the prediction and modelling of insidious cyber-attack patterns on host network layers. She also actively involved in core computing courses teaching and project development since 1992 in universities and companies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Applications of Linear Algebra applied to Big Data Analytics1. IntroductionThe digital universe (the data we create and copy annually) is doubling every two years and willreach 44 zettabytes (44 trillion gigabytes) in 2020 [1]. The stored digital data volume has grownexponentially over the past few years [2, 3]. In 1986, only three exabytes of data existed and in2011 it went up to 300 exabytes [3], and at the end of 2020 it might
report the results oflaboratory activities and projects in various formats that require strong communication skills.Much of the knowledge, skills, and abilities students gain in this class is used during the yearlongcapstone course the following year in the recommended curriculum.IntroductionThe stated purpose of the Thermal Fluid Science lecture and lab course is for students to learnskills and gain a level of knowledge that will allow them to be successful in laboratory and testsettings in industry and academia. The learning outcomes stated in the course syllabus are: - Students will: 1. Be able to design experiments to characterize a temperature, pressure, mass flow rate within a region of fluid, system or subsystem
college isproactively working to address issues of access and success through three strategic approaches:1) the formation of new female-led student clubs aimed at encouraging a growth mindset inengineering; 2) the creation of academic-based collaborative learning spaces which supportsynergistic activities between faculty and students; and, 3) student engagement in the form ofwraparound services based in co-curricular programming. It is through these efforts that theauthors hope to further the discourse among engineering educators on how to improve access andthe success of female engineering students especially within the first two years of the collegeexperience.Strategic Approach I: Female-led Student ClubsBackgroundOver 30 years ago, world
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Aspirations: Overcoming barriers to success and developing character through pre- and post-secondary school partnershipsAbstractThe goal of this study is to improve understanding of how participation in learning and teachingpartnerships between elementary classrooms facing high barriers to success and collegeclassrooms can: 1) influence the knowledge of, interest in, and aspirations toward post-secondaryeducation in populations less likely to explore college; 2) impact college students’ sense of civicknowledge, civic learning, civic reflection, and civic efficacy. Qualitative evaluation methodsdesigned by Lafayette College’s Landis Center for Community Engagement in
receipt of pledged financial supportguaranteeing the program’s solvency for at least the next four years.In addition to the scholarly work produced, helping both faculty and students professionally, theprogram also ensured greater utilization of laboratories during what was previously a relativelyslack time between the end of one academic year and the start of the next. By making availablethe skilled labor of highly talented students, the program also is producing a noticeable shift infaculty research areas toward topics that dovetail well with programs that emphasizeundergraduate education.The summer of 2019 marked the fourth year of the official program, and the sixth of any paidsummer research experience. Table 1 shows the growth of the number
who declare a major in one of the engineering orcomputer science programs upon matriculating at California State University, Chico (CSUChico). The four-year and six-year rates in these programs (~12% and 56%, respectively) arewell below the University’s average graduation rates; it is critical that they increase to meet CSUChico’s goals for graduation rates of 41% and 74%, respectively. The authors created a three-week summer bootcamp to strengthen student understanding of the fundamentals of mathematicsand critical thinking as applied in these disciplines through a series of hands-on projects.Expected project outcomes were 1) an improvement in students’ math skills and 2) to enablestudents to make better informed choices for their major in
grassrootsengineering.In this manuscript, along with a brief recall of the most important facts concerning theemergence of Brazilian grassroots engineering (GE), I will: 1) present three of the GE’s currentleading teams; 2) discuss some of the theoretical and methodological basis of GE; 3) analyzesome of the impacts of GE on the supported group; 4) highlight the main aspects of theformation process and evaluative tools provided to students; and 5) discuss some potentialitiesand limitations of GE.In doing so, I will draw on different GE teams’ publications, interviews with some leadinggrassroots engineers, and my perception as a member of the GE network, Repos.IntroductionAccording to Brazilian law, higher education must articulate teaching, research, and
