Conference Session

Workshop, Program, and Toolkit Results

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

David Devine

Session 2745 ExCEEd Impact on a New Professor David P. Devine Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne Abstract The purpose of this paper is to present quantitative information and qualitative remarks regarding the impact of the ExCEEd Teaching Workshop (ETW) on an assistant professor of civil engineering technology at a regional campus of a large state university system in the Midwest. The participant attended the ETW during the summer between the first and second years of a tenure eligible appointment. Features of the ETW were adapted to the participant ’s teaching immediately

Conference Session

Teaching Software Engineering Process

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Larry Young; John Fernandez

, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 2002.15. Pressman, Roger S., Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, Sixth Edition, McGraw-Hill,New York, NY, 2005.16. Seffah, Ahmed, Learning the ropes: Human –Centered design skills and patterns for softwareengineers’ education, Interactions, Sep-Oct 2003, pp. 36-45.17. Seffah, Ahmed & Andreevskaia, Alina, Empowering software engineers in human-centered design,Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE ’03), 3-10 May 2003, p653-658. Retrieved from www.ieeexplore.ieee.org on December 13, 2004.18. Seffah, Ahmed & Metzker, Eduard, The obstacles and myths of usability and software engineering,Communications of the ACM, 47, 12, December 2004, pp. 71-76

Conference Session

Design and the Community

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Angela Bielefeldt

over the past 7years that are not adequately captured in the various formal surveys that have been distributed.These impressions are based on informal discussions with current students, former students,mentors, and other faculty. I have included these ideas where relevant in the results section.Results: Mentor Motivation and SatisfactionThere were notable differences in the motivation of the mentors. Because the surveys werereturned by the key person(s) sponsoring and serving as a client for each project, thesedifferences are important. Results are summarized in Table 3 below. The main motivation forthe University representatives was to use the outcome from the student work. For the consultantsand the facilitator, enhancing student learning

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Frontiers

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Ahmet Zeytinci; Philip Brach

the determination of cost isusually straightforward. However, determining the monetary value of benefits is quite varied andoftentimes difficult.The history of determining a monetary benefit from engineering improvements dates back to1930’s. For example, the benefit derived from the construction of a dam to provide flood controlcan be easily identified in monetary terms (value of property and goods lost due to flooding).When a dam is constructed for flood control there are incremental aspects of the project, such asmeans for hydro-electric power generation and recreational facilities on the impounded lake. Thedetermination of the monetary value of the hydro-electric power is rather straightforward, butmonetary quantification of the benefit

Conference Session

Design and Computation in ChE Courses

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Michael Elly; Mordechai Shacham; Michael Cutlip

environment. This may very well represent the nextparadigm shift in Chemical Engineering education.Bibliography(1) Cutlip, M. B. and M. Shacham, Problem Solving in Chemical Engineering with Numerical Methods, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1998.(2) Fogler H. S., “An Appetizing Structure of Chemical Reaction Engineering for Undergraduates”, Chem. Eng. Ed., 27(2), 110(1993).(3) Sandall, O. C., "Theoretical Maximum Flame Temperature", pp. 166-179 in Henley, E. J. (Ed). "Computer Programs for Chemical Engineering Education – Stoichiometry", CACHE Corp., Houston, Tx. (1972).Biography of the AuthorsMICHAEL B. CUTLIP is professor emeritus of the Chemical Engineering Dept. at the University of Connecticutand has served as department head and

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade for Teaching II

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

June Marshall; John Marshall

is stressed. He states, “We need to stop worrying about “good”teaching and start worrying about how the learning experience for our students can beimproved.” As educators, we need to utilize the above-identified techniques and tips toensure the very best learning experiences for our students.Bibliographic InformationAlbanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomesand Implementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.Angelo, T.A., (2001). Classroom Assessment: Guidelines for Success. In “Teaching Excellence”. Center forTeaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 12, No 4, 2000-2001.Bennett, J.B., (2001). Teaching With Hospitality. In “Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching

Conference Session

Innovation in Curriculum Development

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Susan Coleman; Hisham Alnajjar; Hesham Elsaghir; Alan Hadad; Donald Leone

