1 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 2015 ASEE Northeast Section Conferencewidely used undergraduate EM textbook that includes a good introduction of antenna theory.The classic antennas book by Krauss presents an in depth theory of antennas. Silver11 coverspractical antenna theory and practical projects for the practitioner.Portable Analyzer to Enhance the Laboratory ExperienceIn this section we will describe the various experiments that have been done using the portableanalyzer.A. Antenna radiation patternAs already stated, the portable analyzer has the capacity to both generate and receive an RFsignal. Thus we can measure the radiation pattern of the test or prototype
State University Robert M. Leicht is an assistant professor and graduate of the Department of Architectural Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University. He is the Director of the Partnership for Achieving Construction Excellence (PACE) at Penn State. Rob is an investigator in the new delivery methods study seeking to empirically capture the impact of integration on project success. Rob leads the construction engineering course dedicated to mechanical and electrical systems construction, he is the lead faculty for the construc- tion option capstone course; he teaches graduate level courses in production management and project delivery systems
26.504.2project pitch phase, mixing and recruiting phase, project development phase, projectpresentations, judging, and closing statements (Duhring, 2014). Hack-a-thons are conducted onevenings or weekends, outside of typical working hours and can range from one day to threedays. Famous design firm, IDEO, designed a version of the hack-a-thon, called a make-a-thon,which is more design-driven and centered on collaboration across silos (Zhang, 2012). Newventures and early-stage startups also use a process called teaming, which involves creatingtemporary groups to solve problems that are complex and rapidly changing (Edmondson, 2011). Developing an entrepreneurial mindset prepares students for the 21st century workplace.Entrepreneurship is defined as
nanocomposites and engineering education. He was trained as a Manufacturing Process Specialist within the textile industry, which was part of an eleven- year career that spanned textile manufacturing to product development.Meghan Daly, James Madison University Senior Engineering Student and Undergraduate Research Assistant, Department of Engineering, James Madison University.Mr. Cairo Jahan, Lakil Sherrell, James Madison University I am a senior engineering student at James Madison University. I expect to graduate with a B.S. of engineering and a mathematics minor in May 2015. I am pursuing a career in systems, sustainable, or environmental engineering while continuing to grow professionally by aiding my capstone project team
Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award Certificate of Excellence. He served as Project Director a Na- tional Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized innovative undergraduate engineering curricula. He has authored over 70 papers and offered over 30 workshops on faculty development, curricular change processes, cur- riculum redesign, and assessment. He has served as a program co-chair for three Frontiers in Education Conferences and the general chair for the 2009 conference. Prof. Froyd is a
a. Custom resin formulations 5. Industrial Quality Assurance a. Control charting of results from testing i. Cpk studies ii. Measurement Systems Analysis 6. Capstone Projects a. Senior projects i. Resin formulating ii. Process ImprovementsAs a hands-on development tool for students through use in demonstrations or labs, studentscould experience a process not used by many at an undergraduate or even graduate level.9. SummaryThe research team was able to successfully automate the lab scale prepreg treater into acontinuous system within the prescribed budget. The treater was qualified through a processingrun that produced 23 feet of prepreg which
Page 26.422.3introduce techniques for learning innovation piecemeal over multiple courses. Consequently,teaching the processes of creative problem solving and innovation becomes disjointed amongmultiple courses. Alternately, the content could be integrated into an existing course (e.g.,capstone/senior project). Unfortunately with this approach, the students will all be from thesame institution and potentially all from the same major. A multi-institution, multi-disciplinaryexperience is highly conducive to learning creativity and innovation. More details are availablein reference 9, but in particular, one camp student noted, “Having all of us work as groups fromdifferent schools made it so that we were able to solve the problems given to us
undergraduate capstone projects) and the project or thesis research required for a graduate SE degree.6) Graduate study in SE should focus on preparing candidates for service as engineering interdisciplinarians, who think always about “the end before the beginning”.7)) The overarching goal should be to promulgate systems thinking focused on the human - made world; that is, the world emerging from system design by humans.10Entirely too much engineering time and talent is being expended addressing operationaldeficiencies plaguing the human-made world. Operational problem mitigation will always beneeded, but the dramatic payoff for humankind lies in operational problem avoidance throughsystem thinking, as recommended for addressing pervasive
