AbstractThis paper demonstrates the design and implementation of an innovative gamified softwareapplication for learning human-spoken languages. The game serves as an interactive and enjoyablesupplement to aid the learning process of different languages for elementary-aged children. At its core,the application uses a translation Application Programming Interface (API) to process text and outputtranslations in the target language chosen by the learner. Additionally, it is AI-enabled, allowing theutilization of APIs such as OpenAIs’s ChatGPT to enhance the translation capabilities. Provided is abasic proof of concept that was developed as part of the Final Pi Project in the Intermediate ComputerProgramming (COSC 1352) course. The gamified program was
still be a good choice for the implementation of the functions. Furtherdiscussion and lessons about MicroPython-based microcontroller education will be continued in thefollowing sub-section. Discussions and Lessons about MicroPython-based Microcontroller educationCustom microcontroller applications could be built rapidly by using the MicroPython language. Userscan meet the required functions with a relatively low effort. As described, for instance, typicalfunctions such as serial communion, motor control, and servo control can be implemented usingMiroPython programs. Users who may seek a rapid prototype development environment ornon-commercial hobby projects can use boards that support a MicroPython language, and they cancomplete their
. Upon completion,However, the principles also apply to industry and research the user may click the “RESTORE SCREEN” button below theapplications where design parameters are required for Moody diagram to clear the graph window and all fields.optimization or pipe material selection. The new graphical If a user wishes to save their data for any reason, at anymethod allows for visualization of a previously abstract stage after all text fields are fixed, enter a name for the dataconcept, the primary goal for this project is to make a computer
Students recognize the potential of AI to makeapplied more practically within their curriculum. learning more efficient, improve educationalSuggestions included integrating AI into hands-on experiences, and provide hands-on applications that aretraining with tools like Building Information Modeling relevant to their future careers. However, there are(BIM) and machine learning for smarter design, significant concerns about AI's potential to diminishconstruction, and project management. This indicates a critical engineering skills such as problem-solving anddesire for AI applications that are directly relevant to analytical thinking. There is a strong call from
the clicker study where questions from the end-of-course evaluations did notreveal any apparent differences between the clicker and control classes2. The NSSE annualsurvey of freshmen and seniors asks students how often they have, for example, participated inprojects that required integrating ideas or information from various sources, used e-mail tocommunicate with an instructor, asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions,received prompt feedback from faculty on their academic performance, participated incommunity- based projects, or tutored or taught other students. The findings are used todetermine how successful a university is at engaging students4.Sometimes student feedback contradicts the results associated with
study situated in a dynamics course reported that most students found onlinelearning comparable to in-person learning for a course in spring 2020, notably taught by aninstructor who had prior experience in online teaching [18]. However, another study conductedin a project-based learning setting found that Grade 12 students’ performance while studyingelectronics deteriorated as instruction shifted from in-person to online during the pandemic [19].Individual factors that influenced students’ learning effectiveness during the pandemic includedtheir digital literacies, learning habits and behaviours, including self-directed learningcapabilities [14, 20]. Contextual influencing factors comprised teaching methods [17], student–student and instructor
advisors and Ph.D. student advisees at UMass Lowell. Previ- ously, Ha worked for eight years as the Program Manager of DifferenceMaker, a campus-wide student entrepreneurship initiative at UMass Lowell. There, she co-created and managed the Mentor program. Ha is also an adjunct faculty member at the Manning School of Business at UMass Lowell. Prior to join- ing UMass Lowell, Ha spent ten years working for The World Bank in Vietnam. In this role, she assisted small and medium enterprises in raising financial capital and acquiring technical consulting services. Ha also managed projects focused on capacity building for industry clusters. Ha holds a B.A. in English from Vietnam National University, an MBA from UMass Lowell
Paper ID #37206Strategies for Continuous Improvement in ETAC of ABET Programs: ANovelApproachProf. Ravi C. Manimaran, Department Chair, Engineering Technology, Austin Peay State University Ravi C. Manimaran is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Technology, Austin Peay State University. His education includes two Master of Science degrees in Electrical and Computer Engi- neering and Electronics and Control Engineering. He has been dynamically involved in higher education leadership as a Dean, Department Chair, Project Director, and a faculty member since 1997. He has served as the PI / Co-PI of multiple