employment is concentrated in two sub-sectors(3259-Other Chemicals and 3344-Semiconductor) and in 2015, constituted 24.6% of the region’stotal employment [1, 2]. Guided by the overarching research question (RQ) “To what extent docurriculum content, employer needs, and student experiences align within an advancedmanufacturing educational pathway,” this study’s goals are to 1) investigate the role AMprogram pathways have in meeting the needs of employers and new professionals who areemployed in the region; 2) expand the research base and curriculum content recommendationsfor entrepreneur and intrapreneur education; 3) build regional capacity for AM programassessment and improvement by replicating, refining, and disseminating study approachesthrough
paperwill describe the focus group feedback as well as present our resulting survey.IntroductionExtra-curricular student project teams are an important part of the undergraduate engineeringstudent experience. Students participate in project teams to do hands-on work, to learn importantskills, and to find community and belonging with their peers. However, as in any team project, ifthe team dynamics are not positive, a student’s experience may be more detrimental thanbeneficial [1], [2]. Student project team situations may be at even higher risk for poor teamdynamics since they are often student-run and student-led; thus, they may lack the scaffolding ofa team project that generally exists in the classroom. Team experiences may be inequitable
participants. It discusses the different types of cybersecuritycompetitions and provides examples of college student-targeted competitions of each type. Thevalue of these team activities is considered and student outcomes from them are discussed. Thepaper presents a discussion of ongoing activities to assess the value of cybersecurity teamparticipation.1. IntroductionThis research paper considers the educational value of cybersecurity competition teams to theirstudent participants. There several types of cybersecurity competitions including red team / blueteam events, blue team events and capture the flag style events. In the first (red team / blueteam) teams attack (red team) and defend against (blue team) the other team’s attacks in a directteam-to
Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), the injuries rate in the fireservice is four times greater than in private industry, with almost a third of firefightingpopulation being injured in the line of duty [1]. Due to the combined physiological andpsychological demands of firefighting, firefighters must go through extensive training whichtypically takes place in a physical environment “classroom’’ with the implementation of thestandard operating guidelines taking place during live - fire training scenes [2]. These scenesrequire tremendous efforts and assets including training personnel, specialized training facilitiesand carefully planned live - fire scenes, as well as new training models for each single trainingactivity [2]. There is a claim that the
job and/or family reasons, enhanced opportunities to take courses on the criticalpath (prerequisite structures) to graduation, and ability to maintain academic continuity duringemergencies such as pandemics. Online courses that include programmed delivery ofinstruction can provide immediate individualized responses and feedback to the learners [1]. Inseveral studies conducted in different environments, online learning has been shown to be atleast as effective as, or in some cases modestly better than conventional classroom education interms of learning outcomes [2, 3]. A few studies observed that classroom discussions can beintimidating due to peer pressure, and the quality and quantity of interaction may be improvedin the online format [4, 5
scripts over three weeks, and scripts were auto-graded using MATLAB grader. 1 Figure 1. Histogram showing individual student grades in statics programming assignment. N = 237.Overall, students generally did well in the programming assignment. However, as can be seen in Figure 1,roughly 10% of students did not pass the lab, scoring a ‘D’ (70%) or lower. We are interested in whysome students struggled with the lab while others succeeded. In this paper we conduct statistical analysesto answer the following research questions:Is there a relationship between students’ grades on the programming assignment and their RQ1. Gender? RQ2
reliable ethicalpractices. Engineering ethics is defined as: “(1) the study of moral issues and decisionsconfronting individuals and organizations involved in engineering and (2) the study of relatedquestions about moral conduct, character, policies, and relations of people and corporationsinvolved in technological activity” [1]. Engineering ethics has been increasingly emphasized inengineering curricula. The Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) hasspecific student outcomes related to ethical considerations. Despite the need for ethical decision-making among the undergraduate civil engineers, incorporating ethics into the curriculum hasnot been an easy task.In some academic institutions, ethics courses could be offered by a non
