalunderstanding of the abstract concepts of signals and systems, including time domain, frequencydomain, and S domain.To help students develop a way to relate the abstract equations of signals and systems toconcepts they have already learned, some of these activities should be based on phenomena theyalready are familiar with, such as electrical circuits. By having the students make measurements,tables, and graphs, they can start to visualize the relations between familiar phenomena, and newtheory and
may be accomplished by utilizing the signal conditioning available fromwithin the myDAQ. Additionally, the signal conditioning circuit (bridge circuit and instrumentationamplifier) required for Lab 10 may be able to be simplified to minimize the time required forcalibration. These changes may also enable sufficient time for students to complete Lab 12.AcknowledgementWe would like to thank the students in the Measurements & Instrumentation course who completedthe labs and the lab assessment. Specifically, we would like to thank Seth Duke and ZacharyMansfield who provided screen captures for the student figures.Bibliography1. Loker, D. and Strom, S. “Automated Test & Measurement System for a Power Supply and Control Board,” Annual
Things Labs to Motivate First-year Electrical and Computer Engineering Students." Proceedings of the 2018 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 2018.[4] Raikar, Meenaxi M., Padmashree Desai, and Jayalakshmi G. Naragund. "Active learning explored in Open elective course: Internet of Things (IoT)." Technology for Education (T4E), 2016 IEEE Eighth International Conference on. IEEE, 2016.[5] Zhongmei, Ma, Sun Juan, and Li Qi. "Discussion on Curriculum and Practices of IoT Professional Course [J]." Microcontrollers & Embedded Systems 10 (2011): 000.[6] Morris, Alan S. "Measurement and instrumentation principles." (2001): 1743.[7] Northrop, Robert B. Introduction to
college: Creating conditions that matter”. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005.. [3] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, & M.K. Norman, “How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching,” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010. [4] National Research Council, “Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering.” Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012. [5] Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds). “How People Learn. Brain, Mind, Experience and School.” Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2008. [6] N. Kober, “Reaching Students
can be less ubiquitous than they are represented as being in academic settings andby exposing students to some of the ways concepts are represented in professional practice theymay become more aware of the tools and resources engineers use to represent these concepts andtheir role in design efforts.References:[1] Bornasal, F., Brown, S., Perova-Mello, N., & Beddoes, K. (2018). Conceptual Growth in Engineering Practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 107 (2).[2] Johri, A. (2014). Conducting Interpretive Research in Engineering Education Using Qualitative and Ethnographic Methods. Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. (pp. 551-570).[3] Johri, A, Olds, B.M., & O’Connor, K. (2014). Situative