Swarms with Distributed Swarm Control 3. Enhancing Security of Cloud-Connected UAS ServicesStudents were placed onto teams based on their prior course experiences and the projectrequirements. Common resources were provided for all students to train them in conductingresearch. Teams were then tasked with developing a more comprehensive research plan for theirspecific project and carrying out that plan throughout the 2020-2021 academic year.Students completed a pre-survey at the start of the project and a mid-project survey shortly afterthe winter break. The surveys combined project specific skills questions as well as relevantquestions from the Undergraduate Research Student Self-Assessment (URSSA), an NSF-fundedassessment tool to measure
Andriessen’s[4] dual purpose of DBR model as illustrated in Figure 1. The focus of the program design isprogressive refinement through the problem statement; defining the design and learningobjectives; planning (project management) of the curricular design, development of thecurricular ideation and selection of a design for initial implementation; and ultimately acontinuously reformed model with a curricular model improvement process. The focus of theresearch design is to establish the research questions; identify the learning theories applicable tothe research work; design of the research work that influences the curricular implementation andimprovement; and ultimately to disseminate what is learned and add to the body of knowledgeon engineering
Grainger College of Engineering. Sara performs undergrad- uate research in soft robotics and engineering education funded by the IDEA Institute at UIUC. Sara is interested in pursuing a career in Engineering Education as well as furthering her education upon gradu- ating.Mrs. Ilalee Harrison James, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Ilalee Harrison James is the Associate Director of The Hoeft Technology & Management Program. She serves as a lecturer in addition to leading the strategic plan for the program’s co-curricular outcomes. She is a first-generation college graduate who is passionate about improving career outcomes for underrepre- sented students in STEAM.Prof. Holly M. Golecki, University of
, renewable energy and micro-manufacturing. His current research interests include robotics, CIM, sustainable manufacturing, micro machining and engineering and tech- nology education. He has published several papers in these areas in various national and international conferences and journals. He has worked in heavy and light manufacturing industries, manufacturing pumps, motors, and CNC machine tools in the areas of system design, production planning, and control and manufacturing. Edinbarough also served in paramilitary forces and in the Air Force. He is a Life Member of the ISTE, a senior life member of the IE (India), a member of ASEE and SME, and a licensed Professional Engineer (P.E.) in the state of Texas.Dr. Jesus
. Graduates will beconferred a bachelors degree in mechanical engineering. Students execute one to two projectcycles per semester.During the proposal stage, students, in collaboration with faculty and clients, develop two plans:a design "work plan" which details the entire execution of the deliverable to the client; and a"learning plan" which addresses professional learning objectives, technical learning objectives,and the learning modes that will be employed to meet the objectives (self-directed learning, peer-directed learning, faculty-directed learning, and external expert-directed learning as well asmethods for formative assessment and reflection). Entering Establish Learning
lesson plans. Figure 1. Summer PD program’s first-week CS/CT content course schedule.2.1.2. Course 2The second-week course was held at a local school district conference center. The course wastaught by four different CS teachers—a college professor, a high school teacher, a middle schoolteacher, and an elementary school teacher. Presentations were arranged so each instructor had achance to talk about teaching the concepts of loops, variables, conditionals, and functions at theirrespective grade level, allowing teachers to understand curricular progressions across the K-12grade span.An outline of the course schedule can be found below in Figure 2. Daily reflections werecompleted online at the end of each day and were graded for completion
. 5 Cohort 8 DemographicsIn State (PA Residents): 7Out of State (Non-PA Resident): 22 6 Objectives • Share the key components and structure of the remote Summer Bridge • Data benchmarking the first-year students’ academic progress • sense of belonging compared to past students with a residential Bridge experience • Lessons learned and best practices • Provide tangible action items that can be replicated across different programs and campusesObjectives of presentation – from abstract 7Summer Bridge 2020 Timeline• April: Planning for remote bridge• May: Hiring
, or study. Role identities are contextually specific and as such, we haveformulated questions for engineering, science, or computer science consistent with previouswork in mathematics, science, and engineering [1], [13], [14]. Students will choose the field ofstudy most relevant to them to answer these questions, as ERC's are interdisciplinary and mayinvolve students from across STEM solving engineering programs. Third, items measuringstudent pathways and sustained interest were developed for this study from The ERC EvaluationConsortium's Multi Engineering Research Center Instrument Inventory [30] to assess thestudent's willingness to continue their STEM paths, such as the pursuit of additional degrees andwhich career plans they might