that orbital debris is an issue, butconflict starts when deciding who should do what to solve the problem [16]. The lesson wasdesigned to introduce students to the exploration of macroethics without pushing them to a‘panic zone’ in which they would disengage and shut down [17]. Future lessons will build ontheir confidence by presenting more disputed topics.A table outlining the agenda of the 80-minute macroethics lesson is provided in Appendix A.While students walked into the classroom (a large lecture hall with stadium-like seating anddesks), we presented what we called the “hook.” We projected a paragraph-long issue brief on1 The authors note that they learned post-lesson and wish to help educate others that “stakeholders” is not
STEM [4]. So, although this research project applies to all UD faculty, engineering and relatedfaculty are disproportionately involved and impacted.UD has also been investing in improving departmental climates and diversity, equity, andinclusion on campus. As part of this work, in spring 2020, UD faculty participated in theCOACHE Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey. This survey, developed at the Harvard GraduateSchool of Education, measures faculty perceptions of various aspects of worklife. Despiteconducting the survey in spring 2020, a semester significantly disrupted by the COVID-19pandemic, UD’s survey response rate was 40%. COACHE determined that most responses werecollected before the disruption and performed a special analysis to determine
become a commonconcern in China's higher education sector, including the engineering education sector.At the same time, the reform of engineering education is also facing the problem oftilting heavily towards scientification and becoming more and more detached from"engineering" itself. The solution is to introduce the "The Idea of Large-ScaleEngineering", so that engineering education in China can return to engineering [28 .In January 2000, the Ministry of Education (MOE) approved the first batch of 670projects for undergraduate education teaching reform. The aim of the project is to adaptto the needs of China's modernization in the new century, to cultivate high-qualitytalents with innovative spirit, practical ability and entrepreneurial spirit
-year program variants, across participants of differentacademic backgrounds, and, eventually, between participants and non-participant comparisongroups. We expect to report on comparative longitudinal findings in future publications. The presentstudy, meanwhile, focuses on an initial alumni survey that was deployed to existing programgraduates across all graduation years for purposes of establishing a baseline alumni characterization.MethodsThe alumni survey conducted for this paper was hosted in Qualtrics XM online survey software.Since this survey is one component of the larger GEL longitudinal assessment, it is incorporatedinto the same Qualtrics project as all other survey components. We established one common surveylanding webpage to
Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment at Arizona State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Flipping the classroom to create a student-centered learning environment in three undergraduate civil engineering coursesA flipped classroom is no longer a novel idea, but engineering education has lagged in implementing thisnon-traditional course delivery method. Traditional engineering courses are typically offered in aninstructor-centered environment which impacts everything from content delivery to student engagementand learning. A decade ago, we initiated a major project in curriculum reform that included flipping threesecond-year civil engineering courses
, use Facebook [39]. Students believe Facebook can be effectively used as an onlinelearning environment [7].Instagram: Instagram has over 800 million users, with one-third being students, making it asuitable platform for learning [40]. It offers a visually stimulating platform for sharing anddiscovering content, engaging students' attention, and promoting their creativity. Students canshowcase their work, share ideas, and connect with professionals in their field. Instagramfeatures live videos, stories, and hashtags, which can be used to host live events, tutorials, anddiscussions around specific topics or interests. Studies show that Instagram can enhance students'learning process through visual aids, improve writing skills, aid in project
design,especially during the front-end of design processes. The development of design observation skills forengineering students presents challenges, however, including the effort required to reachrepresentative observation sites and the uncertainty involved in real-world design environments.Students have often struggled to demonstrate recommended practices in sociotechnical designactivities such as observation, yet may need observation skills during design project opportunitiesincluding curricular and co-curricular design projects. In addition, skills development may beespecially challenging and critical when design environments are difficult to access, such as those insensitive or remote locations. Therefore, this study explored the efficacy
