Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Janet Schmidt; Ardie Walser; Barbara Bogue

Multicoalition Perspective." 2000 Annual ASEEConference Proceedings Session 2630, ASEE, June 2000 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education2 L. L. Bucciarelli, H. H. Einstein, P. T. Terenzini, A. D. Walser, ECSEL/MIT Engineering EducationWorkshop '99: A Report with Recommendations, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. , no. ,2000,pp.141- 149.3 Bogue B., R.M. Marra, T.L. Litzinger, and S. Johnson, “The Penn State ECSEL Learning EnvironmentWorkshop: A Progress Report.” Creating a Global Engineering Community Through Partnerships, 1998WEPAN National Conference, pp. 113-116.ARDIE D. WALSERArdie D. Walser is an

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Perry R. McNeill; Charles Bittle

themidpoint of the DAC’s full range. If this decrease is greater than one least significant bit (LSB),the binary weighted DAC becomes nonmonotonic3.The segmented current steering DAC uses several conversion partitions or segments to overcomethe source of nonmonotonicity described above for binary weighted DACs. The ideal N-bitsegmented current steering DAC is made of 2N elements for thermometer coding. Binary-to-thermometer code conversions are shown in Table I. For example, the binary 011 (decimal 3) isconverted to three 1’s and one 0. This code can be viewed as a thermometer that is filled up tothe topmost ONE in the column and hence the name thermometer code1.However, it is impractical to implement high resolution DACs using 2N elements because

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Todd Morton

, the Noral Micrologics Flex BDM Debugger for the 68HC12 family ofmicrocontrollers will be covered. It takes advantage of the 68HC12’s Background DebugModule (BDM) to provide real-time source level debugging. The system consists of a source-level debugging application and a BDM pod connected between a PC parallel port and the targethardware. It is more expensive than using Motorola’s 68HC12 EVB as a background debug podbut less expensive than a full emulator – if one existed. In the student lab, this system providesmuch better control and insight for the student debugging large C programs. Figure 3 shows anexample of the Noral 68HC12 BDM debugger’s working environment. A few of the features ofthis debugger are shown in the figure including the

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Wayne Walter; Paul Stiebitz

Hall(1997).2 Martin, J.N. Systems Engineering Guidebook. New York, NY: CRC Press (1997).3 Hatley, D.J. and Pirbhai I.A. Strategies for Real-time System Specification. New York, NY: Dorset HousePublishing (1987).4 International Council on Systems Engineering. Systems Engineering Handbook (1999).5 Stevens, R., P. Brook, K. J., and Arnold, S. Systems Engineering: Coping with Complexity. London, UK: PrenticeHall Europe (1998).6 Rechtin, E., and Maier M. W. The Art of Systems Architecting, CRC Press, FL (1997).7 Bass, L., Clemens P. and Kazman C. Software Architectures in Practice, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley (1998).8 Tannenbaum, A.S. Structured Computer Organization. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall (1999).9 URL: http

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Medhat Morcos; David Soldan

. Merritt, S., Telecommunications Software for Education: The Community Networking Model, International Journal of Computers and Education, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 317-321, 1991.14. Rezabek, L. et al, Distance Education: Perspectives from All Sides of the Desk (ERIC Document ED346822).15. Coppola, J., Merritt, S.M., and Stix, A., PC-Based Video Conferencing: Guidelines for Opening A Remote Section of A Course, Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, Paper F1B.2, 1997.16. Pendergrass, N.A., Using Computers, Simulators and Sound to Give Hands-on Experience, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Washington, DC, Session 3532, 1996.17. Wilson, J.M., The Cuple Physics

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Philip Parker; Max Anderson; Michael Penn

. Therelationship between the EC2000 program outcomes and required courses is shown in Table 5below.To document that the environmental engineering program criteria were also met by theprogram, a table was prepared that showed the program criteria and the course(s) that includedcoverage of it. Course numbers and titles used in the various tables are contained below. Moredetail can be obtained at the department web page: www.uwplatt.edu/~enve/. Documentationof how the EC2000 program criteria and courses are shown below in Table 6 and Table 7. Todocument how each of the EC2000 program outcomes and program objectives were met ineach class Table 8 was prepared. It included homework, lab reports, exams, design projects,oral presentations, term paper, guest

