TEAM 1 TEAM 2 20 TEAM 3 TEAM 4 TEAM 5 15 Power [mW] 10 5 0 2 3 4 5 6 Velocity [m/s] Figure 4. Example plot of power produced by the generator coupled to the wind turbine shaft versus the speed of air in the wind tunnel.Door handle projectIn this
and Wilmington.9Both Virginia Tech and Wake Forest have access to Internet2’s Abliene network. Themotivation for selecting IP for delivering SBES courses was driven by several factors: cost andthe ability to move towards future technology. The initial courses for the SBES were deliveredin fall 2002 using ISDN. The technical team carefully reviewed the protocol options fordelivering future SBES classes. Because of the increasing cost of delivering classes using ISDNand the trend of service providers focusing more on supporting IP, the SBES directors supportedthe technical team’s decision to move to IP. Table 2. Summary of Project Goals Summary of Project Goals General Strategy Networking infrastructure
Ventures in the School ofManagement at Florida Tech. She is also the Co-Director of Florida TechStart, the Florida Institute of Technology’sbusiness accelerator. Prior to joining the university, she was a practicing CPA for 25 years and founder of CarolynJ. Fausnaugh Associates, CPA’s. In the early 1990’s she was a member of the founding team of InternetU, the firstInternet
Session 1455Framework for Integrating Project-Based Learning, Experience and Practice in Professional Graduate Education for Engineers in Industry Leading to the Professional Master of Engineering D. D. Dunlap, 1 D. A. Keating, 2 T. G. Stanford, 2 A. L. McHenry, 3 E. M. DeLoatch, 4 P. Y. Lee, 5 D. R. Depew, 6 G. R. Bertoline, 6 M. J. Dyrenfurth, 6 S. J. Tricamo, 7 H. J. Palmer 8 I.T. Davis, 9 R.E. Morrison, 10 J. P. Tidwell, 11 K. Gonzalez-Landis, 12 J. O’Brien 13 J. M. Snellenberger,14 D. H. Quick,14 R. N. Olson,14 L. M. Coulson14 Western Carolina University 1 / University of South Carolina 2
displayed in Figure 3, an incorrect form for thecubic feet per second units was used. LON-CAPA would have recognized units expressed as“ft^3/s”. No penalty is assessed for responses that are in an incorrect form. Notice that the triescounter still registers zero of a maximum of 2 tries for this problem. (The instructor can setmaximum tries as high as 100.) For an incorrect answer, LON-CAPA responds with an“incorrect” message followed by the counter displaying the number of tries used and themaximum allowed.It is advantageous to write some problems in the forms shown in Figures 2 and 3 rather than as inFigure 1 so that multiple answers are submitted all at once with a single push of the submitanswer button because a computer response of “incorrect
psi From measured strains in 1,596 -3,549 mechanics lab From simple beam theory 1,633 -3,924 (hand calculations) From ALGOR analysis 1,633* -3,924 with beam elements From ALGOR analysis 772 -3,146 with solid elements* Ratioed from stress at bottom of beam – results are calculated only for worst stress based onvalue of S (I/c) input for the cross-section.The hand calculations agreed exactly with the beam element results. This was expected
help more accurately represent the full spectrum of student abilitieswith respect to their professional development. By effectively designing assignments and gradingrubrics targeted to ABET assessment, faculty can help students develop project portfolios thatprovide a comprehensive reflection of a-k outcomes.Bibliography1. C. L. Dym and S. D. Sheppard. “Introduction and Overview,” International Journal of Engineering Education 17(4-5): 2001, 322-323.2. J. R. Phillips and Z. H. Duron, “Assessment in the Light (?) of ABET Accreditation Criteria,” InternationalJournal of Engineering Education 17 (4-5): 2001, 476-478.3. P. E. Doepker, “Department Assessment and the Design Course: A Model for Continuous Improvement,”International Journal of
than engineering professions. Providing resources to teachersthat can be integrated into the classroom will not only encourage and help students toprepare for engineering degrees but inform teachers about engineering so that they aremore comfortable discussing engineering with students and parents.Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS)In the 1970’s the Texas Legislature mandated that Texas K-12 education institutionsmeasure student knowledge and skills in reading, mathematics and writing. At firststudents were assessed on minimum basic skills in reading, mathematics, and writing, butin 1990 the focus changed from minimum to academic skills. Ten years later, thelegislature mandated that testing should be conducted at more grade levels and
