100% rational and easy to follow solution process, Meets Minimum including required diagrams and figures Competency Incorrect answer due to one or two minor errors II 80% but supported by a correct solution process as described in Level I Does Not Meet Minimum III 0% Incorrect answer due to conceptual error(s) CompetencyIn Level II scores described in Table 2, there are two necessary conditions for classifying anerror as minor: 1. The mistake is a minor algebraic error, computational error, error in units or significant digits, or other human mistake such
Learning in a STEM Classroom Author ( s ): Andrew C . Butler , Elizabeth J . Marsh , J . P . Slavinsky and Richard G . Baraniuk Source : Educational Psychology Review , Vol . 26 , No . 2 , Special Issu. 2018;26(2):331-340.16. Wambeke B, Barry BE, Bruhl JC. Teaching Model as a Living Document. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Columbus, OH: American Society for Engineering Education; 2017. https://peer.asee.org/28924.17. McGuire SY. Teach Students How to Learn: Strategies You Can Incorporate Into Any Course to Improve Student Metacognition, Study Skills, and Motivation. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing; 2015.
value theinterdisciplinary experience they currently get.) Second, we offer our courses by the usualsemester (spring, summer, for all) over a 14-week period. Programs on a trimester system mighthave to adapt accordingly. Third, for large research groups, it should be possible for the principalinvestigator(s) to present our approach via research group meetings. Students could then beprovided with the appropriate templates and coached to use the CT framework in bothpresentations as well as in the drafting of papers. We believe research advisors and their studentswould benefit from having a consistent intellectual framework as well as a consistent vocabularyto use in developing critical reading and writing skills. Finally, other universities might
: United StatesAssociation for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 2017.[8] F. Martin, “Toy projects considered harmful.” Commun. ACM 49(7), July 2006. pp. 113-116. doi:10.1145/1139922.1139958[9] T. Nurkkala and S. Brandle, “Software studio: teaching professional software engineering.”In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE'11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2011. pp. 153-158. doi:10.1145/1953163.1953209[10] M. Beedle, A. van Bennekum, A. Cockburn, W. Cunningham, M. Fowler, J. Highsmith, A.Hunt, R. Jeffries, J. Kern, B. Marick, R.C. Martin, K. Schwaber, J. Sutherland, and D. Thomas.“Manifesto for Agile Software Development.” Agile Manifesto, February 2001. [Online].Available: Agile Alliance, http
autonomy support, and undergraduate student engagement," International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 98, pp. 91-105, 2019.[5] D. A. Torvi, "Engineering graduate teaching assistant instructional programs: training tomorrow's faculty members," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 376- 382, 1994.[6] J. Johnson and D. D. Pratt, "The apprenticeship perspective: Modelling ways of being," Five perspectives on teaching in adult and higher education, pp. 83-103, 1998.[7] A. E. Austin, "Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career," The journal of higher education, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 94-122, 2002.[8] J. S. Fairweather, "Beyond
Links webpage. https://gwc.gsrc.ucla.edu/Resources[10] Eaton, S. (2018). “10 great writing resources for grad students.” Learning Teaching and Leadershipblog. https://drsaraheaton.wordpress.com/2013/04/23/10-great-writing-resources-for-grad-students/[11] Lantsoght, E. (2017). “How to Deal with the Two-body Problem.” Academic Transfer blog.https://www.academictransfer.com/en/blog/how-to-deal-with-the-two-body-problem/[12] Baker, K. (2014). “On ‘Poor Husbands’ and Two-Body Problems.” Chronical Vitae.https://chroniclevitae.com/news/609-on-poor-husbands-and-two-body-problems[13] Warner, J. (2017). “Academic Hazing?” Inside Higher Ed blog.https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/just-visiting/academic-hazing[14] Kelsky, K. (2019). “Academic Hazing is
. 62, no. 1, pp. 27-42, Mar. 2019.[6] V. B. Mansilla, “Assessing Student Work at Disciplinary Crossroads”, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 14-21, Jan. 2005.[7] V. B. Mansilla and et. al., “Quality Assessment in Interdisciplinary Research and Education”, Research Evaluation, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 69-74, Apr. 2006.[8] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Applied Social Research Methods Series, 5th ed., Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2013.[9] S. B. Merriam, Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2009.[10] D. Wicks, “The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers”, Qualitative Research in Organizations and