Technology students had already completed the requirement.Others students wanted to go but couldn’t justify the extra cost involved for food, transportation,and housing. Thus, only five students were actually enrolled by early October. A “Plan B” wasneeded to get the course, and exchange program, off the ground.Arrangements were made with the Packaging and Engineering Technology Program Directors toallow MFGT 341 in Darmstadt as a substitute for another course, MFGT 251 Plastics Materialsand Processes. MFGT 251 is one of a three course materials series required by both degrees.Normally MFGT 251 is a prerequisite for MFGT 341. Because non-plastics concentrationEngineering Technology and Packaging graduates who work in the plastics industry have a
. Moreover, among all engineering fields, electrical engineering has oneof the largest gender gaps. That is, the women’s representation in electrical and computerengineering fields is only 10% compared to for example 35% in chemical engineering 4 .In order to improve the situation of women in electrical and computer engineering fields,we designed and organized a summer camp for middle school girls enrolled in grades 6-8(11-13 years of age). This is part of a three year educational and outreach plan supportedby a National Science Foundation award. The first edition of this camp was held in 2012 inthe Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) at North Dakota StateUniversity (NDSU). In this paper, we present details about the first
outreach project at Daniel Hale Elementary School which provides civil engineering lesson plans, afterschool pro- grams, family workshops and field trips. Prof. Villatoro is the Project Director for the Peer Advisement program sponsored by Perkins and designed to increase retention of females across the School of Tech- nology and Design.Laurin Moseley, CUNY New York City College of Technology American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Benefits of the virtual platform for K-12 STEM OutreachAbstractThe number of students enrolling and graduating with STEM degrees in the United States mustincrease exponentially in order to meet the predicted job
, and discuss the application process. • Make a compelling (clearly argued, articulated, inspiring, and well prepared) presentation about how their international experiences are relevant and beneficial to becoming a successful engineer. • Anticipate the cultural demands that may accompany international business travel and formulate a plan to compensate for such needs, including identifying appropriate resources to investigate how one can professionally engage with the target culture. • Discover opportunities for international internships, careers, and fellowships. • Reflect and build upon intercultural learning experiences and to consider ways to apply their knowledge, skills, and perspectives
only continue to grow until it becomes a serious problem. Inthe words of a fellow student, Kayla Bensley, when asked what her school could do to improverecycling, she answered: “Rowan could do everything better because they do not do anything.When I lived in [the freshman dorm] there weren't any recycling bins on my floor at all, and it isconcerning how little they care. I am also pretty sure they do not recycle things put in recyclingbins.”Objective In order to be able to increase the recycling rate at Rowan University, there has to be aplan put in place. The start of every plan to raise awareness requires an introduction of theproblem to the campus community. As seen in other places similar to this university, a SWACOpoll in central
communication competencies needed for successful civil andenvironmental engineering practice. To address this gap, the civil engineering curriculum addeda new course entitled Communicating with Stakeholders in Engineering. This course coverstopics including communication theory, stakeholder identification, communicating throughconflict, communication planning, implicit bias, public engagement principles, and more. Thecontent was selected to fill the gaps in traditional communication classes taken by civilengineering students to expose students to tools and approaches to workplace communicationand communication with public stakeholder groups. The topics covered in the course allowstudents to develop an understanding of and gain extensive practice with
include the ability to use symbols, learning through observation, planning,self-regulation, and self-reflection [1]. A brief description of each of these humancognitive capacities follows: Ability to Use Symbols: By the use of symbols, humans transform immediatevisual experiences into internal cognitive models that in turn serve as guides for theiractions. Through symbolizing, people also ascribe meaning, form and duration to theirpast experiences. Learning Through Observations: Learning can also occur indirectly by observingother people’s behavior and its outcomes. Individuals’ capacity to learn by observationenables them to obtain and accumulate rules for initiating and controlling differentbehavioral patterns without having to
