and research interests include solid mechanics, engineering design, and inquiry-guided learning. He has supervised undergraduate and master’s student research projects and capstone design teams.Dr. Aleya Dhanji, Highline Community College Physics faculty at Highline College with research interests in culturally responsive STEM education, inclusive advising and mentoring practices, and antiracist faculty development.Kira Glynn KingDr. Jie Sheng, University of Washington Jie Sheng received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 2002 from the University of Alberta, Canada. Since then, she has been an NSERC Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (2003-2004); a lecturer at the University of
Paper ID #26505Predictors of Engineering Doctoral Students’ Future Career SectorMs. Maya Denton, University of Texas, Austin Maya Denton is a STEM Education doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant in the Center for Engineering Education at the University of Texas at Austin. She received her B.S. in Chemical Engineer- ing from Purdue University. Prior to attending UT, she worked as a chemical engineer for an industrial gas company.Mr. Nathan Hyungsok Choe, University of Texas, Austin Nathan (Hyungsok) Choe is a doctoral student in STEM education at UT Austin. His research focuses on the development of
Paper ID #43095Board 339: NSF S-STEM: Educating Engineering Undergraduates to be IntrapreneursDr. Tim Dallas, Texas Tech University Tim Dallas is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Texas Tech University. Dr. Dallas’ research includes developing educational technologies, Microelectromechanical Systems, solar energy collection, and Unmanned Aircraft Systems.Dr. Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Nanyang Technological University Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, PhD, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at Texas Tech University, as well as the Associate Chair of the department
social engagement analysis in hashtag campaigns where he investigates the factors affecting retweetability and information diffusion in such contexts.Mr. Rajat Handa Graduate Student in Data Analytics Engineering at George Mason University with an interest in Machine Learning, NLP and social media analytics.Dr. Hemant Purohit, George Mason University Dr. Purohit is an assistant professor in the department of Information Sciences and Technology at George Mason University, USA. His research interest is to study human behavior from the unstructured Web data via an interdisciplinary approach of Computer and Psychological Sciences using social computing and natural language understanding methods
Maryland. He also holds an MA in Experimental Psychology from S.U.N.Y at Geneseo, and a B.S. from S.U.N.Y.at Brockport where he majored in psychology and business administration.Dr. Susan Pruet, STEMWorks, LLC Dr. Susan Pruet has been actively involved in STEM education for over 30 years – as a teacher, teacher educator and director of reform initiatives. Since 1998 she has directed two STEM reform initiatives for the Mobile Area Education Foundation (MAEF): the Maysville/Mobile Mathematics Initiative and, most recently, Engaging Youth through Engineering (EYE), a K-12 workforce development and STEM initiative in Mobile, Alabama. Both initiatives, funded largely through NSF grants, involve valuable partnerships with the
activeness of the system. Since the system isaimed at controlling an embedded system which is Lego Mindstrom EV3, hence for avoidingsynchronization problem with Android platform in terms of programming, LeJOS EV3 API isused. It facilitates to program the whole system using Java without the integration of any otherprogramming environment. Immediately after the implementation of the system, it is tested forits functional validity and programming correctness. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 2016 ASEE Southeast Section ConferenceAs aforementioned and as mapped in the system architecture, each component of the overalllifecycle of the system implementation can be applied in
students detect inconsistencies in theirargumentations. Tested PSLEs favored the development of students’ ability to argue throughoutthe curriculum. Very important differences (occurrence and quality) concerning argumentationamong individual students from the same semester were detected by means of qualitative dataanalyses, mainly with regards to adequacy of premises, organization of arguments, and quality ofclaims. Our results validate that argumentation is an essential skill in learning to solve studied Page 26.234.2food engineering problems as well as a powerful method for assessing problem-solving abilityfor both ill-structured and well
Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, and accessibility and assistive-technology.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the
