more girls in STEM to make it the new norm. She has also architected SFAz’s enhanced Community College STEM Pathways Guide that has received the national STEMx seal of approval for STEM tools. She integrated the STEM Pathways Guide with the KickStarter processes for improving competitive proposal writing of Community College Hispanic Serving Institutions. Throughout her career, Ms. Pickering has written robotics software, diagnostic expert systems for space station, manufacturing equipment models, and architected complex IT systems for global collaboration that included engagement analytics. She holds a US Patent # 7904323, Multi-Team Immersive Integrated Collaboration Workspace awarded 3/8/2011. She also has
Paper ID #35200Instructing Lab Courses VirtuallyDr. Zhen Yu, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Dr. Jenny Zhen Yu is an Associate Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. She has expertise in the areas of Nanotechnology with application in nanomaterial synthesis, electronics devices fabrication and characterization, low cost and robust manufac- turing processes, 3D printing of energy storage device for UAVs and water contamination treatment. Her research has resulted in several patent applications, peer-reviewed journal papers and book chapters, and
entities at the university that align with progression through a doctoral program. Examples of the modules include: ₋ Year 1: time management, success in graduate school ₋ Year 2: responsible conduct of research, data management, teamwork, ethics, mentoring, oral presentations, writing conference abstracts ₋ Year 3: writing academic papers, effective graphics for presentations, networking, responding to reviews, having difficult conversations ₋ Year 4
exciting way to introduce school students to different STEM fields, sincethe students will be exposed to engineering, sciences as well as computer programming.Increasingly, engineering schools embed mentoring opportunities for undergraduate studentsthrough robotics club activities [2,3]. Some schools provide service learning credit for coursesin robotics [4] in their curriculum. When mentoring middle/high school children, it is essentialto communicate the fundamental concepts in simple, easy to understand and for-fun ways.Studies indicate that a practice of journal writing about the mentoring activity [5] and usingreflection leads to improved mentoring. This can improve among mentors the ability tocommunicate complex engineering topics to lay and
access to gradedsolutions, that were available to them throughout the course. The instructors could also retain acopy of student solutions for future reference.Before covid-induced lockdown, exams were conducted in person in the classroom. Post-covidlockdown, the exams were moved to zoom. Exam questions were posted online on blackboard,students could download them and attempt the questions on paper while sitting in front of aphone/laptop camera over zoom. This method was chosen since the students did not want to usemore intrusive software like proctorio. Also, we wanted to give a non-multiple-choice questionexam that students could hand write. We wanted to monitor the students while they were takingthe exam to allow them to ask questions and to
information systems, networking, web sitedevelopment, and how to write computer programs with Python. As a general education course,it is available to any student to use to complete the requirements for their degree. As a result,students enrolled in the course have diverse academic backgrounds and a wide range of priorexperience with computer science concepts.Course material is divided into weekly subjects ranging from an introduction to informationtechnology and networking, creating a webpage using raw HTML, to an introduction toalgorithms and programing concepts with Python. Each week, recorded lectures, course slides,and related online materials are provided via the university’s online course management system(Blackboard). Classroom lectures can
Paper ID #34473A Hands-on Learning Approach to Introducing Computer Organization andArchitecture to Early-college StudentsDr. D. Cenk Erdil, Sacred Heart University Dr. Erdil has joined Sacred Heart University’s School of Computer Science & Engineering in Fall 2017. Prior to SHU, he has held academic positions at Marist College, Columbia University, and Istanbul Bilgi University. His research interests include using Cloud Computing as Artificial Intelligence Infrastructures, Cyber-Physical Systems and Internet-of-Things, Teaching coding to P-12 students, and Health Informat- ics. He is the author of numerous peer
. Wecompleted the first of three research experiences thus far. Here we expand upon currentknowledge to show the role of professional development in preparing students for graduate studyand research in the field of BMMB.Each week participants attended professional development seminars focused on topics tofacilitate their success in the application process and graduate school, writing a resume andcompetitive application materials, how to write an abstract and give presentations, and what toexpect and how to be successful in graduate school. Throughout the summer studentsparticipated in weekly journal clubs with faculty to help them understand faculty mentor researchand the discipline of BMMB. Facility tours helped students see firsthand the types of