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Cynthia Atman; Jennifer Turns

Engineering Education January: pp. 3-8, 1993.Todd, R. H., S. P. Magleby, C. D. Sorenson, B. R. Swan and D. K. Anthony. A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America. Journal of Engineering Education April: 165-174, 1995.Turns, J. Supporting Engineering Education with Information Technology: The Case of Instructional Design Experiences. School of Industrial Engineering. Atlanta, Georgia Institute of Technology: 207, 1998.Appendix 1. Final Exam Questions1. EC2000 Learning Outcomes - Generally. Imagine that you are in a job interview with an interviewer who has just heard of the EC2000 learning outcomes for the first time. Because you have been in this class, you are now prepared to discuss this topic with the

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Lynn Mack; James Wood

the Year” Awardand Piedmont Technical College’s Presidential Medallion Award. The SC ATE Exemplary Faculty Project wasselected as a national model for faculty development and is featured in an American Association of CommunityColleges case study publication, The Learning Edge. Her educational degrees include a B. A. from WinthropUniversity and a M. S. from North Texas State University, both in mathematics. Page 6.806.15 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright  2001, American Society for Engineering Education

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Norman Asper; Bijan Sepahpour

student groups. A formal report andpresentation is also required.In both courses, the elements of technical writing and group dynamics are further reviewed andexercised.The following table displays the strategic allocation of the design activities/projects throughoutthe four-year period for the mechanical specialty of the program. Counterparts of such a chartmay be generated for other specialties of the program. Nature of the Design Activity/Project Course Title Year Term Design Mini-Design Final Design Reverse C.A.D. Taken Taken Problems Project(s) Project Engineer. Fund. Eng. Design 1 1

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Carl Zorowski

previous classes that took the course in thestandard offering delivery format.Background The College of Engineering at North Carolina State University implemented a program inthe late 1970’s to deliver graduate level credit courses to non-resident students to pursue Mastersdegrees in Engineering. Courses were initially delivered live by faculty who traveled to a selectnumber of state sites where the students met for classes. Regular university credit was providedfor these offerings to fulfill graduate degree requirements. As the demand for universityaccredited off-campus educational course offerings rapidly grew across the state this method ofdelivery became cumbersome and unworkable. A more convenient delivery method was needed that

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Terrence Freeman

) minorities has increasedsteadily from 2.9% in 1972-73 to 9.2% in 1994-951. Even with the increase, Reichert & Absherreport that the degrees awarded are stills less than half of the combined representation of theseminorities in the U. S. population.Almost thirty years ago a national effort was launched to increase the number of minorities in thefield of engineering1. The effort has met with some success and participation by minorities inscience and engineering is at an all time high. Many major corporations now support the thesisthat diversity makes good business sense. Hispanic, and Native Americans, however, still remainsignificantly underrepresented in science and engineering with roughly half of the science andengineering degrees awarded to

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Thomas Stanford; Michael Aherne; Duane D. Dunlap; Mel Mendelson; Donald Keating

address basic marketing questions such as:• What is our market, and what makes it fundamentally different from the target market for either MBA programs or research-based graduate engineering science programs?• What career-related ETL product(s) does the market want?• What price is the market willing to pay for new learning products which fundamentally meet their needs?• What can we deliver vis-à-vis “total product,” based on what the market is willing to pay?• What are the most effective and responsive delivery strategies and under what circumstances?• How do we promote ETL graduate professional education as a “new product introduction” that meets an increasingly unmet stakeholder community need, without disenfranchising the