of physics, Yang, Baek, and Swanson (2020)used a project-based learning approach to integrate components of CT in eight lessons onairplane design to learn about physical forces in a class of 6th graders. The pre-post results oftheir study show that students’ CT skills improved significantly after the course. In a follow-upstudy (Yang et al., 2021), similar gains are reported in design-based projects that integrate CTbased activities into a science context (investigating life on Mars) and an engineering context(designing earthquake resistant bridges). Student thinking in both cases is scaffolded by aproblem-solving process and connections are made to CT at each point in the process.Increasingly, K-12 education has recognized the importance of
career outcomes [10]. In addition, capstone courses arenow explicitly promoting entrepreneurial versions of the course; while many capstone projects aredefined by industry partners and sponsors or sometimes academic projects, courses are now beingpiloted that specifically cater to the needs of students who want to discover and work on their ownideas [11].Entrepreneurially infused educational opportunities are also catching on with some vigor in designcourses before senior year. These cornerstone experiences were developed for first and secondyear engineering students based on the known impacts of design on self-efficacy and persistencewithin engineering through the formation of an engineering identity [5]. Existing frameworks, suchas the
enough toprepare ALL children to become wise decision-making citizens, who can evaluate the situation,find the flaw in the system and suggest ways to improve the system or redesign the system. Sincethese skills can be promoted by engineering design projects [1][4][5][6][7] providingengineering design opportunities for ALL children, regardless of their abilities and backgrounds,is necessary.Inclusive Engineering EducationHaving inclusive engineering education is not a new effort. Many researchers and educators havebeen taking actions to diversify engineering education. In a systematic literature review, Hynesand colleagues [8] reported that the word “diversity” was one of the most frequent words in theword count they conducted on studies
Thinking in Engineering EducationAbstractThis research paper provides a case study of a large Engineering Science program, with aparticular focus on perceptions and practices related to first principles thinking from alumni,faculty and students. As part of a broader project designed to realign program goals, practicesand outcomes, this study included semi-structured interviews and focus groups, designed tounderstand how program stakeholders conceptualize first principles thinking, and how theyperceive the benefits or utility of such an approach.Through the historical analysis of the engineering curriculum, a key tension identified is thefocus on foundational mathematics and science, which is contrasted with a focus on professionalpractice and the
students, and non-engineeringprofessionals [5]. Our first-year engineering students are using the results of the survey as a toolto compare and contrast how different users (i.e. differences in age, gender, education, etc.)interpret displays and controls. These comparisons are composed in short reflections by theengineering students to facilitate discussions of social, cultural, and educational design biases.Introducing the discussion of inclusivity in design can be accomplished in many ways. We areproposing the use of a compatibility survey and reflection to drive unit discussions. Some otherapproaches to this quandary include course development, gamification, and design projects. ThePicker Engineering Program at Smith College has created the
Converged Platform Power Thermal Throttling Specification that maximizes re-usability across CPU generations and computing segments. She was the recipient of 20+ Intel Corporation awards for contributions to major product and industry initiatives. She is a member of ASEE.Prof. Branimir Pejcinovic, Portland State University Branimir Pejcinovic received his Ph.D. degree from University of Massachusetts, Amherst. He is a Pro- fessor and former Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education at Portland State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering department. He has led department-wide changes in curriculum with emphasis on the project- and lab-based instruction and learning. He was awarded the best paper award by the ECE
. Derrick James Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno Derrick Satterfield is a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on engineering graduate students’ experiences and motivation centered on career planning and preparation.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of studenDr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University