] 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.nacme.org/underrepresented-minorities.[5] Catherine Hill Christianne Corbett Andresse St Rose, "Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics," 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.aauw.org/aauw_check/pdf_download/show_pdf.php?file=why-so-few- research.[6] Pamela R. Aschbacher, Erika Li, Ellen J. Roth, "Is Science Me? High School Students’ Identities, Participation and Aspirations in Science, Engineering, and Medicine," Journal of Research in Scientific Teaching, pp. VOL. 47, NO. 5, PP. 564–582, 2010.[7] S. Catsambis, "Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, pp. Vol. 32
– 378, 1998.[3] K. Heid, “In-Depth Interviews to Understand Student Understanding”, in Assessment Practices in Undergraduate Mathematics (Gold, G., Kieth, S., and Marion W. ed), pp. 109 – 110, 1999.[4] V. Odafe, “Oral Examination in College Mathematics: an Alternative Assessment Technique”, PRIMUS, 16(3), pp. 243 – 256, 2006.[5] P. Iannone, and A. Simpson “Oral Assessment in Mathematics: Implementation and Outcomes”, Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: International Journal of the IMA, 31(4), pp. 179 – 190, 2012.[6] P. Iannone, P. and A. Simpson, “Students’ Views of Oral Performance Assessment in Mathematics: Straddling the ‘Assessment of’ and ‘Assessment for’ Learning Divide
implemented with larger group sizes. While teaching a course with a group-basedstructure is often more work for the instructor, it provides a great benefit to the students andreduces operational and support cost. Engineering students need to gain as much experienceworking on teams as possible, so they are prepared for the teaming environment that isprevalent in industry. For this reason, educators should try to incorporate a group-basedcourse design that includes ample individual assignments whenever it is possible. It wasfound that a 50/50 model, where half of the grade came from group work and half came fromindividual work functioned well in ECE3873.References1. E. Sancristobal, M. Castro, S. Martin, M. Tawkif, A. Pesquera, R. Gil, G. Daz and J
literacy which presuppose CADeducation, so that designers can pick the best tool for the design task(s) [11]. Dankwort et al.suggest there should be less emphasis on the education of the tool itself, and more focus on howthe tool integrates with the entire product development lifecycle [17]. Through a cursory readingof the design courses at the institutions mentioned above, there is no explicit requirement forthese courses to ensure deliverables of conceptual designs, let alone, conceptual designs whichare created in CAD [13] [14] [15] [16]. For introductory courses, Brown’s shows empirically thatstudents who enroll in the introductory CAD classes can find them unengaging, which can act asan impediment to further seeking to practice CAD in future
the Necessary Infrastructure: When RELLIS was announced in 2016 much of the campus infrastructure dated back to the 1940’s. This infrastructure was insufficient to support the envisioned campus and there were no buildings in which the classes could be offered. Blinn College District began construction of its first classroom and office building on RELLIS beginning in 2016. That building opened in fall 2018 and was the location of all classes offered through the Academic Alliance that academic year. A&M System began construction of its first building in spring 2018 (it opened in fall 2019) and its second building in fall 2019 (scheduled to open in January 2021). Lastly, construction of a three
the required skill set(s)? Were too many people interested in thatproject as their first choice? Were enough people interested in the project to get a team of four?We asked them to consider moving to their second or third choice if their first choice had morethan four people. During this reflection period, we (the faculty facilitators) highlighted thoseprojects that had fewer than four interested people and suggested students consider moving theirsticky notes to those projects. We also highlighted projects for which there appeared to beinadequate skills. We reiterated that each project should have a team of four people, then weasked them to make a final decision regarding their choice of project. After this short time ofreflection, we started
Chung. Revisiting first-year college students’ mattering: Social support, academic stress, and the mattering experience. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 9(1):21–37, 2007. [5] Robert-Paul Juster, Bruce S McEwen, and Sonia J Lupien. Allostatic load biomarkers of chronic stress and impact on health and cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(1):2–16, 2010. [6] KS Coyne, Z Zhou, C Thompson, and E Versi. The impact on health-related quality of life of stress, urge and mixed urinary incontinence. BJU international, 92(7):731–735, 2003. [7] Susan Gennaro and Mary Dawn Hennessy. Psychological and physiological stress: impact on preterm birth. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic
the material(s) as ductile or brittle. Explain your rationale. Identify and discuss three potential sources of error in this experiment. Your discussion should include a method of minimizing the impact of these sources of error on the results.Appendix CAssignment: read the lab report that your team was assigned, and then provide feedback asfollows: 1. write an internal document in the format that could be submitted at work that includes the lab experimental procedure used in the report; the internal document must also include your judgment and recommendations. 2. complete the feedback table that will be given to the authors of the report; be professional
