short term, robotics education fosters problem solving skills, communication skills,teamwork skills, independence, imagination, and creativity32-34; and 2) in the long term, roboticseducation plays a key role in preparing a workforce to implement 21st century technologies.Currently, few universities offer specific robotics degrees. For instance, Worcester PolytechnicInstitute (WPI) has offered a Bachelor of Science in Robotics Engineering50 since 2007.Universities that have graduate degrees focused on robotics include Carnegie Mellon University,MIT, UPENN, UCLA, WPI, and the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (SDSMT).Michigan State University has a well-established Robotics and Automation laboratory, but it isutilized for graduate
and electronic transducers, has resulted in theneed for younger or enterprising audiences to learn the software used in these fields. The accessof such tech has fallen to specialization roles, where people would defer time to designers andarchitects to develop what is needed. The field of mechanical, let alone general, design will benecessary for future companies and businesses, or even for printing laboratory equipment, as theprocesses and science respectively catches up to the industry. However, whilst the science, math, and engineering components are catching up, thetechnological side is faltering. More time and effort is being pressed onto designers, and the fieldhas pushed forward to where the design work is brought upon those
ConklinNicholas B. Conklin received a B.S. in applied physics from Grove City College in 2001, and aPh.D. in physics from Penn State University in 2009. He is currently an Associate Professor andChair of the Physics Department at Gannon University, Erie, PA.Quyen Aoh 2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Spring Conference, April 6-7, 2018 – University of the District of ColumbiaQuyen Aoh has a doctorate in Cell Biology from the University of Virginia. She is currently anAssistant Professor of Biology at Gannon University. She teaches Molecular & Cellular Biologyand Genetics. When she is not in the laboratory studying the cell biology of disease, she spendsher time engaging the public in science through various outreaches. 2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Spring
-curricular and experiential learning, and the equity and accessibility of education.Prof. Paul R. Chiarot, State University of New York at Binghamton Dr. Chiarot received the BASc, MASc, and PhD degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Toronto and was a post doctoral research associate at the University of Rochester. He has published over twenty papers in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings and has one issued US patent. Dr. Chiarot joined the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the State University of New York at Binghamton in 2011 where he directs the Microfluidics and Multiphase Flow Laboratory. Dr. Chiarot was the recipient of the NSF CAREER Award in 2016
holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the De- partment of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano manufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 MAKER: Designing and Building a Prosthetic Hand for a High School Engineering Design CourseAbstractThis
and their implications for teaching and learning, discourse analysis of scientific classroom talk, and science teacher education.Dr. Jacqueline Callihan Linnes, Purdue University Dr. Jacqueline Callihan Linnes is an assistant professor of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University. She earned her Ph.D. in Bioengineering and certificate in Global Health from the University of Wash- ington. She was a Fogarty engineering fellow in collaboration with Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the Little Devices laboratory at MIT before moving to Boston University’s Biomedical Engineering de- partment where she received a NIH NRSA postdoctoral fellowship to develop molecular diagnostics for point-of-care pathogen detection. Dr
the Department of Biomedical Engineering at The University of Akron since August 2013. The overall goal of his research laboratory is to improve human health by studying the multi-scale biomechanics and biotransport in cardiovascular, ocular, and digestive systems. Dr. Amini’s research has been funded by the National Science Foundation, Akron Children’s Hospital, Firestone Foundation, and American Heart Association. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 WIP: Mandatory Attendance in Office Hours to Improve Students’ Learning ExperienceIntroductionOffice hours have long existed as a tool to provide instructor-student interaction, and to helpstudents ask
) provide a reserved classroom forREU students every year with computers and printers/scanners, 2) provide visiting student IDcards to access most university facilities including library, campus shuttle, etc. 3) apply keys ofthe reserved classroom and necessary laboratories for REU participants, and 4) creatinguniversity student account for accessing internet and computers.5. AcknowledgementThis paper is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC-1359414. The authors would also like to thank the support from Texas A&M University-Kingsville.References:[1] Li, H., Jin, K., & Abdelrahman, M. (2017). REU student engagement during and after REUprogram: a case study comparing individual project with group
