Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5A: Work-In-Progress: 5 Minute Postcard Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi Cian, Clemson University; Michelle Cook, Clemson University; Lisa Benson, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2), 29.9. Li, Q., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2009). Development of a classification system for engineering student characteristics affecting college enrollment and retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 361.10. Doolen, T., & Long, M. (2007). Identification of retention levers using a survey of engineering freshman attitudes at oregon state university. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 721-734. doi:10.1080/0304379070152078411. Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139-151.12. Strobel, J., & Pan, R

Conference Session

Emerging Computing and Information Technologies I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chafic Bousaba, Guilford College; Tiera Kazar, Guilford College; Will C. Pizio, Guilford College

Tagged Divisions

Computing & Information Technology

.[14] Raspberry Pi Diagram. (n.d.). [Online]. Available:https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAcQjRxqFQoTCO2xoan7ssgCFUGNDQod140FYQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.raspberrypi.org%2Flearning%2Frobot-antenna%2Fworksheet%2F&psig=AFQjCNG9MWf-2bzcSvvTmdadxa7t1KjZOg&ust=1444396721593289. Accessed: September 22, 2015.[15] Raspberry Pi Foundation. (n.d.). About Us. [Online]. Available:https://www.raspberrypi.org/about/. Accessed September 20, 2015.[16] Raspberry Pi Foundation. (n.d.). Raspberry Pi 2 Model B. [Online]. Available:https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-2-model-b/. Accessed September 20, 2015.[17] Raspberry Pi Foundation (n.d.). Raspi-Config

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joshua Levi Weese, Kansas State University; William H. Hsu, Kansas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

number of repeated markers known headers (question, > (𝒕𝒉𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒉 − 𝟑) 2 ques, q, pre, post) Table 1. Heuristics for identifying the header row.In order to identify the boundaries of the payload within the data, we first start by identifying theheader row of the payload. The header row consists of column names of the various columnsavailable in the assessment scores. These could be student particulars such as name, identifier, orgender, or the particular assessment information, such as grade, question number, or aggregatescore. Our model consists a series of heuristics that score rows and columns for identifyingwhich row contains column headers, and which rows contain

Conference Session

Concurrent Paper Tracks Session I Curriculum

Collection

2016 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Douglas Moore Schutz, Tokyo University of Science; Dante Dionne, Korean Air; Yong-Young Kim P.E., Konkuk University

Tagged Topics

International Forum

. 14(S2): p. 95-112.13. Jones, Q., G. Ravid, and S. Rafaeli, Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Information systems research, 2004. 15(2): p. 194-210.14. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations. 1983, New York: Free Press.15. Karahanna, E., D.W. Straub, and N.L. Chervany, Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 1999: p. 183- 213.16. Bandura, A., Social Learning Theory. 1977, New York: General Learning Press.17. Kanawattanachai, P. and Y. Yoo, The Impact of Knowledge Coordination on Virtual Team Performance Over Time. MIS Quarterly

Conference Session

Concurrent Paper Tracks Session I Study Abroad Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Aaron Richard Sakulich, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

International Forum

the Panama Canal. Tenn. JL & Pol'y, 2008. 4: p. 303.20. Berrey, C.A., Inequality, demography, and variability among early complex societies in Central Pacific Panama. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2015. 40: p. 196-212.21. Wedgwood, A. and K. Sansom, Willingness-to-Pay Surveys: A Streamlined Approach: Guidance Notes for Small Town Water Services. 2003: WEDC, Loughborough University.22. Carse, A., Nature as infrastructure: Making and managing the Panama Canal watershed. Social Studies of Science, 2012: p. 0306312712440166.23. Fotos, M., Q. Newcomer, and R. Kuppalli, Policy Alternatives to Improve Demand for Water- Related Ecosystem Services in the Panama Canal Watershed. Journal of Sustainable Forestry

Conference Session

Technical Session 1: Collaborating with Engineering Students and Faculty

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aleshia Huber, Binghamton University; Jill Dixon, Binghamton University; Sandy Card, Binghamton University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

/ssie/under- grad/objectives-outcomes.html. 4. Large, J. (2006). Communication is engineering: Responding to needs of industry in a capstone course. 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois, 1-10. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/838. 5. Retherford, J. Q., & Ellenburg, K. S. (2016). Impacts of a university-wide service learning program on a senior undergraduate capstone course. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1-10. doi:10.18260/p.25548 6. Wilk, R. D. & Anderson, A. M. (2002), Development of communication skills across the engineering curriculum. 2002 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, Canada, 1-14. Retrieved from