and technology retention database,”Research News on Graduate Education, 2(2), 2000.[8] E. Seymour, and N. M. Hewitt, Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave thesciences, Westview Press, CO. 1997.[9] C. M. Vogt, “Faculty as a critical juncture in student retention and performance inengineering programs,” Journal Engineering Education, 97(1), 27–36, 2008.[10] M. Meyer and S. Marx, “Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of whyundergraduates leave engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), pp.525-548,2014.[11] R.M. Felder, K.D. Forrest, L. Baker‐Ward, E.J. Dietz, and P.H. Mohr, “A longitudinalstudy of engineering student performance and retention: I. Success and failure in the introductorycourse,” Journal of
and ethical components of the profession of engineering are shaped arelicensure and accreditation. “Licensure is the mark of a professional. It's a standard recognized by employersand their clients, by governments and by the public as an assurance of dedication, skill and quality.”3 Socialand ethical components reveal themselves in this arena through professional codes of ethics. Every professional1 National Academy of Engineering, U. S. The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: NationalAcademies Press, 2004.2 Phase, I. I. Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. National Academies Press, 2005.3 https://www.nspe.org/resources/licensure/why-get
gene therapy to the United States, FDA News Release, 2017.[6] Roger Greene, Jennifer Mercer, Meg Casais, Tony Lubiniecki, Joseph Mezzatesta, SamanthaSheridan, Mark Schenerman, Bruce Meiklejohn, Stefanie Pluschkell, Paul Smock, Stuart Feldman,Jutta Look, Bernerd McGarvey, John Towns, Lois Atkins, Jim Precup, Paul Tsang, Tim Schofield,Sally Anliker, Taruna Arora, Mark Rosolowsky, Anurag S. Rathore, “Quality by Design forBiotechnology Products,” BioPharm International, DOI (2009).[7] P. Kaminsky, Y. Wang, Analytical Models for Biopharmaceutical Operations and Supply ChainManagement: A Survey of Research Literature, Pharmaceutical Bioprocess, 2 (2015) 61-73.[8] Feliza Mirasol, “The Challenges of PAT in the Scale Up of Biologics Production
projections: 2005–2050. Washington, DC: Pewhispanic center, http://www.pewhispanic.org/2008/02/11/us-population-projections-2005-2050/[3] Hobson, Rosalyn S. "The changing face of classroom instructional methods: service learningand design in a robotics course." In Frontiers in Education Conference, 2000. FIE 2000. 30thAnnual, vol. 2, pp. F3C-20. IEEE, 2000.[4] Salzman, Noah and Strobel, Johannes, "Motivations and Benefits for College StudentsServing as Mentors in a High School Robotics Competition" (2011). School of EngineeringEducation Graduate Student Series.[5] Sevier, Carol, Seung Youn Chyung, Janet Callahan, and Cheryl Schrader. "What Value DoesService Learning Have on Introductory Engineering Students' Motivation and ABET ProgramOutcomes
) x1 Altimeter STM32F427 x2 Accelerometer, x2 Gyroscope, Pixhawk 1 $130 (168 MHz) x1 Magnetometer, x1 Barometer Figure 8. Pixhawk Autopilot Compar i- After analyzing the information above, our team chose to use the Pixhawk 2.1 (Cube) on BFL. ThePixhawk 2.1 meets all requirements set by the team, and has proven to be reliable on our legacy systems. Otherreasons the Pixhawk 2.1 was chosen include its relatively low cost, excess amount of redundant sensors for safeflight in case of sensor failure(s), and ability to
greatly appreciated. Bibliography1 K. Moore, C. Jones, and R.S. Frazier, Dec 2017, "Engineering Education for Generation Z," AmericanJournal of Engineering Education, Vol. 8, No. 2, retrieved 1 Jul 2019 fromhttps://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1162924.pdf.2 M. Taylor, 2011, "Teaching Generation NeXt: Methods and Techniques for Today’s Learners," A Collectionof Papers on Self-Study and Institutional Improvement – 2011 Higher Learning Commission, retrieved 1 Jul2019 from https://taylorprograms.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Techniques_article_2011.pdf.3 R. Myose, S. Raza, K. Hoffmann, and A. Ghoddoussi, Sep 2014, "Correlating Engineering Statics StudentPerformance with Scores of a Test over Pre-requisite
any outbound communication. This means the essential requirement of dynamicfirewall software. Zone alarm firewall is a good choice for VNC as it validates bothinbound and outbound communication, does not slow down the connection, does notrequire much of the computer’s resources, and is also available freely.ConclusionThe paper presents a set of laboratory exercises for learning two software tools, VNC andVisual Route, and the logic behind combining both tools for increased security. Theseexercises are designed by the author(s) using the open source network testing tools to Page 12.1593.16complement the existing laboratory exercises in
