Director of the Center for 3-D Visualization and Virtual Reality Applications, and Technical Director of the NASA funded MIST Space Vehicle Mission Planning Laboratory at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore. In 2010, he joined Eastern Michigan University as an Associate Dean in the College of Technology and currently is a Professor in the School of Engineer- ing Technology. He has an extensive experience in curriculum and laboratory design and development. Dr. Eydgahi has served as a member of the Board of Directors for Tau Alpha Pi, as a member of Advi- sory and Editorial boards for many International Journals in Engineering and Technology, as a member of review panel for NASA and Department of Education, as a
.References [1] J. R. Anderson. Learning and memory: An integrated approach. John Wiley and Sons, second edition, 2000. [2] A. D. Baddeley. Human Memory: Theory and Practice. Psychology Press, second edition, 1997. [3] F. B. Baker and S.-H. Kim. Item Response Theory: Parameter estimation techniques. Marcel Dekker, second edition, 2004. [4] L. Crowley and G. L. Herman. Using faculty communities to drive sustainable reform: Learning from the Strategic Instructional Initiatives Program. In ASEE 2014: Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 121st Annual Conference and Exposition, 2014. Paper ID #9052. [5] J. L. Davis and T. McDonald. Online homework: Does it help or hurt in the long run? In ASEE 2014: Proceedings
generation, prototyping, and testing underguidance. To this end, a team of four community college mechanical engineering sophomores,working under a NASA Curriculum Improvement Partnership Award for Integration of Researchinto Curriculum (CiPAIR) grant, were tasked with conceptualizing, designing, and prototyping aclosed-loop temperature-controlled enclosure that encased a 3D printer using commerciallyavailable parts, as well as testing the properties of parts printed in such a controlled environment.Under the supervision of a graduate student mentor and a faculty mentor, the team learnedmechanical design using SolidWorks, material selection, hands on metal and plastics fabrication,heat transfer, as well as microcontroller programming using Arduino
, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by over $14.5 million from the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received Best Paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011. Dr. Ohland is Chair of the IEEE Curriculum and Pedagogy Committee and an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette enay Purzer is an
found in a traditional high schoolprogram, specialized courses that include an introduction to research method and twoTechnology and Engineering courses, and a University- or industry-based research mentorshipthat starts in the summer of the 10th grade and culminates in a senior capstone project. TheIntroduction to Research method class is designed to provide students with a vital, year long,full-emersion experience into the processes and activities involved with scientific andengineering research and practices. The Technology and Engineering courses, in 10th and 11thgrades, introduce students to the technology tools and their applications in science andengineering practices through modern, hands-on experiments. These courses integrate a
American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Teaching Digital Designs by Building Small Autonomous Robotic Vehicles Using an FPGA PlatformThis article discusses the experiences of implementing a new model in teaching and learningdigital designs using Verilog in an embedded systems design course. This paper discusses thecourse structure, laboratory exercises, student projects and project evaluation process, and finallythe student evaluation outcomes. Students’ course assessment and student learning outcomeswere very positive. In many existing digital designs curriculum, students learn how to createstructural and behavioral models in Verilog Hardware Description Language (HDL) to designsimple combinational and
engineering research. The NSF Research Experience forUndergraduates (REU) program [9] promotes and supports research involvement, and this activityclearly has the potential to benefit students. Pascarella and Terenzini [10] note several positiveoutcomes for students who participate in undergraduate research programs, among them greaterretention in the curriculum and greater likelihood of enrolling in graduate school.On the other hand, Seymour et al. [11] argue that most studies of undergraduate research did notinclude proper control groups, used biased samples or failed to provide sufficient details of theirevaluation methods. However, Kevin Gibbons et al. [12] have developed an approach to involve agroup of senior mechanical students that were
Engineering Education, 2015 On the Development of an Automated Course Assessment ToolAbstractHigher education assessment is typically addressed at three levels: course, program, andinstitution. While commercial products for aid in the assessment process exist, a developmentalAutomated Course Assessment Tool (ACAT) is presented. Primary features and functionalityinclude simple and efficient set-up of course outcomes and the associated weighted mapping ofperformance indicators, Moodle integration, “No Submit Analysis,” basic statistical analysis,basic correlation studies, and auto-generation of a course outcomes assessment summary table.In this paper, extended functionality to program-level outcomes and enhancements to course-level outcomes
