Paper ID #40316A Comparison of ABET Assessment InstrumentsDr. Celeste Chavis, Morgan State University Celeste Chavis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Transportation and Urban Infrastructure Studies and the Interim Associate Dean of Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering at Morgan State University in Baltimore, MD. She is a registered professional engineer in the State of Maryland.Dr. Petronella A. James, Morgan State University Dr. Petronella James is a faculty member at Morgan State University in both the Electrical Engineering and Transportation departments. Dr. James has experience in
Paper ID #42431Professional Development for STEM Teachers in Rural Counties to BroadenParticipation in EngineeringDr. Taryn Melkus Bayles, University of Pittsburgh Taryn Melkus Bayles is a Professor, Teaching Track, in the Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department at the University of Pittsburgh, and serves as the Undergraduate Program Director. She has spent part of her career working in industry with Exxon, Westinghouse, Phillips Petroleum and Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center (now NETL). Her industrial experience has included process engineering, computer modeling and control, process design and testing, and
Paper ID #32698The Stated and Hidden Expectations: Applying Natural Language Process-ingTechniques to Understand Postdoctoral Job PostingsJia Zhu, Florida International University Jia Zhu is a Ph.D. student in the Knight Foundation School of Computing and Information Science at Florida International University (FIU). Her research interests include computer science education, educa- tional data mining, and data science, with a focus on broadening participation in computing.Ellen Zerbe, Pennsylvania State University Ellen Zerbe is a graduate student pursuing a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University
Challenges identified by the National Academy of Engineeringwould you choose to address, and how would you do it? Each team selected a differentchallenge, and was instructed to produce a video that described: • The challenge • The social impact • The national technological readiness to address the challenge • Possible avenues to solve the challengeTeams were instructed to create all-original video content using class/reading materials providedby the instructor and posted in the class Blackboard site. This included the NAE website and theuniversity library’s engineering database. Videos were posted to YouTube as either “Public” or“Unlisted,” and the URL emailed to the instructor. The videos were screened during the lastclass session of
of Applied Leadership at City University of Seattle; meyers@cityu.edu. Page 26.1508.1Mr. Fabian Zender, The Boeing Company Fabian Zender is an Engineering Performance Coach at The Boeing Company where he participates in research in the Technical and Professional Learning Solutions group. He obtained his undergraduate and graduate degree in Aerospace Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. In his research c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Paper ID #14006
Science at the University of Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. He earned his Master’s degree in Information and Communication Engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology’s School of Electronics and Information Engineering in Harbin, China and holds a Bachelor of Education (Electrical Technology) from Moi University in Eldoret, Kenya. I am extremely passionate about teaching and public information dissemination. Creating a safe, friendly and productive environment for my target audience to learn is my top priority. With a strong background in electrical engineering, I am a meticulous python programming-based data analyst with vast experience working with a variety of synthetic aperture radar datasets, arising from my two years
the blending of science and engineeringas its first “conceptual shift,” combining the two into “Science and Engineering Practices”(NGSS, Appendix A). NGSS explains, “This integration is achieved by raising engineeringdesign to the same level as scientific inquiry in classroom instruction when teaching sciencedisciplines at all levels and by giving core ideas of engineering and technology the same status asthose in other major science disciplines” (NGSS, Appendix A). The following analysis examines how it addresses issues of equity and access in theimplementation of these “science and engineering practices.” To do this, the authors: 1. Examine the historical purposes of science and engineering education (as well as the connections
for the corporation. He also worked as a consultant in office automation for five years at Microlink Computer Services, Bangladesh. Dr. Choudhuri also taught undergraduate courses in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Bangladesh Institute of Technology for five years.Dr. Brian Krug, Grand Valley State University I have spent 24 years as an electrical engineer in both the telecom industry aerospace industry. Before joining the School of Engineering here at GVSU, I worked for Teradyne and Tellabs in Chicago and at Eaton Aerospace, GE aviation and Parker Aerospace in west Michigan. My research interests include sensors, embedded systems, control and power theory. My most recent work involved developing a new
interests include: the appli- cation of arts based research methodologies to consider ”wicked problems”; the curricular impacts of art and technology on education; exploration and development of cross disciplinary STEAM initiatives, and using the lenses of affect theory and aesthetics to craft alternate forms of assessment.Ms. Kate Rice, University of Cincinnati c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Sticky Innovation: Exploring the Problem of the Bees Through Engineering and ArtIntroduction STEAM is an initiative that proposes to incorporate arts and design with the sciences;STEM and Art = STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art & Mathematics
), Academic deputy Director 2005-2008), Graduate Studies deputy Director (2009-2014) and Innovation deputy Director (2014-). Member of the Mexican Academy of Sciences, member of the Mexican Research System.Dr. Martin Edgar Reyes-Melo, Universidad Aut´onoma de Nuevo Le´on Ph.D. in Materials Science at Universit´e Paul Sabatier, Toulouse France 2004.Ing. Jos´e Alejandro Cazares, Teacher I am a teacher of mathematics and physics for students of the fistr year of engineering. I am also a re- searcher on issues related to education in Engineering, Technological Innovation, Entrepreneurship. Cur- rently I’m the administrative head of the Office of Innovation at the Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering
with engineering.One of the most pervasive engagement strategies employed in K-12 engineering education is useof real-world, context-driven engineering design. This is especially true of the Engineering isElementary (EiE) curriculum for grades K-8. EiE’s mission statement is “fostering engineeringand technological literacy for ALL elementary school-aged children.”16 The EiE curriculum issponsored by the National Center for Technological Literacy and is hosted by the Museum ofScience, Boston. Through curriculum development, research, and teacher professionaldevelopment, EiE disseminates engineering design-based curriculum for life science, earth andspace science, and physical science. The science focus in EiE is consistent with
. Denucci, United States Coast Guard Academy Thomas DeNucci is an Assistant Professor of Ship Design at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy in New Lon- don, CT. He holds a PhD in Ship Design from the Technical University of Delft, Delft, the Netherlands. His research interest include ship design and optimization tools and fishing vessel stability.Dr. Jaye Falls, United States Naval Academy JAYE FALLS is a faculty member in the Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Program at the USNA and received a B.S. in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering from Webb Institute in 1995 and an S.M. in Ocean Engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1997. She completed a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University
researchers can disrupt the chilly, heteronormativeculture of STEM by modeling inclusive classroom and lab practices. Additionally, we offerinsights on how students negotiate their identity visibility in a chilly, heteronormative, and silentculture. Introduction Despite efforts to increase diversity and inclusion on college and university campuses,Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) programs continue to be largelycisgender, male, heterosexual, and white [1]–[3]This continued lack of diversity is largely due tothe heteronormative, racist, and sexist culture that serves to make STEM spaces inhospitable formarginalized students, and results in high levels of attrition for these groups [1], [4]. In order toaddress this, we
University Press.15. Downey, G., & Lucena, J. (1997). Engineering selves. In Downey, G. and Dumit, J. (Eds.), Cyborgs and citadels (117-142). Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press.16. Lagesen, V. A. & Sørensen, K. H. (2009). Walking the line? The enactment of the social/technical binary in software engineering. Engineering Studies, 1(2), 129-149.17. Huff, J. L. (2014). Psychological journeys of engineering identity from school to the workplace: How students become engineers among other forms of self. Retrieved from ProQuest (3669254).18. Bijker, W., & Law, J. (1994). Shaping technology/Building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.19. Downey, G. (2005
, engineering education, diffusion of innovation, panel logit model(Poster, Work in Progress) IntroductionWorkforce projections indicate that opportunities in Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics (STEM) fields will grow considerably in upcoming years (BLS, 2014). Engineeringfields in particular are experiencing a shortage of qualified workers in spite of being high paidpositions compared to many professions. There is a concern that this shortage is in part due to apipeline crisis within the educational field. Specifically, review of higher education retentiondata highlight that post-secondary institutions are not recruiting and graduating a sufficientnumber of high-quality students to fill STEM
for Community Development, Environmental Science, and Environmental Engineering Technologies.Capt. Charles M Ouellette, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY 10996 Charles Ouellette is a Captain in the United States Army and an Instructor in the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering at the United States Military Academy. He is a 2006 graduate of Michigan State University with a B.A. in Economics. He obtained an M.S. from Missouri Science and Technology in Geological Engineering and most recently graduated from Cornell University with an M.S. in Ecology. He teaches Ecology, Environmental Science, and Environmental Engineering Technologies.Capt. Luke Thomas Plante, United States Military Academy
engineering students, and engineering students with mental health disabilities.Dr. Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University Dr. Kimberly G. Talley is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Technology, Maker Space Co-Director and Senior Research Fellow for the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research at Texas State University, and a licensed Professional Engineer. She received her Ph.D. and M.S.E. from the University of Texas at Austin in Structural Engineering. Her undergraduate degrees in His- tory and in Construction Engineering and Management are from North Carolina State University. Dr. Talley teaches courses in the Construction Science and Management Program, and her research focus is in
Paper ID #14431Self-Regulated Learning in Engineering Education: A Research Experiencesfor Undergraduates (REU) Site ProgramProf. Ning Fang, Utah State University Ning Fang is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University, USA. He has taught a variety of courses at both graduate and undergraduate levels, such as engineering dy- namics, metal machining, and design for manufacturing. His areas of interest include computer-assisted instructional technology, curricular reform in engineering education, and the modeling and optimization of manufacturing processes. He earned his PhD, MS, and BS
the promotion of gender equality, and ensuring womenparticipation in leadership roles and decision-making positions in political, economic, andpublic life. [1]These gaps are significant depending on the sectors that can be analyzed: by geographicregion, by culture, by education, by place where one lives (city or country), by field of study,by type of work, etc. This research addresses this gap in STEM (Science, Technology,Engineering and Mathematics) environments in Latin America.UNESCO shows the gap by reporting that in the world 35% of those pursuing highereducation in STEM areas are women. When analyzing LATAM countries, it is observed, forexample, that "in Mexico, for every 100 men enrolled in engineering, there are 45 women",while in
engineering before, during, and after theCOVID-19 pandemic.ESTEEM ProgramThe Enhanced Support in Technology Entrepreneurship for Engineering Majors (ESTEEM 1)and Enhancing Success in Transfer Education for Engineering Majors (ESTEEM 2) programsled by the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) were funded by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) through the Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (S-STEM) Program. ESTEEM 1 (2011-2016) emphasized technologyentrepreneurship support for first-generation undergraduate engineering majors already at UCSB,while ESTEEM 2 (2016-present) emphasizes transitions in engineering that included bothundergraduate engineering majors and transfer students from four community college