management, from the University of Missouri-Rolla. As the author or coauthor of over 100 technical papers, his research interests include supply chain management, humanitarian and healthcare logistics, healthcare/medical in- formatics, and data standards. He has directed several projects funded by the National Science Foundation, Air Force Research Lab, and Wal-Mart Stores.Prof. Corey Kiassat, Quinnipiac University Dr. Corey Kiassat is an Assistant Professor of Industrial Engineering at Quinnipiac University and has a BASc and a PhD degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Toronto. He has an MBA, majoring in Marketing and International Business, from York University. Corey is a Professional Engineer and
fromthe knowledge, skills, and attitudes of toy Makers to advance teaching in the engineeringclassroom? Findings are presented to inform possibilities for design in engineering contexts anda multi-disciplinary, holistic attitude towards engineering education that is rising fromdiscussions on the future of engineering education.IntroductionIn undergraduate engineering academic programs, engineering design often serves as acornerstone or capstone experience, supplying context and motivations for how to construct andredesign the world. There is usually an undue burden on the instructor to seed such classes withcompelling and technically sufficient projects and provide enough structure to make a goodlearning experience.1 With this concern, it is
be arranged as modules, depending on the course and program.• Lecture and/or lab topics - describe the topic or theme of the lectures/labs. Topics may be subcategorized by lecture hour or by week. Topic should be descriptive enough so that students may best prepare for in-class time.• Events, assessments, and due dates: The schedule should include all assessments for lecture/lab; due dates for projects, special projects, and presentations. Also, include dates that are holidays, days in which classes will not be held due to instructor’ s absence or due to other reasons.F. How learning will be assessed• Grading procedure – this generally include in-class (i.e., exams and quizzes) and out-of-class assignments, multiple-choice
collaboratively in multidisciplinary and multicultural work environments. Recognize and understand global, environmental, social, and ethical contexts of their work. Progress to an advanced degree and certificate programs and be committed to lifelong learning to enhance their careers and provide flexibility in responding to changing social and technical environments.The degree offers students the choice to select an option that fits their interests andregional aspirations. All three options in the degree offer multiple years of design coursesculminating in a two semester senior capstone project, allowing students to complete aresearch project from conception through prototyping. The three options presentlyoffered in
Paper ID #12518Supporting Students’ Plans for STEM Careers: How Prepared are HighSchool Educators in Appalachia to Help?Dr. Cheryl Carrico, Virginia Tech Cheryl Carrico is a Postdoctoral Research faculty member for Virginia Tech. Her current research fo- cus relates to STEM career pathways (K-12 through early career) and conceptual understanding of core engineering principles. Prior to her current role, Dr. Carrico spent over 25 years in the aerospace in- dustry conducting and leading R&D, design engineering, and project management for composite aircraft components. Dr. Carrico received her B.S. in chemical engineering
participating on those teams associatewith leaders and leadership. Team members strongly associated five categories of behavior withleadership: Ideal Behavior, Individual Consideration, Project Management, TechnicalCompetence, and Communication. Other leadership behaviors, including Collaboration, Training& Mentoring, Problem-Solving, Motivating Others, Delegation, and Boundary-Spanning, wereless consistently recognized, and some behaviors were valued more highly within one team thanthe other. When asked to define leadership, most team members ascribed to a mainstream view.A few team members revealed a more mature understanding of the nonpositional andcollectivistic aspects of leadership.BackgroundThe Jets and the Sharks are the largest engineering
610prototyping in the engineering design process . The introduction of inexpensive and functional 3D printing technologies into the marketplace has permitted the adoption of this technology by 1112many colleges and universities . The addition of 3D printers to engineering design spaces provides students with an authentic, industrylike opportunity to rapidly realize product concepts. The inclusion of 3D printing technology appears particularly useful in firstyear cornerstone and 1317senioryear capstone design courses . The remainder of this paper describes an approach for introducing 3D printers in a large introduction to engineering