, this paper’s primary objective is to present detailsof a construction materials laboratory that has included a notable writing experience for severalyears, but recently incorporated panel evaluations to expose students to presenting andemphasize competition.The laboratory compliments CE 3313: Construction Materials, a lecture course which is arequired part of an ABET/EAC-accredited curriculum leading to a Bachelor of Science in CivilEngineering (BSCE). The laboratory was taught in a non-credit producing manner as part of CE3313 (3 total credit hours) until the 2014 spring semester, and thereafter the laboratory was a 1credit hour producing laboratory (4 credit hours for lecture and laboratory) with the CE 3311
Paper ID #13650A Hybrid Approach to a Flipped Classroom for an Introductory CircuitsCourse for all Engineering MajorsDr. Steven G Northrup, Western New England University Dr. Steven G. Northrup, an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Western New England University, earned a BSEE from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and an MSEE & Ph.D. from Vanderbilt University. Before attending Vanderbilt University, he worked in the defense industry in Whites Sands, NM and in the automotive electronics industry designing climate control systems for Ford Motor Company. At Western New England University
Paper ID #12674Exploring Implicit Understanding of Engineering Ethics in Student TeamsDr. Eun Ah Lee, University of Texas at Dallas Eun Ah Lee is a graduate student at University of Texas at Dallas. She received her PhD in science education from Seoul National University in Korea and has worked for STEM education in which she has strong interest. Currently, she is studying for dual masters’ degree in Applied Cognitive Science and in Emerging Media and Communication for her professional development.Prof. Nicholas Gans, University of Texas, Dallas Nicholas Gans is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical
aerosols, assessment of student learning, and educational computer games.Dr. Bradley Bowen, North Dakota State University Bradley Bowen is an assistant professor at North Dakota State University. He has a duel appointment with the Teacher Education Department and the Department of Construction Management and Engineering. He has a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech and received a Master’s of Civil Engineering and an Ed.D. in Technology Education from N.C. State University. He specializes in developing and integrating project-based activities into the K-12 classroom that incorporate engineering and STEM learning concepts as well as providing professional development for K-12 teachers
with his students and colleagues, he has made over 230 technical presentations at international, national, and regional conferences and at universities. One of Professor Nambisan’s passions is the development of the future workforce, including efforts at the pre-college level. He enjoys working with students. For his contributions as an educator, researcher, and leader, Professor Nambisan has received several awards and honors. Among the awards and honors he has received is a proclamation by the Governor of Nevada designating January 31, 2007 as the ”Professor Shashi Nambisan Day” in recognition of his leadership role in and contributions to enhancing transportation safety.Dr. Jennifer Richards, University of
the concepts learnt in theclass and thoughtfully consider project requirements and constraints while seeking possiblesolutions. PBL also allows the instructor to integrate oral and written communicationcomponents into the course through required presentations, project reports and team meetings.The application and hands-on components of PBL are especially crucial in an applied scienceprogram such as engineering. Also, it is argued in this paper that integrating a PBL course in thejunior year curriculum can serve as a very good preparation for the Capstone project.While it is extremely important to design engineering curriculum so as to meet specific programoutcomes and deliver specific content, it is being increasingly recognized that a focus
and approaches are used inteaching sustainability in different engineering disciplines, e.g., creating an interdisciplinaryseminar as a summer research program5, or integrating sustainability into all engineering coursesincrementally6, 7, etc. In general, it is agreed that integrating sustainability into existing coursesmight be a better way8, 9. However, predefined course content requires additional preparations onthe instructor’s side and supplementary resources may be a challenge as well.Capstone design as a showcase for students’ development before their graduation has beenchosen18-24 to engage students in sustainable engineering design experience, especially in civiland environmental engineering areas. Burian18 proposed to use a specific
