development and program assessment, the Committee identifiedthree guiding principles. According to these recommendations2 engineering education should 1)emphasize engineering design; 2) incorporate important and developmentally appropriatemathematics, science, and technology knowledge and skills; and 3) promote engineering “habitsof mind.”The majority of research studies focus on measureable outcomes of K-12 engineering educationprograms. Some have focused on enhanced engineering career awareness.3,4 Others havefocused on increased understanding of engineering design principles.5,6 Yet others have focusedon increased awareness of the ways engineers apply science and mathematics functions andprocedures.7 In all, these assessments of children’s
and resource space was created within the College ofEMS. Two commonly discussed reasons for students leaving STEM fields are academicdifficulty and failure to integrate effectively into the campus community or feelings ofisolation/not fitting in2. A space of this nature, in theory, would address both of these concerns –it would provide academic support and also provide a welcoming atmosphere that allows fornatural interaction with like-minded peers within the larger campus community. Prior to thecreation of this center, many informal study alcoves and spaces existed within classroombuildings on the campus, but none that were staffed or provided consistent access to resources.ImplementationA classroom in one of the two engineering academic
Paper ID #14915Improving Undergraduate Engineering Education with Educational ModuleLibrary and Vertical Integration ProjectsDr. Lei Zhang, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore Dr. Lei Zhang received his Ph.D. Degree in Electrical Engineering on 2011 from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Since 2012 he is working in the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore. His main research interests include image processing, autonomous system development, optical SoC/NoC architecture, and on-chip optoelectronic device design.Prof. Ibibia K. Dabipi, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore
Paper ID #16486Measuring the Impact of Service-Learning Projects in Engineering: HighSchool Students’ PerspectivesTamecia R. Jones, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamecia Jones is currently a doctoral student in the Engineering Education department at Purdue Uni- versity with a research focus on K-12 engineering education, assessment, and informal and formal learn- ing environments. She is a graduate of Johns Hopkins and Stanford University. Originally trained as a biomedical engineer, she spent years in the middle school classroom, teaching math and science, and consulting with nonprofits, museums, and summer
9 43% Multidisciplinary 1 5% Nuclear 1 5% Total Participants 21ResultsWe analyzed our transcripts with the following research questions in mind: 1. Why do veterans pursue a Bachelor’s degree in engineering? 2. How do military experiences shape student veterans’ educational experiences? 3. What are the experiences of student veterans in engineering education?Our thematic analysis indicates that military veterans pursue engineering based on (1) previousexperiences with engineering-related activities while in the military, (2) recommendations fromfamily and friends, (3) the intellectual challenge they
co-runs three joint programs at undergraduate levelthat have been approved by the Ministry of Education, PRC including BE in ElectronicInformation Engineering jointly run with UB [2]. Graduates of the programs are expected tobe equipped with fundamental knowledge, expertise and relearning capacity in related areasas well as a global outlook, science literary and innovative mind, which can prepare them fora fulfilling career in engineering as a researcher, designer, manufacturer, developer oradministrator.There are several important characteristics of the program between UB and WUST: (1) theprogram focuses on a specific academic program, so both universities co-design the programsuch that fits students at WUST: (2) a collaborative program by
Paper ID #16339Developing an Affordable and Reconfigurable Experimental Platform for Teach-ing Engineering Lab CoursesDr. Collins Adetu, Florida A&M University Collins Adetu received his BSc in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Florida A&M University in 2005. After graduating with his Bachelor’s degree, he worked in industry before returning to Florida A&M University to complete his MSc and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 2009 and 2015, respectively. His research interests include robotic controls, teleoperation, and haptics.Dr. Camilo Ordonez, Florida State University Camilo Ordonez received the B.S
classes, more and more universities are including a design project within their first-yearexperience (9). This gives students an opening to understanding engineering early in theiracademic career and can provide a meaningful touchstone during future engineering coursework. With collaborative, project based design in mind, the University of Notre Damedeveloped a new project for its first-year engineering course sequence. First and foremost, theproject was intended to increase student exposure to design through a hands-on experience. Inaddition, the project was created for the first-semester, where students would be concurrently incalculus and chemistry (physics is not taken until second semester). Therefore, the focus shouldbe on a simple model
