2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 In 2 In 4 Institutionalizatio Institutionalizatio Very Institutionalize Freshman department department n n limited d s s in progress in progress In 2 In 2 Institutionalizatio Sophomor Institutionalize
market for the product(s) and other revenue generating streams was discussed (Outcomes 2 and 6). e) A clear recommendation as to whether the project should be considered in more detail was made. This recommendation was based on the I/O economic assessment, as well as on environmental and social measures. It was also made clear which process alternative(s) were viable, if any (Outcomes 1 and 4). f) The proposal was written in a logical format. There were minimal typos and formatting errors, the figures were clear and readable, and the references were cited correctly (Outcome 1).Students were assigned the prompt on the first day of class and were allowed eight weeks tocomplete the
, undergraduate design canvas can improve both student learningand successful product design.Another objective of the work is to develop a “meta-canvas” approach that is comprehensive andrigorous, yet customizable, such that faculty can develop a canvas to suit their specific course(s).Customizability for different faculty approaches is vital, but an underlying metamodel used alsohelps make it clear where the boundaries to customizability lie. Existing canvases, with theirinherent complexity, may be better suited to more advanced courses, and a customizable canvasapproach may broaden the impact of the canvas concept from first-year design through capstonedesign and beyond. Faculty may utilize different approaches or have different learning
s Exams Tutor Measure Integrity E Grading … P Graduate Assistants Computerized Scholar
strategies and style). Presumably,improved instructional support would mitigate the damaging impact of negative perceptions such asstereotype threat (Steele & Aronson, 1995) or avoidance orientation (Midgely, 2001) that limitengagement, and at the same time support student tendencies related to cultural norms and practices.Future research that can untangle the complex combination of these factors can provide new insights intohow to support UREM’s in engineering education contexts. ReferencesBenson, L., Kirn, A., & Faber, C. (2013, June). CAREER: Student motivation and learning in engineering. In ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.Borrego, M., Cutler, S., Prince, M., Henderson, C., &
1. Arduino. (2017). http://www.arduino.org/, last accessed: January 26, 2017. 2. Cardella, M. E., Wolsky, M., Paulsen, C. A., Jones, T. R. (2013). Informal Pathways to Engineering. In Proceedings of the 120 th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA. 3. Carnasciali, M-I., Thompson, A. E., Thomas, T. J. (2013). Factors influencing students’ choice of engineering major. In Proceedings of the 120 th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta, GA. 4. Conrad, J. M., Harkins, M. S., Taylor, D. B., Mayhorn, J., Raquet, J. (2015). Prospect for Success in Engineering: Assessing Freshmen Curriculum Engagement. In Proceedings of the 7th First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference. Roanoke
-1-2419.The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not beinterpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Office ofNaval Research or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce anddistribute reprints for government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation hereon.Bibliography[1] Aurigemma, J., Chandrasekharan, S., Nersessian, N. J., and Newstetter, W., 2013, "Turningexperiments into objects: The cognitive processes involved in the design of a lab‐on‐a‐chipdevice," Journal of Engineering Education, 102(1), pp. 117-140.[2] Cattano, C., Nikou, T., and Klotz, L., 2010, "Teaching systems thinking and biomimicry tocivil engineering
sampling techniquesduring campus site visits (Patton, 2015).AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Kevin Fosnacht with the National Survey of StudentEngagement for assistance in providing the initial analysis of the data being used to validate theproposed model presented in this paper.ReferencesAllie, S., Armien, M. N., Burgoyne, N., Case, J. M., Collier-Reed, B. I., Craig, T. S., . . . Wolmarans, N. (2009). Learning as acquiring a discursive identity through participation in a community: improving student learning in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 359-367. doi:10.1080/03043790902989457American Society for Engineering Education. (2014). Divisions: American Society
engineering student self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1): 27-34.[8] Baker, D., Krause, S., Roberts, C. (2007). An intervention to address gender issuesin a course on design, engineering, and technology for science educators. Journal ofEngineering Education, 96(3): 213-226.[9] Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases andrecommendations. Meridian: A middle school computer technologies journal, 5(1),83.[10] Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future.The Clearing House. 83(2): 39-43.[11] Alfonseca, E., Carro, R. M., Martín, E., Ortigosa, A., & Paredes, P. (2006). Theimpact of learning styles on student grouping for collaborative learning: a case study.User