of AerosPACE who studied MechanicalEngineering at Brigham Young University said: “As an undergraduate senior in mechanicalengineering, I had already been exposed to the fundamentals of engineering throughout the coremechanical engineering curriculum at a mountain west university. As well as having a coreunderstanding, I also understood the design applications of those core principles (i.e.,Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Computer Aided Engineering (CAE), Finite ElementAnalysis (FEA), and optimization methods) to the level of a novice. The AerosPACE programintegrated all of the knowledge that I had obtained throughout my undergraduate career andprior, and allowed me to apply it in a real situation (i.e., the design of a fully 3D
have addressed both topics, they are typically taught as separate subjects, providingthat the synergistic convergence of sustainability and BIM has been embraced by bothprofessional and educational communities [1, 2]. This study investigated an integrative strategy toformulate a joint course project with concurrent focus on sustainable design and BIMimplementation using two upper division elective courses in an undergraduate constructionmanagement (CM) program.This study was motivated by the dual pressure from program assessment requirements andregional industry needs. Recent American Council for Construction Education (ACCE) re-accreditation review of the CM program revealed severe weaknesses of students in graphicalcommunication
keytechnologies: design software, manufacturing tools, and integrated control systems. Intuitivecomputer-aided design software programs provide users with an ability to quickly master basicfunctions and design sophisticated systems. Once designed, components can be manufactured(and some automatically) with a variety of traditional and modern machines including 3Dprinters; laser, water and plasma cutters; and computer controlled mills, lathes and routers.Sensors that measure nearly any physical parameter can then be readily integrated with systemsto monitor and control functions.Access to manufacturing technology has been made easier due to a convergence of factors,including the ease of use of tools, reductions in the cost of manufacturing equipment
deserving attention.Critical When needing to make a critical judgment, the student People: understandingThinking (skill) perceptively states a project-related question and clearly asserts a Project: defensibility reasoned conclusion that addresses alternative perspectives, key assumptions, and supporting evidence in context.Ethical When facing an issue with ethical or professional dimensions, the People: ethics andStandards and student identifies and appropriately applies relevant ethical or responsibilityResponsibility professional principles or standards in ways that demonstrate Project: legal and societal(ability) integrity and
. Page 26.1038.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Investigating Pattern in Design Performance of Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Engineering Student TeamsINTRODUCTIONOver the last 5 decades, the average engineering curriculum has largely been based on an “engineeringscience” model in which the analytical and mathematical elements of engineering are strictly of focus [1].This implies that all challenges faced in engineering can be condensed and modeled as solvable mathequations. This model, however, poses a threat to the current methods of engineering practice by givingthe notion that all serious engineering is done in the language of mathematics [2]. While the
Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com- munication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teach
manufacturing processes and details challenges that were overcome to effectively integrate 3D printing into the course in a way that strikes a balance between reliability, ease of use, and learning potential. Introduction This paper describes the implementation of consumer grade 3D printers in a firstyear introduction to engineering design course, ENES100, at The University of Maryland, College Park. Providing firstyear engineering majors with an opportunity to experience engineering through a projectbased design course has become an important curricular element in many 15engineering degree programs . Additionally, many experts point to the benefits of rapid
, Stanford) where design is integrated throughout the curriculum [25]. In particular, size,space, organizational rigidness, and relationships are all important aspects to consider in designcourses.Lesson 1: SizeThe size of a team or organization impacts the way the people interact with one another and theoverall project/group [26]. There is some optimal (“small”) number of people on a team that allowfor close relationships to form between team members or employees [27,28]. This could translate toengineering education by informing the way that large courses break down into smaller groups orsections. It could also help to identify methods for creating these close knit relationships,whether through cohorts or living and learning options amongst others
