. M. Bekki, S. R. Brunhaver, S. S. Jordan and M. Lande, "Pedagogical Ninjas: Using an Additive Innovation Cycle for Faculty Development of Teaching-focused Faculty," in Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida, 2019.[4] J. Bekki, A. Ayela-Uwangue, S. Brunhaver, N. Kellam, M. Lande and A. McKenna, "I Want to Try That Too! Development of a Conceptual Framework for Interventions that Encourage Pedagogical Risk-Taking Among Faculty," in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Conference, 2017.[5] P. Baker, "Creating Learning Communities: The Unfinished Agenda," in The Social Worlds of Higher Education: Handbook for Teaching in a New Century, Thousand Oaks, CA
-recipient of the 2002 IEEE Donald G. Fink paper prize award and was elected Fellow of the IEEE in 2003. He served as distinguished lecturer for the IEEE Signal processing society in 2004.Dr. Mahesh K Banavar, Clarkson University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27234 Mahesh K. Banavar is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Clarkson University. He received the BE degree in Telecommunications Engineering from Visvesvaraya Technological University, Karnataka, India in 2005, the MS degree and the Ph.D. degree, both in Electrical
Paper ID #39219Chaturved Janaki ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Impacts of the ProQual Institute: Building communities of technical STEM faculty for long-term engagement in educational researchIn this paper, we report on the impacts of the ProQual Institute—a $1M award via the NSF ECR-EHR Core Research program in 2019—as it nears the end of its funding period. The ProQualInstitute’s goal is to build national capacity for STEM education research by engaging technicalSTEM from across the U.S. in cohorts that participate in an 8-week course on qualitative andmixed methods educational research techniques, followed by engagement in severalcommunities of practice to continue supporting participant research
member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an American Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the American Educational Research As- sociation and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engineering. Her evaluation work includes
, engineering, and mathematics programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #26880Dr. Sam Spiegel, Colorado School of Mines Dr. Spiegel is the Director of the Trefny Innovative Instruction Center at the Colorado School of Mines. He previously served as Chair of the Disciplinary Literacy in Science Team at the Institute for Learning (IFL) and Associate Director of Outreach and Development for the Swanson School of Engineering’s Engineering Education Research Center at the University of Pittsburgh. Prior to joining the University of Pittsburgh, he was a science educator at
. (2012). Online Delivery of Electrical Engineering Laboratory Courses,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, June 2012 3. Ko, S and Rossen, S. (2017). Teaching online: A practical guide. New York: NY. Routledge. 4. Astatke, Y, Connor, K.A., Newman, D. L, Attia, J.O. & Nare, O. E. (2016). Growing experimental centric learning: the role of setting and instructional use in building student outcomes” 2016 ASEE Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Paper ID# 17030 5. Connor, K. A., Y. Astatke, C.J. Kim, C. J., A.A. Eldek, H.R. Majlesein, H. R., P. Andrei, J.O. Attia, & K.A. Gullie, C.A. Graves, and A.R. Osareh, A. R. (2015). Simultaneous Implementation of Experimental Centric Pedagogy in 13
Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, and Technical Communication Quarterly, among others.Dr. Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 15 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE and a former board member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Her research interests include the educational climate for students, faculty, and staff in science and engineering, assets based approaches to STEM equity, and gender and race
site). Dr, Richard is active in profes- sional societies (American Physical Society (APS), American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), etc.), ASEE, ASME. Dr. Richard has authored or co-authored about 35 technical articles (about 30 of which are refereed publications). Dr. Richard teaches courses ranging from first-year introductory engineering design, fluid mechanics, to space plasma propulsion.Dr. So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University So Yoon Yoon, Ph.D., is an associate research scientist at Institute for Engineering Education and Innova- tion (IEEI) in College of Engineering at Texas A&M University and Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station (TEES). She received a Ph.D. in Educational
National Institute of Engineering Ethics, and past-division chair for the ASEE Liberal Education/Engineering and Society division.Dr. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Nicholas D. Fila is a research assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. His research interests include empathy, innovation, design thinking, course design, and engineering ethics.Dr. Corey T. Schimpf, University of Buffalo, SUNY Corey Schimpf is an Assistant
survey prior to widespreaddeployment for data collection. The eventual goal of this instrument is to provide a tool formeasuring engineering intuition that can support the development of engineering classroominterventions to improve intuition by providing a means to measure effect sizes.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1927149 and Grant No. 1927250.References[1] E. M. Miskioglu and K. M. Martin, "Is it Rocket Science or Brain Science? Developing an Instrument to Measure "Engineering Intuition"," in Proceedings of the 126th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[2] A. Smith, "Exploring the legitimacy of intuition as a form of nursing knowledge
Professor at the University of Washington. Her research includes NOx formation in lean-premixed combustion and electro-mechanical systems for sustainable processing of microalgae. Her work is published in venues including the Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Education, Bioresource Technology, Chemical Engineering Journal, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, and Combustion and Flame. She is a member of the American Society of Engineer- ing Education and the Algae Biomass Organization. Dr. Shuman served as Chair for the ASEE Energy Conversion and Conservation Division last year. She received a Dipl.Ing. degree in mechanical engineering from Belgrade University in 1992, an M.S.M.E. from the
undergraduate mechanical engineering major anticipating graduation in May of 2019. I am a member of the Beyond Professional Identity research group based in Harding University located in Searcy, Arkansas. I plan to further my studies in engineering education in graduate school particularly in regards to equipping students to work in development and sustainability. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #22967Dr. Jeremiah SullinsDr. Shari E. Miller, University of Georgia Shari E. Miller is an Associate Professor and the Associate Dean of the School of Social Work at the Uni- versity
Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), etc.), ASEE, ASME. Dr. Richard has authored or co-authored about 35 technical articles (about 30 of which are refereed publications). Dr. Richard teaches courses ranging from first-year introductory engineering design, fluid mechanics, to space plasma propulsion. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Theory Building in Engineering Education: The Case of Enculturation in a First-Year ProgramI. IntroductionGuidelines on scientific research are emphatic about the importance of theoretically informedresearch for the advancement of knowledge. They state that “studies that do not start with a clearconceptual framework and
focuses on ethical and empathic formation in engineering education. He received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education, as well as a Master of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue University’s School of Civil Engineering. He is the editorial board chair for the Online Ethics Center, deputy director of research for the National Institute of Engineering Ethics, and past-division chair for the ASEE Liberal Education/Engineering and Society division.Sowmya Panuganti, Purdue Engineering Education Sowmya Panuganti is a graduate student at Purdue University in the Engineering Education department. She is passionate about understanding engineering culture and the effects it has on engineers’ mental
Engineering Education, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 665– 702, 2022.[6] E. Zerbe, G. M. Sallai, K. Shanachilubwa, and C. G. P. Berdanier, “Engineering graduate students' critical events as catalysts of attrition,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 868– 888, 2022.[7] D. Satterfield, M. Parker, M. Bahnson, H. Perkins, M. Tsugawa, K. Scalaro, C. Cass, and A. Kirn, “Unpacking engineering doctoral students’ career goal setting and future time perspectives,” In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[8] C. G. P.Berdanier, C. Whitehair, A. Kirn, and D. Satterfield, “Analysis of social media forums to elicit narratives of graduate engineering student attrition,” Journal of
% to 10%. Engineering curriculum roadmaps for degree or certificate completion are designed to see a student complete required courses within two years when beginning the curriculum at Math 5A (Calculus 1). When beginning in an earlier math, students are guided using a three-year plan to complete courses at FCC before transferring.The FCC Institutional Research, Assessment, and Planning Office tracks institutional data for eachobjective. The ESP initiated in fall 2019. As such we do not yet have data on completion rateimpact (Table 1). However, despite the impact of the pandemic, in the remaining years of theproject we expect to see an increase in both 2- and 3-year completion rates. The increase in degreeand certificate
, numerical and experimental methods. He has participated in many research projects and has published several peer-reviewed journal papers since 2004.Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko, Morgan State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #31691 Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko is currently a Doctoral student and Research Associate in the Department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University (MSU) in Baltimore Maryland. Prior to joining the department in January of 2019, Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko was a Graduate Research Assistant (GRA) at Tennessee State University (TSU) in Tennessee State, where she
@mail.usf.edu Abstract This paper accompanies the poster presented at the IEEE ASEE 2019 conference’s NSF grantees special poster session. Our goal is to provide the reader with an overview of the deliverable and findings that resulted from three collaborative National Science Foundation (NSF) awards from the Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) program; #1504634, #1502564, and #1503834. The so-called EvoParsons project (http://cereal.usf.edu/EvoParsons) resulted in a proof of concept educational software aimed at novice programmers. It applies coevolutionary computations theories and advances to both design Parsons puzzles for students, and enable a dimension based analysis
work under the auspices of the National Science Foundation (NSF) undergrant number # 1644743. However, any items expressed in this paper do not necessarilyrepresent the views of NSF or its affiliates.References[1] M. Z. Lagoudas, S. Y. Yoon, and R. Boehm, “The Implementation and Assessment of an I- Corps Site: Lessons Learned,” Proceedings of the 126th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, 2019.[2] G. Lichtenstein, and T. Monroe-White, “Entrepreneurial mindset assessment reviews,” 2016. Available: https://venturewell.org/wp-content/uploads/EMAR-v1-1.pdf[3] S. Zappe, “Avoiding construct confusion: An attribute-focused approach to assessing
: The CDIO Approach," J. Malmqvist, S. Östlund, D. R. Brodeur, and K. Edström, Eds., Second edition ed: Cham : Springer, 2014.[3] M. Wisnioski, "What's the Use? History and Engineering Education Research," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 244-251, 2015.[4] D. T. Bourdeau and B. L. Wood, "What Is Humanistic STEM and Why Do We Need It?," Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 205-216, 2019, doi: 10.5642/jhummath.201901.11.[5] J. W. Bequette and M. B. Bequette, "A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation," Art Education, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 40-47, 2012.[6] D. Henriksen, "Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent STEM teaching practices," The STEAM journal, vol. 1, no
Methods Approach to Better Understand Researcher Identity,”Proceedings of the 126th American Society for Engineering Education Annual (ASEE) Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, June 16-19, 2019.13. D. Lee, A. McAlister, K. Ehlert, C. Faber, R. Kajfez, E. Creamer, and M. Kennedy, “The Use of Structured Memo-writing in a Mixed-methods Grounded Theory Study,” Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Cincinnati, OH, October 16-19, 2019.14. L. Benson, C. Kennedy, M. Kennedy, D. Lee, and C. Faber, “Research-with-Practice: Insights from Delivering a Workshop Linking Undergraduate Research, Identity and Epistemic Thinking,” Proceedings of the Research Symposium on Engineering Education, Cape Town
. B. Campbell, W. F. Denetclaw, S. Gutierrez, S. Hurado, G. H. John, J. Matsui, R. McGee, C. M. Okpodu, T. J. Robinson, M. F. Summers, M. Werner-Washburne, and M. Zavala, “Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in stem,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 15, no. 3, p. es5, 2017. [4] M. I. Shuster, J. Curtiss, T. F. Wright, C. Champion, M. Sharifi, and J. Bosland, “Implementing and evaluating a course-based undergraduate research experience (cure) at a hispanic-serving institution,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, vol. 13, no. 2, 2019. [5] D. M. Arnold, C. J. Mortensen, A. C. Thoron, E. K. Miller-Cushon, and J. K. Miot, “Contrasting science learning gains and attitudes of
, and directed many interdisciplinary projects related to design. Dr. Pidaparti’s research interests are in the broad areas of multi-disciplinary design, computational mechanics, nanotechnology, and related topics. Dr. Pidaparti has published over 250 technical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings. Dr. Pidaparti received a Research Initiation Award from the National Science Foundation and the Young Investigator Award from the Whitaker Foundation. He is a member of Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Gamma Tau, and Who’s Who societies. He is a member of professional societies including AIAA (Associate Fellow), AAAS (Fellow), ASME (Fellow), RAeS (Fellow), and ASEE (member). Dr. Pidaparti will move to University of