Page 10.939.12Engineering Consortium57 publishes a free monthly newsletter and provides extensive, free, on-line educational programs in high-tech areas. Proceedings of the 2005 Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationU. S. Air Force Summer Faculty Fellowship Program58, administered by the ASEE, offers 8-12week research residencies at participating Air Force Research Facilities for full-time science andengineering faculty at U.S. colleges and universities. It provides mentoring under Air Forceresearchers to faculty who are citizens or legal permanent residents of the U.S. Research isconducted at an Air Force Research
, NY.Ulanowicz, R.E. 2000. Growth and development: Ecosystems phenomenology,Iuniverse.com, Lincoln, NE.Wolfram, S. 2002. A new kind of science. Wolfram Research, Champaign, IL.Zemansky, M.W. and R.H. Dittman. 1997. Heat and thermodynamics (7th Ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Page 10.619.15Presented at the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education National ConferencePortland, Oregon.
: National Academy Press.3 Bloom, B. S., “The 2-sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring,” Educational Researcher, 13 (6), 1984, pp. 4-16.4 Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American EducationalResearch Journal, 31, 104-137.5 Bennett, R.E., Jenkins, F., Persky, H., & Weiss, A. (in press). Assessing complex problem-solvingperformances. Assessment in Education.Biographical InformationKAY HOWELL, Federation of American Scientists, is the director of the Information Technologiesprogram and project manager of the Learning Federation. She previously served as Director of theNational Coordination Office for Computing, Information, and Communications for
-based education methods as a link for stimulating and strengthen engineering Page 9.943.12 excellence in the academic and the professional world. 6th EDA Conference, august 4-7, 2002.“Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copy- right 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”5. Kjersdam, F. and Enemark, S.: The Aalborg Experiment, Project Innovation in University Education. Aal- borg University Press ISBN 87-7307-480-25. 1994. (The book contents a long bibliography of further pub- lications).6. Kiip, Hans: M.Sc.Eng. in
withglobally dispersed development teams [Refs 2 and 3]. As mentioned above the MBAprogram now offers a certificate program in entrepreneurship called the Venture series. Inaddition, our Manufacturing System Engineering offers a graduate course for newproduct development within a corporate framework.Entrepreneurship teaching – undergraduate: Since the mid 1990’s Lehigh has offeredan award winning cross-disciplinary program in Integrated Product Development (IPD)for students in engineering, business and the design arts. For the past six years, theprogram has focused on technical entrepreneurship through new product development,with industry sponsorship of cross-disciplinary student teams [Ref 4]. The IPD programhas also engaged local entrepreneurs and
11As can be seen in Fig 2, higher FC causes higher TC which results in a higher BE point.This is the concern when comparing the traditional courses with online courses. Twoways to compensate or correct for this higher BE Point is to charge a higher course feefor the online course or increase the number of students in the online course at the oldfee.Twigg’s Cost for his Online course within a Mature SystemUsing data collected by the authors and applying them to Professor Twigg”s onlinecourse, we calculated the fixed costs for his online MET 111 course. Twigg’s Start-up Costs (Fixed cost) Hours Course Development $8,000 One course reduction 3,000
appear in IEEE Trans. on Education.[8] J. P. Perlin, D.J. Pack, B.E. Mullins, and R.E. Speakman, “Senior Capstone Design Experience: HoveringRobot,” Proc. of the 2003 ASEE Conference, Nashville, TN, June, 2003.[9] D.J. Pack and B.E. Mullins, “Toward Finding an Universal Search Algorithm for Swarm Robots,” Proceedings2003 IEEE/RJS Conference on Intelligent Robotic Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, Nevada, October 2003.[10] T. Hsiu, S. Richards, A. Bhave, A. Perez-Bergquist, I. Nourbakhsh. "Designing a Low-cost, ExpressiveEducational Robot." In Proceedings of IROS 2003, Las Vegas.AppendixThis syllabus is used in the first semester senior design course at the United States Air ForceAcademy. Lesson Topic Meet In Class