Conference Session

Exploring the Entrepreneurial and Innovation Mindset

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Miles J, Mabey, Arizona State University; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Micah Lande, Arizona State University; Steven Weiner, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2603-2612). ACM.[5] Lindtner, S., Greenspan, A., & Li, D. (2015, August). Designed in Shenzhen: Shanzhai manufacturing and maker entrepreneurs. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives (pp. 85-96). Aarhus University Press.[6] Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.[7] House, Robert, et al. "Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE." Journal of world business 37.1 (2002): 3-10.[8] – (n.d.). Maker Faire. Retrieved from makerfaire.com, March 18

Conference Session

Engineering Identity

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, Conference Proceedings. Virginia Tech, United StatesDepartment of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, U.S. Military Academy, West Point, United StatesCollege of Engineering, University of Notre Dame, United StatesDepartment of Engineering Education, United States: American Society for Engineering Education; 2011.4. Tonso KL. On the Outskirts of Engineering: Learning Identity, Gender, and Power via Engineering Practice. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense; 2007.5. Jorgenson J. Engineering Selves: Negotiating Gender and Identity in Technical Work. Manag Commun Q. 2002;15(3):350-380. doi:10.1177/0893318902153002.6. Du X-Y. Gendered practices of constructing an engineering identity in a problem-based learning

Conference Session

Nontraditional Teaching Approaches

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cedrick Kwuimy, University of Cincinnati; Jeff Kastner, University of Cincinnati; Yuan Chen, Center for Enhancement of Teaching and Learning, Chongqing University, China

Tagged Divisions

International

2017 ASEE Southeast Section Conferenceprompt/adaptive feedback on individual or group works. Q 8: The in-class activities helped you improve your understanding of the lectureThis metric is directly connected to the first 4 discussed above. It directly gives the impact of theclass structure and approach on the overall main goal which is student learning. Responses arechosen from the following list: (1) Strongly agree, (2) Agree, (3) Neither agree or disagree, (4)Disagree, (5) Strongly disagree.Students from UC campus are more likely to agree that the activities in class have contributed toimprove their understanding of the lecture. Similar observation was made for most students of theother campus. A percentage of students have disagree or were

Conference Session

Global Graduate Studies and Programs Abroad - Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fazil T. Najafi, University of Florida; Chi Xu, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

E., Water cooled concentrated photovoltaic system. Int J SmartGrid Clean Energy, 2012, pp. 2–6.[33] Chong, K-K., Tan, W-C., Study of automotive radiator cooling system for dense- arrayconcentration photovoltaic system. Sol Energy, 2012, Vol. 86, pp. 2632–2643.[34] Babic, D., Murray, D B., Torrance A. Mist jet cooling of grinding processes. Int J MachTools Manuf, 2005, Vol. 45, pp. 1171–1177.[35] Royne, A., Dey, C., Design of a jet impingement cooling device for densely packed PVcells under high concentration. Sol Energy, 2007, Vol. 81, pp. 1014–1024.[36] Russell C. R. Optical concentrator and cooling system for photovoltaic cells. US patent,RE30584, 1981.[37] Zhu L., Wang, Y., Fang, Z., Sun, Y., Huang, Q., An effective heat dissipation

Conference Session

EET Papers 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Otilia Popescu, Old Dominion University; Shiny Abraham, Seattle University; Samy El-Tawab, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

wireless propagation characteristics and perform specific wireless experiments outsidetraditional labs. By experimenting with the mobile platform students will enhance their hands-onand programming skills, and will become more competitive in the wireless industry job market.AcknowledgementDr. Otilia Popescu’s work was supported in part by the Virginia Space Grant Consortiumthrough the 2015 New Investigator Program.References 1. Wyglinski, A. M., Orofino, D. P., Ettus, M. N., & Rondeau, T. W. (2016). Revolutionizing software defined radio: case studies in hardware, software, and education. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(1), 68-75. 2. Ge, F., Chen, Q., Wang, Y., Bostian, C. W., Rondeau, T. W., & Le, B. (2008, March

Conference Session

Project-Based Learning

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul M. Yanik, Western Carolina University; Chip W. Ferguson, Western Carolina University; Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University; Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

(3.7%) expressed dissatisfaction. Table 2 – Open-ended design project survey results (percentages) on usefulness, project management, teaming and leadership: Strongly Agree (SA), Agree (A), Disagree (D), Strongly Disagree (SD).Q# Survey Item SA A D SD SA+A D+SD4 I enjoyed the open-ended design projects. 59.3 37.0 3.7 0.0 96.3 3.76 I gained knowledge and skills that may be applied to my career from participating in the open-ended design challenges. 37.0 59.3 3.7 0.0 96.3 3.71 The program’s PBL activities have helped me