theory or concept based questions as opposed toproblem or application questions). In cases where the instructor notices lack of depth in thequestions, they can stimulate the discussion by injecting deeper questions on Piazza withoutproviding the answer.Stage 2 - Learning: The second phase, learning, happens periodically throughout the term in theday(s) before upcoming mini-tests. Students are given a schedule of when mini-tests occur at thestart of the semester. In this phase, discussion on Piazza is frozen, and students are given theopportunity to study each other’s questions in preparation for the mini-test.Stage 3 - Quiz: In the third phase students are required to take the test (individually), where thequestions in the quiz will be only from
,collectingdataviaacomputerinterfaceanddescribingexperimentalresults.TheavailabilityandcostofmaterialsandinformationassociatedwithfuelcelldevelopmentmaketheMFCtechnologyandexcellentfitforstudentrelatedprojects.References1. UnitedNations,(2012).Waterforlifedecade. http://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/africa.shtml2. Logan,B.,Hamelers,B.,Rozendal,R.,Schroder,U.,Keller,J.,Freguia,S.,Aelterman,P.,&3. Berman,J.,April2009.WHO:Waterbornediseaseisworld'sleadingkiller.Voiceof America.http://www.voanews.com/content/a-13-2005-03-17-voa34-67381152/ 274768.html4. Verstraete,W.(2006,July14).Microbialfuelcells:Methodologyandtechnology. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es06050165. Paulson,L.(2012,August20).Microbialfuelcelllatrinepromisessanitation,power. http://www.rwlwater.com/microbial-fuel-cell-latrine-promises-sanitation-power/6. Davies,C.(2010,Aug23).Solarenergybringspowertoruralafrica.CNN,http:// www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/innovation/08/10
. House, J. Livingston, and A. Watt, “Grandest Challenge: Models for Communication Development in Technical Contexts,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ., Jun. 2014.[4] A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and E. Seymour, “Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development,” Sci. Educ., vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 36–74, Jan. 2007.[5] D. Lopatto, “Undergraduate Research Experiences Support Science Career Decisions and Active Learning,” CBE-Life Sci. Educ., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 297–306, Dec. 2007.[6] K. W. Bauer and J. S. Bennett, “Alumni Perceptions Used to Assess Undergraduate Research Experience,” J. High. Educ., vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 210–230, Apr. 2003.[7] M. C. Linn, E. Palmer, A. Baranger, E
states “ASU is a comprehensivepublic research university, measured not by whom we exclude, but rather by whom we includeand how they succeed”. Postsecondary education faculty need to be aware of ASD students sincethey want the “same opportunity for success, not the right of success.”10Bibliography1. VanBergeijk, E., Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. (2008). Supporting more able students on the autism spectrum: college and beyond. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1359-1370.2. White, S. W., Ollendick, T. H., & Bray, B. C. (2011). College students on the autism spectrum. Autism, 15(6), 683-701.3. Adreon, D., & Durocher, J. S. (2007). Evaluating the college transition needs of individuals with high- functioning
• Mortality from breast cancer was cut by 31 percent1 • Implantable cardioverter defibrillators have shown a 20 to 30 percent reduction in mortality after more than 10 years of follow-up; 21 National Center for Health Statistics. “Health, United States, 2012: With Special Feature on Emergency Care.” Hyattsville, MD. 2013.2 S. Bevan et al., “Adding Value: The Economic and Societal Benefits of Medical Technology”, The Work Foundation – part of Lancaster University, November 2011 22 Med Tech Makes a DifferenceWe improve the efficiency of health care systems through earlier disease detectionand more
women STEM faculty. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 21, 141-157, doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2015011275 (2015).2 Herring, C. Does diversity pay?: Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American Sociological Review 74, 208-224 (2009).3 Yoder, B. ASEE College Profiles. (American Society of Engineering Education, 2014).4 Locks, A. M., Hurtado, S., 1957-, Bowman, N. A. & Oseguera, L. Extending Notions of Campus Climate and Diversity to Students' Transition to College. Review of higher education 31 (2008).5 Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M. & Holder, A. Racial microaggressions in the life experience of Black Americans. Professional Psychology: Research and
us to explore the process-oriented framework that Walther, Sochacka, & Kellamconceptualized and to attend to the procedural validation of our research process6. Walther et al.situate their framework in the understanding that ‘the nondualist ontology of interpretive researchdemonstrate[s] that neutral observation is, in principle, impossible.’6 Through the process ofwriting this research paper, we are developing ‘methodological awareness’ by explicitlyreflecting on how our own experiences created biases in developing the survey, which willultimately support us in ‘fostering a deeper understanding of the social system underinvestigation.’6 The qualitative framework conceived by Walther et al., and used by other EngEdresearchers in their
. Reference Services Review, 2013. 41(1): p. 125-133.2. Mikkelsen, S. and E. McMunn-Tetangco, Guide on the Side: Testing the Tool and the Tutorials. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 2014. 19(3-4): p. 271-282.3. Becker, B.W., Start Flipping Out With Guide on the Side. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 2013. 32(4): p. 257-260.4. Bowles-Terry, M., M.K. Hensley, and L.J. Hinchliffe, Best Practices for Online Video Tutorials in Academic Libraries: A Study of Student Preferences and Understanding. Communications in Information Literacy, 2010. 4(1): p. 17-28.5. Mestre, L.S., Student Preference for Tutorial Design: A Usability Study. Reference Services Review, 2012. 40(2): p. 258-276.6. Turner
positionof being the co-chair of a department may be viewed more as simply an administrative postionladen with managerial responsibilities and not as a genuine leadership role.What can be surmised from this study is that on the whole engineering faculty are shifting intheir predilictions regarding gender biases. This may mark a tipping point when the work oforganizations such as the National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT) 23,24 has begun to nudge attitudies and awareness of underrepresentation of women in engineeringand computing sciences and actually shift actions. References1 Fairweather, J. S. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional
. Students then had time to reflecton the feedback before practicing again with another recruiter during the mock career fairexperience. Additionally, an important logistical element of the activity centered on the timingof the mock career fair in coordination with the actual career fairs on campus. Students werethen able to reflect on their experiences in the classroom, establish conclusions, and try out whatthey learned and refine their pitch during the actual career fair the following day(s). Thislogistical consideration provided ease in confirming employer attendance. One hour and fifteenminutes is ideal for a class of 30-40 students, requiring that each student speak with at least threedifferent recruiters for feedback. Fifty to sixty minutes
, pacedimplementation of the pedagogy, and collaboration with colleagues across institutions.ReferencesAdair, J. K., Reyes, M. A., Anderson-Rowland, M. R., & Kouris, D. A. (2001). Workshops vs. tutoring: How ASU's minority engineering program is changing the way engineering students learn. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, 2.Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185-207.Cox, M. D. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004(97), 5–23.Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., and Wieman, C
of knowledge, skills, and expertise between students - participants of the CoP-.Interviews conducted based on the principles of (Kvale, S, 2009). Interviews were thentranscribed and analyzed using definitions from Wenger’s CoP model to clarify and verify howthe Makerspace impacted the cultivation of a makers CoP on campus. We looked for evidence ofidea units that emphasized domain, community and practice.ResultsParticipants shared a common interest in “making”, tinkering, and realizing their designs. Therewere five categories of reasons for participation in the Makerspace: accessibility to resources,professional development, self-efficacy, Networking, social interaction and engagement, andlearning opportunities.Making use of Wegner’s
understanding of the importance of linking to professional practice through involvement of the department’s or college’s existing Industrial Advisory Board (or equivalent); An acknowledgement of additional example strategies, such as increasing the stature of professor(s) of engineering practice and their role as change agents or connecting the work with professional master’s programs. An incorporation of scalability and adaptability considerations.After Riley’s keynote, the webinar transitioned to the panelists who discussed questions, such asWhat is revolutionary and not-so-revolutionary? What does it mean to start and sustain arevolution? The panelists were Elsa Villa from University of Texas at El Paso, Milo