engineering majors, two femalesand four males), asking each of them to answer three or four questions, explaining theirthought processes out loud as they did so. The students were volunteers who wereselected on a first-come basis and compensated for their time. We followed a protocolduring the sessions: first we gave the student a written copy of each question and thenread it aloud. We asked the student to tell us what concept s/he thought the questionaddressed and then asked him or her to solve the problem thinking aloud and usingsketches, notes, etc., if desired. We asked questions intended to probe the students’thought processes as they solved the problems and tape-recorded the sessions for latertranscription and analysis. We also collected all
: The Mars Society Of CaltechHuman Exploration Of Mars Endeavor, 2000.4 S. J Hoffman,., and D. L Kaplan, ed., Human Exploration of Mar: The Reference Mission of the NASA MarsExploration Study Team, http://exploration.jsc.nasa.gov/marsref/contents.html, 1997.5 R. Zubrin and R. Wagner, The Case for Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet and Why We Must, 1996.6 T. Kammash and M.-J.Lee, “Gasdynamic Fusion Propulsion System for Space Exploration”, Journal of Propulsionand Power, 3, pp. 544-53, 1995.7 Zubrin, ibid.8JOHN W. NORTON, JR.John W. Norton, Jr. (jnorton@umich.edu) is working on his doctorate at the University of Michigan in civilinfrastructure systems with a focus on optimal drinking water technology implementation under the direction
. W. (2001). ‘Construction Contracts,’ McGraw Hill, New York.9. Hinze, J. W. (2001). ‘Construction Safety,’ Prentice Hall, New Jersey.10. Huband, F.L. (ed.) (1998), How Do You Measure Success? Designing Effective Processes for Assessing Engineering Education, ASEE Professional Books, Washington, D.C.11. Koehn, E. (1997), "Engineering Perceptions of ABET Accreditation Criteria," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 123(2), 66-70.12. Online Ethics Center for Engineering & Science, National Science Foundation (1999), http:// onlineethics.org.13. Pfatteicher, S.K.A. (1999), "EC2000 and the Engineering Ethics Dilemma," http://onlineethics.org/text/essays/pfatteicher.html.14. Roland, S., and Martin, M
agreements and the establishment of foreign universities in the country• Trans-national education• Modernizing the curriculum• Learning to learn• ICT`s and the pedagogical viewpoints• Higher education and the workforce (unemployment vs. making go-getters)In recent times, the way that universities, and therefore higher education in general, has becomea part of an increasingly globalized world, has changed. In this new scenario it is possible tosingle out the processes that tend towards the internationalization of higher learning. Theconstant and growing amount of exchanges amongst researchers and scholars, the many jointprojects undertaken by international groups and the mobility, real and virtual, that undergraduateand graduate students
Engineering Departments, Saginaw Valley State University, May 1999. 5. K. Scales, C. Owen, S. Shiohare, M. Leonard. Preparing for Program Accreditation Review Under ABET Engineering Criteria 2000: Choosing Outcome Indicators, Journal of Engineering Education, July 1998, pp. 207-210. 6. Joint Task Force on Engineering Education Assessment. A General Assessment Framework, in How Do You Measure Success?: Designing Effective Processes for Assessing Engineering Education, ASEE Professional Books, 1998, pp. 17-26. Page
& Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education12. M.S. Zwyno, Engineering Faculty Teaching Styles and Attitudes toward Student-Centered and Teaching- Enabled Teaching Strategies, Proceedings of 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 1122, Nashville, Tennessee (2003).13. M.S. Zywno, A contribution to Validation of Score Meaning for Felder-Soloman’s Index of Learning Styles, Proceedings of 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 2351, Nashville, Tennessee (2003).14. D. Elger, J. Beller, S. Beyerlein, B. Williams, Performance Criteria for Quality in Problem Solving, Proceedings of 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 2230