applied project-based experiences among lower development, etc. In addition, lectures on entrepreneurshipdivision courses causes many students to lose interest and were integrated during Winter quarter to allow students toleave engineering during the first year, without understanding develop a business plan related to the quadcopter project.the importance of rigorous training in math and physical Lab sessions were designed for students to apply thesciences. Many programs implemented innovative first-year technical contents to their project and were co-instructed bycourses to enhance engineering curriculum and increase graduate teaching assistants and laboratory staff. Studentsstudent retention [1
Paper ID #24387Full Paper: PathFinder: Affordable and Effective Web-books for First YearEngineering CoursesDr. Jess W. Everett, Rowan University Jess W. Everett has worked in four distinct areas: waste management operations research, contaminated site assessment and remediation, education innovation, and sustainable engineering. He has employed a wide variety of techniques, including computer modeling, laboratory experiments, field testing, and surveys. His current research focuses on energy conservation, alternative energy generation, engineering learning communities, and hybrid courses (courses with classroom and on-line
Paper ID #24498Tangible Electricity: Audio Amplifier and SpeakerMr. John Edward Miller, Baylor University John Miller is a Senior Lecturer in the Electrical and Computer Engineering department at Baylor Univer- sity. He teaches a wide range of courses, including the first-year program, mid-level laboratories, control systems, and capstone design. These courses lean heavily on hands-on experience and active learning. He has a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Baylor University, and currently serves as the Assistant Chair for the department.Dr. Brandon Herrera, Baylor University
approach. Groups ofstudents (i.e. laboratories, design classes) are also potential targets for BPL, as they often includecollaborative and competitive aspects.Narrative Games: Narrative games are where the class, or portions of it, have a story arc. Thatarc may be an entire semester/class or a subset of the class within a set time period. The storytheme and how class elements interact with it help give it structure and rules, and allow studentsto understand connections. Themes can be serious (i.e. technical simulations, real-worldscenarios) or more whimsical (i.e. fantasy, fiction). The story serves to anchor the students andprovide opportunities for engagement with the material, and students’ collective actions candrive and influence the story
postdoctoral research associate at AT&T Bell Laboratories from 1988-1990. Cooper’s research interests include optical spectroscopic studies of novel magnetic and superconducting materials at high pressures, high magnetic fields, and low temperatures. Each spring since 2013, Cooper has co-taught (with Celia Elliott) a graduate- level technical writing course, ”Communicating Physics Research,” to physics and engineering graduate students.Celia Mathews Elliott, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Celia Mathews Elliott is a science writer and technical editor in the Department of Physics at the Uni- versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She has been teaching technical communications to upper-level
instructional designers through retrospectiveinterviews. Kirschner and colleagues27 compared university and business instructional designersthrough a Delphi-like study (using Visscher-Voerman’s 16 principles) and a short team designtask. In another study, Perez and colleagues28 compared expert and novice instructional designprocesses using a think-aloud protocol in laboratory setting. Although these studies do not reporton their findings as heuristics, they all rely on data collected from expert practices anddemonstrate several similarities, including an emphasis on learner and context analysis, theapplication of proven techniques, and problem framing. However, these studies also showimportant differences between contexts (e.g., university and business
received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Tsinghua University, Bei- jing, China, in 1995 and 1997 respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the Uni- versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2002. From 1997 to 2002, he was a research assistant at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. From 2002 to 2005, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the Electromagnetics Laboratory in the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He was an assistant professor with the Department of Elec- trical Engineering, the University of Texas at Arlington from 2005 to 2012. He joined the Department of Electrical and
