Paper ID #28273Beyond Buzzwords and Bystanders: A Framework for SystematicallyDeveloping a Diverse, Mission Ready, and Innovative Coast Guard Work-forceDr. Kimberly Young-McLear, U.S. Coast Guard Academy Dr. Kimberly Young-McLear is currently an Assistant Professor (Permanent Commissioned Teaching Staff) at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy. She has served at a variety of Coast Guard units since 2003. She holds engineering and technical degrees from Florida A and M, Purdue, and The George Washing- ton University (Ph.D in Systems Engineering). She has taught a breadth of courses including Operations and Project Management
appointment in Engineering Education. His research interests include engineering identity, self-efficacy, and matriculation of Latine/x/a/o students to graduate school. He works with survey methods and overlaps with machine learning using quantitative methods and sequential mixed methods approaches.Dr. Janice Mej´ıa, Northwestern University Dr. Mejia is an Associate Professor of Instruction in the Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences. She also teaches in the Design Thinking and Communication (DTC), Masters in Engineering Management (MEM), and College Prep programs. Her research interests focus on mixed methods research in engineering education, curriculum assessment and development, and engineering
at Austin in 2016 and her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Northwestern University in 2022. Her areas of expertise include computational modeling of cell-based therapies and integrating social justice concepts into engineering curriculum. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 To record or not to record? Collaborating through conflictPOSITIONALITY STATEMENTWe acknowledge that the authors all vary in disability status, and those disabilities representedby the authors are far from representative of the entire community. We also represent faculty,staff, and students from a wide range of backgrounds who were initially at conflict over theissues presented. Through surveys, discussions
, streamlined standards would help assess thesustainability components, even if the project directly addresses sustainability, e.g. greeninfrastructure, solar energy. To fulfill the capstone requirement for a Masters of Science in aSustainability Management (SM) program at Stevens Institute of Technology, the Co-authordesigned the Sustainability Implications Scorecard (SIS) while working with several SeniorDesign capstone coordinators. The student additionally conducted field research, interviews, andbenchmarking against the UN SDGs, Envision, and ABET.The SIS is a flexible, adaptive, and project-focused rubric that simultaneously guides andevaluates how successfully an engineering design or project team integrates sustainabilitycomponents. In
than the mean of thatsample’s time sum value. Differing QA/QC standards would influence some overall trends. 17Conclusions1. Additional subsequent weeks of data integration are necessary to differentiate between the threepossible framework explanations for faculty and cadet time relationships. In an 18-week semester,five or six weeks constitute a one-third slice of a continuous academic campaign including six-and ten-week grades reports (in the case of USMA), a significant quantity and diversity in gradedevents, course modules, extracurricular activities, and mandatory and optional beneficial furtheractivities. However, an expansion of the time period along with a greater sample size
participants have actuallylearned along the way. Our study aims to fill this gap by tracing the career long leadershiplearning journeys of 28 Canadian engineers with at least twenty-five years of work experience.Theoretical perspective: Situated leadership learningThe notion of situated learning is central to our investigation of senior engineers’ leadershiplearning experiences [52]. In contrast to the didactic learning opportunities students encounter inschool, which follow a pre-existing curriculum and are tightly mediated by an instructor, situatedlearning opportunities are shaped by everyday practices and left largely to novices forinterpretation. Lave and Wenger’s situated learning theory [52] highlights the type of learningthat occurs in
has always been praised by students and department for his outstanding teaching and research excellence. To supplement his teaching and research, he has been involved in numerous professional societies, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published thirty journal papers and thirty-nine conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Structural BIM Integration, 3) 4D/5D BIM, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Innovative Construction Demolition, and 6) Carbon Footprint Analysis on Roadways.Dr. Caroline Murrie Clevenger P.E., Caroline M. Clevenger is an Associate Professor and Assistant Director of Construction
ways that impact their educational experiences, and shapes the choices and thecareer pathways that they take. It is also clear from this literature, some of which is cited below,that those choices are not always entirely of their own choosing.In this paper, we wish to present some preliminary results from a pilot study on studentperspectives about engineering education, and how students navigate through their owneducational transformation. What we provide in the paper is an early analysis of interview datagained from student interviews, where undergraduate URP/REU students interviewed otherstudents about their educational experiences. Our initial analysis suggests that student pathwaysare determined in largely interactionist terms, namely