, gender disparities persist across many engineeringdisciplines and are particularly high in mechanical engineering and electrical engineering, with less than20% of undergraduate degrees being awarded to women (ASEE By the Numbers 2021). K12 roboticsprograms have shown potential in increasing a student’s likelihood of enrolling in a mechanical orelectrical majors. By broadening the applications of robotics to human-centered designs and highlightingsoft and biomaterials used in building robots, the field of soft robotics may be a platform to engage adiversity of students in K12 robotics and later, engineering majors. This paper presents a pilot studyaimed at answering the research question: Can a soft robotics curriculum impact high school
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests in- clude workplace safety, occupational health, and fairness and mistreatment in the workplace and in STEM classrooms and programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 DIY Classroom Observations: A Toolkit for Novice Classroom ObserversAbstract“Improving Student Experiences to Increase Student Engagement” (ISE-2) was funded by theNational Science Foundation, through EEC-Engineering Diversity Activities, at Texas A&MUniversity. The grant activity focuses on a faculty development program for faculty who teachfirst- and second-year engineering courses. As part of the evaluation plan, classroomobservations were conducted by the ISE-2 team
Education, 2019 Paper ID #26177 model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Dr. James M Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jim Widmann is a professor and chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department at California Polytech- nic State University, San Luis Obispo. He received his Ph.D. in 1994 from Stanford University and has served as a Fulbright Scholar at Kathmandu University it Nepal. At Cal Poly, he
. Jones, A. M. Ernst, “Physics Innovation and Entrepreneurship (PIE)Introduced into the First-year Physics Course,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & ExpositionProceedings.[25] American Physical Society, “APS PIPELINE Network,” aps.org.https://www.aps.org/programs/education/innovation/pipeline/index.cfm, , (accessed Feb. 3,2019).
opportunity tostrengthen program structure and encourage deeper connections.Looking beyond individual responses, we see a broader picture. Mentoring, coupled withfostering connections among APEX scholars and participation in other success series programs,has had a profoundly positive impact. Students reported a stronger sense of belonging,connection, and self-efficacy. This comprehensive approach underscores the APEX program'ssuccess in empowering students to navigate their academic journey and thrive in highereducation.References:[1] K. Acton, D. Besser, K. Nepal, and J. Holte, “Board 267: Engineering a Transfer FriendlyExperience with Alternative Pathways to Excellence” in ASEE Annual Conference, Baltimore,MD 2023.[2] N. Walters, A. DeSalvo, and S
from Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India (2001). Dr. Nandy had served as a Co-Principal Investigator of an NSF S-STEM Project, and is currently serving as the Principal-Investigator of an NSF IUSE project. Dr. Nandy is a member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), and American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).Steve Cox, Northern New Mexico College Schooled at Marquette University in Electrical Engineering and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and New York University in Mathematics. Joined the Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics at Rice University in 1988 and the Department of Neuroscience at Baylor College of Medicine in 2004. Held visiting positions in Madrid, Cologne and
hispanic-serving institutions: A synthesis of the research. Review of Educational Research, 89(5):745–784, 2019. doi: 10.3102/0034654319864591. URL https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319864591. [2] Yizhou Qian and James Lehman. Students’ misconceptions and other difficulties in introductory programming: A literature review. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., 18(1):1:1–1:24, October 2017. ISSN 1946-6226. doi: 10.1145/3077618. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3077618. [3] Karyn L. Lewis, Jane G. Stout, Noah D. Finkelstein, Steven J. Pollock, Akira Miyake, Geoff L. Cohen, and Tiffany A. Ito. Fitting in to move forward: Belonging, gender, and persistence in the physical sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pstem). Psychology of