mathematics (STEM) workforce pipeline is facingmultiple challenges. The first challenge is the relatively lower academic performance of USstudents in comparison to the other 35 countries of the Organization of Economic Cooperationand Development (OECD) as evidenced by the data of the Program for International StudentAssessment (PISA). According to the 2018 assessment PISA [1] which measured themathematics, science and reading skills of 15-year old students from almost 80 countries, theaverage score of US students in science was lower than six of the 36 countries OECD. Theperformance of US students in math literacy is even more concerning. The average score of USstudents in math was lower than the average math score of students from all the OECD
self-driving car, also known as an autonomousvehicle (AV), connected and autonomous vehicle (CAV), driverless car, robo-car, or robotic caris a vehicle that is capable of sensing its environment and moving safely with little or no humaninput [1, 2, 3, 4].” “Self-driving cars combine a variety of sensors to perceive their surroundings,such as radar, lidar, sonar, GPS, odometry and inertial measurement units [1]. Advanced controlsystems interpret sensory information to identify appropriate navigation paths, as well asobstacles and relevant signage [5, 6, 7].” It can be said that autonomous vehicles are complexembedded devices.The area of autonomous vehicles goes back to at least the 1920s where the first radio-controlledvehicles were designed
teaching andlearning (SoTL). And it was used in a University course - EE 263: Digital Logic Design. Thecourse evaluation showed that with new feedback method, the evaluation measurement for overallperformance of instructors increases by 11.3%. Regarding to course policies, useful feedback,course comparison, examinations and assignments, difficult concepts, and online materials, theevaluation measurement increases respectively by 10%, 10%, 6%, 15%, 8%, and 6%.1. IntroductionThe current practice on feedback in Universities is that students provide feedback to theirinstructors in the mid-term or final-term of the course, that are primarily unidirectional. While thisapproach may partly improve the teaching and learning, but sometimes, it will produce
skills and knowledge usuallydeveloped/learned in the engineering courses, also encompasses: empathy, ability to dialogue,critical sense, and openness to learn from local (or grassroots/traditional) knowledge. To achievethis profile, different pedagogic approaches and activities have been developed in manyBrazilian universities.In this manuscript, after presenting a brief account on grassroots engineering’s history, I will:1) analyze the four non-technical skills of grassroots/educator engineers, making explicit theirFreirian roots; 2) present the three main engineering education approaches (and correspondingactivities) aimed at the development of (part of) grassroots engineer’s skills; and 3) highlight thestrengths and weaknesses of each as well
“cross-cutting foundationalresearch capabilities” to “integrate natural and social science, engineering, and other disciplinaryapproaches” and “build capacity for climate assessment through training, education, andworkforce development.” Realization “requires new approaches to training and curriculum, aswell as research to evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches to research and teaching[1].”Charting a Path to Trans-disciplinary Collaborative Design, is a current NSF project that willevaluate, test, and model pedagogic methods in an existing interdisciplinary hybrid set of coursesdevoted to studying adaptation to sea level rise for urban neighborhoods in Norfolk, VA. Theexisting course set, combines lecture, community engagement, and
Paper ID #30383Broadening the Participation of Latinx in Engineering: Highlights from aNational, Longitudinal StudyDr. Lisa Y Flores, University of Missouri Lisa Y. Flores, Ph.D. is a Professor of Counseling Psychology at the University of Missouri. She has expertise in the career development of Latino/as and Latino/a immigrant issues and has 80 peer reviewed journal publications, 18 book chapters, and 1 co-edited book and presented over 200 conference presen- tations in these areas. She has been PI and co-PI on grants funded by NSF and USDA to support her research. She is Editor of the Journal of Career Development
rural communities support and promote engineering as a career choice for theirstudents. Therefore, this study explored the ways in which rural communities provide support tohelp students make fully informed decisions about engineering as a college major.The findings presented here come from Phase 2 of a three-phase study exploring engineeringcareer choice among rural students. Using interview and focus group data collected from currentengineering students in Phase 1, Phase 2 turned to community members, including high schoolpersonnel, local industry leaders, members of local governments, and members of keycommunity organizations (e.g., 4-H). Using interviews with 16 participants across 3communities, we address the following question: What
. The five main goals in this collaborative infrastructure wereestablishing (1) a management structure, (2) one primary high school partner, (3) two academictransfer agreements, (4) an Industrial Advisory Board of three members, and (5) seven additionalhigh school partners to scale future implementation.Three of these goals were fully accomplished within the planned timeline, and the two otherswere partially accomplished. This paper discusses detailed achievements in each area along withthe project’s external evaluation results and the project leadership team’s lessons learned. Thepartnership infrastructure that has been built will be used to build the skilled technical workforcein North Louisiana through increasing high school students