Conference Session

Design and Making

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

/10.18260/p.25671McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1995). Culture as disability. Anthropology & EducationQuarterly, 26(3), 324-348.Mihelcic, J. R., Paterson, K. G., Phillips, L. D., Zhang, Q., Watkins, D. W., Barkdoll, B. D.,Fuchs, V. J., Fry, L. M., & Hokanson, D. R. (2008). Educating engineers in the sustainablefutures model with a global perspective. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 25(4),255-263.Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how thesociology of. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociologyand history of technology, 17.Ramírez, M. C., Bengo, I., Mereu, R., & Silva, J. C. (2011). Participative methodology for

Conference Session

COED: EE Topics

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joshua Alexéi García Sheridan, Virginia Tech; Richard M. Goff, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Carl B Dietrich P.E., Virginia Tech; Vuk Marojevic, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Nicholas F Polys, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; R. Michael Buehrer, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59. doi:10.1007/BF02505024Mitola III, J., & Maguire Jr, G. Q. (1999). Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal. Personal Communications, IEEE, 6(4), 13-18.Noam, E. M. (1995). Taking the next step beyond spectrum auctions: open spectrum access. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 33(12), 66-73.Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Sohoul, M., et al., Next generation public safety networks: a spectrum sharing approach, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 54, Iss. 3, March 2016.

Conference Session

PCEE Evaluation Studies

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vanessa LeBow, University of Arkansas; Michelle L. Bernhardt-Barry, University of Arkansas; Jyotishka Datta, University of Arkansas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

Review, ​vol. 25 issue 1, pp. 69-94, Mar. 2013[9] M. Heil and P. Jansen-Osmann, “Sex differences in mental rotation with polygons of different complexity: Do men utilize holistic process whereas women prefer piecemeal ones?” ​Q J Pyschol (Hove), ​vol. 61 issue 5 pp. 683-689, Jan. 2008[10] R.E. Stafford, “Hereditary and environmental components of quantitative reasoning,” Review of Educational Research,​ vol. 42, pp. 183-201, 1972[11] D.B. Hier and W.F. Crowley Jr., “Spatial ability in androgen-deficient men,” ​New England Journal of Medicine, ​vol. 306, no. 20 pp. 1202-1205, 1982[12] S.A. Sorby, “Developing 3-D Spatial Visualization skills for non-engineering students.” In American society for Engineering Education

Conference Session

Practice II: Curricular Innovations

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Hug, Colorado Evaluation & Research Consulting; Suzanne Eyerman, Fairhaven Research and Evaluation

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions forevaluation, 2007(114), 11-25.[10] Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Healthservices research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189.[11] Geertz, C. (1994). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. Readings inthe philosophy of social science, 213-231.[12] Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1991). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, andschooling in social context. Cambridge University Press.[13] National Research Council. (2014). Developing assessments for the next generation sciencestandards. National Academies Press.[14] Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. TheMIT Press

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jing Guo, Colorado Technical University; John M. Santiago Jr., Colorado Technical University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[13] C. Wang, "Teaching Entrepreneurial Mindset in a First Year Introduction to Engineering Course," in 124th Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, , 2017.[14] R. S. H. J. N.-G. C. Q. L. M.-I. C. Nadiye O. Erdil, "Impact of Integrated e-Learning Modules in Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset based on Deployment at 25 Institutions," in 124th Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[15] N. Tabrizi, "Fostering an Entrepreneurial Mindset in “Digital Systems” Class through a Jigsaw- Puzzle Model," in 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) , 2017.[16] A. H. Hoffman, "An entrepreneurial approach to a senior design course," in 2017 IEEE Frontiers in

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 2: Veteran Identity & Inclusion

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas L. Davis, Kent State University; D. Blake Stringer, Kent State University; Maureen Regan McFarland, Kent State University

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans

Veterans in Engineering Programs,” in 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2011.[5] D. B. Stringer and M. McFarland, “Veterans ’ Contributions to Enhancing the Capstone Learning Experience of Engineering Cohorts,” in Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE’s Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[6] M. D. Mumford, S. J. Zaccaro, F. D. Harding, T. O. Jacobs, and E. A. Fleishman, “Leadership Skills for a Changing World: Solving Complex Social Problems,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 11–35, 2000.[7] A. Cummings and W. Oakes, “Helicopter Aerodynamics and Design Course Developed from a Research-Informed Framework,” in Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015.[8

