extends back to the 1930’s when the school was a junior college. The University wasknown as The University of Tennessee Junior College, and the engineering program consisted ofthe first two years towards a baccalaureate degree in the student’s chosen field of engineering.The University became a four-year college in 1951. Most degree programs were transformed intofull four-year baccalaureate programs at that time. The engineering program remained a two-year transfer program with most students transferring to the University of Tennessee atKnoxville.In the fall of 1967, a formal proposal was developed by the UT Martin Department ofEngineering and submitted to the College of Engineering at Knoxville for an engineering degreewith majors from one of
2006-991: VDP--A MENTOR-FOCUSED MIDDLE SCHOOL OUTREACHPROGRAMEugene Brown, Virginia Tech EUGENE F. BROWN -- Dr. Brown is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech. He has worked with ONR since 2001 on university-centered Navy work force development issues. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in thermodynamics and fluid mechanics and is the author of many papers and reports describing his research in the areas of computational fluid dynamics and aircraft propulsion.Robert Kavetsky, Office of Naval Research ROBERT A. KAVETSKY -- Mr. Kavetsky is currently on assignment to ONR, where he is the director of the N-STAR program, an initiative focused on revitalizing the S&T
problem does this design solve, who benefits, what human need is met,what improvement can be made? Examples of these assignments and exercises are listed below: Page 11.157.6a. Like/Dislike this Design – This assignment is given on one of the first days of class. Theinstructions are:“Find an engineered product that you like or dislike to show to the class (unless the product istoo large to bring, then it should be easily described, or bring a picture). Review the feature(s) ofits design that you like or dislike. Briefly describe on paper this design feature and why it is sodesirable or so undesirable. Draw a sketch of an improved product. Hand
: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. (pp.129-160). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.[10] Chi, M.T.H. (2005). Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161-199.[11] Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Creativity: Shifting Across Ontological Categories Flexibly. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp.209-234). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.[12] Slotta, J.D., Chi, M.T.H., and Joram, E. (1995). Assessing Students’ Misclassifications of Physics Concepts: An Ontological Basis for Conceptual Change. Cognition and Instruction. 13 (3), 373-400
sincethe late 1980’s. Our university identified this early in time and initiated the Wright STEPP in Page 11.293.21988 to provide academic enrichment and tuition scholarship to students of the city publicschools who are scholarly, but have financial problems. Wright STEPP targets all 7th through10th grade students in the city public schools. Forty students from the 7th grade are selected eachyear with a minor replacement at the higher grades. Every year, 160 students (40 from eachgrade 7th - 10th) attend this four-week program that operates at our university campus. Thisprogram is in accord with the American Competitiveness and Workforce
model will contain the name of theperson(s) who submitted the physical model, a Bottom Line Up Front (short model description),pictures and/or videos of the model being used, Principle (theory supported by the physicalmodel), What You Need (the parts list and how to build it, if needed), How It’s Done (how thesubmitter uses the physical models in class to include before and in-class instructions), and ThatLittle Extra (how to generate some drama or humor with the physical model, how it is tied toother concepts or future courses, etc.) Figure 3 shows a partial snapshot of one of thedemonstrations. The reader is encouraged to surf to the site and check a full page out. Figure 3. A Snapshot of a Demonstration Page at
change as well.AcknowledgmentsAny opinions expressed here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of any supporting agencies.Bibliography1 Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century. Committee on Academic Prerequisites for ProfessionalPractice, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia: ASCE, 2004.2 “Interpretation of the ABET Engineering Critieria for Civil and Similarly Named Programs”, Commentary,Version 1.1, Committee on Curricula and Accreditation, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia:ASCE, 20043 Bloom, B. S., ed. Taxonomy of educational objectives, New York: Longman, 1956. 4 Boyer, E.L. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate, A Special Report. The
gr ag Ag Ag Ag sa isa s ly y tly Di Di D el ht os et
Professional Level.” Levels of Achievement Subcommittee of CAP^3, September 2004. Accessed at http://www.asce.org/raisethebar, January 16, 2006.8. Bloom, Benjamin S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman, 1956. Page 11.1038.17
by supporting students whohave backgrounds or experiences that will contribute to the overall diversity of the College ofEngineering. Underrepresented ethnic groups currently comprise 17 percent of the UT Austinengineering student body. The EOE Director serves as co-administrator of the College’s OpenMentoring® Program. Page 11.911.4The College of Engineering at UT Austin has consistently remained among the ranks of thecountry's top engineering schools. The 2006 edition of the U. S. News & World Report survey ofthe country's engineering undergraduate schools ranked UT Austin eleventh in the nation among350 accredited engineering schools
phase of the competition: however, all of the wheels must be carried withthe vehicle for each of the runs (distance, load, speed and stopping) of the competition. Inaddition, the following guidelines were placed on the construction: ‚ The mousetrap mechanism could not be altered or modified. ‚ Only the mousetrap could be used to power the vehicle. ‚ No use of rubber bands or anything elastic to attach from the mousetrap to the Page 11.889.7 axles of the vehicle. ‚ Either axle, or both, may be used as the drive axle(s). ‚ The entire vehicle must start behind the designated