Grade s Base d on 100% Figure 2 Comparing results with the traditional course taught in Fall 2002 in Table 1, it can beseen that although the averages are similar. the term project average is 11.5 points lower. In2002, all the technical work on the term project was done in the GIS lab under the tutelage of theinstructor. The reports were written up outside the lab. This hands-on-support and personalassistance needs to be replicated in the distance learning version. Page 10.969.8

Conference Session

Outstanding Contributions - Mechanical Engineering Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Goodarz Ahmadi, Clarkson University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

specifically with glucose, the concentration of glucose can be measuredindependently of the presence of other sugars that are quite chemically similar. As forindustrial catalysis, practical sensor applications require that enzymes and receptorproteins be immobilized onto a solid surface. The chemical scheme most commonlyemployed on the laboratory scale involves the use of Au-S self-assembly chemistry. Thisallows both direct immobilization of proteins that contain cysteine residues, and indirectattachment of proteins to surfaces through linker chemistries. As will also be discussed,protein immobilization can also be made directly onto Si for integration into MEMS

Conference Session

Online and Web-based Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amelito Enriquez, Canada College

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

) your primary reason(s) for taking this class online? Schedule conflict with regular class 12 57.1% Convenience 12 57.1% Commute (I live far from Cañada College) 8 38.1% I prefer online over face-to-face 3 14.3% Other Reasons 6 28.6%Would you have been able to take this course if it were not online? Yes 5 23.8% No

Conference Session

Thermodynamics, Fluids, and Heat Transfer II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Maixner, United States Air Force Academy; William Parker, Air Force Research Laboratories

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

, Stillwater OK[chapter 5].4 Solar Position Calculator, University of Oregon Solar Radiation Monitoring Laboratory http://solardat.uoregon.edu/SolarPositionCalculator.html Revision dated 6 Mar 2009.5 Palyvos, J.A., 2008, “A Survey of Wind Convection Coeficient Correlations for Building Envelope EnergySystems’ Modeling”, Applied Thermal Engineering, v.28, pp. 801–808.Incropera, F. P., D. P. DeWitt, T. L. Bergman, and A. S. Lavine. 2007. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. John6Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ. Page 15.358.13

Conference Session

Measurement Tools

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Carberry, Tufts University; Matthew Ohland, Purdue University; Chris Swan, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

physics. American Journal of Physics, 1998. 66(3): p. 212-224.27. Stathopoulou, C. and S. Vosniadou, Exploring the relationship between physics-related epistemological beliefs and physics understanding. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2007. 32(3): p. 255-281.28. White, B., et al., The epistemological beliefs assessment for physical science, in American Education Research Association. 1999: Montreal.29. Vincenti, W.G., What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. 1990, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.30. Loverde, L., Science & engineering, philosophy and common sense. Ingenierias, 1998. 1(2): p. 24-31.31. Pajares, F., J. Hartley, and G. Valiante, Response format in

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luis Godoy, University of Puerto Rico; Pedro Covassi, National University of Cordoba (Argentina)

. Page 15.569.10References[1] Ahmed, S., K.M. Wallace and L.T.M. Blessing, “Understanding the differences between how novices andexperienced designers approach design tasks”, J. Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 14(1), pp. 1-11, 2003.[2] Petroski, H., Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgment in Engineering, CambridgeUniversity Press, 1994.[3] Delatte, N., Beyond Failure: Forensic case studies for civil engineers, ASCE Press, Reston, VA, 2009.[4] Kolodner, J., Case-based Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1993.[5] Gonzalez, A. J. and D. D. Dankel, The Engineering of Knowledge-Based Systems: Theory and practice,Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993.[6] Godoy, L. A., “Interviews with experts, in which they explain how

Conference Session

Capstone and Senior Design in Engineering Technology: Part I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vladimir Genis, Drexel University; William Danley, Drexel University; Warren Rosen, Drexel University; Shawn Racz, Lockheed Martin, Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

isconsistent with ABET accreditation requirements.1 The analysis of the performance resultsgenerated from capstone course sequence is an integral part of the continuous qualityimprovement for the AET Program. This analysis allows AET faculty members to provideevidence of the effectiveness of the developed processes and quality of the program. Thisanalysis justifies necessary changes to keep the program relevant to the university andcommunity.Bibliography 1. 2008 – 2009 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, ABET Inc., 2008. 2. V. Genis. Senior Design Project in Biomedical Engineering Education. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, pp. 1-9, 2007. 3. William S. Janna and John I. Hochstein. An assessment process for a capstone

Conference Session

Student Learning and Assessment

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas Harlow, Western Kentucky University; Robert Choate, Western Kentucky University; H. Joel Lenoir, Western Kentucky University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Page 15.570.13 Rating, AMCA and ASHRAE.7. Nagyszalanczy, S., 2002, Woodshop Dust Control, Taunton Press, Newtown, CT.