progressing in the practice of civil engineering disciplines. Withinthis Body of Knowledge, communication is identified as one of the professional outcomesnecessary for successful civil engineering practice.Of course, developing communication skills begins as early as K-12 education. Once studentsenter their collegiate course of study, academia, industry, and the students themselves must seekout and integrate communication study and practice into their engineering training [2]. Althougheffective communication is critical to the practice of civil engineering, it has been identified as askill missing from engineering curricula in general [3]. Communication skills are not onlynecessary for the tasks of writing reports and giving presentations: effective
engagement—did in fact occur. Becausestudents were asked to predict what would happen prior to the demonstration, they were motivatedto pay attention during the demonstration. Students in the back of the room stood up so that they Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of New Mexico – Albuquerque Copyright © 2008, American Society for Engineering Educationcould see more clearly what was happening. The instructor's questioning process before, during, andafter the demonstration kept student attention focused on critical components of the demonstration.Further, students were asked to write predictions and write answers to post-demonstration
, were two very different things, but they were and arevery much entwined and the discussions at many of the section meetings made that clear. If one wants to pursue a pathway to research in engineering education, the researchmethodology in engineering education should be no different than the same methodologicalapproach used in technical engineering research: 1. define the research question or hypothesis, 2.write a proposal or plan, 3. seek funding or other appropriate support, 4. do the work rigorously,and 5. publish the results in peer-reviewed journals. In this sense, engineering educationresearch should be considered favorably in promotion and tenure. One caveat in educationalresearch is that the student (human subject) is the target
advice related tothe workload of the course, indicating a heavy reading and writing focus in the course. This samecohort of students was also asked to discuss reasons for their unsuccessfulness in the onlineenvironment. The top three reasons for failure in online courses included: falling behind withcoursework, personal conflicts (health, job, children, etc.), and inability to balance school andlife responsibilities. These three reasons were cited by over 47% of all respondents.The number of students enrolled in online courses has steadily increased since 2012, with over35% of all university students, undergraduate and post-baccalaureate, enrolled in at least oneonline course in 2018 23, suggesting that the COVID-19 pandemic may have only
, online education effectively competeswith residential programs. For many disciplines, the interaction among students required fordiscussion or peer review of written work can be handled in courses through discussion boards,chat sessions, team conferences, and written assignments. Furthermore, for some courses,simulations and case studies can replace active learning sessions.[1] However, even with theadvances in online education, the challenges of most laboratory courses required on-sitelaboratory experiences because of the need for physical hardware and resources. Some of themost affected disciplines include engineering, the physical sciences and health sciences.[2][3][4] The 2020 pandemic created immediate and focused challenges that
workshops,specifically as it relates to hearing different perspectives and time commitment.Finding: Multiple PerspectivesThe co-designing of exam wrappers, as opposed to each individual working on their separateproject, provided a diversity of perspectives that aided instructors in developing effective examwrappers in two main ways: guided exercises from the study designers, and peer-to-peerconversation and learning. The sessions and activities designed by the research team were aimedat creating conversation around a few key exam wrapper concepts, not all of which individualparticipants may have explored on their own: “what shouldn’t an exam wrapper be?,” “who iscompleting the reflection (i.e. individuals vs. class)?,” “what is the format of the
and practicing design skills) • Professional Communications (conveying designs and interacting with peers/customers) • Professional Tools [4] (teaching and implementing design tools) • Professional Ethics [5] (evaluating and practicing appropriate professional behavior)Offering a hands-on, project-based environment does not require much convincing. It has beenstated that the value of active learning is “sufficiently answered.” [6] To address the morepertinent follow-up question: “what kind of activities work best in which situations?” WKU MEfaculty continue to deliver, assess and refine the Professional Plan.This paper is focused on design experiences at freshman and sophomore levels, which eitherintroduce or reinforce the design