in an Engineering ClassroomIntroductionThis research paper describes a study that examines a testing effect intervention deployed in anengineering classroom setting. The testing effect is based on the premise that learning isimproved when students engage with newly acquired information by challenging themselves toanswer questions about the content instead of using other means of interacting with the content,such as rereading a text. The testing effect has been established in laboratory research studies[1]. To translate this finding into educational practice, classroom research studies [2]-[6] aim todefine the conditions for which the testing effect remains robust in authentic classroom settings.In the classroom domain, a testing effect
or studio setting thatintegrates both lecture and laboratory work in the same environment. The course interactivelydeveloped student's understanding of: the product design process, project management skills, andengineering practice principles while keeping track of the economic aspects of the design. Theteam based approach provided students with the opportunity to discuss alternative design ideasand work on their communication and interpersonal skills [6]. In addition, the setup of thiscourse also played an important role in meeting ABET general Criteria, Criterion 3 -Student Outcomes a -k. The course covers (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, k) [7].Essentially, recycling and re-manufacturing would allow production of new products with lowermaterial
MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY.Prof. Branislav M. Notaros, Colorado State University Branislav M. Notaros is Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Colorado State University, where he also is Director of Electromagnetics Laboratory. He received a Ph.D. in elec- trical engineering from the University of Belgrade, Yugoslavia, in 1995. His research publications in computational and applied electromagnetics include more than 150 journal and conference papers. He is the author of textbooks Electromagnetics (2010) and MATLAB-Based Electromagnetics (2013), both with Pearson Prentice Hall. Prof. Notaros served as General Chair of FEM2012, Colorado, USA, and as Guest Editor of the Special Issue on Finite
valves. Dr. Amini has served as an assistant professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at The University of Akron since August 2013. The overall goal of his research laboratory is to improve human health by studying the multi-scale biomechanics and biotransport in cardiovascular, ocular, and digestive systems. Dr. Amini’s research has been funded by the National Science Foundation, Akron Children’s Hospital, Firestone Foundation, and American Heart Association.Dr. Marnie M SaundersMichael CoonMr. Robert Paul Thoerner, University of Akron Biomedical Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress: using video tutorials to assist biomedical
Have students reflect on how knowledge in their field has changed over time and discuss the process of creating new knowledge. o Plan and conduct open-ended laboratory experiences or solve problems for which students and instructors do not know the outcome. o Ask students to reflect on the knowledge they gained that is new to them versus new to their field.Future WorkThe outcome of the first two phases of this work will be the development of a theoretical modelthat captures epistemic cognition and identity development during UREs based on our data andusing a grounded theory approach. The final phase of the project will involve defining anddescribing the factors and experiences from UREs
engineer for Mote Marine Laboratory, and a contestant onthe television show MythBusters.2. Sponsor a girls technology summer camp where women engineering students help teach middle school girlsThrough outreach programs, women engineering students promote the engineering profession tomiddle school girls as they begin taking the math and science classes they will need as anengineering college major.5 Started in the summer of 2016 and continuing in the summer of2017, a week-long full day camp for middle school girls was held at the UF science andengineering library. Teaming with women engineering students to teach the middle school girlscreative technologies reinforced the women engineering students’ belief in their own abilities.3. Hold a human
Innovations in Engineering Education and Research,2007.[9] Feisel, L.D. and Rosa, A.J., "The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education”, Journal ofengineering education, pp. 121-130, January 2005.[10] Thomas, J.W., "A review of research on project-based learning", California: The Autodesk Foundation. URL:http://www.bie.org/images/uploads/general/9d06758fd346969cb63653d00dca55c0.pdf, March, 2000. AccessedMarch 13, 2018.[11] Waks, S. and N. Sabag, N., "Technology Project Learning Versus Lab Experimentation", Journal of ScienceEducation and Technology, Volume 13, issue 3, pp. 333-342, September 2004.[12] Song, J. and Ma, G., "Different Lab Formats in Introduction to Engineering Course", Proceedings of the 2017American Society for