, University of California, San Diego Marko V. Lubarda is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of California, San Diego. He teaches mechanics, materials science, design, computational analysis, and engineering mathematics courses, and has co-authored the undergraduate textbook Intermediate Solid Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2020). He is dedicated to engi- neering pedagogy and enriching students’ learning experiences through teaching innovations, curriculum design, and support of undergraduate student research.Dr. Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego Saharnaz Baghdadchi is an Assistant Teaching Professor at UC San Diego. She
reported directly to multiple VPs of Global Product Management and was responsible for a variety of products Profit and Loss that worth USD $550M. He worked over 20 industrial sectors from 80+ U.S. and global facilities. Achieved over $100M in savings for multiple LSS Enterprise CI programs. Dr. Fong graduated with his MSME and PhD from Virginia Tech. He obtained his BSME from U. of Texas-Arlington. He is an IISE Fellow, a Registered P.E. (Virginia), a ASQ-Certified Quality Engineer, a Certified Six Sigma Black Belt (Caterpillar), and a DFSS-Master Black Belt (GE Healthcare).Dr. Patrick Brunese, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Patrick A. Brunese is the Assistant Head of the School of Industrial Engineering at
sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Chris Swan, Tufts University Chris Swan is the Associate Dean of Undergraduate Curriculum Development in the School of Engineer- ing and an associate professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Tufts University. He has additional appointments in the Department of Education, Jonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service and Center for Engineering Education and Outreach at Tufts. His current engineering education research interests focus on learning through service-based
a designated recorder, notetaker, andinterviewer. After the interview/focus groups were completed, all materials were transcribed foranalysis. Such interview/focus group protocols were used to provide valuable experience for theMercer University students participating in the MOM Belize Program, as well as obtainsufficient amounts of data during the short study period.The faculty and staff interviews included questions related to an understanding of personal andprofessional backgrounds of the interviewees, student outcomes and success, curriculum andinstitutional development, preparation and challenges, transferability and global opportunities,and collaboration and future vision. The student focus groups included questions related to
microcredential fits within the department's curriculum and integrates with other courses and programs offered by the department. Additionally, the departmental review allows faculty members to collaborate, allowing them to share their expertise and contribute to the development of a high-quality microcredential.(b). College Review: College review is critical to ensure that the college can commit to the necessary resources and requirements needed for the microcredential course. This includes allocating funding for course development, instructor compensation, and ongoing support for the course. The review also provides an opportunity for collaboration among departments and cross-disciplinary input, allowing for a more well
teaching, and a similar outcome was shown in the design report evaluationtest which evaluates critical thinking. The design report evaluation test reported positive resultsfor MEA online courses [24].Study 2Another study by Chatterjee et al. (2016) [21] investigates the design of an asynchronous onlineengineering classroom, focusing specifically on cognitive radio networks. A prominent feature ofthe course design is the emphasis on various assessment methods, including asynchronous onlinediscussions, virtual labs, open-ended module assignments, and a final project. Central to thisapproach is the integration of feedback mechanisms within these assessment methods [21]. Theeducational strategies in this study stray away from the traditional
researched by Becker (2010).4A summary of his surveys indicates that the greatest disparity is found in four categories:1) hands-on know how; 2) methods, systems know how; 3) ability to work in teams; and4) communication skills. The ETIC was created to address these gaps while responding tothe regional economy’s requirements for well-qualified workers. By having direct accessto industry, students benefit from real-life experiential activities while gaining thefoundational skills necessary to their integration into the workforce.Progress to-dateSince the launch of the Entrepreneurship and Technology Innovation Center (ETIC) inMarch 2015, the School has put into action a strategic plan to nurture an entrepreneurialecosystem at the new facility. All
seek to create an infrastructure that would eliminate disabling barriers,and work with stakeholders historically impacted but often ignored. Integrating a social justicemindset in engineering would normalize universal design while reducing the social acceptabilityfor “unforeseen” consequences.” This group subsequently convened bi-weekly with the aim ofcollaboratively developing a series of comprehensive lessons that could be shared with the largerCIT-E community of practice and would follow the established CIT-E lesson template.Motivated by the literature mentioned previously, the group decided to focus on the use of casestudies of past and current infrastructure projects that resulted in social inequities as a vehicle.Case studies have been