Florida Tech. She is also the Co-Director of Florida TechStart, the Florida Institute of Technology’sbusiness accelerator. Prior to joining the university, she was a practicing CPA for 25 years and founder of CarolynJ. Fausnaugh Associates, CPA’s. In the early 1990’s she was a member of the founding team of InternetU, the firstInternet Service Provider in Brevard County, Florida. Page 9.1152.15 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education
Observations and Results guidelines (specifics follow)Equations: 24. Equations are numbered 25. Punctuation with equations (: with follow/s/ing only) 26. Equations have spaceFigures/Tables: 27. Figure/Table labels correct. (Figure 1. Title) 28. Figures oriented correctly, clearly labeled and referencedLab ObservationsAnalysis29. Mathematical model used to predict system behavior presented with ample explanation and lead in.Experimental Equipment and Procedure30. Schematic of equipment used31. Highlights of equipment used32. Highlights of the procedure (not specific steps)Results33. Data presented with clear indication of what data applies to34. Reader will understand what this data refers to35. Trends in data stated
limited productionplanned for late Spring 2003. The pilot run is expected to run in the Summer of 2003.Curriculum materials will be finalized in the Autumn along with mass production of parts for fullimplementation in Winter 2004.Bibliography1. Crawford, P., Little, M., 2002, “Collaboration Among Educators for True Innovative Programming,” Journal of Teacher Education and Special Education, 25(3):320-324.2. Duerden, S., Graham, J.M., Garland, J., Doak, B., McCarter, J., Roedel, R.J., Evans, D.L., Williams, P., 1997, “Scaling Up Arizona State University's First-Year Integrated Program in Engineering: Problems and Solutions,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference.3. Frair, K., 1995, “An Integrated First Year Curriculum at the
Class Problems S-N curves, etc.9 Write effectively Lab & EDP Reports 5 Students turn in 6 written technical reports10 Speak effectively In-Class Discussions 2 Most students called on at least once per class.11 Knowledge of contemporary issues Student Discussion 2 We do bring current engineering issues into the classroom; develop an interest board in the classroom.12 Broad education to understand the impact of In-Class Discussions and 2 Mostly sidebar discussions as
Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers”, John Wiley &Sons, Inc., New York, NY.Creighton, L. L, April 2001, “Kicking Old Habits”, ASEE Prism, pp. 32-34.Denton, D. D., January 1998, “Engineering Education for the 21st Century: Challenges and Opportunities”, Journalof Engineering Education, pp. 19-22.Doderer, E. S., and Giolma, J. P., 1995, “If You Want to Teach Engineering”, Proceedings of the ASEE AnnualConference, pp. 1351-1355. Page 8.421.14Dugas, R., 1988, “A History of Mechanics”, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, NY. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society of Engineering Education
suggestthe teams work with rolled tubular elements made from the newspaper and tape. There isno set length that their bridge must span, however the winning team will be the one that isable to support the book for a given period of time (30 s) while spanning the largestdistance. This exercise is a good one to hold after the students have been introduced tothe topic of truss forces.Variation: For an even tougher challenge substitute a roll of toilet paper for thenewspaper.Decision Making Activities:Activity 11: Sporting Predictions using Group Decision MakingMaterials Required: A listing of teams in a tournament of interest to studentsGoal: to demonstrate one method for group decision making and consensus developmentDescription: Assign students to a
look at the lives of minority mathematics studentsin college. The College Mathematics Journal, 23(5), 362-372.9 Treisman, P. U., & Surles, S. (2001). Systematic reform and minority student high achievement. Washington,DC: Institute of Medicine (NAS). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 460199)10 Collins, Rachel E., General Engineering home page, as of January 12, 2003, http://www.ces.clemson.edu/ge/11 Clemson University College of Engineering and Science History, http://www.ces.clemson.edu/about/history.htm12 Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange report, http://www.occe.ou.edu/csrde/13 Clemson World, Winter 2002, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, p. 31.14 Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange report, http
Excellent 8 6 Numbe r of Re sponse s 4 2 0 a Excellent b Very Good c d Good e Fair g ABET Obje ctiv e Poor