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Nigel Middleton; Debra Lasich; Barbara Moskal

achievement: an update", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 28, No. 6, 1997, 652-679.2. Tierney, W., "The parameter of affirmative action: Equity and excellence in the academy", Review of Educational Research, Vol. 67, No. 2, 1997, 165-196.3. Fennema, E., "What Affirmative Action has Contributed to Educational Research", Educational Researcher, Vol. 27, No. 9, 1998, 5-7.4. Greene, M., "Moral and Political Perspectives: The Tensions of Choice", Educational Researcher, Vol. 27, No. 9, 1998, 18-20.5. Johnson, E. S., "College women's performance in math-science curriculum: A case study", College and Page 6.857.10

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Sheila A. O'Connor; Don Malzahn

al. Making Design Teams Work. in Frontiers in Education Conference. 1996. SaltLake City, UT.16. Carver, C.A., R.A. Howard, and W.D. Lane, Enhancing Student Learning Through HypermediaCourseware and Incorporation of Student Learning Styles. IEEE Transactions on Education, 1999. 42(1): p.33-38.17. Rasmussen, K.L. and G.E. Davidson-Shiver, Hypermedia and Learning Styles: Can PerformanceBe Influenced? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1998. 7(4): p. 291-308.18. Regan, M. and S. Sheppard, Interactive Multimedia Courseware and the Hands-on LearningExperience: An Assessment Study. Journal of Engineering Education, 1996. 85(2): p. 123-131.19. Dutson, A.J., et al., A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Vincent R. Capece; William E. Murphy; G. T. Lineberry; Bonita L. Lykins

from MIT in1982, and Ph.D. from Purdue University in 1987.WILLIAM E. MURPHYWilliam E. Murphy is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering with the University of Kentucky and Director of theEngineering Extended Campus Programs in Paducah. Dr. Murphy received his B.S. degree from the University ofKentucky and his M. S. and Ph.D. degrees from Purdue University, all in Mechanical Engineering. He is a member of theABET EAC and a past ABET Director representing ASHRAE. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in Kentucky.G.T. LINEBERRYG.T. Lineberry is Associate Dean for Extended Campus Programs and Professor of Mining Engineering with theUniversity of Kentucky. Dr. Lineberry received his BS and MS degrees from Virginia Tech and his PhD degree from

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Andrew N. Vavreck

responses was 16 for this question only. Page 5.275.19 BIBLIOGRAPHYNorton, Robert L. Design of Machinery with CD-ROM, Second Edition. McGraw-Hill, 1999.Wanket, Philip C. and Frank S. Oreovicz. Teaching Engineering. McGraw-Hill, 1993. DR. ANDREW N. VAVRECKDr. Vavreck teaches mechanical engineering, mechanical engineering technology, industrial engineeringtechnology and business administration courses. His research involves the application of electro- andmagnetorheological dampers to adaptive-passive vibration control. Dr. Vavreck earned B.S. (EngineeringScience), M.S. (Engineering Mechanics) and

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Robin H. Lovgren; Michael J. Racer; Anna P. Phillips

effort. In the last section, we provide someconclusions and identify our directions for the future.II. INSE - A Historical PerspectiveThis section discusses the evolution of the Industrial and Systems Engineering (INSE) Programat The University of Memphis from a graduate program to a combined undergraduate/graduateprogram. INSE began as a graduate program. In the early 1970’s, a group of industryrepresentatives approached the university expressing the need for a program to teach systemsengineering skills to people in industry who possessed technical knowledge in other areas.These local industries provided the first students as well as the adjunct faculty to teach thecourses. Thus, the connection to the "real world" was established at INSE’s

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Noellette Conway-Schempf; H. Scott Matthews; Francis C. McMichael; Chris Hendrickson

Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, pp. 273-278, May 1995.N. Conway-Schempf and L. Lave, 1996. Pollution Prevention Through Green Design. Pollution Prevention Review, Winter, 1995-1996, 11-20.T.E. Graedel and B.R. Allenby, “Industrial Ecology”, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 412pp, 1995.C. T. Hendrickson and F. C. McMichael, "Product Design for the Environment", Environmental Science & Technology, p. 844, Volume 26, No.5, 1992.C. T. Hendrickson, A. Horvath, S. Joshi and L. B. Lave, "Economic Input-Output Models for Environmental Life Cycle Assessment”, Environmental Science & Technology, pp. 184A- 191A, April 1998.C. Horney, "Integrating Environmental Costs

