-Math. At the end of each semester, students are asked to completean end-of-semester survey as their last assignment, which counts toward their grade. As a part ofthis survey, students rate certain aspects of the projects and course using a 5-point Likert scaleand are allowed to leave additional comments and suggestions for improvement. We analyzedthe end-of-semester survey results for the following five questions: The assignments associated with this course: 1) improved my engineering problem-solving skills. 2) improved my ability to communicate solutions to engineering problems. 3) provided me with a meaningful experience working on a diverse team. 4) helped me appreciate the multi-disciplinary nature of engineering. 5
attend an event on campusand write about their experience at the event. The reflection paper included the requirement toelucidate how attending the event may help the student to build their network at the University.In addition to this assignment, course instructors were focused on building in additional groupactivities and in-class assignments that encouraged students to share ideas with peers, thusbuilding their in-class peer network. A final group project was replaced with a final reflectionpaper.undeclared studentsThe greatest adjustment to the delivery of this course was the increased focus on supportingUndeclared Engineering students. During AY 1718 Undeclared Engineering students wereintegrated into sections that were major-specific. The
the pilot study, we would like to ask students who havetaken the lessons in previous cohorts about how the lessons may have impacted them in theirfuture coursework, particularly their design courses. During informal conversations withstudents, at least two have mentioned to the GTA how their outlook on design has beeninfluenced by #FunTimesWithTheTA. Students noted that they took design principles learned in#FunTimesWithTheTA and applied them to their senior design projects. Given the small size ofour initial subject pool, we find these positive comments very encouraging.Acknowledgements: We would like to thank Ms. Attiyya Houston for designing our logo.References[1] C. C. Bonwell and J. A. Eison, Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the
opportunities forthe industry to evaluate the particular student involved. It also provides the student anexperience to the particular facets of an industry, or multiple industries, if they have not yetdecided on where they wish to begin their career.It is important both to the student and the industry involved that the internship provide “realworld” work, not drawing filing or other paperwork projects which do not apply to the programthe student is following. That is not to say that the student must be given original design work tocomplete, but rather some small segment of design, drawing modification, subroutine algorithmdevelopment, and so forth. The effort must be applicable to the student‟s development, but ableto be completed in the short
answers toParts (a) and (c) of the question described in Figure 2 when they begin trying to explain theirrespective answers in Parts (b) and (d). This self-critique of the student’s conceptions (andmisconceptions) would seem to represent learning at the highest levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy13.3. MethodsConcept Quizzes were incorporated into two courses: an introductory material and energybalances course (CHE 205) and a transport phenomena course focusing on fluid mechanics andheat transfer (CHE 311). Concept Quizzes were given to students as a typical typed questionsheet and lasted 10 minutes of class time. When giving a Concept Quiz to students, the instructoralso projected the quiz content onto a screen in the classroom, read the questions to the
technologists and engineers capable of supervising a project from its conception through itseconomic analysis and on to completion. Too many schools have permitted their technicalstudents to enter the business world without a sound technical economics background (1976,vii).”2 Page 8.1327.1Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationEngineering Technology and Engineering Education: Their DifferencesIt is not the objective or purpose of this section to exhaustively present the differences
German speaking students – utilize “Rollercoasters” as the medium to learn German technical engineering terms • German 3221 (spring) - Introduction to Science terms in German including Engineering, Math, Physics and Chemistry and also develop a German Resume • German 3222 (fall) – Fields of Technology – special topics in engineering sometimes includes nanotechnology, energy, infrastructure, etc.• German Capstone course • Polish German Language skills • Mentorship of younger Eurotech students • Final Project related to Co-op Experience in Germany Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2018
,and striving to form symbiotic partnerships between local industry and academiathrough: capstone projects, theses work with practical overtones, and applied researchprojects in selected domains, is extremely desirable and beneficial. Today, with theengineering profession undergoing dramatic changes on many fronts - there is realneed for faculty and students, to become involved with practical problems and toshare in providing solutions. We owe it to our students to prepare them to meet thechallenges ahead by focusing on real issues derived from tangible situations. Thesurest road to having a working college-industry relation is to come to a mutualunderstanding that both parties would gain from such a relationship.The discussion noted above may
engineers thinking and design series common to all engineeringand is included in the new ABET requirements as Criteria 3, majors (ENG1102). Only students who completed bothStudent Outcomes 3, “ability to communicate effectively ENG1102 and UN1015 within their first year of college andwith a range of audiences” [1]. Many programs focus on earned numerical grades were included in this data set.assessing communication within the context of a final report Additionally, not all incoming students submit ELA ACTor senior design project, at the end of a student’s experience, scores to the University. Only students with both math andbut do not measure incoming students’ baseline ELA ACT scores