Foundation, with a $6.4 million research funding participation from external sources. He has been directing/co-directing an NSF/Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site on interdisciplinary water sciences and engineering at VT since 2007. This site has 95 alumni to date. He also leads an NSF/Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) site on interdisciplinary water research and have 10 alumni. He also leads an NSF-funded cybersecurity education project and serves as a co-PI on two International Research Experiences for Students (IRES) projects funded by the NSF. He has published over 90 papers in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. American c
the United States.Cynthia Hampton, Virginia Tech Cynthia Hampton is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. While at Virginia Tech, Cynthia has directed summer bridge programs, led peer support initiatives for un- derrepresented groups, and served on various commissions, committees, and research groups focused on student support, organizational change, graduate student policy, and culturally responsive evaluation. Her research interests include organizational behavior and change as it pertains to engineering education and broadening participation, faculty change agents, and complex system dynamics. Her research investigates narrative inquiry of faculty who use their agency
Colorado Conference; SUNY Online Learning Summit (SOL) (DOODLE;, Teaching and Learning with Technology Conference (TLT), and the Conference on Instructional Technologies. All of these presentations focused upon the various topics that support my mission for student success and efficient class management. SUNY has recognized me as an Open SUNY Fellow Expert Online Instructional Designer. In addition, I am a member of the MERLOT Teacher Education Editorial Board as well as a MERLOT Peer Reviewer Extraordinaire several years running. And as a certified Quality Matters Master Reviewer and peer reviewer in general, I have reviewed hundreds of online and blended course using various checklists including the OSCQR.Erin
branding strategy can achieve to promote thegrowth of the business.IP is considered an ‘asset’ of the organization and can have real value. The form of that valuevaries from the type of IP and the increase in freedom to operate that it affords. For patents,particularly in technology-driven companies, patents represent legitimacy to prospectiveinvestors. Like peer-reviewed papers, issued patents present to the world that an idea, indeeddoes have merit according to a separate panel of experts that do not have a vested interest in thecompany. This translates to many investors as a due diligence checkmark toward investability.Similarly, crowdfunding platforms that invest in consumer product-based companies may havean easier time raising capital than
between Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to deliver outcomes that integrate sustainability in their results. In addition, the SSC builds community by holding social events, such as potlucks, incubation expos, and workshops. Collaborating with a peer, he assisted the school in achieving AASHE Gold by leveraging the SSC’s network to draft and disburse the Sus- tainability Literacy Assessment (SLA). He aspires to give instructors and students a deeper meaning of sustainable development: by using the principles of sustainability management, e.g. lifecycle assessment (LCA), the 3-P paradigm.Mr. Viraj Vasudev Rokade, Stevens Institute of Technology American c Society
across a wide range of disciplines including two representatives from engineering (onebeing the author of this paper), and one from each of the following disciplines:anthropology/sociology, architecture/art, communication, creative writing, history, and legalwriting.3. Challenges to Modifying the Existing Engineering CurriculumPreliminary DIF meetings brought to light an important issue with regard to achieving the DIFprogram’s purpose of “social justice and inclusion in the classroom.” Specifically, it becameapparent during early discussions that the civil engineering representatives believed there wasconsiderably less room to adjust curriculum and teaching methods to include issues of diversityin the classroom and to teach in a manner that was
, even if those needs do not appear todirectly relate to the library.In 2018, UB was one of fourteen U.S. academic institutions that participated in the Ithaka S+R-led multi-site research study investigating the teaching practices of faculty providingundergraduate level instruction in business. The author was the sole researcher from UB andprovided de-identified interview transcripts to Ithaka S+R for their self-published report,“Teaching Business: Looking at the Support Needs of Instructors [3].” Findings specific to UBwere provided in the non-peer-reviewed report, “Examining the Undergraduate TeachingPractices of Faculty in the School of Management,” and made available on the UB institutionalrepository (UBIR).The study of UB business school
morecourse specific. One use of technology was an online collaboration assessment. Students, insmall groups, were requested to use Google Docs, an online tool which allows students tointeractively respond to the evaluations. All students were able to view each other’s commentsand respond to the comments. Google Docs is familiar to many students and requires nosoftware purchase [13]. This study was successful with many students. Despite this successusing Google Docs, there remains questions of anonymity and the willingness of some studentsto share information when peers have visible access to their responses.Many studies [12] [14] recognize the importance of teaching center or facilitator intervention inthe mid-semester evaluative process. Diamond’s