Success (ROPES):Mitigating and Expanding Students’ Learning OpportunitiesAbstractR.O.P.E.S. is a dual enrollment initiative that was funded by the U.S. Department of Educationand aligned with the New Jersey Governor's Emergency Education Relief Fund II and the CRRSAAct. It aimed to create pathways to college for high school juniors in South Jersey, focusing onfive select fields that included teacher education, music business, social services, computer scienceand engineering. The program exposed students to five career pathways, employed targetedstrategies to support underrepresented communities, and integrated social and emotional learning.This paper showcases the program's objectives, student participation, impact on South Jerseystudents, and
Nuclear Society (ANS), and a student branch advisor for the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE).Mr. Bruce Allen Peterson, Minnesota State Energy Center of Excellence Bruce Peterson Dean for Energy Technologies Executive Director, Minnesota State Energy Center of Excellence Minnesota West Community and Technical College Bruce has been engaged in higher education for 40 years as a teacher, curriculum specialist, and admin- istrator. Over the past 24 years he served as Academic Dean at three colleges and as program director over several major grants. In his current position, Bruce is responsible for Energy related programs across Minnesota West campuses. At the state
with the Neag School of Education at UConn, seeking a Master’s of Curriculum and Instruction, and will be entering the public teaching workforce after graduation of Spring 2024.Todd Campbell, University of Connecticut Todd Campbell is a Professor and Head of the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Connecticut.Marina A. Creed, UConn Health and UConn School of Medicine Marina Creed is an Instructor in the Department of Neurology at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine and practicing Neuroimmunology Nurse Practitioner in the Multiple Sclerosis Center at UConn Health. She has been engaged in translational public health efforts throughout the COVID19 pandemic to improve outcomes
). Throughout her engineering career, she has tried to integrate global engineering into her work. Most recently, she spent the final year of her PhD at the University of Cape Town, integrating her benchtop cardiovascular research into computational models. In 2018-2019, she spent a year living and working in Tanzania, in East Africa through the Fulbright US Scholar program, teaching and conducting clinical research. Now at UD, her scholarship work includes embedding global engineering opportunities into the engineering curriculum through study abroad programs, new courses, serving as an advisor for UD’s Engineers Without Borders, and hosting global design workshops. ©American Society for Engineering
curriculum: at Tufts, students take the course(ES 4) in the fall semester of sophomore year and it forms part of their core conception of whatelectrical and computer engineering is. In general, their courses up to this point have been genericacross engineering, and many students see the course as a way to confirm whether an electrical orcomputer engineering major is right for them. As a result, we have both an opportunity and anobligation to inspire and motivate students in addition to helping them develop prerequisite skillsfor other courses.Digital logic labsAs at most universities, our offering of the course has a substantial laboratory component, wherestudents put in the hard (and rewarding) work of translating pencil-and-paper logic designs
from a Student Perspective?AbstractThis paper investigates student perceptions of the relationships between social media,engineering, and leadership. Participants in this study consisted of freshmen engineeringstudents enrolled in a first-semester introduction to engineering course at the University of SouthCarolina. A grounded theory approach was used, in which instructional activities and datacollection processes occurred concurrently, were guided by one another, and developed over thecourse of the study. The phrase “social media engineering leadership” is developed within thispaper to include social media mediated communication within an engineering leadership context.The results of this study suggest that social media engineering
workingprofessionals who represent all the disciplines represented in our endeavor. This was our firsttime offering a course with this combination of disciplines (and hence has no feedback from agroup of external stakeholders). As an update, we have, since the submission of the abstract,offered this course twice. However, it was offered to only engineering students, and with aplatform-independent app development methodology. Feedback from all students convinced usto seek a simpler and better integrated app development process. We now feel comfortable inoffering full-fledged transdisciplinary courses in spring 2018, at which time formativeevaluation will be undertaken (see the discussion section). We document our efforts at formativeevaluation in another paper