National Science Foundations Advanced Technological Education (NSF-ATE) as a Regional Center of Excellence. FLATE’s mission is to support manufacturing education in K-14 programs through outreach, professional development, curriculum reform and technician research. She earned a Ph.D. in Civil En- gineering/Environmental from the University of South Florida and served on the Engineering faculty at Hofstra University and the FSU-FAMU College of Engineering. Dr. Barger has authored over 50 papers for presentations on engineering and technology education, serves on several national advisory boards for CTE and workforce education initiatives, and is a Fellow of the American Society of Engineering Edu- cation (ASEE) and the
Paper ID #11396Synthesis of Engineering Undergraduate Students’ Out of Class InvolvementMs. Rongrong Yu, Virginia Tech Rongrong Yu is a PhD student at the Educational Research and Evaluation Program in School of Education at Virginia Tech. She holds a B.S. degree in psychology and a M.Ed. degree in educational psychology. Her research interests include K-12 student mathematics and science achievement, STEM and gender, and co-curricular involvement.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons PE, Virginia Tech Dr. Denise R. Simmons, PE, is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction and in Civil &
. L., Olsen, P. E., Nwogbaga, A. P., and S. Stotts, "Integrative approach for a transformative freshman-level STEM curriculum," Journal of College Teaching and Learning, vol. 13, 2016.11. Wilson, Z. S., Holmes, L., Sylvain, M., Batiste, L., Johnson, M., McGuire, S., Pang, S. and I. Warner. "Hierarchical mentoring: A transformative strategy for improving diversity and retention in undergraduate STEM disciplines," Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 21, p.p. 148-156, 2012.12. Gilmer, T. "An understanding of the improved grades, retention and graduation rates of STEM majors at the Academic Investment in Math and Science (AIMS) Program of Bowling Green State University (BGSU)," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8
, no. 1, p. 189, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1057/s41599-021-00871-1.[8] G. Bixler, J. Campbell, R. Dzwonczyk, H. L. Greene, J. Merrill, and K. M. Passino, “Humanitarian Engineering at The Ohio State University: Lessons Learned in Enriching Education While Helping People,” IJSLE, pp. 78–96, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.24908/ijsle.v0i0.5545.[9] K. Conroy and P. Sours, “Engagement in Practice: Better preparing students for community-engaged engineering by restructuring an academic program, minor, and curriculum,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, 2023.[10] A. Parkinson, J. Harb, and S. Magleby, “Developing Global Competence In Engineers: What Does It Mean? What Is Most Important?,” in 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
, 2008, doi: 10.1002/cc.[62] G. M. Mooney and D. J. Foley, “Community College: Playing an Important Role in the Education of Science, Engineering, and Health Graduates,” 2011.[63] S. Olson and J. B. Labov, Community colleges in the evolving STEM education landscape: Summary of a summit. 2012.[64] S. R. Jones and M. K. Mcewen, “A Conceptual Model of Multiple Dimensions of Identity,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 405–414, 2000, doi: 10.1353/csd.2007.0000.[65] M. L. Miville, P. Darlington, B. Whitlock, and T. Mulligan, “Integrating Identities: The Relationships of Racial, Gender, and Ego Identities Among White College Students,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 157–175, 2005, doi
-hole modular totalizer tables and onecalibrated scale that are now in routine daily use. The participation was truly multidisciplinary,with 64% of the students coming from an engineering curriculum (EE, Computer E, MechE,AeroE or ChemE), 25% from Biology or Biomolecular Science and the rest from elsewhere inthe University or on exchange. A high school senior, whose participation was required by EPICSin IEEE funding, received full college credit for the course.The course’s didactic goals were to 1) introduce students to the disability field and the concept ofsupported employment through their own research and by visits to the recycling centers; 2) intro-duce by hands-on experiences college and high school students of varied backgrounds to
), and HBCUs (Gasmanand Nguyen, 2014, Toldson 2018, and Toldson, 2019) represent a unique venue through which toreach a large population of such students. This research focused on increasing retention rates andimproving academic and career success in the STEM disciplines at an open-enrollment HBCUthrough a hands-on and mentorship-focused research program. We have utilized the “ScientificVillage” model, where students interacted as peers assisting, encouraging, holding each otheraccountable, and interacted with faculty mentors. Incorporating hands-on research furtherstimulated and engaged students to enhance interest in STEM curriculum and careers. This was avoluntary, three-year, mixed-method, hands-on research program that tracked a cohort of