sustainability interrelationships. Project 3 a. Described the social, economic, and environmental (Introduced) challenges associated with collective specific topic Project 5 3/7 (related to University sustainability goals and (Reinforced) chapters 6-10) 4. Demonstrate the need for interdisciplinary approach to Not assessed 2022 sustainability. 5. Evaluate sustainable engineering practices and technologies. Project 5 a. Described tradeoffs for suggested collective actions. 5/7 b. Evaluated each suggested
Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Director of the Center for Ad- vanced Computation and Telecommunications and formerly Associate to the Dean for Research and Grad- uate Study at the University of Massachusetts at Lowell. He received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from New York University, a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Polytechnic Institute of NewYork, and a Ph.D. in Acoustics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Upon graduation he became an Assistant Professor of Engineering Science and Mechanics at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. In 1987 he joined the Department Electrical and Computer Engineering at UMASS Lowell as its Analog Devices Career Development
Technologies.Dr. Neslihan Alp P.E., Indiana State University Dr. Neslihan Alp is the Dean of the College of Technology at Indiana State University since August 2018. She has received her Ph.D. in Engineering Management from the University of Missouri-Rolla. Her teach- ing and research interests are in the areas of project management, decision making, optimization, quality control, six sigma, lean systems, and operations management. Dr. Alp has numerous of publications in national and international conferences and journals. She is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Tennessee. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Open Educational
Paper ID #20939Motivation Profiles of Non-Major Computer Programmers in a Flipped Class-room EnvironmentLauren Miranda LingarAbbey WilliamsDr. Rachel McCord, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Rachel McCord is a a Lecturer and Research Assistant Professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Divi- sion at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. She received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include the impact of metacognitive and self-regulated learning development on engineering student success, particularly in the first year. c American Society for Engineering
with a Master of Science degree in Data Science and Analytics from the University of Oklahoma. She is currently employed full time as a Data Scientist. Her research interests include text mining, machine learning, and data analytics.Prof. Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma Zahed Siddique is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering of University of Oklahoma. His research interest include product family design, advanced material and engineering education. He is interested in motivation of engineering students, peer-to-peer learning, flat learning environments, technology assisted engineering education and experiential learning. He is the coordinator of the
identities with other gender, racial, andethnic groups that are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) education.Based upon national recognition that nontraditional students possess untapped potential tostrengthen and diversify the engineering workforce, the purpose of this qualitative research studywas to examine the lived experience of nontraditional students engaged along alternativepathways to engineering degrees. Providing new understandings of how nontraditional studentsmade sense of their engineering education experiences, this work reports on the waysnontraditional engineering students narratively described their success in the context of the two-year transfer program. Findings revealed that participants
autonomous vehicles and opportunities and challenges with regard to technology, user acceptance, privacy, legal issues, and the role of engineers and scientists in addressing the pertinent issues.Initial Observations and FindingsThis section presents instructor observations from working with high school students onimplementation of this activity as part of a week-long engineering summer camp. Studentsworked together in pairs to modify the traffic-simulation model. All the teams were able tosuccessfully run models and report the traffic performance measures before and after removingthe lane. Few teams had begun to write down the transportation performance measures before thesimulation period was complete, and thus a fair comparison of the two
children go aboutsupporting their children 's engineering learning—especially given the upswing in the number ofchildren being homeschooled in the U.S. over the past decade [1] [2], which is expected tosteadily grow in the future. Thus, in this study we aim to investigate the role a homeschoolparent plays in their child’s engineering learning. Literature review In the last decade computers have become less of a cutting-edge technology and more ofa commonality in every household. The shift in technology from exciting innovation to pertinenttools requires more than the ability to use computers for work. In fact, it is becomingincreasingly pertinent for children to think like computer scientists and
of engineering to pursue a career in education. For the past 5 years, Brian has taught various levels of high school physics, mathematics, applied technology, and robotics. Brian joined Sparkfun Electronics to help integrate ”tinkering,” electronics, and computational thinking into the classroom. One of his goals is to help teachers to de-mystify how household consumer electronics work. With a few simple tools, classrooms can excite and encourage students to explore the possibilities of microcontrollers, electronics, and physical computing. Brian Huang has a Bachelor’s of Science in Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign and a Masters in Education from the University of
Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Understanding Student Perceptions and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Technical WritingOpen generative artificial intelligence’s (AI’s) ability to craft human-like text concerns educatorswho fear students will complete assignments without meeting course objectives. Currently, AIdetection is unreliable, adding to educators’ concerns. While these fears are valid, we believe thebest way forward is to teach students how to use this powerful technology ethically andeffectively. Best practices for using AI