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Zheng-Tao Deng; Abdul R. Jalloh; Amir Mobasher; Ruben Rojas-Oviedo

we chose to startthe acronym with the letter S. The authors are confident that by teaching students how to learnit will help in their development of skills for life long learning. Page 5.337.6 Project in each Course (1-6)* Cross Comm. Team Teaching (1,2,5) (1-5) SEAARK Interdisciplinary Student Work (1,5

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Hrishikesh Potdar; Kurt Gramoll

Test for the Fundamentals of Engineering. ASEE conference 19992. McArthur David J., and Lewis Matthew W. - Untangling the Web. Rand Education, 19983. Mccright, John S. PC Week Online, ‘ Cisco Chambers: e-learning will help us control our destinies’4. Walter L., Smith J., Steadman J., White K., Engineering curriculum assessment – ‘ Using the fundamentals of engineering (FE) examination to assess academic programs.5. Potter, Merle C. Fundamentals in Engineering – FE/EIT A.M. and General P.M. Review, 7th Edition, 19986. Young, Donovan EIT Industrial Engineering Review for the FE exam, 19977. Musiciano C., and Kennedy B., HTML The definitive guide, Third Edition 1998.8. Macromedia Flash 3.0, Using Flash. First Edition, 1998.9. AmesA

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Suzanne E. Keilson; Randall Jones; Lester Coyle; Elliot King; Duane Shelton

renaissance of provenmethods, but one that exploits modern technology to make experience with the scientificmethod affordable and attractive to students and professors.What is new in the late 1990s is that rapid development of the Web has created an opportunity toprovide all students with involvement in the full range of pure and applied science methods in anaffordable and attractive manner. This project provides a focus on completing the full range oflearning of scientific methods by incorporation of real laboratory experience with the informationdelivered over the Web.Bibliography1. Rada, Roy, "Developing Educational Hypermedia: Coordination and Reuse," (Ablex Publishing: Norwood, NJ 1995)pp. 2-33.2. Beattie, K., C. McNaught and S Wills

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Charles V. Camp; Anna P. Phillips; Paul Palazolo

. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers, 249-263, 1987.8. Flower, L. Metacognition: A Strategic Response to Thinking. In The Construction of Negotiated Meaning. Southern Illinois University, 223-262, 1984.9. Kellogg, R.T. Strategies. In The Psychology of Writing. New York: Oxford University Press, 249-263, 1994.10. Odell, L. Teaching Writing by Teaching the Process of Discovery: an Interdisciplinary Enterprise. In L. Gregg and E. Steinberg (Eds.) Cognitive Processes in Writing, Hillsdale, NJ: LEA, 139-159, 1980.11. Hammons-Bryner, S. and Robinson, B. Excitement in Core Curriculum Classes. College Teaching, Vol. 42, 97-100, 1994.12. Engineering Criteria 2000, 3rd Edition, Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board for

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Mike Papadakis

hole. A smoking hole pre supposes a defectof some kind. I get to grade the papers, I do not have to take the test. “ I come to bury thewidget, not praise it”As a trial lawyer, I am going to try and persuade the jury made up of twelve nonengineers that there was a defect within the product or that some act of negligence doneby the defendant company caused the harm that befell my client. I will try to paint apicture in the juries mind ‘s eye that will indelibly mark your product defective as theresult of bad engineering. Do not allow that bad engineering to be yours.The law gives me two favorite ways to win for my client, while making your productliable for the accident.The first is through application of NEGLIGENCE LAW, The second is