Conference Session

Critical Issues in IT and IET: Focus Group

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gabriel Harley, IUPUI; Daniel Baldwin, IUPUI; Wanda Worley, IUPUI; Tresler Thurston, IUPUI; Stephen Hundley, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

listing a number of “engagement or involvement factors”developed from their own experiences as well as those gleaned from the National Survey ofStudent Engagement. These factors include obviously classroom-related items such as “Activeand Collaborative Learning” activities, “Time-on-Task,” and “Course-Related Interactions withFaculty.” Less obvious factors, however, are also listed. These include “Out-of-ClassRelationships with Faculty,” “Quality of Campus Relationships,” and even “Use of InformationTechnology.”9 Engagement, then, can be said to be an amalgamation of a number of elements,constituting both the intellectual and social connections students make with course materials aswell as the environment(s) in which the materials are

Conference Session

ADVANCE Grants and Institutional Transformation

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Elizabeth Birmingham, North Dakota State University; Ann Burnett, North Dakota State University; Roger Green, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

/web/20080130023006/http://www.president.harvard.edu/speeches/2005/nber.html . (accessed March 19, 2010).13. Collins, P.H. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge, 2000.14. Britton, D. “The epistemology of the gendered organization.” Gender and Society, 14(2000): 418-434.15. Rosser, S. “Attracting and retaining women in science and engineering,” Academe, 89:4(2003): 24-8.16. American Council on Education (ACE). On Change. Washington D.C.: Author, (1998).17. West, M., & J.W. Curtis. AAUP faculty gender equity indicators 2006. American Association of University Professors, 2006.18. Nelson, D. (2005). “A National Analysis of Diversity in Science and Engineering Faculties

Conference Session

Educational Methods and Technologies

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Marshall, University of Southern Maine; William Marshall, Alief Independent School District

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Page 15.695.1112, 2000.5. Felder, R., Active Learning with Dr. Richard Felder, downloaded on March 17, 2010 fromwww.youtube.com/watch?v=1J1URbdisYE.6. Dutch, B.J., and Allen, D.E., and White, H.B. (1998). Problem-based Learning: Preparing Students to Succeedin the 21st Century. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9,No 7, 1997 – 1998.7. Bound, D. & Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St. Martin’sPress.8. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes andImplementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.9. Marshall, J. and Marshall, J. (2007). In Search of Teaching Excellence. American

Conference Session

Improving Student Entrepreneurial Skills

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Ferguson, Ohio Northern University; Michele Govekar, Ohio Northern University; Amanda Stype, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

examinedthe ratings of software processes for new ISO standards (Jung 2003). It also evolved practically in a university-level evaluation of individual college assessment plans within that author’s experience.Designation and use of a head-judge/s is an intervention that we have used within our events. Each head judgeis assigned a team of judges. Each team of judges is then assigned a set of participants that a certain number ofjudges must rate. For example, a team may consist of three to five judges, be assigned to rate 12 contestants,with each contestant rated by a minimum of three judges. The head judge determines the logistics required tofulfill these conditions. Also, the head judge fields questions about the criteria and the judging process. At

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan Klingbeil, Wright State University; Byron Newberry, Oklahoma Christian University of Science and Arts; Anthony Donaldson, California Baptist University; Joan Ozdogan, Chantilly High School Academy