schools. One of them is the Collegeof Science and Engineering (CSE) which hosts eight departments. CSE is in the midst of a multi-year project to develop programs and policies to better support students from underrepresentedpopulations in engineering and computer science.Previous work examined data on undergraduate students who were enrolled in the fourengineering majors in the College of Science and Engineering for any part of their time at SeattleUniversity. Our analysis showed that female-identifying students appeared to primarily facebarriers to access as they were less likely to pursue engineering degrees, but those who didshowed comparable rates of completing those degrees to their male-identifying peers. In contrast,URM-identifying
consists of “institutionalstructures, resources, and responsibilities that influence students’ identities within their academicinstitution and engineering as a career” [9, p. 2].The networking strand includes two elements ofnetworks, interpersonal and intertextual to support their personal, academic, and professionaldevelopment. Interpersonal networking consists of the present, past, and historical relationshipsbuilt with faculty, peers, and professionals that contribute to students; identity development andsuccess, while intertextual networking includes students’ accessing books, articles, andeducational technology to expand their knowledge and understanding of the field.ResultsWithin the research project’s lifespan, we have collected stories
billion employees and $15.8 trillion in wages The rapidly changing landscape of the workplace and associated uncertainty has raised a lot of questions about the future of our education system. The impact of different industrial revolutions on education, just like all other parts of society has been profound. Education 1.0 was no education at all. At that time children worked in manual jobs and child labor was the order of the day. Education was not necessary to earn a living, it was merely a luxury for the elites and the rich. Education 2.0 originated from the need to read and write and was developed in the model of Industry 2.0, with emphasis on repeatability, uniformity, efficiency, and mass production. Industry needed lots of people
, anonymoustransactions and as an efficient money-laundering tool. Cryptography and blockchain technology usedto produce building blocks of cryptocurrencies – a process called mining – to verify and addtransaction records to a write-only database of all previous transactions. As an incentive to add a newblock to the blockchain, the network compensates miners’ efforts with cryptocurrency, and a newlyadded block protected by cryptographic techniques to ensure the integrity of the record. To add ablock to the blockchain, miners have to solve a cryptographic puzzle, and a valid block will contain asolution to such puzzle with a hash of a previous block, hash of the transactions in the current blockand an address for the miner’s wallet on which the reward will be
mechanical engineering coursework. The app needs to besimple yet effective and useful to comprehend complex models. So, the prototype app was testedto verify the requirements proposed and was evaluated by anonymous participants (that includedgraduate students and some faculty from the university peer survey system). Section 2 presentsthe related works in the field of AR for education, section 3 presents the features of thedeveloped app, the framework of the software, and the evaluation results. Section 4 presents thefuture direction for the app and section 5 provides the conclusion.2 Related LiteratureThe current use of AR in education is mainly focused on teaching for younger students as itprovides active interaction and engagement and can lower
complex engineering problems, as well aspresentations and intensive technical writing. We conducted comparative surveys of teachers andstudents at a medium-sized liberal arts university in the Midwestern U.S. The results showed thatsolving real-life problems and teamwork skills are the strongest motivators for students. Thesefindings aligned with teachers’ perceptions of what motivated their students in this course.Furthermore, we found some interesting differences in some of the motivations based on gender,race, and student GPA. We hope our results inform more effective design in first-yearengineering design courses in liberal arts universities and further improve student retention andgraduation rates. We also intend to use this pilot study for
in the junior/senior design clinic as well as teaches graduate-level engineering communication courses. Her research involves engineering commu- nication, technical communication pedagogy, and knowledge transfer. She has published and presented widely including work in the Journal of Engineering Education, the Journal of STEM Education: Innova- tions and Research, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, the Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, Technical Communication and Technical Communication Quarterly. Julie has a PhD in Rhetoric and Professional Communication from New Mexico State University, an MA in English with Technical Writing Emphasis from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte