-Miguel. Implementing the sustainable development goals in university higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(6):1769–1776, 2023. 4 S. Lee and D. Shapiro. Completing college: National and state report with longitudinal data dashboard on six- and eight-year completion rates. (signature report 22),. Technical report, National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, Herndon, VA, 2023. 5 A. Valero and J. Van Reenen. The economic impact of universities: Evidence from across the globe. Economics of Education Review, 68:53–67, 2019. 6 M. Hanson. College Graduation Statistics. 2023. EducationData.org. 7 B. Yoder. ASEE Retention and Time-to-Graduation
Engineering,” Applied Sciences, 2022, 12, 7595. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157595.[2] H. Thai, “Machine learning for structural engineering: A state-of-the-art review,” Structures, Vol. 38, pp. 448-491, April 2022.[3] IBM, “What is a chatbot?” [Online]. Available: https://www.ibm.com/topics/chatbots. [Accessed February 7, 2024].[4] B. Marr, “A Short History of ChatGPT: How We Got To Where We Are Today,” Forbes, May 19, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/05/19/a-short-history-of-chatgpt-how-we- got-to-where-we-are-today/?sh=3bb6ca85674f. [Accessed January 23, 2024].[5] S. Slocum, “ChatGPT in Structural Engineering,” Engineer’s Notebook in Structure Mag., January
, and A. Ganz, IEEE EMBS Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, September, 200920. FIREGUIDE: Firefighter Guide and Tracker, by S. Gandhi, A. Ganz, and G. Mullett, the 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC'10), Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1st-4th September, 2010.21. Wireless Technologies for e-Healthcare, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol.17 No. 1, February, 201022. Department of Transportation website: www.its.dot.gov/resources.htm23. Mullett, Its 2010 and the new Electronics Technology Paradigm is Emerging Page 22.936.15
, Engineering is Elementary web site: http://www.mos.org/eie/20_unit.php9. Museum of Science, Boston. (2011). Thinking inside the box: Designing a plant package. Retrieved from Museum of Science, Boston, Engineering is Elementary web site: http://www.mos.org/eie/20_unit.php10. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Wadsworth Group/Thomson Learning: Belmont, CA.11. Hsu, M., Cardella, M., & Purzer, S. (2010). Assessing elementary teachers’ design knowledge before and after introduction of a design process model. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) annual meeting, Louisville, KY
assistant at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University. She is the coordinator of two component projects of a National Science Foundation grant focusing on retention issues and engaging early engineering students, and also serves as an academic advisor. McDonough earned a bachelor’s degree in sociology from William Smith College and a master’s degree in Public Administration from the University of Southern California. McDonough is currently a third year doctoral student in the Higher, Adult and Lifelong Education program at Michigan State. Her areas of interest include educational theory, student development and engineering education.S. Patrick Walton, Michigan State University S. Patrick Walton is an
, and the electronics component interface anddisplay, respectively. We further acknowledge companion support from the World Bank for ini-tial graduate student support for PhD students involved in the study.References1. TIDEE. Integrated Design Engineering Assessment and Learning System. 2011 [cited; Available from: http://tidee.org/page/Front.2. Sageev, P. and C. Romanowski, A message from recent engineering graduates in the workplace: Results of a survey on technical communication skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 2001. 90: p. 685-693.3. Sheppard, S., et al., What is engineering practice? InternationalJournal of Engineering Education, 2006. 22(3): p. 429-438.4. Johnson, M., et al., Use of the
?”Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, 20-23 Page 22.1294.12June, 2010.22 Meyer, K., Bert, S., 2007, “A Technique for Program-Wide Direct Assessment of Student Performance,”Proceedings of ASEE Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.23 Marin, J.A., Armstrong, J.E. Jr., Kays, J.L., “Elements of an Optimal Capstone Design Experience,”Journal of Engineering Education, January 1999, pp.19-22.24 Welch, R.W., “Addressing Professional Practice Issues within the Curriculum,” Proceedings of theAmerican Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 26-29 June, 2011.25 http
college at America's public universities. 2009, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. xxi, 389 p.4. Ehrenberg, R.G., C.V. Kuh, and Cornell Higher Education Research Institute., Doctoral education and the faculty of the future. 2009, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ix, 308 p.5. Lowell, B.L. and H. Salzman, Into the eye of the storm: Assessing the evidence on science and engineering education, quality, and workforce demand. 2007, The Urban Institute: Washington, D.C.6. Sheppard, S., et al., Exploring the engineering student experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES). 2010: Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. TR-10-01.7. Astin, A.W
AC 2011-2085: THE VALUE OF DIRECT ENGAGEMENT IN A CLASS-ROOM AND A FACULTY: THE LIAISON LIBRARIAN MODEL TO IN-TEGRATE INFORMATION LITERACYAnne Parker, University of Manitoba Anne Parker, PhD is an Associate Professor and Technical Communication Coordinator in the Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba S. Norma Godavari, MLIS, is the Head, Donald W. Craik Engineering Library and Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba Page 22.1512.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 The Value of Direct Engagement in a Classroom and a Faculty
. L. (1998, December). Research & curriculum. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 54-61.6. Goodwin, T. & Hoagland, K. E. (1999). How to get started in research (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.7. Karukstis, K. (2006). A council on undergraduate research workshop initiative to establish, enhance, and institutionalize undergraduate research. Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 1744-1745.8. Malachowski, M. (1997, June). Not all research is equal: Student-oriented vs. research-oriented approaches to scholarship. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 182-185. Regalado, S. New EWU Building Makes History. . .21st Century Style, Inland Northwest Catalyst magazine
.2010.12.04910 Bednarz, S.W. (2000). Connecting GIS and problem based learning. In Audet, R. & Ludwig, G. (Eds.), GIS in Schools. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.11 Lambros, A. (2004). Problem-Based Learning in Middle and High School Classrooms: A Teacher's Guide to Implementation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.12 Torp, L., S. Sage (2002). Problems as Possibilities: Problem-Based Learning for K-16 Education (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.13 Kucharski, G.A., J.O. Rust, T.R. Ring (2005). Evaluation of the Ecological, Futures, and Global (EFG) Curriculum: A Project-Based Approach. Education, 125(4), 652.14 Hurd, P.D. (1997). Scientific Literacy: New Minds for a Changing
late 1990’s. The student enrolments for both the U of A andMacEwan for 1995 and 2010 are provided in Table 1. Currently MacEwan students comprisealmost 10% of the second year engineering students at the U of A.Table 1 - Enrolment statistics for MacEwan and University of Alberta: 1995 & 2010Year MacEwan MacEwan % U of A U of A % Engineering Engineering / Engineering Engineering Institution /Institution Enrolment Enrolment ~25,000
23, 2011].11. S. Gustin, “Gawker Media Websites Hacked, Staff and User Passwords Leaked,” Wired. Dec. 2010. [Online]Available: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/12/gawker-hacked/. [Accessed: Feb 23, 2011].12. M. Wilson, K. Stine, and P. Bowen, “Information Security Training Requirements: A Role- and Performance-Based Model (Draft).” NIST Special Publication 800-16 Revision 1 (Draft). 2009.13. D. Jacobson. “Teaching Information Warfare with Lab Experimentations via the Internet.” In Frontiers inEducation, 2004. T3C/7-T3C12 Vol. 11 (2004).14. J.A. Whittaker and R. Ford, "How to think about security," IEEE Security & Privacy, vol.4, no.2, pp.68-71,March-April 2006.15. J. Viega, The Myths of Security, O’Reilly Media, Inc. Sebastopol, CA
teaching. In W. Wulf (Ed.), Emerging technologies and ethical issues in engineering: Papers from a workshop, October, 2003. Washington D.C: National Academic Press.10. Herkert, J.R. (2000). Engineering Education in the USA: Content, pedagogy and curriculum. European Journal of Engineering education, 25(4).11. Ohland, M. & Barry B., (2009) Applied Ethics in the Engineering, Health, Business, and Law Professions: A Comparison. Journal of Engineering Education, October 2009.12. Pritchard , Michael S., (2010). Teaching Engineering Ethics: A case study approach. Center for the study of Ethics in Society, Western Michigan University.13. Interview with Tinus (January 10, 2011).14. Svinicki, M. (2004). Learning and
Education.16. Pisupati, S. Jonathan P. Mathews and Alan W. Scaroni, “Energy Conservation Education for Non- Engineering Students: Effectiveness of Active Learning Components,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2003). American Society for Engineering Education.17. National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/., Accessed March 15, 2010.18. Committee on Enhancing the Community College Pathway to Engineering Careers, National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council “Educating America's Engineers: The Vital Role of Community Colleges,” The National Academies in Focus, Vol 5, No 3 (2005).19. Krupczak, J.J, and K
. Srinivasan Vanchinathan, Ph.D Professor and Chair, Civil & Advanced Process Control & LP modeling Environmental Engineering Manager Rowan University Sunoco, Inc Mother of 11 year old Father of 11 year oldB Donna S. Reese, Ph.D. Bob Reese, Ph.D. Interim Department Head Associate Professor and Director of Page 22.514.2 Computer Science & Engineering Microsystems Prototyping Laboratory Mississippi State University
annual conference of the American Industrial Arts Association (1947, 1965). Epsilon Pi Tau.11 Savage, E. and Sterry, L. (1990). A Conceptual Framework for Technology Education. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.12 Schmitt, M. L. & Pelley, A. L. (1966). Industrial arts education: A survey of programs, teachers, students, and curriculum. U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare,. OE 33038, Circular No. 791. Washington, DC: Office of U.S. Government Printing Office.13 Dugger, W.E., Miller, C.D., Bame, E.A., Pinder, C.A., Giles, M.B., Young, L.H., & Dixon, J.D. (1980). Report of the survey data. Blacksburg, VA: Standards for Industrial Arts Programs Project, Virginia
for the Controls Division of the Harris Corporation, a Division with over U$S 60 million (then dollars) in annual sales. He joined the University of the Pacific in 2000 and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Texas. His present research interests are principally in multidisciplinary engineering education and enginering economic analysis.Elizabeth A. Basha, University of the Pacific Elizabeth A. Basha is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of the Pacific. She received a S.M. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology as well as a B.S. degree in Computer Engineering from the University of the
implemented to achieve these outcomes: Sustainability Learning Modules Multidisciplinary Senior Design Project and Quality Sustainable Engineering InternshipEach program component addresses specific learning objectives/student outcomes associatedwith the outcomes described above. The learning objectives (Table 1) reflect increasedexpectations and levels of complexity as students attain higher academic classifications andmatriculation levels. The key components are described in the sections that follow.Table 1. Engineering sustainable Engineers Learning ObjectivesLearning Objective/Student Outcome Course Level(s)/ExperiencesExplain sustainability concepts and terminology
difference between S and P waves using Slinkys, which providestudents with a visual way to observe the waveforms. Students learn about how seismic wavespropagate and how recording the waves allow scientists to understand where and in whatdirection a fault ruptured during an earthquake. Students complete a worksheet in order to gainan understanding of the process of triangulation of a quake’s epicenter and the different types ofseismic waves.2.2.2.4. Geologic Half Life with PenniesThis activity provides a hands-on demonstration of how the concept of a half-life works forradioactive material through the shaking of pennies in a box. Initially all of the pennies areplaced heads up in the box, which is then closed and shaken. Upon inspecting the
Comprehensive Learning Spaces Evaluation Model Accessed January 10 2011 from http://www.swinburne.edu.au/spl/learningspacesproject/ [12] Woolner, P., Clark, J., Hall, E., Tiplady, L., Thomas, U., and Wall, K. (2009, in press). Pictures are necessary but not sufficient: using a range of visual methods to engage users about school design. In Press.[13] Wall K. & Higgins, S. (2006). Facilitating metacognitive talk: a research teaching and learning tool. International Journal of Research and method in Education 29(1) p. 39-53.[14] Pitkethly, A. & Prosser, M. (2001). The First Year Experience Project: A model for university-wide change. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 185-191.[15] Pascarella, E.T. &
in either case.References 1 Blair, B. F. (2004). Student Academic Performance and Compensation: The Impact of Cooperative Education.College Student Journal , 38 (4), 643-6532 Smith Jr., H. S. (1965). The Influence of Participation in the Cooperative Program on Academic Performance.Journal of Cooperative Education , 2, 7-203 Blair, B. F., & Millea, M. (2007). Quantifying the Benefits of Cooperative Education. Journal of CooperativeEducation , 38 (1), 67-72.4 Schuurman, M. K., Pangborn, R. N., & McClintic, R. D. (2008). Assessing the Impact of EngineeringUndergraduate Work Experience: Factoring in Pre-work Academic Performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 97 (2), 207
Instructional and Curricular Change in Engineering, R. Spalter-Roth, N. Fortenberry, and B. Lovitts, eds., American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.11. Ambrose, S. (2007). "Exploring the Role of the Reward System in the Diffusion of Innovation in Engineering Education." The Acceptance and Diffusion of Innovation: A Cross-Curricular Perspective on Instructional and Curricular Change in Engineering, R. Spalter-Roth, N. Fortenberry, and B. Lovitts, eds., American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.12. Kramer, L. (2007). "Greedy Institutions and Faculty Involvement in Retention." The Acceptance and Diffusion of Innovation: A Cross-Curricular Perspective on Instructional and Curricular Change in Engineering, R
Conference and Exposition, June 2009, Austin,TX.13 R. Welch and M. McGinnis, “Assessment of ABET 3 a-k in an Open-Ended Capstone?” Proceedings ofthe ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2010, Louisville, KY.14 N. Al-Massoud, P. Baumann, and A. Gates, “Development and Implementation of an IntegratedOutcomes-Based Assessment Plan for a New Engineering Program,” Proceedings of the ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, June 2009, Austin, TX.15 K. Ossman, “An Assessment and Data Collection Process for Evaluating Student Progress on A-K ABETEducational Outcomes,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2010,Louisville, KY.16 Y. Al Kalaani and S. Bernadin, “An Outcomes-Driven Approach for Assessment: A
. Page 22.346.16References1 Roy S. Czernikowski, Margaret B. Bailey, David A. Borkholder, Matthew M. Marshall, Alan H. Nye, and N.Richard Reeve. (2007) RIT’s Engineering Honors Program: Product Innovation in a Global Economy. 37thASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. T2A9-T2A152 William E. Lee III. (2002) Humanities Awareness: A Comparison Between Honors Program and TraditionalUndergraduate Engineering Students. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition.3 Gregory Tonkay, E.Zimmers. (2007) Migration from a Leadership Honors Program to an Engineering LeadershipMinor. American Society for Engineering Education.4 Kathleen A.K. Ossman. (2005) Enhancing the Education of Engineering
engineering competency knowledge addressed in theirrecently completed online course(s). Responses were received from 100% of the instructors and25% of the students. The instructor survey requested instructors to select from a list of 37systems engineering competencies to identify which competencies were addressed in theircourse; and to select from six competency knowledge levels to identify what level of knowledgeproficiency the instructor expected successful students to achieve upon completing the course.Similarly, the student survey asked each student to select from the same list of 37 systemsengineering competencies to identify which competencies were addressed in the course; and toselect from the same six competency knowledge levels to identify
Technology, a M. S. in Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering from the Illinois Institute of Technology and a Ph. D in Mechanics from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.He has received the Archie Higdon Award from the American Society of Engineering Education. Page 22.357.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Comprehensive Course Redesign: Introduction to the Mechanics of MaterialsAbstractConvergence of multiple patterns necessitates significant new directions in redesigning andteaching courses in the area of solid mechanics for undergraduate engineering
22.371.12 43. Right click on transport of diluted species, and select add selected.44. Click on the flag, select domain 1, and click on the plus sign .45. In the model builder, click on the plus next to transport of diluted species.46. Right click on transport of diluted species, select convection and diffusion, highlight the domain (domain number 1 is the entire rectangle), select velocity field spf1/fp1, and enter a diffusion coefficient of 1 x 10-6 m2/s.47. Right click on transport of diluted species, select inflow, and enter 41 mol/m3. Zoom in, select boundary 2, and click on the plus sign.48. Right click on transport of diluted species, select concentration, and enter 0 mol/m3. Zoom in, select boundaries 1 and 4, and click
of Engineering, 2005. (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11338#description) accessed on January 17, 2011. 5. Sanders, M., Thompson, M., El-Sayed, M., King, L., and Lindquist, M. “Assessing Interdisciplinary Engineering Capstone Project,” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006. 6. Green, M., Leiffer, P., Hellmuth, T., Gonzalez, R., and Ayers, S., “Effectively Implementing the Interdisciplinary Senior Design Experience: A Case Study and Conclusions,” Proceedings of the 2007 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2007. 7. Kim, K., and McNair, L., “ Self-Managed Teaming and Team