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Molly M. Gribb; Elisabeth M. Alford

that came form your brainstorming session(s). • Continue your searching for information, and think about ease of manufacture along the Page 5.709.9 way...Design Project Assignment 3 Now that your team has identified design constraints and developed a weighted list ofdesign criteria, it is time to have a little fun! Each team member is to fabricate an edible car tobring to a team meeting. Teams will analyze the alternative designs according to their owndesign criteria. Based on these results, each team will determine the final design to be pursued. The written portion of this assignment is as follows. Prepare a table

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Ernest W. Tollner

. Soc. Agr. Engrs., St. Joseph, MI.Esteghlalian, A., B.P. Verma, T. Foutz and S. Thompson. 1999. A step-wise procedure for incorporating environmental and societal consideration into engineering design. ASAE Tech. Paper No 992257. Am. Soc. Agr. Engrs., St. Joseph, MI.Geisler, N.L. 1989. Christian ethics: options and issues. Baker Books, Grand Rapids, MI.Hare, R.M. 1952. The language of morals. Oxford University Press, London, England. (1991 edition is available also).Hitt, W.D. 1990. Ethics & leadership: Putting theory into practice. Battelle Press, Columbus, OH.Hitt, W.D. 1998. A global ethic: The leadership challenge, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH.Leopold, A., 1966. A sand county almanac. Ballantine, New York, NY.List

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Shirley Fleischmann

the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright  2001, American Society for Engineering EducationBibliography 1. Janet Eyler, Dwight E. Giles, Jr., Where’s the Learning in Service Learning?, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 1999 2. Edmund Sang (Editor), Projects that Matter – Concepts and Models for Service Learning in Engineering, AAHE (American Association for Higher Education) Series on Service Learning in the disciplines, published by AAHE, One DuPont Circle, Suite 360, Washington, D.C. 20036- 1110 3. Arthur Levine, Jeanette S. Cureton, When Hope and Fear Collide – A Portrait of Today’s College Student

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Ash Miller; Jeffrey Honchell

2 * 3.0 * 4.0133Step 7 – Calculate the input conductance of the patch fed on the edge corresponding to the feed line. (Note this equation is highly simplified, and well suited for practical purpose designs). G= l  [2π (h) / 100]2  2.3509 E −2  1 + = E −3 [ 1 + 2π (1.59 ) / 100 ]2   = 1.959 E −3 S 120 * 0.1

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Shari Kimmel; Fadi Deek; Howard Kimmel

Session 2793 Applying Problem-Solving Heuristics to a Freshman Engineering Course Shari J. Kimmel1, Fadi P. Deek2, Howard S. Kimmel2 1 Penn State Berks-Lehigh Valley College and Lehigh University 2 New Jersey Institute of TechnologyAbstractMany students enter undergraduate engineering programs lacking basic problem solving skills.We have adapted the problem solving heuristics originally used in a computer scienceenvironment to an introductory engineering class to help freshman engineering students

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

John Bourne

been on thefaculty since 1969. He also held the position of Professor of Management of Technologybetween 1991 and 1998. He is the Director of the Sloan Center for Online Education atOlin and Babson Colleges and is a Fellow of the IEEE and a Fellow of AIMBE.AcknowledgementsThe following faculty members of the Franklin W. Olin College of Engineeringcontributed to the materials in this paper. Their contributions and hard work as thefounding faculty of the Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering were essential to thecreation of materials in this paper.Hillary Thompson Berbeco, Ph.DDiana Dabby, Ph. DWoodie Flowers, Ph.D, Distinguished PartnerDaniel Frey, Ph.DStephen S. Holt, Ph.DDavid V. Kerns, Jr., Ph.D., P.E.Sherra E. Kerns, Ph.DRichard K. Miller

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Ingrid St. Omer

Session 2230Appendix A: Student SurveyEE 461 Technology SurveyMy Class is: Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior Graduate OtherSex: Male FemaleRacial/Ethnic Origin: African American Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Resident Alien Non-resident AlienAge:The grade I expect to receive is: A B C D F S UPercentage of classes I attended: 0-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-90% 90-100% Not applicablePercentage of classes for which I completed the assigned work or reading before class: 0-25% 25-50