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !"#$%"' ! N)! ! NK! ! NO! ! NM! ! NP! ! NQ! ! ?4.730HR!! +0.--! ! KBLM! CPI! KBLP! CSI! KB*S! CQI! KBLO! CLI! KBQS! C*I! OBP@! CKI!! +0.--! ! KBPQ! CSI! KBPQ! CSI! )B@@! C)I! KBKO! COI! KBLO! CMI! KBSQ! CQI!! D-84./H! ! KBKO! COI! )B*P! CKI! KBSO! CSI! )B*P! CKI! OB@@! C)I! KBMQ! COI!! T29/0.--! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! @! C)I! )B*P! CKI! ?4.730HR!! T29/0.--! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! "#$!%&'!! ()*K(! ! +,-./0-!&1+!23!45-!678.9-!:7

Conference Session

The New ABET CE Criteria - Program Development

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Swenty, University of Evansville; Mark Valenzuela, University of Evansville; James Allen, University of Evansville; Immanuel Selvaraj, University of Evansville

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

., Baltimore, MD, 2009.3. How Are We Doing? Assessment Tips With Gloria Rogers, http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents- UPDATE/Assessment/Assessment%20Tips8.pdf, ABET, Inc., Baltimore, MD, 2009.4. Assessment Basics, ABET Program Evaluator Training-Pre Work, http://www.abet.org/_TrainingCD/index.htm, ABET, Inc. Baltimore, MD, 2010.5. Peterson, O, Williams, S, and Durant, E., “Understanding ABET Objectives and Outcomes,” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX, 2008.6. The Fact Book 2009-2010, University of Evansville, Evansville IN, 2009.7. Mission Statements, University of Evansville, http://www.evansville.edu/aboutue/mission.cfm, Evansville, IN 2010.8. Gravett, L. and

Conference Session

Frontiers in Engineering Economy

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ted Eschenbach, TGE Consulting

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

. Lavelle, and Ted G. Eschenbach, “How Do Engineering Managers Teach Engineering Economy?” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEM National Conference, West Point, November 2008, CD.14. Newnan, Donald G., Jerome P. Lavelle, and Ted G. Eschenbach, Engineering Economic Analysis 10th, Oxford University Press, 2009.15. Newnan, Donald G., Ted G. Eschenbach, and Jerome P. Lavelle, Engineering Economic Analysis 11th, Oxford University Press, 2012 (in press).16. Park, Chan S. Contemporary Engineering Economic Analysis, 4th, Prentice Hall, 2007.17. Peterson, William R., “Spreadsheets as the Primary Means of Engineering Economy Education,” Proceedings of the 2009 IERC National Conference, Miami, June 2010, abstract on CD.18. Ross, Stephen A., Randolph W

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Outside the Classroom

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Bowler, Michigan Technological University; Susie Amato-Henderson, Michigan Technological University; Tom Drummer, Michigan Technological University; Joseph Holles, Michigan Technological University; Ted Lockhart, Michigan Technological University; Joanna Schreiber, Michigan Technological University; Debra Charlesworth, Michigan Technological University; Jingfang Ren, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

issueRecognition of possible 0 = No recognition in responseconsequences resulting from the 1 = Recognition of issue in responseaction.Recognition of the perpetrator’s 0 = No recognition in responseresponsibility or accountability for 1 = Recognition of issue in responsethe action.Recognition of the rights of the 0 = No recognition in responsevictim(s) of the action. 1 = Recognition of issue in responseRecognition of the duties and/or 0 = No recognition in responseobligations of the individuals 1 = Recognition of issue in responseinvolved in the action. Total Score Range per ethical 0 to 6 issueInter-Rater Reliability and Agreement AnalysisScores were totaled for each ethical

Conference Session

Ethics & HSS in Engineering

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

David Haws

. Hoover was a prolific (and sometimes eloquent) writer—often more coherent than like-minded contemporaries, such as Arthur Morgan. As engineering educators, we should befamiliar with two of his more important political tracts: American Individualism (1922) and TheChallenge to Liberty (1934). We should also be familiar with the first volume (of three) of hisMemoirs: Years of Adventure (1952). George H. Nash wrote an excellent, multi-volumebiography, the first volume of which, The Life of Herbert Hoover: The Engineer (1983) bears onHoover’s engineering career. Finally, the eighth chapter of Edwin T. Layton, Jr.’s The Revolt ofthe Engineers (1971) contains a fascinating analysis of Hoover’s participation in the attemptedreform of the American

Conference Session

Nontechnical Skills for Engineering Technology Students

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Hamid Khan

results have been undertaken to see theimpact of modular and case methods. A statistical treatment has been envisioned for the future to Page 9.1199.9 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education.comprehensively study the long term impact of interventions when more time and resources aremade available.References 1. BOATRIGHT, J. (2003) Ethics and the conduct of Business. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. 2. KELMAN, S. (1994) Cost Benefit Analysis: An Ethical Critique in The Ford Pinto

Conference Session

Capstone Design II

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Ajay Agrawal; Zahed Siddique

accomplish the major targets. Identify the end product(s) of your efforts. The weekly individual plan must align with the weekly group plan. The group plan should support the strategic plan and the overall plan of action. Problems or Concerns/Achievements or Success Explain problems or concerns of your own division or department. List your achievements and successes. Figure 3 - Individual Weekly Progress Report Format• Each team meets weekly at a regularly scheduled time with the faculty advisor to review progress, plans, and to seek input. Additional meetings with the advisor may be arranged as necessary.• The team meets with the Project Liaison as necessary. At the minimum, a copy of

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

John McGuire; John Kaplan; Kathleen Kaplan

. Romantic (1800 AD-1900 AD)The Romantic period was a time of independence from the simplification of the Classicalperiod. Composers expressed love in their music: love of nation, love of nature, love ofman, along with the spirits of immortality and independence. Interestingly, the pianobecame the most popular instrument.5.7. 20th Century and Modern Music (1900 AD-present)The music from the 1900’s to today has shown searches for new experiences. There hasbeen radical experimentation, deregulation, and permissiveness.6. Engineering HistoryThe term “engineering” is from a Latin word meaning ingenious [5]. The history ofengineering is rich, as rich as the history of music, with a great number of changesoccurring in the last few centuries.Some texts

Conference Session

Teaching about New Materials

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Rita Caso; Ibrahim Karaman; Jeff Froyd; Terry Creasy; Winfried Teizer

resistance against introducing newtopics and reach the largest number of students quickly. Work is continuing to assess the degreeto which students comprehend the new material that is being introduced.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Division of Engineering Education andCenters of the National Science Foundation under grant number EEC-0304049. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliographic Information1. Morgan, J., Rinehart, J., and Froyd, J. (2001) Industry Case Studies at Texas A&M University, Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference2. Lasting

Conference Session

IE Outreach and Advancement

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Sandra Moore Furneaux; Randa Shehab; M Jayne Fleener; Kim Warram; Elizabeth Kvach; Betty Harris; Anne Reynolds; Teri Reed Rhoads; Susan Walden; Teri Murphy; Deborah Trytten

that." (female junior)In addition to the emphasis on helping people, participants also mentioned an emphasis onworking with people: "All engineerings involve going out and, at, at some degree, talking to people, gathering information, um, but I think industrial engineering does more of the social interaction with people to get their input …" (male junior)In fact, several students said that professional industrial engineers need to be goodcommunicator s, especially relative to other engineering disciplines: Page 9.2.4 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition

Conference Session

Lean Manufacturing Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Robert Seaker; Jignesh Rathod; Farouk Attia

for Engineering EducationBibliography: 1. Askin, Ronald G., J. B. Goldberg (2002) Design and Analysis of Lean Production Systems, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2. Evans, J. R., D. R. Anderson, D. J. Sweeney, T. A. Williams (1990), Applied production And Operations Management, West Publishing Company. 3. Klaas, Thorsten, Push vs. Pull concepts in logistics chains, CEMS Academic Conference, Louvain-la- Neuve, May 7-9, 1998. 4. Seaker, R., Farouk Attia, Jignesh Rathod (2004), Strategically Deployed WIP Inventory: Toward Flexible Low cost manufacturing, a Working Paper, College of Technology, University of Houston. 5. Slack, N., S. Chambers, R. Johnson (2001), Operations Management

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Douglas Coffin; Catherine Almquist; Amit Shukla; Michael Bailey-Van Kuren; James Kiper; Christine Noble

Education”the possibility of a seminar series for all students in SEAS, which will further highlight therelationship between the theoretical foundations and real world engineering experience. Thread 1 Thread 2 Thread 3 (i.e. Design) EAS 101 EAS102 P S r e a MME2XX ECE 2XX PSE 2XX m c i