assess the reasonableness of their numeric answer; and 3) studentsprimarily used online resources to gather information but did not justify the use of their sources.Redesign of Assignment to Scale-up This work is situated within a first-year physics course for engineering students. The course useslectures as the primarily means of instruction with well-structure homework problems following. Thestudents also meet for lab two days a week where they do problem sets, conduct labs related to thelectures, and complete one design project over the course of the semester. For the ill-structured problemassignment, students could pick any physical phenomena to analyze using the principles from thecourse. They were asked to describe the phenomenon
theycannot simply copy answers. Most calculation exercises have an associated practice problemstudent can explore before attempting the scored exercise. Exercises are graded automatically,freeing graders to spend more effort on higher-level assignments, e.g., more sophisticated oropen-ended exercises or reports.Figure 2 is a screenshot of the PathFinder Plan Tab for a Spring 2018 Freshman EngineeringClinic II (FEC II) web-book at a public university in the northeast. FEC II is a second semesterengineering course that introduces students to fundamental engineering concepts such ascustomer-focused design principles, statistics, engineering economics, and engineering ethics. Itis the second in a sequence of four interdisciplinary, hands-on, project
success astudent has in the UNIV 101 course, and the students’ rate of retention at the University.references[1] Going the Distance; Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering, EngineeringTechnology and Computing Students, [Online] Available:http://www.asee.org/retention-project.2012.(Accessed 18-June-2018)[2] Salzman, N., Ohland, M., “Building Alignment Between Pre-college and First-YearEngineering Programs”, in Proceedings of the 9th First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE)Conference, Daytona Beach, FL. 2017[3] Geisinger, B.N. & Raman, D.R. (2013). Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attritionfrom Engineering Majors. Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Publications Paper 607.[Online] Available: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu
major is? (3) How does this perception of major impact their sense of fit and satisfaction? a. Within engineering in general? b. Within their intended engineering major? (4) How do students view the FYE curriculum related to their intended engineering major?This work is a subset of a larger project that is exploring how students navigate engineeringcurriculum pathways and make adaptive decisions in major choice. Our research team hasdeveloped a survey to evaluate fit, satisfaction, and intent to persist in engineering; however, it isunknown how FYE students are interpreting these prompts in our survey. Therefore, we seek tounderstand how students identify as engineers and how the student’s
cater specifically tousing student surveys. We also look forward to gathering students, who are taking pre-calculus and are one to twofeedback from other conference attendees about this terms behind the expected starting point [4, 5]. For the firsthands-on lab exercise and hope to refine it further for two offerings of ENGR101 at NJIT, the lab projects donefuture semesters. were virtual simulations (on computer). Starting Fall 2017, we started moving gradually towards more hands-on physicalIndex Terms – Application-oriented, Engineering labs.mathematics, First year introductory course
and engagedesign, various engineering disciplines, and how to succeed freshmen students in the variety of real-world engineeringas an engineering student. It is their first opportunity to innovation.begin to think about what type of engineering projects THE IDEAinterest them and ‘try on’ the profession. At the same time itteaches students to use information effectively in a digital In order to get students excited about engineering whileworld and improve aspects such as critical thinking, writing learning about innovative research, we introduced a two-and research skills. part assignment through our required first year
intentions behind the activity were great. I 6 from Step 5 and connect below at last right array. believe it encouraged all students to use real-life Place Part 4 (2x6) under Part 4 problem solving and critical thinking to tackle a project 7 connected in Step 6 and connect at the last right array above. that relates to something that is not theoretical. Parts are not
-type game as a review session. These can beestablished games introduced to accomplish a certain task, such as a review, or they can bedeveloped to tackle a certain topic. As an example, one of the authors developed a Cards AgainstHumanity style prompt-response game with the theme of engineering ethics [8].Badges/Points/Leaderboards: The BPL approach can be used to incentivize students to learnrequired material or perform optional, extra tasks. Many examples of BPL approaches exist inthe literature, and some examples are evident in mainstream culture, such as Weight Watchers(stay within your point limit; compete with friends). Designing a class around competencies (i.e.public speaking, projects, ethical reasoning) can lend itself to a BPL
, Catherine Riegle-Crumb, and Carolyn robustness of test statistics to nonnormality andSeepersad for their partnership on this project as well as the specification error in confirmatory factor analysis’,student participants, instructors, department chairs and Psychological methods, 1996, 1, (1), pp. 16other department liaisons for assisting with data collection. 9 Gliem, J.A., and Gliem, R.R.: ‘Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales’, in Editor (Ed.)^(Eds.): References
existing course material and in-class activi- field and becoming a successful practitioner [1]. Below, theties. The research project will use two-sections of the same authors describe the activities which will be used in thecourse taught during the same semester with approximately course to integrate problem-solving into the curriculum200 students in each section. Nine hands-on activities, while teaching the programming course concepts requiredeach covering a fundamental programming concept, were for an introductory computer science class. The course iscreated to explain these concepts to students with a visual, taught with a high-level of active learning as is shown inreal-world component. Both sections will cover
. Subsequent mechanical and aerospace Horne, “Cases on Higher Education Spaces: Innovation, engineering class pass rates before and after ENGR Collaboration, and Technology”, IGI Global, pg. 165- 1300 was implemented 185 (2013). [3] R. Beichner, “The SCALE-UP Project: A Student- As can be seen, student pass rates have significantly Centered Active Learning Environment forincreased in these three difficult courses after ENGR Undergraduate Programs,” Invited paper for the1300’s implementation. In fact, Statics and Solid National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved
students who strongly disagree (SD), Proceedings of the ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual disagree (D), agree (A), strongly agree (SA) and where Conference, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, neutral (N) with the statements. Texas (2017)Statement SD D N A SA Total 1 1 2 6 10 9 28 [3] Fadda, D. and Rios, O., "Designing a Scalable Statics 2 1 2 6 11 8 28 Project for a First-Year Mechanical Engineering Course," 3
several projects from the Army, DOD, and NIH.Victor Yu, United States Military Academy Victor Yu received his MS in mechancal engineering from the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor. He has been faculty at West Point for 3 years and is currently a medical student at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. Page 12.589.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 ELASTIC MODULUS OF BONE USING ULTRASONIC TESTINGI. Background In 2003, a slow loop assessment of the mechanical engineering curriculum at the UnitedStates Military Academy at West Point was conducted to determine whether the
, New Jersey Institute of Technology Levelle Burr-Alexander is a Project Manager of Instruction at the Center for Pre-College Programs at the New Jersey Institute of TechnologyNuggehalli Ravindra, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Nuggehalli M. Ravindra is a professor of physics and is the director of the Joint Rutgers(Newark) - NJIT Graduate Programs in Applied Physics. He is an academic coordinator of the Upward Bound Mathematics & Science Programs at NJIT. Page 12.1585.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Variation of Fractal Dimension of Leaves Based on Stem
fry, has horizontal and vertical panes; to simulate finbehavior, with the same dimensions, exposed to a high temperature fluid. Page 12.318.11Figure 7. A presentation slide concerning the French fry study.Every two weeks students, previously (and almost routinely) organized in groups of two orthree, had to give the whole class a presentation. This regular activity proved to be anexcellent choice to bring down the stress levels. In the end, the last version of the presentationwas the assignment which was handed in and evaluated, not only as a final project but also asthe result of continuous learning and assessment. It was used as a way to foster
. a. How it works b. For whom it works c. Its deployment: market value or other measure of value d. Its competition e. The trends f. The tradeoffs: strongest and weakest features (what the critics say) g. List references 3. The topic may be on technologies such as high intensity white LED lights, or microbial disposal of toxic waste, or on a major project (system), such as the Three Gorges or (saving) Venice. It could also focus on a failure like the Columbia Shuttle, or the New Orleans levees. See helpful links below. 4. Note: Some generic technology families like explosives, or nanotechnology, may appear to have no competition. They do.Comments
prestigious ( i.e. lower entry requirements) in the same discipline area; • lower in sub-degree courses than degree courses (in the same discipline area); • lower in computer oriented engineering courses with a hard core computer programming emphasis; • higher in courses with chemical and life science orientations (e.g. chemical, environmental); • higher in some double degrees that permit a broadening of studies (i.e. arts or science) rather than more of the same thing (i.e. computer science).A project report commissioned by the European Union11 similarly commented that national,institutional and discipline specific differences appeared highly likely to provide a complexpicture, where the culture would be
AC 2007-1497: TESTING OUR ASSUMPTIONS: MATHEMATICS PREPARATIONAND ITS ROLE IN ENGINEERING STUDENT SUCCESSJohn Gardner, Boise State University John F. Gardner is Professor & Chair of the Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering Department at Boise State University. He is also Director of the Hewlett Foundation funded Engineering Schools of the West Initiative at Boise State. His current research interests, in addition to engineering education, include dynamic systems and sustainable energy systems.Pat Pyke, Boise State University Patricia A. Pyke is the Director of Education Research for the College of Engineering at Boise State University. She oversees projects in freshman programs, math support
’ development of skills with which tosituate their technical work. Furthermore, the increasingly diverse engineering workforce andmarketplace require “cultural competence”; that is, a willingness and ability to consider culturein engineering problem-solving.4 This growing recognition of the need for contextual awarenessmakes the ABET learning outcomes that speak to context particularly relevant. Among ABET’stechnical and professional learning outcomes are both the ability to design within realisticcontextual constraints and an understanding of the impact of engineering solutions within aglobal and societal context.5Research has demonstrated that when given the opportunity to learn in context (e.g. throughservice learning projects or study abroad
research project conducted by the NCLT professionaldevelopment team. This qualitative study focused on understanding the specific ways middle- Page 12.873.4and high-school teachers felt they could incorporate nanoscale science and engineering topicsinto their curricula. The data used in this introductory study are comprised of the nanoscalephenomena-related lesson plans matched to state standards created by middle- and high-schoolscience teachers participating in a two-week professional development workshop held in thesummer of 2006.ParticipantsTwelve science teachers participated in the 2006 professional development workshop onnanotechnology held
to acquire data from sensorsand instruments but be able to teach signal processing and control design concepts as well asmechatronics and embedded design. Educators at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology[1] haveused Virtual Instrumentation that is based on graphical programming to teach signal processingconcepts. Educators at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) Mechatronics [2] have used VirtualInstrumentation to teach mechatronics concepts and design innovative systems such as the HOT-V (Human Object Transport Vehicle) in one semester from concept to prototype. An interestingdemonstration of this system can be found at [3]. Another project in the same department at RPI