. Having an understanding of what contributes to barriers to belongingness has helpedinform the scope and data analysis of this project. In summary, the three barriers to belongingdiscussed were faculty interaction with women students, negative interactions with men-identifying peers, and stereotype threat.Research Statement While the literature abounds with studies evaluating the impact of varying REU programson student participants, less attention has been placed on evaluating specifically the experiencesof women REU participants. It is important to ensure that these experiences are inclusive andcontribute to positive experiences for all students, including women students. The researchquestions for this study seek to investigate: (1) How
engagement projects, evaluation tools and tech- nology, and gender issues in STEM education. https://orcid.org/0000- 0002-0383-0179Prof. Marcela Silva, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile Marcela Silva is the Academic Director at the Engineering Faculty of the Andres Bello University in Campus Santiago. She works as a teacher in the Construction Engineering career and supports innovation and entrepreneurship courses. She obtained a BacheloDr. Carolina Alvarado, California State University, Chico Dr. Alvarado is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Science Education at California State University, Chico. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Engineering Physics and a doctorate in Physics Education from
Psychology, vol. 52, no. 2,p. 196, 2005.[48] J. S. Bruner, The Process of Education. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1960.[49] D. DiBiasio, L. Comparini, A. G. Dixon, and W. M. Clark, “A project-based spiralcurriculum for introductory courses in ChE: III. Evaluation,” Chemical Engineering Education,vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 140–146, 2001.[50] Lohani, Vinod K, M. L. Wolfe, T. Wildman, K. Mallikarjunan, and J. Connor,“Reformulating general engineering and biological systems engineering programs at VirginiaTech,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 4, p. n4, 2011.[51] S. Vemuru, S. Khorbotly, and F. Hassan, “A spiral learning approach to hardwaredescription languages,” in 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems(ISCAS
projects. Tasks RC, SI Offer to Help Others Newcomers seek opportunities to help and/or emotionally or technically support their coworkers and offer to help. RC Attempt Task Newcomers try to solve their work problems or assignments on their own. Independently RC Suggest Team Newcomers suggest establishing a new team or modifying the existing Modification team. TM, SI Have Good Work Newcomers try to be professional, respect coworkers, work hard, do high- Ethics quality work, and finish tasks on time. TM Self-Study
sources were part of a larger research project with the researchethics protocol approved by the Canadian university.In the survey, instructors were asked about the changes in their teaching practices and theirprofessional development activities from 2020 to 2022; their perceptions of certain teachingpractices in terms of teaching effectiveness; and their views on how to move forward. Theresponse rate of the instructor survey was 20%, based on the completed 81 responses. Of the 81instructors who completed the survey, 64% were tenure-stream faculty members, and 36% wereteaching-stream faculty members or sessional instructors. The respondents had varying lengthsof teaching experience, with 43% having taught more than 20 years, 29% having 11 to 20
engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Dr. Benjamin David Lutz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Ben D. Lutz is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Design at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. He is the leader of the Critical Research in Engineering and Technology Education (CREATE) group at Cal Poly. His research interests include critical pedagogies; efforts for diversity, equity, and inclusion in engineering, engineering design theory and practice; conceptual change and understanding; and school- to-work transitions for new engineers
belonging inmathematics classrooms? The PLC was part of a larger NSF-funded project entitled Student Engagement inMathematics through an Institutional Network for Active Learning (SEMINAL). The project is a5-year initiative examining departmental change efforts to infuse active learning teachingstrategies into precalculus and calculus courses. During the outset of this project, it becameapparent that although departments were concerned with issues of equity and inclusion, mostdepartment members communicated that they needed additional support engaging with thesetopics. As such, we developed a professional learning community (PLC) and invited instructorsfrom nine universities to participate in a year-long series exploring issues of equity
stereotyped groups, we tested theimpacts of four different social markers instructors might share with their students: gender, race,sexual identity, and First-Generation College Student status (FGCS). Data from this study comesfrom student survey responses (n=19,191) on the Student Post-Secondary Instructional PracticesSurvey as part of the NSF-funded Progress Through Calculus project, which examined studentreports of introductory mathematics programs across the United States. We analyzed the datausing a cumulative link mixed model on the survey items related to instructional practice,academic performance, and affective beliefs to determine which items exhibited a minoritizedrole model effect. Out of the 58 survey items, 25 items exhibited a