unnecessary delays, frustration,and potential harm due to lack of oversight. Comparison of the evaluations of the tool with PDPand the final DHFs for the same projects will be used to determine effectiveness of the fivequestions tool at early evaluation.Five Questions:1. Are any humans included in the testing plan?2. Is the data collected directly about the person(s) in any way? (e.g. physical, demographic, capabilities, etc. including personal identification information; name, picture, age, SES, etc.)3. Is the data collection from testing / evaluation resulting in any type of tables or graphs?4. Is there a plan to publish or present the results in any public format?5. Is there any risk of harm to any persons in any way? (If yes please
clients and stakeholders. By positioning students as experts and by explicitlyacknowledging their linguistic repertoires as assets, engineering teachers may enact educationthat is more responsive to and affirming of linguistically diverse students. 11 References[1] Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96, 359- 379.[2] Fosmire, M., & Radcliffe, D. (Eds.). (2014). Integrating information into the
rendering.The nomenclature used (Figure 3) in the present work is: spacing (s), pitch (p), height (H),thickness (t), length (L), base width (W), and base thickness (tb) [19]. However, compared toactive cooling systems, passive cooling system have lower heat dissipation rates, andenvironment conditions such as air temperature and wind speed will affect the heatdissipation rates [20]. Active cooling system concludes micro-channels, spray cooling and jetimpingement, Abdolzadeh showed spray cooling could reduce cell temperature from 58°C to37°C [21], however, spray cooling require water usage and the heat from the cell is wasted.The active cooling system is more efficient and more technically feasible if the waste heatfrom cooling system can be reused in
. We firmly believe that these results are due to our capability to deliver rigoroushands-on learning experiences through the CVCLAB in addition to the inquiry-based frameworkthat we used in the design of these hands-on activities. Fall 2017 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, October 6-7 – Penn State BerksReferences1 Morgan, S. (2015, December 21). Cybersecurity Market Reaches $75 Billion In 2015; Expected To Reach $170 Billion By 2020. Retrieved August 31, 2017, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevemorgan/2015/12/20/cybersecurity%E2%80%8B-%E2%80%8Bmarket- reaches-75-billion-in-2015%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B-%E2%80%8Bexpected-to-reach-170-billion-by- 2020/#71dbf07b30d62 Morgan, S. (2016, January 04
State EdWatchWebsite: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/state_edwatch/2012/08/a_busy_year_for_states_third-grade_reading_policies.html.[3] Center for Community Solutions (2014). Northeast Ohio Regional Impact and Outcomes Report. Retrievedfrom: http://www.communitysolutions.com/assets/docs/NEORIO/thirdgradereading_neorio_2014_2.pdf[4] Sterling, S., (2014), Incorporating literacy in your STEM classroom, Retrieved from Learning Sciences website:http://blog.learningsciences.com/2014/11/18/incorporating-literacy-in-your-stem-classroom/.[5] Cervetti, G., Pearson, P., Bravo, M., Barber, J., (2006), Integrating literacy and science. In R. Douglas, M.Klentschy, K. Worth (Eds.), Linking science and literacy in the K-8 classroom (pp 221-244). Arlington, VA
engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 48-88.2. Ball, D. L., Hill, H.C, & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(1), pp. 14-17, 20-22, 43-46.3. Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Horizon Research, Inc.4. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rodgers, C. (2008). Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369 – 387. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x5. Carlson, L., & Sullivan, J
collection efforts andinteractions with civil engineers—of the disconnect between education and practice. Knowingthat practicing civil engineers perform worse than students in most cases on concept inventoryquestions challenges the broad role and focus on concepts in undergraduate education. Theseresults can impact other fields that rely on potentially inappropriate and/or non-holistic means ofassessment, and encourage consideration of other means of assessment.References:1. Bornasal FB, Brown S, Perova N. The use, representation, negotiation, and interpretation of concepts in engineering practice. Journal of Engineering Education. 2016:Accepted pending revisions.2. Urlacher M, Brown S, Steif P, Bornasal FB. Practicing Civil
, functioning as initial core group, must then balanceproviding support without taking over the community. One must allow the active group tobecome the core group in order to maximize the possibility of a lasting and vibrant communitythat sustains itself after the project funding has ended. References(1) S. Brunhaver, C. Carrico, H.M. Matusovich, R. Streveler, P. Boyland-Ashraf, P., and S. Sheppard, “Professional Engineering Pathways Study: A longitudinal study of early career preparedness and decision-making”, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, El Paso, TX , 2015.(2) J. P. Sampson, J. G. Lenz, R. C. Reardon, and G. W. Peterson, “A cognitive information processing approach to employment problem solving and decision-making”, Career