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joshua Alexéi García Sheridan, Virginia Tech; Richard M. Goff, Virginia Tech; Seungmo Kim, Georgia Southern University; Vuk Marojevic, Virginia Tech; Carl B. Dietrich, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

have beenclear or complete to everyone’s liking: “I would like to say that some important parts of the documentation for CRTS were really poor. Especially the beginning parts of the CRTS manual which lacks clarity [...] I am not an expert in using Ubuntu[....]The CRTS manual can be improved by providing easier and user friendly methods [to perform] various tasks.” (5) Instructions for each phase of the competition were not always clear or timely: “There should be some better source that we can go and see up to date instructions and Q&A for each step. Mail group is not that efficient, since everyone cannot reach. I joined to contest in the second phase, and could not see previous

Conference Session

Career Development for Engineering Professionals

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Swetha Nittala, Purdue University, West Lafayette (School of Engineering Education); Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

: Literature review, integrative framework, and suggestions for further research,” J. World Bus., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 122–133, 2010.[4] K. Mellahi and D. Collings, “Strategic Talent Management: A review and research agenda,” Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev., vol. 1, pp. 133–150, 2009.[5] R. E. Lewis and R. J. Heckman, “Talent management: A critical review,” Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 139–154, 2006.[6] S. Fegley, “Talent management (Survey report)," Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management. 2006.[7] Y. Kim, R. Williams, W. J. Rothwell, and P. Penaloza, “A Strategic Model for Technical Talent Management: A Model Based on a Qualitative Case Study,” Perform. Improv. Q., vol. 26, no. 4, p

Conference Session

MET and Mechatronics

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John R. Haughery, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

, Jan. 2017.[9] J. McLurkin, J. Rykowski, M. John, Q. Kaseman, and A. J. Lynch, “Using multi-robot systems for engineering education: Teaching and outreach with large numbers of an advanced, low-cost robot,” Education, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2013.[10] Z. Nedic, A. Nafalski, and J. Machotka, “Motivational project-based laboratory for a common first year electrical engineering course,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 379–392, 2010.[11] J. R. Haughery and D. R. Raman, “Influences of Mechatronics on Student Engagement in Fundamental Engineering Courses: A Systematic Review,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 2134–2150, 2016.[12] R

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 2: SE Applications

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicole A.C. Hutchison, Stevens Institute of Technology; Sergio Luna, Stevens Institute of Technology; William D. Miller, Stevens Institute of Technology; Hoong Yan See Tao, Stevens Institute of Technology; Dinesh Verma, Stevens Institute of Technology; Gregg T. Vesonder, Stevens Institute of Technology; Jon Patrick Wade, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

tion ire im en Pr lysi se ce Bo ool on i n Pr nin In ycl Ri Pro ictio sig In en el ctu an me n Ag ri Ri an ypi isi q u S l C st

Conference Session

COED: EE Topics

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Afsaneh Minaie, Utah Valley University; Ephraim Nielson, Utah Valley University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

])) = (𝑇𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡[𝑛] − 𝑓(𝑖[𝑛])) ∙ 𝑓′(𝑖[𝑛]) (5) 𝑤( [𝑛] + 𝐿𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒 ∙ 𝑟P𝑇𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡[𝑛], 𝑓 (𝑖[𝑛])Q ∙ 𝑥( [𝑛] 𝑤( [𝑛 + 1] = M 𝑤* [1] = 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡* (6) 𝑤8 [1] = 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡8While a trained model needs only equations 3 and 4, training the perceptron utilizes all theequations listed. When in training mode, an input of the Target value of the perceptron is required.Other initialized values not taken as inputs to the perceptron are Weight1, Weight2, and LearnRatethat are included in the Perceptron module. These values can be changed according to the desiredvalue in code

Conference Session

Holistic Assessment and Teaching in Service-learning Environments

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Larry L. Howell, Brigham Young University; Spencer P. Magleby, Brigham Young University; Terri Christiansen Bateman, Brigham Young University; David C. Morgan, Brigham Young University; Lynda Palma, Brigham Young University Museum of Art

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

FullyCompliant Space Pointing Mechanism.” Mechanical Sciences, pp. 381-390, 2013.[13] B. J. Edmondson, L. A. Bowen, C. L. Grames, S. P. Magleby, L. L. Howell, and T. C.Bateman. “Oriceps: Origami-Inspired Forceps,” in Proeedings of the ASME 2013 Conference onSmart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, 2013.[14] Q. T. Aten, B. D. Jensen, S. H. Burnett, and L. L. Howell. “A Self-reconfiguring MetamorphicNanoinjector for Injection into Mouse Zygotes.” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 85, p.055005, 2014.[15] K. C. Francis, L. T. Rupert, R. J. Lang. D. C. Morgan, S. P. Magleby, and L. L. Howell.“From Crease Pattern to Product: Considerations to Engineering Origami-Adapted Designs,” inProceedings of the ASME International Design