an improved approach to increased learning in capstoneexperiences through use of early, short design exercises in the capstone course.1.1. Engineering design education in capstonesThe purpose of a capstone engineering design project is rooted in the need to provide aculminating experience to engineering students. The design and creation of a system withmultidisciplinary teams are key tenets of the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) recommended student outcomes.1 While the ABET “General Criterion 3:Student Outcomes A-K” are meant to be satisfied throughout an entire curriculum, the courseoutcomes of most engineering capstones seek to meet most of these outcomes in an integratedfashion during capstone design courses
the final year of engineering education, as part of the capstone design experience. Studentsfirst begin to develop design skills while they are also integrating their engineering contentknowledge and learning to apply it in authentic (or pseudo-authentic) contexts. In some cases,design is also introduced as part of a “cornerstone” experience in the first year of an engineeringprogram. Generally, however, the bulk of the engineering curriculum consists of engineeringscience courses that rely heavily on theoretical mathematics and closed-ended problem solving.Many design studies have investigated the difference between novices and experts in practicingdesign. Novice designers perceive the design task as a well-structured problem5 and
courses,experiential learning can promote lifelong learning, a common goal for many higher educationinstitutions.6 The research also found that professional skills are best cultivated and enhanced bypracticing them through real experiences.6 Davis et al. also stated that it is difficult for studentsto achieve leadership skills in a lecture format.11ReflectionExpanding on the experiential learning theories, reflection is an increasingly important elementthat must be discussed in student learning. Self-reflection is a way to bridge connectionsbetween elements of specific experiences and contributes to true learning and positive changes.4Similarly, Wong et al. stated that reflection integrates theory with practice and appreciation ofthe world.14
resulted in sheep shearing robots (1975- 1993). He and his students produced the first industrial robot that could be remotely operated via the internet in 1994. He was presented with the 1993 Engelberger Science and Technology Award in Tokyo in recognition of his work, and has twice been presented with the Japan Industrial Robot Association award for best papers at ISIR conferences. These are the leading international awards for robotics research. He has also received university, national and international awards for his teaching and papers on engineering education. From 1996 till 2002 he researched landmine clearance methods and his web site is an internationally respected reference point for information on
Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and the ASEE. She was the recipient of the 2002 ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award for Innovation in Engineering Education and the 2009 UW David B. Thorud Leadership Award. Dr. Atman holds a Ph.D. in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University.Prof. Janet McDonnell, Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts London Janet McDonnell is Professor of Design Studies at Central Saint Martins, London where she is Director of Research. She holds a PhD for work on modelling engineering design expertise, an MSc in Computer Science and a BSc in Electrical Engineering. She is the editor-in-chief of the International Journal of CoDesign.Mr. Ryan C. Campbell, University
Professor, Electrical/Computer Engineering, UAF Earth & Planetary Remote Sensing, UAF Geophys- ical Institute Associate Director for Science & Education, Alaska Center for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration 2009-2012: Director, Air Force Research Laboratory Air Vehicles Directorate 2006-2009: Deputy Director, Air Force Office of Scientific Research 1999-2003: Deputy Head, USAF Academy De- partment of Astronautics 1992-1996: Assistant Professor, USAFA Department of Astronautics 3. PUB- LICATIONS 1. Cunningham, K., M. C. Hatfield, and R. Philemonoff, Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Alaskan Civil Research, 2014 Arctic Technology Conference, 2014 2. Hatfield, M. C., and J. G. Hawkins, Design of an Electronically
, financial evaluation, benefit cost analysis,resource allocation, time/cost tradeoffs, team-building, progress monitoring and risk assessment.Future professional challenges involve real problems faced by real people living in realcommunities and contain both technical and non-technical elements. Integrated and collaborativeeducational experiences can help students to meet these challenges successfully. This project gavestudents an opportunity to overcome obstacles and step out of their comfort zones. Students learnedthe value of a committed team and gained confidence to lead and take risks, realizing that nothingworthwhile comes easily. Assignments, progress reports, a final report, and peer evaluations wereused to assess student learning outcomes