psychiatry.Dr. Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University Muhsin Menekse is an assistant professor at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, with a joint appointment at the Department of Curriculum & Instruction. Dr. Menekse’s primary research investigates how classroom activities affect conceptual understanding in engineering and science for all students. His second research focus is on verbal interactions that can enhance productive discussions in collaborative learning settings. And his third research focus is on metacognition and its implications for learning. Much of this research focuses on learning processes in classroom settings. Dr. Menekse is the recipient of the 2014 William Elgin Wickenden Award by
focuses on human action, communication, and learning as socio- culturally organized phenomena. A major strand of his research explores the varied trajectories taken by students as they attempt to enter professional disciplines such as engineering, and focuses on the dilem- mas encountered by students as they move through these institutionalized trajectories. He is co-editor of a 2010 National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Learning Research as a Human Science. Other work has appeared in Linguistics and Education; Mind, Culture, and Activity; Anthropology & Education Quarterly, the Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science; the Journal of Engineering Education; and the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering
Paper ID #16166Background Factors Affecting Student Success in Aerospace Engineering: ASurvey of Sophomore and Senior StudentsMrs. Rachel Jannette McFalls-Brown, Mississippi State University Rachel is a second year masters student in Aerospace Engineering at Mississippi State University. She graduated from Mississippi State University with a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering in May 2014. Her current research interests include K-12 STEM education, first-year engineering, gifted, K-12 - First year transition, and aerospace engineering success.Dr. Mahnas Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University Dr. Jean Mohammadi
Missouri, where he also directs a maker initiative for the College of Education. He received his M.Ed. and Ph.D. in Information Science & Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri. His research/teaching focuses on engineering as an innovation in pK-12 education, policy of STEM ed- ucation, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering, engineering ’habits of mind’ and empathy and care in engineering. He has published more than 140 journal articles and proceedings papers (many with graduate and undergraduate students) and is the inaugural editor for the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research. c American Society for Engineering
characteristics of high quality STEM integration, including providing“opportunities for students to learn from failure and redesign.”18 Many in engineering educationpromote the idea of teaching it through the habits of mind, or how engineers think and do theirwork.19 These include: “systems thinking, collaboration, ethical considerations, creativity,communication and optimism.”20 Failure, although not explicitly named, is best exemplified aspart of the habit of mind of optimism. Resilient responses to design failure include an optimisticmindset that the problem can indeed be solved or that the failure can be overcome. Theseresponses are representative of a growth mindset, in which students learn from failure andbelieve that growth is a natural byproduct
Paper ID #15109Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) Integration throughout aManufacturing Engineering CurriculumDr. Daniel J. Waldorf, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Dan Waldorf, Professor in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, joined the Cal Poly faculty in 1998 after two years in Chicago as a Quality/Manufacturing Engineer at ATF, Inc., a supplier of specialty cold-formed and machined components for automotive applications. At ATF he implemented process control technologies, taught and instituted quality control systems, and designed experiments in a tra- ditional manufacturing environment
graduation. Somestudents also described their enjoyment of the camp, particularly the chance to learn from peersand make social contacts with a group of like-minded students.Concluding Remarks The design of E-GIRL curriculum successfully excited female students about engineeringcareers. The structure and activities provided participants with a unique opportunity toexperience a week as an engineering undergraduate student both academically and socially.Interactive lessons and the group project introduced students to engineering problems and currentproblems engineers (hydraulic fracturing) are working to solve. Since female students tend toprefer problem solving with real world and social connections,5 a project focused on hydraulicfracturing, a
Paper ID #15017Designing a Big Machine: A Description and Assessment of a Mechanical En-gineering Design ProjectIrene B. Mena, University of Pittsburgh Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. Her research interests include first-year engineering and graduate student professional development.Prof. William W. Clark, University of PittsburghEllen M. Moe c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Designing a Big Machine: A Description and Assessment of a Mechanical
persisted in engineering or 38.4%. The data is shown inFigure 2. These persistence rates were evaluated based on spring 2016 major/degree earned. Ifthese rates seem low, keep in mind that any student enrolling in the EPS course is counted asintending to major in engineering, even though at least one third of the students never declare anengineering major. 0.7 2012 NFS 0.6 non-NFS 0.5 Fraction of Students 0.4 0.3 0.2