expand the number of students who can benefit from conducting research as the designprojects are embedded directly into the curriculum and are taken by all students in the program.Undergraduate research has been shown to help students take ownership of their own learningand helps them to see the real-world relevance of research as they learn problem-solving skills[1 – 3]. Inquiry-based projects are beneficial because they require a significant investment ofstudent time and effort over an extended period with frequent constructive feedback from facultyand regular opportunities for reflection [4, 5]. This paper addresses the process of developmentof performance indicators and presents the results of assessment and evaluation of both ETACABET and
design functionality of the project's robot for detectingupcoming events in terms of encountering objects, platform openings, or extreme tilting in itspath that may cause harm if current trajectory is further continued. When such obstacles aredetected, the vehicle’s programming instructs it to cease movement, back-up as necessary, andoverride and disregard the user’s instruction that would point it toward harm’s way. Where adirected path is deemed hospitable, the vehicle follows the preprogramed instructionunconditionally. The vehicle utilizes a Parallax Boe-Bot kit[1] chassis while the information processing andmovement program is run through an Arduino Mega board; these separate components are joinedvia a fiberglass platform which also
Paper ID #18624Getting ”There”: Understanding How Innovation and Entrepreneurship Be-come Part of Engineering EducationMrs. Elizabeth Nilsen, Purdue University Liz Nilsen is a Senior Program Director at the Purdue Agile Strategy Lab, helping nurture change efforts in engineering education, innovation, and beyond. Previously, she was a Senior Program Officer at Ven- tureWell, where she co-developed and co-led the Epicenter Pathways to Innovation initiative, an effort to engage with a cohort of colleges and universities to fully embed innovation and entrepreneurship in under- graduate engineering education. Her experience
Paper ID #32918A Sojourn of Engineering Identity Conflict: Exploring IdentityInterference Through a Performative LensDr. Cole Hatfield Joslyn, University of Texas at El Paso Cole Joslyn is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education and Lead- ership at The University of Texas at El Paso. His research emphasizes humanizing engineering education, particularly 1) increasing Latinx students’ sense of belonging in engineering by a) integrating holistic, socio-culturally responsive practices and Latinx cultural assets and values into educational success strate- gies, and b) understanding how
Paper ID #44003Latino/a/x Engineering Students and Nepantla: A Multi-Case Study withinthe US SouthwestDr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an Associate Professor with joint appointment in the Department of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering and the Department of Bicultural-Bilingual Studies at The University of Texas at San Antonio. His research has contributed to the integration of critical theoretical frameworks in engineering education to investigate deficit ideologies and their impact on minoritized communities, particularly Mexican Americans
. 241–263, 2011.[2] M. Laugerman, D. Rover, S. Mickelson, M. Shelly, “The Middle Years in Engineering: An Effective Transfer Partnership Drives Student Success in STEM,” Advances in Engineering Education, 2019 [Online], Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1236915.[3] L. Smith-Doerr, S.N. Alegria, T. Sacco, “How diversity matters in the US science and engineering workforce: A critical review considering integration in teams, fields, and organizational contexts.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, Vol. 3, pp. 139-153, 2017[4] Y.L. Zhang and T. Ozuna, “Pathways to engineering: The validation experiences of transfer students,” Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 39, no
-engineers. Different perspectives and teaching approachesfor ESI were evident among these groups, and this range of experiences could ultimatelyenhance students’ ethical reasoning abilities, impact their attitudes, and effect their behaviors.It appears that one could not expect to achieve adequate education on ESI within a single course.A single course simply cannot cover the breadth of important microethics and macroethics topicsand reach reasonable levels of cognitive and affective depth. Integrating ESI across a range ofcourses in a deliberate manner can reinforce and build on ideas. Including ESI across thecurriculum has been advocated as an effective way to foster ethical development in an alreadydense technical curriculum [23, 24]. One