Paper ID #28305Research Experience for Undergraduates Social Programs: A Key Ingredientfor SuccessDr. Jeremy Straub, North Dakota State University Jeremy Straub is the Associate Director of the NDSU Institute for Cyber Security Education and Research and an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science at the North Dakota State University. He holds a Ph.D. in Scientific Computing, an M.S. and an M.B.A. and has published over 40 journal articles and over 120 full conference papers, in addition to making numerous other conference presenta- tions. Straub’s research spans the gauntlet between technology
supremacist, patriarchal norms in the profession? • Uneven consequences of fit: Who is crunched into these normative fantasies? Who is uplifted by them? For whom does advancement require a masquerade?all 6 of us completed our undergraduate education in Canada. We have different levels of familiarity andcomfort with critical theory. The process of writing and integrating feedback has itself been an importantlearning process for all of us, helping us bridge our own paradigmatic comfort zones. 2One reviewer invited us to justify our use of Lorde’s theory to analyze mobility patterns, suggesting thatshe was referring to social roles and identities, not career paths. While we cannot claim to know Lorde’sintended referent, the fantasies she names
course titled Enhancing Academic Success. This is a one-credit hour (elective) course taught by one of the authors, who is an instructor in the engineering department. The course has been offered every semester since Spring 2017, and was loosely based on the Studying Engineering curriculum developed by Ray Landis.27 While this course was originally designed for students on academic probation, it covers topics of interest to all students, especially those in their first and second years who are interested in learning how to learn engineering concepts, and become successful students. Figure 1 below summarizes the course syllabus. The topics listed have been covered each semester, Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Gulf
, no. 1, pp. 52–61, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.11120/ened.2011.06010052.[19] C. M. Leahy, R. F. Peterson, I. G. Wilson, J. W. Newbury, A. L. Tonkin, and D. Turnbull, “Distress Levels and Self-Reported Treatment Rates for Medicine, Law, Psychology and Mechanical Engineering Tertiary Students: Cross-Sectional Study,” Aust N Z J Psychiatry, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 608–615, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.3109/00048671003649052.[20] University of Michigan - Counseling and Psychological Services, “Healthy Minds Study,” 2012. https://caps.umich.edu/article/healthy-minds-study (accessed Aug. 14, 2020).[21] H. Tajfel and J. Turner, “An integrative theory of intergroup conflict,” in Intergroup relations: Essential readings, New York
power control or fan speed control is required. Students in an instrumentation or controlscourse could use the USB interface to the Arduino to collect data and/or reprogram the Arduino toperform feedback control.Six of the devices with varying sized heat sinks were used in a trial homework assignment in anundergraduate heat transfer course with 75 students in Spring 2015 and in another section of thesame course with 57 students in Winter 2016. At this point, we have no quantitative assessmentdata.OverviewThough laboratory exercises are a standard part of an engineering curriculum, there are a widevariety of ways that labs can be implemented. In recent years a number of simple experimentshave been developed that help to make laboratory
Texas, she has worked with the Department of Mathematics and the Department of Biomedical Engineering on under- graduate student education initiatives. She draws on her experiences in technical recruiting and mathe- matics education to influence her research. Stephanie holds a bachelor’s degree in mathematics from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and a master’s in educational psychology from the University of Texas at Austin. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Targeted Recruitment of Biomedical Engineering Graduate Students: The Influence of Recruitment Event ChangesAbstractThis paper presents progress on an ongoing study of the effectiveness of the
Frazier [17], there are five pedagogical areas that can beintegrated into the classroom with relative ease: 1. Integrate Active, Collaborative, and Problem-Based Learning – ACL and PBL techniques are well known and have been shown to assist in developing creativity and engagement in students [30]. 2. Help Students Extract Answers from an Ocean of Information – While most iGen students are adept at finding answers to surface questions through technology, many are poor at finding information that is harder to find. Students should be encouraged to seek the assistance of technical librarians in finding credible, peer-reviewed research. 3. Assess Often and Provide Feedback – iGen students are characterized
Paper ID #21263Identifying Classroom Management Strategies by Focusing on Diversity andInclusionDr. Mohammad Moin Uddin P.E., East Tennessee State University Dr. Mohammad Moin Uddin is an Associate Professor and Graduate Coordinator in the Department of Engineering, Engineering Technology, and Surveying at East Tennessee State University. His current re- search interest focuses on sustainable design and construction, data integration and development of energy models for campus building structures for knowledge based decision making. He also contributed to data analysis methods and cost effective practices of highway
Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project Oriented Capstone Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education (January 1997): 17 - 28. 4. Milo Koretsky, Christine Kelly, and Edith Gummer, “Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially Situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories,” Journal of Engineering Education (July 2011): 540 - 573. 5. Heshmat A. Aglan and S. Firasat Ali, “Hands-On Experiences: An Integral Part of Engineering Curriculum Reform,” Journal of Engineering Education (October 1996): 327 – 330. 6. Stupak P.R., S. Rumrill, B. S. Carlsen, T. George, and J. Suriano, “Authentic Engineering Experience: Electromagnetic-Induction Keychain for a
MentorProgram [20, 23].IRAP/ELCIR includes course credit. Each participant must register for a research elective whichis conducted as an independent study course [14, 15, 20]. The elective can be taken for up to fourhours of credit [20, 24], although one hour is the typical load for an IRAP participant [14, 15].The course curriculum is adapted specifically to the IRAP process and spans three semesters,spring, summer and fall.IRAP/ELCIR’s spring activities are an “orientation and training workshop” [20]. These arefollowed in the summer by a “two-week trip to Yucatan in Mexico, where students take a classon introduction to research, visit research sites and tour cultural areas of Yucatan, includingUxmal, Chichen Itza, the cenotes and the Mundo Maya
the U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). http://engineering.tufts.edu/me/people/wendell/Chelsea Joy Andrews, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Chelsea Andrews is a Ph.D. candidate at Tufts University in STEM education. She received a B.S. from Texas A&M University in ocean engineering and an S.M. from MIT in civil and environmental engi- neering. Her current research includes investigating children’s engagement in engineering design through in-depth case study analysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Elementary student engagement with digital engineering notebook cards
research and gender and culture in science education. Her research interests include girls’ participation in science and engineering; teacher’s engagement in action research; and science teachers’ integration of the engineering design process to improve science learning.James D. Lehman, Purdue University Dr. James D. Lehman is a Professor of Learning Design and Technology in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction and the Director of the Discovery Learning Research Center at Purdue University. He is member of the leadership teams of two current NSF-funded projects, Science Learning through Engineer- ing Design (SLED) and Professional Development for Computer Science (PD4CS). He holds a B.S. and M.S. in biology and
practices that support learning and educational attainment for all students” (p.277). This principle guides computing education policies, standards, curriculum, and teachingmethods, driving initiatives like ”Computer Science for All” [3].Equity-enabling education research is research that supports the needs for achieving equity ineducation, including providing ...the evidence needed for decision-makers and educators to advocate, support, and deliver computing education in K-12 classrooms that lead to equitable access, participation, and experiences (and therefore outcomes) among all students. Equity-enabling education research, by its very nature and necessity, must meet quality standards to provide meaningful evidence for
very relational. How can we prioritize very meaningful relationships over projects that come and go? And how do we base (projects) on our very local cultures and ways of knowing?I n this passage, the student underscores how discussions on decolonization within humanitarian engineering class often remain confined to improving power imbalances and relationships between community members and HE practitioners. However, these initiatives tend to be top-down or centralized changes across the sector, which fall short of addressing the goals of decolonization as articulated in Indigenous studies. Indigenous studies emphasize dismantling central control as an integral piece of decolonization, making this
collection, analysis, and drafting of this document, is pursuing a doctoral degree in Engineering Education. The author also shares many of the same or similar disabilities with those who were interviewed. Although this alignment was unintentional, it ended up being an integral aspect of the interview process that allowed for greater comfortability and vulnerability in interviews. We believe that this aspect of shared identity amongst the researcher and students helped foster richness in the data and a deepened understanding of student experiences during analysis. The second author holds identities as a disabled white cisgender woman, tenure-track engineering professor, and engineering education researcher