University of Cincinnati Evaluation Sevices Center and the Arlitt Child & Family Research & Education Center. She has a BS in Chemical Engineering and an EdD in Educational Studies with a concentration in the cognitive and social aspects of instructional practices. Dr. Maltbie has evaluated STEM educational projects and programs since 2000.Ms. Julie Steimle, University of Cincinnati Julie Steimle is the Project Director for the Cincinnati Engineering Enhanced Math and Science Pro- gram (CEEMS). Prior to that, she ran an outreach tutoring program for K-12 students at the University of Cincinnati. Before joining UC, Ms. Steimle served as the Director of Development and Children’s Services at the Literacy Network of
EngineeringLeadership, and (3) Engineering Leadership Capstone) within the minor are developed andtaught in-house. The final requirement involves experiential learning engagement. Studentprogress and leadership development are tracked as they complete the requirements of the minor. The elective courses are classified into four concentrations: (1) communication, (2)ethics, (3) creativity and innovation, and (4) global and societal impact. The four concentrationareas were created following research about other engineering leadership programs and thecourses available to engineering students across the university. The ‘communication’concentration includes courses that focus on the development of students' professional skills andengagement with technical
systems.Mr. John Kaemmerlen, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) John is a Senior Lecturer at RIT in the Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, and is the Director of the Toyota Production Systems Laboratory. His areas of concentration are Lean, Production Systems, Facilities Planning, and Supply Chain Management. He also guides many of the capstone projects that RIT engineering students complete in the multidisciplinary senior design program. He has been at RIT for 7 years following 31 years at Eastman Kodak Co.Dr. Matthew Marshall, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Matthew Marshall is an Associate Professor in the Industrial and Systems Engineering Department at Rochester Institute of Technology. He
the number of concepts generated from a given prompt word to increase in proportion to the number of possible definitions for the prompt word.3.2 Evaluation of the HypothesesThe research team conducted a study to further evaluate the Analogy Seeded Mind-Mapsprocess. The study was conducted at USAFA in a manner similar to the previous study. Thedesign teams consisted of upperclassmen enrolled in the capstone engineering design class. Theteams worked on the following design projects: 1. Replacement for land mines 2. Debilitating function in hard deeply buried targets 3. Personal cooling system for special operations teams 4. Composable/fractionable munitions 5
subscribed within days ofannouncement. Both programs are non-credit and are offered at no-cost to participating students. The facility is now an integral component within the engineering curriculum with studentinvolvement spanning the new Engineering 100 course to senior Capstone Design projects andnew student business start-ups. As with many new initiatives, the Aggie Innovation Space faceda particular challenge in overcoming unintended consequences that resulted from engagement inthe space, particularly the overuse by classes and occasional misuse by students. In an effort tobroaden student participation in the realm of innovation and entrepreneurship within a productdevelopment course, the instructor had the class meet in the space during
disparate projects, in order tofrom a social support network. A capstone social activity again was provided by SOCHE in theform of a group kayak trip along the Mad River, ending in downtown Dayton (26.5%participation rate).Continuation of Component #3: Weekly Seminar Meeting with Outside Presentations ofGeneral InterestIn 2014, we planned an activity at least once per week. The activities began with a jointorientation from Component #1 and concluded with the poster session from Component #4; andin the interim, we again alternated between social gatherings and professional developmentactivities.The 2014 full schedule of activities across all components was: • Week 1: Joint orientation, with pizza lunch (Component #1) • Week 2: Social lunch
creation of a “CreativityMinor”. A cross-college committee was formed and the focus changed from creativity andinnovation to leadership, specifically leadership for engineers. The minor would help studentsdevelop the essential leadership skills necessary in engineering, including project management,working in teams, communication skills, global awareness, green engineering, and professionalethics.11 In 1995 the Plan was crystallized by the proposal for an Engineering LeadershipDevelopment Minor (ELDM) consisting of courses in leadership, organizational and businessskills, entrepreneurship, and a capstone course in science, technology and public policy.12Creativity and innovation, although the original focus of the proposed Minor and
and engage students while bringingreal-world context to the classroom. Students can extend the concepts and theories from class byworking with robots in lab or as part of a project or competition. Robots can be used as ateaching tool across the educational spectrum.Related LiteratureA review of the Engineering Education literature reveals that robots have been and continue tobe used as teaching tools in Kindergarten-12 (K-12) and undergraduate engineering curriculums.In K-12 environments it can be seen that robots are predominantly used to teach concepts andtheories related to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics or STEM as it iscommonly referred to in the literature 2-8. In the realm of undergraduate engineering we find