successfully introduced students to DNAsequencing technologies and genomic analysis. Students were able to identify appropriatetechnologies for different types of experiments. They were able to perform basic analysis andidentify the challenges associated with these analyses.To improve student mastery of the learning objectives that were not well met, I will be addingmore discussion of the history and developmentof genetics as well as genomic technologies.We will spend more time discussing libraryproduction, and spend some time reviewing theearly concepts again later in the course.For those wishing to implement a similarcourse, I have posted my materials on githubfor public use (http://bit.ly/GenAnal). Thecomputational laboratory component has beenmost
exit the discipline [1]. Important factors in student attrition from STEM disciplinesinclude: 1) instructional experiences such as first-year Mathematics courses and facultyexpectations [1][2] and 2) individual self-efficacy, epistemologies, and goal orientations [2][3].In order to enhance student cognitive and affective outcomes and retain students in STEMdisciplines, undergraduates have been used as Learning Assistants (LAs), course UTAs, and labUTAs with positive results [4][5][6]. For example, UTAs used in an inquiry-based generalchemistry laboratory context have similar student content knowledge gains as GTAs in the sameposition [5]. As another example, in a large-enrollment introductory physics course, studentshave significantly higher
unit, soil and irrigation water analysis laboratory, nursery,earthworm production unit, medicinal and aromatic plant garden, sheep and goat farm, fruitorchard mother block, shade-net, and hydroponic project. The college has departmentallaboratories that are renovated and furnished with state of the art equipment. The college isaccredited by the university through 2018-19 and offers a three-year diploma program, whichadmits 90 students after graduating from high schools. The admissions are based on students’performances in the high school graduation examination, which is a government managed state-wide examination. The main objectives of the diploma program are, 1) to develop competence amongst itsstudents for solving problems related to
chapter and research papers on machining of composites. He has a diverse industrial experience for 27 years, in design, research and manufacturing of electro me- chanical systems, such as design of various types of gear and gear boxes, antennas and light and heavy fabricated structures, for communication, TV telecast, natural disasters management and Telemedicine application. Dr PS, designed and manufactured various types of antenna’s weighing from 200 pounds to 100,000 pounds. He was also actively involved in configuring the antenna controls and selection of motor and motor controllers. Dr PS, has advised more than 40 senior/capstone projects. One of his project won the national award from Airforce Research Laboratory
different toolsand techniques employed by the design, analysis, development, implementation, andimprovement of modern manufacturing systems. The general concepts provided in this courseare also widely applicable to service industries. The course involves hands-on learning andexercises in laboratories as well as real world industry projects. Upon satisfactory completion ofthe course, students should be able to: Explain the key performance measures of manufacturing systems. Describe the different techniques and tools for manufacturing systems design and analysis. Compare key techniques used to improve manufacturing systems productivity and efficiency. Apply process improvement methods in real manufacturing or
Environment Association (CWEA), and Engineers Without Boarders (EWB) stu- dent chapters. Additionally, Dr. Palomo is the CE Water Analysis laboratory director and coordinates all teaching, research and safety training activities in the engineering laboratory. Dr. Palomo conducts research in surface water quality improvement via natural treatment systems, water and wastewater treat- ment processes, and water education. She is involved in outreach programs for K-12 students to increase the participation of Hispanic female students in STEM fieldsDr. Natalie Mladenov, San Diego State University Dr. Natalie Mladenov is an associate professor and William E. Leonhard Jr. Chair in Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering
semester. The instructors of the two sectionscoordinated and synchronized their lecture topics, shared their lecture notes throughout thesemester, and met weekly—with their shared teaching assistants—to discuss issues related tostudent learning and course activities. Additionally, the two sections shared laboratory sections 3and used the same graded assignments and tests. Results of this study again showed that studentsin classes with CCEs score higher on the CS knowledge test than students in non-CCE classes,further supporting the hypothesis that CCEs contribute to learning core CS concepts.Recent Findings The most recent extension of our project is the investigation of the impact of CCEs