computed or returned. Except whereindicated, answers range from 1(Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). Note that somequestions are worded so that a positive response corresponds to the hypothesis and others areworded so that a negative response corresponds to the hypothesis. Late Days Questions: Q1) Of the 2 late days allowed for homework assignments, how many did you use? (0/1/2) Q2) The regrade policy affected my decision as to which homeworks to turn in late. Q3) I planned, in advance of problems actually working on the homework, which assignments to turn in late. (For example, during a week with multiple tests.) Q4) The late policy allowed me to spend more time on the homework than I would
degrees, and the Bachelor degree inMultidisciplinary Technology. In order to advise a student graduating with an InterdisciplinaryDegree, the faculty must have a full, joint, or courtesy appointment with the Department ofMultidisciplinary Engineering.Step Three: Involve the appropriate voices to get a preliminary understanding of what the PhD, MS,and DEng degree plans would look like. If degrees are going to be grantable in the topic of engineering education, it is important toestablish what an acceptable degree plan would look like. There were numerous questions raisedabout the efficacy of the plan: ● What types of applicants would be admitted to the program? ● Would graduate students be required to have an undergraduate degree in
thetransfer to a new university easy. Strategies employed by the LINK scholarship program focuson integration of new transfer students into the College of Engineering culture and onprofessional planning and skill development. We recognize that extracurricular involvement andleadership experience while an engineering student are important aspects in professionaldevelopment, but that a two-year timeline makes them difficult to achieve without intentionality.Efforts to integrate new transfers include a zero-credit (no cost) seminar that serves to familiarizestudents with the college and university environment and resources. Resumes are written,evaluated, and edited, and visits from the career services offices make sure that students areaware of support
--- --- 100% --- 1:1 Mentorship: Grow Your Network --- --- 50% 50% Parenting as a Professor --- --- --- 100% COVID-19 Check-In --- --- 100% ------ = 0%Survey results also revealed participants found the sessions to provide information beneficial totheir academic career planning process, as nearly 100% of the sessions were rated as “beneficial”or “very beneficial” (see Table 3). The How to Write Stellar Research Articles session wasidentified by all participants as “very beneficial.”Table 3. Session Information was Beneficial for Academic Career Planning Session Title
distributed. 2. A workshop for faculty in the College of Engineering (COE) that was conducted during every departments’ regular faculty meetings. 3. Discussion sessions were conducted with faculty who taught project-based courses. 4. Informal lunch sessions to encourage sharing of effective strategies were proposed.Each component of this approach is described in greater detail below.1. Resource (‘One Pager’)An important part of the initiative was the creation of a detailed resource which containedinformation in the form of organized steps on how to make a traditional classroom moreinclusive. The authors initially planned on creating a one-page resource but quickly realized thedifficulty in this task due to the volume of information that
trust. Results indicate that designing ameeting structure with thorough planning documentation that designates time for socialinteractions to foster trust between team members is a powerful method for encouragingeffective communication and overall project success.IntroductionVirtual teams are growing in prevalence in industry for a number of reasons [1], includinglowering overall project costs, optimizing project time management, and expediting problemsolving [2]. In the modern workplace, working virtually allows teams to pool together resources,including people, regardless of physical location [2]. By employing virtual engineering teams,research claims companies strengthen their ability to compete on a global scale [3]. Companyinvestments in
. The webinars focused on career preparation and planning, time and projectmanagement, and career opportunities in STEM fields. Finally, all the SRI participants wererequired to complete six online personal financial literacy training modules that took about 4 to 6hours in total, including 1) budgeting, 2) behavioral finance, 3) scholarships, 4) repaying studentloans, 5) federal student loans, and 6) using credit cards responsibly.3. Program Evaluation and AssessmentQuantitative and qualitative data were collected through pre-/post- participation surveys. Out of49 SRI participants, we received 43 complete responses. Table 2 shows the demographic data ofthe 43 SRI participants. Table 2: Demographic Data of 43 Survey
expresseda need to be better prepared for the python modeling sections, something we plan to address bycreating introductory primers on the use of python for data analytics in bioprocessing. Thesefindings have to be confirmed for bootcamps that provide an advanced understanding of howanalytics can be applied for bioprocessing; however, it is encouraging to see that bootcampsdeveloped for incumbent worker training may be leveraged for collegiate pipeline development.Our next steps are to develop cases and companion data sets that will be disseminated to NIIMBLmembers and support development of advanced training modules. We will also deliberate uponways to adapt content from the bootcamps into existing or new curriculum through courseactivities