otherengineering disciplines.IntroductionEngineers must gain the ability to communicate and collaborate across disciplines in addition togaining a deep technical disciplinary knowledge. This is increasingly true in modern society inwhich scientists and engineers must address complex, interdisciplinary challenges on a globalscale. While current efforts at teaching interdisciplinary problem-solving at the collegiate-level(e.g., class projects, capstone courses) exist, the effectiveness of many of these approaches areineffective in achieving interdisciplinary learning objectives. Richter and Paretti (2009)identified two main learning barriers to common interdisciplinary approaches: (1) students areunable to identify the relationship between their own
. Courses are often integrated into these two major fields to allow for some exposure to themanufacturing industry. A paper in the Journal of Engineering Education notes that amovement to move to higher course content on manufacturing in both of these disciplines isneeded8. Many current engineering programs do not emphasize the marriage of design andmanufacturing in a modern industrial technical workforce.Many research studies have assessed the quality of exposure to manufacturing through the senior“Capstone” design project course. McMasters and Lang believe that too few in industry have anunderstanding of how the current engineering education is set-up. Therefore, if industry partnersare brought into the education process through design projects
through a variety of initiatives she is helping to bring to Upstate South Carolina, one of which is the NIH- and VentureWell-funded De- FINE Program. Breanne obtained her B.S. in May 2012 (research focus: nanomedicine technology) and her M.S. degree in August 2013 (research focus: glenoid loading and stability of the inlay verus onlay shoulder system) both from the Clemson University bioengineering department. Breanne was a four year varsity collegiate athlete, rowing for the Clemson University Women’s Rowing Team, where she learned how to foster her team-centered leadership. Breanne moved on to lead her senior design capstone team to a 1st Place finish in the 2012 NCIIA BMEStart Undergraduate Design Competition
specialize through their choice of technical electives in Year 2, earlier intheir studies as compared to the programs in the US with which the author is most familiar. Therequired hands-on experience in Years 1-3 is gained through companion laboratory courses; thecompanion lab course is typically taught by a different instructor than the faculty member who Page 26.153.4is teaching the lecture course. In addition, projects may be assigned in lecture courses that donot have a companion lab course. In Year 4, students are required to enroll in a capstone designcourse, which is an individual rather than a team project. The laboratory courses and
MaterialsIntroductionThe work reported in this paper begins with the end of a previous research project. Our earlierwork investigated student understanding of mechanics of materials1–3. After describing howstudents understand this topic, we wanted to move on to developing course materials to helpbuild on students’ existing understanding and address misconceptions. This is not an unusualprogression, and, indeed, our initial research in this area showed us that most course materialsthat are developed from research never achieve broad adoption4. Many engineering educatorsdevelop their own materials, duplicating researchers’ efforts and potentially denying students thebenefit of research-based materials with proven effectiveness. The lack of adoption is a
underdevelopment. Students are being encouraged to get involved with this work in the form ofindependent studies or senior capstone projects. Such a project would require the studentor team to develop a significant component in PowerX to include design, development, Page 26.1604.13testing and documentation of their work.ConclusionThis paper presented an overview of a software application called PowerX that initiallystarted out as a research tool and eventually made its way into the classroom to helpstudents get a better understanding of power systems problems and solutions to theseproblems. For the most part, student response has been very positive and assessment
seminars,internships, learning communities, and capstone projects compared to only two anecdotalreferences to study aboard.This paper postulates that ABET’s Student Outcome 3(h) “the broad education necessary tounderstand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, andsocietal context” and Student Outcome 3(i) "a recognition of the need for, and an ability toengage in lifelong learning" are not mutually exclusive but rather interdependent and mutualisticin nature. Outcomes by their very nature describes what students should know or can do by thetime of graduation. The implication is therefore, that lifelong learning and a global perspectivemust originate within the 4-year engineering curriculum/program. The