efforts have aimed to provide a holistic engineering education [1], producing T-shaped engineers [2] who possess broad knowledge across disciplines with deep expertise intheir domain. We have seen many pedagogical advances, such as team-based learning, problem-based learning, experiential learning, and creative learning using virtual reality, to name a few.The core driver for this change stems from the need for engineering education to prepareengineers to stay relevant and to contribute to society in the face of rapid global change andadvancement in information and technology.These trends have been the main motivator for integrating liberal studies and engineering.Bucciarelli and Drew laid out a “design plan” for liberal studies in engineering
possibilities in all areas of human life. The utopias were a blue-sky project;students were constrained only by the limits of their imagination and their understanding ofcourse concepts. The summative project is a key example of the alternative learningmethodologies employed in this seminar, and the paper describes in depth how students fulfilledassignment goals, using examples from student projects. This paper illustrates the benefits ofemploying a humanities-based approach when teaching engineering ethics.IntroductionSince the adoption of the ABET EC 2000, ethics education in engineering has developed to agreat degree. The revised ABET criteria cited a need for students to achieve an “understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility [1, 2
minimum abasic understanding of the ways that AI, data analytics, and machine learning affect their lives.Familiarity or fluency in CS will help children retain agency and discernment while growing upwith the increasingly complex computer systems of the “4th Industrial Revolution“ 1 . Manyschools and school districts recognize the need for introducing age-appropriate CS and robotics asyoung as in pre-kindergarten. Researchers confirm the value of this move, notably led by thepioneering work of Marina Umanschi Bers and her colleagues as well as a growing number ofresearchers in various countries. These scholars study ways to integrate CS in early educationthrough various means; these include development of age-appropriate robotics kits, pre
related to the conception and institutionalization of a minor in engaged engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Building Community Engaged Programs in Curriculum - A Short Review of Brazilian ApproachesIntroductionEngineering schools have established a variety of ways of how community engagementprograms (CEP) are built into curriculum [1]. But what are the conditions for establishing CEP inengineering schools? And how can we explain the different ways in which CEP programsthrive? From the perspective of the social systems theory, there is an interplay in the dimensionsof constraints (structural coercion), free choices, and contingencies, allowing actors a set ofoptions
unusually large population of students who were homeschooledwhen they graduated from high school (about 1/5 of students university wide and 1/4 of studentscurrently enrolled in the School of Engineering and Computer Science). In this paper, I investigatethe retention rate and calculus readiness for homeschooled students entering the School ofEngineering and Computer Science as compared with their non-homeschooled peers.In this study, I hypothesized that homeschooled students might have a different likelihood tosucceed in engineering school compared to their non-homeschooled peers. The results of the datastudy support this hypothesis and suggest that homeschooled students are more likely than othersto succeed in engineering school, with retention in
of movement organizing toward achievingtwo goals: (1) changing rewards structures so that they value engineering education researchcontributions; and (2) enacting radical structural change that enhances diversity, inclusion, andequity. The first part of the work for this project involved relational interviews through whichparticipants who wanted to take part in the campaign shared their issues and hopes for changewithin engineering education. A deeper analysis of these relational interviews can be found in apaper previously presented at ASEE [1]. The results of that research pointed to a need for changein reward structures, the need for social infrastructure that provides support systems for thosecritically engaged in engineering education
has over 30 years’ experience in engineering practice and education, including industrial experience at the Tennessee Valley Authority and the US Army Space and Missile Defense Command. Her research inter- ests include Engineering Ethics, Image and Data Fusion, Automatic Target Recognition, Bioinformatics and issues of under-representation in STEM fields. She is a former member of the ABET Engineering Ac- creditation Commission, and is on the board of the ASEE Ethics Division and the Women in Engineering Division. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Can ABET Assessment Really Be This Simple?AbstractWith the hard roll-out of ABET’s new outcomes 1-7 in the 2019