paths that could lead to success. Our second goal is to improve thestructure of the Decision-Making Competency Inventory (DMCI) so that it can explain student'sdecision-making competency in more detail and in congruence with the Self-Regulation Modelof Decision-Making. This instrument will be used to map decision-making competency toacademic choices and outcomes. The third goal is to develop an Academic Dashboard as a meansfor sharing relevant research results with students. This will allow students to have access to thestrategies, information, and stories needed to make and implement adaptive decisions. This paperhighlights our progress in the fifth year of the project and our plans going forward.Mapping Pathways - Studying OverpersistenceThe
training and has plans for additional larger-scale modifications in the coming year. In addition to the start-of-semester orientation andtraining, the department will follow up with focused training sessions during the first few weeksof the semester. The planned topics are (1) effective interaction with students in labs and officehours and (2) effective and efficient grading and relevant software tools. In addition, thedepartment is considering a new model in which lab sections are larger but are staffed by twoGTAs so that new GTAs can be paired with more experienced GTAs for ongoing mentoring andinformal training.To deepen our understanding of GTA perceptions of their preparation for the role and to providemore effective ongoing training, the
the school year.The curriculum was built to require no more than a middle school life science course as aprerequisite. Teachers were given lesson plans, teaching supplies, and support from the researchteam as questions came up. Further runs are planned on additional lab kits and with additionalschools. The next lab kit to be tested will expand on previous implementations by employingcomputational and robotic models of working brains allowing students to understand more of thefunctionality of brains. This paper assesses how technology such as lab kits benefitsunderrepresented students and potential improvements that can be made to better benefit thesestudents and their teachers. Figure 1. Planned testing for this study
school districts: Over thepast two EngiNearMe cohorts, the BOLD (Broadening Opportunitiesthrough Leadership and Diversity) Center has developed strongpartnerships with several schools and districts across the Denver metroarea that have produced many of the students participating in theprogram. Moving forward, recruitment efforts need to maintain thoserelationships while expanding to new districts with high populations ofURM students to create broader statewide representation in futurecohorts.Post-program contact: We believe we can have greater yield if weincrease our contact with participants throughout their senior year. TheStudent Recruitment Coordinator will create a plan for ongoing outreachto the 2019 EngiNearMe participants throughout
switching between tasks(parallel task completion). Although the nature of a faculty position does not always allow one to choosebetween serial or parallel task completion, there is often a great deal of autonomy if one can become moreintentional about how one works. On the timescale of months, the FDC can help plan out the balancebetween intrinsic and extrinsic activities. Spending too much time only completing either intrinsic orextrinsic tasks can be a warning sign. As faculty developers, we can suggest using the canvas withorganizational tools (e.g., Slack, Trello, or other project management software), that can track andsequence actions. On the timescale of years and decades, a faculty member will likely change theirbehavior patterns and even
respect to the product design for atticaccess scenario, students were supplied broad background on the scenario and why a new productwas being designed. The homework consisted of five parts (Problem Identification, Research,Design Specs, Specification Source Model, and Site Plan Bubble Drawing) with 11 stepscomprising the five parts: listing stakeholders, creating a needs statement, identifying broaderimpacts of design solution, consulting experts, reviewing publications, asking stakeholdersquestions, assumptions to make, classifying constraints and evaluation metrics in the designspecifications, applying the Specification Source Model (second scenario), establishing newconstraints and evaluation metrics, and creating a preliminary site plan of
construction, or plan to work in the industry. This wide range ofstudents and varying levels of experience necessitates an understanding of terminology early inthe course. The technique presented in this paper is done during the third and fourth lectureperiods to help facilitate that understanding.As this may be the only construction course that many Civil Engineering students at MichiganTech take, it was decided that the course should cover a broad range of topics that CivilEngineers would need to know. As a result there are many topics covered that may have acourse dedicated to them in other programs. These topics include a construction overview, Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE North Midwest Sectional Conference