Engineerign Education, 95, 1 (2005).2 Dally, J. W. and Zhang, G.M., “A Freshman Engineering Design Course,” Journal of Engineering Education, 83, 2(1994).3 Quinn, R. E., “Drexel’s E4 Program: A Different Professional Experience for Engineering Students and Faculty,”Journal of Engineering Education, 82, 4 (1993).4 Froyd, J. E. and Ohland, M. W., “Integrated Engineering Curricula,” Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1(2005).5 D. K. Ludlow and K. H. Schulz, "Writing across the chemical engineering curriculum at the University of NorthDakota," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 83, pp. 161, 1994.6 J. A. Newell, D. K. Ludlow, and S. P. K. Sternberg, "Progressive development of oral and written communicationskills across and integrated
Ap ACTIVITIES nA plie llo he P dR Training Labor wa ese ce nc arc rien ents rofes h e d s es p tu tiv e x n E rS
leaders in service to our nation.USCGA provides the U. S. Coast Guard (USCG) with approximately 190 new Coast Guardofficers each year. Each graduate earns both a commission (as Ensign, USCG) and a Bachelor ofScience degree in one of eight academic majors. Four of these majors are in engineeringdisciplines: Civil; Electrical; Mechanical; Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering.A typical cadet day at USCGA involves academics, leadership and military training, and somesort of athletic activity (NCAA division III or intramural). At least once each semester, eachcadet is required to participate in an outside community service project either individually or as agroup. All cadets must complete the academic requirements for their chosen major
students’ attainment Page 12.1335.2of the outcome. If it is possible to pass a course while not accomplishing the associatedoutcome(s), then the course grade cannot possibly be a valid measure of outcome achievement.Furthermore, if your professors grade on a curve, then the course grades have no absolutemeaning and cannot be used as the basis for measuring performance against a standard.Program: Okay, then I will administer surveys to my students with questions as to how wellthey feel they can meet specific outcomes.Expert: Student self-assessment surveys are indirect measures of performance. They tell ushow well students think they are learning
mathematical models or formulas. Groups should be able to calculate important numbers like number of people, cost per house, cost per person, etc. IV. Test the group’s model using the supplied data. Determine which type(s) of housing would make the best solution for the tsunami village. Most effective solutions may have one type of house or different types. Solutions should be designed based on your list of important items.4b. Teams are to brainstorm to find the important characteristics which must be supplied orassumed, the characteristics of an acceptable solution, and useful formulas they may need. Someexamples are given: (number of families) * (cost for one family shelter) = (total cost to house families
. and Michael J. Piore. (2005). Innovation, the Missing Dimension, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.7. Matyas, M. L. and Malcolm, S. M. (Eds.). (1991). Investing in Human Potential: Science and Engineering at the Crossroads. American Association for the Advancement of Science 91-39S, Washington, D.C.8. Musgrove, L. (2006). “The Real Reasons Students Can’t Write,” Inside Higher Ed, http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2006/04/28/musgrove.9. Moore, Randy. (1993). "Does Writing About Science Improve Learning About Science?" Journal of College Science Teaching, Volume 12 (pp. 212-217).10. University of Pittsburgh. (2006) “Engineering and English collaboration serves as model for improving outcomes,” Teaching Times, http
, June 18-21, 2006, Chicago, IL.4. Rooney, D. and Puerzer, R., (2002) “The Smaller Engineering School and its Industrial Advisory Board: An Effective Partnership.” 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, November 6-9, 2002, Boston, MA.5. Genheimer, S. and Shahab, R. (2007) “The Effective Industry Advisory Board in Engineering Education - A Model and Case Study.” 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 10 – 13, 2007, Milwaukee, WI.6. ABET (2007), Engineering Accreditation Commission, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs.7. Sanoff, A. (2001) “Under the magnifying glass”, ASEE Prism, 11:2.8. Kramer, K. (2004), “Achieving EC2000 Outcomes in the Capstone Design Via Structured Industry
/assessmentwhitepaper.cfm. 5. Walter LeFevre, John W. Smith, John W. Steadman, and Kenneth R. White. Using the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Examination to Assess Academic Programs. Clemson, SC : NCEES, 1999. 6. Walter LeFevre, John W. Steadman, Jill S. Tietjen, Kenneth R. White, and David L. Whitman. Using the Fundametals of Engineering (FE) Examination to Assess Academic Programs. Clemson, SC : NCEES, 2005. 7. Reliability and Validity of FE Exam Scores for Assessment. Lawson, William D. s.l. : A.S.C.E., October 2007, JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL ISSUES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, Vol. 133, pp. 320-326. 8. ETS: Educational Testing Service. ETS: Educational