of security should the location of the content be disclosedby some other means.The RedRover program is called online like any other HTML page on the server. A typicalsystem call is outlined in Figure 2 to visualize the request chain within the system from a clientmachine. The page name is simply redrover.cfm instead of a .htm or .html extension. Uponbeing called, the program asks for a user name and password before presenting a menu ofcourses from which to select, similar to most learning management systems such as Blackboard.Based on the selection, the internal variables corresponding to the content page(s) requested willlocate the file by index and display its content (if allowed by the user’s credentials) as part of theRedRover output
results of theanalysis by major with regard to the two-way interaction as viewed by the third party. Many ofthe responses were Neutral and one survey had a written response of N/A with respect to the oneof the third party questions. It is believed that many of the “Neutral” answers may have been “Idon’t know what the other two did when they were working in a two-way interaction.”Therefore, it is recommended that a sixth response category be added to the survey to allowstudents to answer “no observation” or “don’t know”. Page 11.766.14Bibliography[1] Northrup, S., Moriarty, J., Vallee, G., Presz, W., “A Successful Interdisciplinary Engineering
distributing paper versions of thesurvey, Robert Knee for posting the web survey and summarizing its results, and John Muffo forsurvey resources and expertise.Bibliography1. Katehi, L., K. Banks, H. Diefes-Dux, D. Follman, J. Gaunt, K. Haghighi, P. Imbrie, R. Montgomery, W. Oakes, and P. Wankat, “Development of graduate programs in engineering education,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT. 2004.2. Griffin, Jr., O. H., A. Aning, V. K. Lohani, J. M. Kampe, R. Goff, M. Paretti, M. Alley, J. Lo, J. Terpenny, T. Walker, H. Aref, S. Magliaro, and M. Sanders, “Designing and Implementing Graduate Programs in Engineering Education,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake
importantly, to help maintain the sense of colleagueship and community that develops among the workshop participant s during their four days together. The sessions are open to participants in the orientation workshops held in the preceding three years. Topics that have been addressed include troubleshooting teaching, working with student project teams, dealing with fund ing agencies, and the most popular one, writing effective NSF CAREER grant proposals. The average attendance is between ten and twenty. One of the principal reasons for initiating the workshop was new faculty dissatisfactionwith the orientation they received following their arrival at N.C. State. To assess the impact ofthe workshop in this regard, surveys of
models are used for analyzingand evaluating operational impact of ITS alternatives on traffic flow by adjusting traffic signalsand other ITS controlled variables, based on real-time information to help move traffic at higheraverage speeds and better adhere to schedules. Unlike the other three projects, this projectshowed how computer simulated learning occurs. The teacher was first introduced to the basictheories and fundamentals of traffic simulation by using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)-based software as a teaching tool. For selected freeway ramp sites and immediately followingarterial intersection(s) in Cincinnati, the teacher studied the traffic flow in a short segment of thefreeway to understand what variables impact the traffic flow
-Share, Thinktrix, Thinklinks, and weird facts: An interactive system for cooperative learning. In N. Davidson & T. Worsham (Eds.), Enhancing Thinking Through Cooperative Learning (pp. 169–181). New York: Teachers College Press. 10. McKeachie, W. J., & Svinicki, M. (2006). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. 11. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Publishing. 12. Angelo, T. A., & Cross, P. K. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 13. Stacy S
John in that he retrospectively reflectson how reading journal articles in the past helped him approach reading journals in the present.He states: “When I started reading paper[s], I used to go through it very fast. My idea was just grasp the results and that's all… I didn't follow the whole idea of the [paper]... [My advisor] wanted me to see that all these things are not very difficult. All the [big] equations we see are actually very small, simple equations… Now when I see some very difficult equation, I know that it's not difficult. Inherently it's very simple. This is the learning I had because this helps me a lot now.” - UmarEven though Umar knows he learned how to approach reading journal papers with
sketch of any new equipment, an estimatedprice, and the potential market. In addition, each group delivered an “elevator pitch” for theirproduct(s) (< 2 minutes). The class then voted for the best product.This assignment addresses the 3Cs by requiring students to identify opportunities and brainstormideas (curiosity), investigate the market and perform research (connections); and identifycustomers and develop a value proposition (creating value). The KEEN outcomes for thisactivity are for students to explore a contrarian view of an accepted solution, integrateinformation, identify opportunities, apply creative thinking, investigate the market, evaluatevalue and feasibility, and convey a solution.This assignment has been used to assess a
Intellectual Property Advisory Committee (IPAC) (Patent in progress).7. Technical Date Sheet for 1002300 Twist-Release Polymagnet Pair – 90 degree with Detent, available from http://catalog.polymagnet.com/media/pdf/1002300%20datasheet.pdf on October 24, 2016.8. A.B. Nellippallil, J.K. Allen, F. Mistree, R. Vignesh, B.P. Gautham, and A.K. Singh, (2017). A Goal-Oriented, Inverse Decision-Based Design Method to Achieve the Vertical and Horizontal Integration of Models in a HotRod Rolling Process Chain, ASME Design Automation Conference. Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Under Review.9. C.-H. Goh, S. Ahmed, A.P. Dachowicz, J.K. Allen, and F. Mistree, Integrated Multi-scale Robust Design to Consider Microstructure Evolution and Material Properties in the