Conference Session

Computing Technology Applications-II

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yun Dai, University of Southern California; Tianmeng Li, University of New South Wales; Ang Liu, University of New South Wales; Stephen Lu, University of Southern California

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

, 40(4), 206-209.[8] Simon, B., Kohanfars, M., Lee, J., Tamayo, K., & Cutts, Q. (2010, March). Experience report: peer instruction in introductory computing. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 341-345). ACM.[9] Nicol, D. J., & Boyle, J. T. (2003). Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in higher education, 28(4), 457-473.[10] Ramaswamy, S., Harris, I., & Tschirner, U. (2001). Student peer teaching: An innovative approach to instruction in science and engineering education. Journal of science education and technology, 10(2), 165-171.[11] Cortright, R. N., Collins

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Chiou, Drexel University; Carlos Michael Ruiz, Drexel University; Michael G. Mauk, Drexel University; M. Eric Carr, Drexel University; Tzu-Liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

variousdisciplines to reduce costs, increase revenue, and remain a global competitor. The workshopprovided insight to historical contexts of manufacturing provided by industry experts anddisplayed the importance of collaborative research from multidisciplinary fields of engineering. Adirect correlation to diverse disciplines of engineering was given to display commercial necessityto solve complex problems with effective solutions. Such solutions to manufacturing requireexperimental studies to justify long term investment. The event was titled “The New Horizons forthe Next Generation Manufacturing Workshop.” Students were given various presentations thatwere followed by a Q&A session. A luncheon was followed to increase industry networking andexchange of

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ona Egbue, University of South Carolina Upstate; Arshia Khan, University of Minnesota Duluth; Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

academic research”. Journal of Research Administration vol. 42, no. 1, pp.61–73, 2011.[9] D. E. Meyerson, & J. K. Fletcher , “A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling”. Harvard Business Review, pp. 127-136, 2000.[10] F. Trix, & C Psenka, “Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty”. Discourse and society, 14, pp. 191-220, 2003.[11] S. M. Malcom, J. W. Brown, and P. Q. Hall. “The Double Bind: The price of being a minority woman in science”. American Association for the Advancement of Science Publication, 76-R-3, 1976. Washington, DC.[12] J. C. Williams, , K. W. Phillips, and E. V. Hall. “Tools for change: Boosting the retention of women in the STEM pipeline”. Journal

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cem Karacal, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville; Hasan Sevim, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

) base their unilateral termination of the agreement on “the negativefeedback of the students” when there was no evidence of official student feedback sincethe inception of the program?Q 12. If the program were to continue, would you recommend it to a friend or relative?Fourteen (14) of the 40 alumni and 2 of the 18 current students indicated they would notrecommend the program. Only four alumni gave reasons for not recommending it; twoindicated that they would not recommend it because SIUE is not well-known in the USA,one indicated that s/he could not find a job in the USA with an SIUE diploma, andanother one cited the high cost of the program due to continuous devaluation of TurkishLira.Q 13. In your opinion, what might be the reason(s) ITU

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Merredith D. Portsmore, Tufts University; Adam V. Maltese, Indiana University; Karen Miel, Tufts University; Kelli Paul, Indiana University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

-2192, 2015.[7] R. H. Tai, C. Q. Liu, A. V. Maltese, and X. Fan, “Planning early for careers in science,” Science, vol 312, no. 5777, pp. 1143-1144, 2006.[8] A. V. Maltese and R. H. Tai, “Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 669-685, 2010.[9] A. V. Maltese, C. S. Melki, and H. L. Wiebke, “The nature of experiences responsible for the generation and maintenance of interest in STEM,” Sci. Educ., vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 937- 962, 2014.[10] C. Murphy and J. Beggs, “Children’s perceptions of school science A study of 8–11 year- old children indicates a progressive decline in their enjoyment of school science,” Sch. Sci. Rev., vol. 84, no. 308

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University; So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Students’ Access to Graduate Schools. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, 2005[18] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2002.[19] D. R. Thomas, A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 27, pp. 237-246, 2006.[20] J. C. Richard and S. Y. Yoon, “Impact of undergraduate research experiences on diverse national and international undergraduate researchers”. Proceedings of the 125th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2018.