. 3 See Robert Cialdini, Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: Morrow,1993; Douglas Stone, Bruce Patton, and Sheila Heen, Difficult Conversations: How toDiscuss What Matters Most (New York: Penguin, 1999); and Roger Fisher and DanielShapiro, Beyond Reason: Using Emotions as You Negotiate (New York: Penguin, 2005).4 Eight Hours for What We Will: Workers and Leisure in an Industrial City, 1870-1920.Cambridge University Press, 1983.5 Engel’s autobiography, like those of his seven co-conspirators, was originally publishedserially in 1886 in the Chicago Knights of Labor. They were reissued in a single volume,edited by Philip S. Foner in 1969. Engel’s short autobiography is available online:https
,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, Jan. 2005.2. M. Hoit and M. Ohland, “The Impact of a Discipline-Based Introduction to EngineeringCourse on Improving Retention,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, no. 1, Jan. 1998.3. P. A. Johnson, “Problem-Based, Cooperative Learning in the Engineering Classroom,”Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 125, no. 1, Jan. 1999.4. L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate EngineeringEducation,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, Jan. 2005.5. M. Meyer and S. Marx, “Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of WhyUndergraduates Leave Engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 4, Oct
Strategies for Engineering Education and Practice,” Proceedings of the 1st World Engineering Education Flash Week, Lisbon, Portugal, pp.205-212, 2011.24 John Heywood, “Engineering Education Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction,” Hoboken, N.J. : Wiley-Interscience: IEEE Press, pp.402-415, 2005.25 Larry J. McKenzie, Michael S. Trevisan, Denny C. Davis, & Steven W. Beyerlein, “Capstone Design Courses and Assessment of ABET EC 2000: A National Survey,” Proceedings of 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Engineering Education Reaches New Heights, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, pp.20-23, June 2004.26 Leah H. Jamieson, William C. Oakes, & Edward J. Coyle, “EPICS: Documenting Service-Learning to
education, faculty in your department who have been more vocal about pedagogyand associated research, and members of the ASEE collegiate chapter.Involvement with Engineering Education ResearchThere are a few approaches to get involved with engineering education research if it is not theprimary focus of your doctoral work.Express an interest to learn and collaborate with an engineering education faculty mentor(s) thatyou have sought out, who may be faculty outside of your department. Investigate if they have on-going research projects that you could assist with on a voluntary (unpaid) basis, but that wouldultimately allow you to co-author papers and/or participate in poster or presentations at on-campus symposia, regional or national conferences. A
and stakeholder relationships. Organization studies, 29(8-9), 1227-1254.Lester, J., & Kezar, A. (2012). Faculty grassroots leadership: Making the invisible visible. The Journal of the Professoriate, 6(2), 98-129.Lozano, R. (2006). Incorporation and institutionalization of SD into universities: breaking through barriers to change. Journal of cleaner production, 14(9), 787-796.Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of organizational behavior, 23(6), 695-706.Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: developing an individual differences measure. Journal of applied psychology, 88(4), 680.Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional Change in Toque Ville
. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8:255- 284.[16 Isaacs, B. (2001). Mystery of the missing women engineers: A Solution. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 127(2):85-91.[17] Tuan, H., Vhin, C., and Shich, S. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation toward science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6): 639-654.[18] Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, Instrument: Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.[19] APPLES (Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey), created by the CAEE (Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education) project and available
biomedical engineering curricula", Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual: IEEE, 2001, pp. F3E-16-21 vol. 12.[16] Linsenmeier, R.A., T. Harris, and S. Olds, "The VaNTH bioengineering curriculum project", Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 2002. 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society EMBS/BMES Conference, 2002. Proceedings of the Second Joint: IEEE, 2002, pp. 2644-2645.[17] Linsenmeier, R.A., and D.W. Gatchell, "Core elements of an undergraduate biomedical engineering curriculum–State of the art and recommendations", 9th International Conference on Engineering Education, 2006.[18] Martin, T., S.D. Rivale, and K.R. Diller
century is described asthe “era of sustainability”. Engineering education needs to foster this concept and impartknowledge about dealing with it to future engineers by conducting innovative teachingapproaches like the EWB Challenge, for instance.AcknowledgmentThis work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research withinthe project ELLI (Excellent Teaching and Learning in Engineering Sciences). The authorswould also like to thank Mr. Steffen Rolke of Engineers Without Borders, Germany(Ingenieure ohne Grenzen e.V.).ReferencesAllen, Deborah E., Richard S. Donham, and Stephen A. Bernhardt. 2011. “Problem-Based Learning.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning (128): 21–29.Belu, R., R. Chiou, Ciocal L., and B. Tseng. 2016