., Kisenwether, E. C., Rzasa, S. E. & Wise, J.C. (2005). Developing and assessing students’ entrepreneurial skills and mind-sets. Journal of Engineering Education. 94(2): 233-243.5. KEEN (2015). Website: http://keennetwork.org/, last retrieved on Oct.11.6. Purzer, S., Nicholas, F. & Natarja, L. (2016). Evaluation of current assessment methods in engineering entrepreneurship education. Adv. Eng. Educ. 6(1): 1-27.7. Fernandez, T.M., Coutinho, G.S., Wilson, M. D. & Hoffmann, S.R. (2015). Development of Entrepreneurial Attitudes Assessment Instrument for First Year Engineering Students. . The 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Seatal, WA.8. Rodriguez, J., Chen, H.L., Sheppard, S., & Jin, Q. (2014). Exploring
Engineering Education to the New Century, by the Committee on the Engineer of 2020, Phase II, Committee on Engineering Education, National Academy of Engineering, 2005.8 Bransford, John D., Brown, Ann L., and Cocking, Rodney R., “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School,” with additional material from the Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 2000. Nation Academy of Sciences9 Popovic, Milica, “Giving Life to Teaching Introductory Electromagnetics: A Three-Year Assessment Plan,” 2004 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, pp. 3361–3364, 2004.10 Carlson, Lawrence E., and Sullivan, Jacqueline F., “Hands-on Engineering: Learning by Doing in the
translates into academic, work, and career self-efficacy particularly for women. Student sections of industry clubs and professionalorganizations such as the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, the AmericanSociety of Mechanical Engineers, the Lunar Lion Team at Penn State, and the National Societyof Black Engineers provided the students interviewed here with a heightened sense of academicand work self-efficacy. These organizations afforded students valuable opportunities to meetlike-minded engineering students, learn about important industry news, and serve as mentorswhile providing outlets to employ technical skills taught in the classroom.Although only the full-time engineer data pool was asked specifically about whether their co
Paper ID #16025Targeted Recruitment of Biomedical Engineering Graduate Students: TheInfluence of Recruitment Event ChangesMs. Brittain Sobey, The University of Texas - Austin Brittain Sobey is the Graduate Program Coordinator for the Department of Biomedical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. She earned her Master of Education from Boston University.Ms. Margo Cousins, The University of Texas - Austin Ms. Cousins oversees undergraduate and graduate academic advising at the Department Biomedical Engi- neering at The University of Texas at Austin. She directs the office in strategic academic and professional
engineers, and engage the community as service-minded leaders. Generally, thesestudents came to SPU from low-income households, underrepresented populations, and atypicalbackgrounds. By examining our body of ECASE scholars in this paper, we aim to expandperceptions about who could, who would, and who does succeed in earning the rigorousundergraduate electrical engineering degree.This paper includes a discussion of the lessons learned from interacting closely with 49 ECASEscholarship recipients and supporting them in an adaptive manner to address their individualneeds. The paper provides composite illustrations of the range of their backgrounds and uniquesituations. It highlights the challenges faced by these students during matriculation at SPU
Paper ID #17286Major Observations from a Specialized REU Program for Engineering Stu-dents with ADHDDr. Arash Esmaili Zaghi P.E., University of Connecticut Dr. Arash E. Zaghi received his PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno, where he worked on the seismic behavior of novel bridge column and connection details. After graduating, he stayed with UNR as a Research Scientist to overlook two major research projects involving system-level shake table experiments. In 2011, Dr. Zaghi joined the Department of Civil and Environmental Engi- neering at University of Connecticut as an Assistant Professor. His
technical versus non-technical course choiceallocations. Perhaps an unstated bias exists that choice equates to less “rigor,” and so theunintended message to students of differential choice in technical versus non-technicalcoursework may be that knowledge and courses in non-technical subjects are comparativelyunimportant. Values are inherent in engineering design; so just as the technical content of anengineering program is (hopefully) carefully scaffolded, “the same intentionality and evaluationshould be undertaken for the liberal component of a student’s undergraduate experience.”6Though some choice is necessary, too much choice can be detrimental;29 thus, providing choicein a balanced manner is essential. Engineering educators must be mindful
College of Engineering. Dr. Daher collaborates with engineering faculty to document and research the integration of innovative instructional strategies and technologies in his classroom. His latest collaborative submitted publication discusses Using the Flipped approach in a water resources course.Dr. Stuart Bernstein, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Stuart Bernstein received his Bachelors in Construction Management from Syracuse University, His Mas- ters in Architecture from Virginia Tech, and his PhD in Educational Administration, Leadership in Higher Education from the University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Dr. Bernstein has taught in the College of Engi- neering for 14 years, teaching classes in construction estimating
Paper ID #17192Utilizing an Innovative Engineering Skills Curriculum and Technology to Ex-pand Classroom Learning in Low-Resource SettingsMr. Dhinesh Balaji Radhakrishnan, Purdue University Dhinesh Radhakrishnan is a doctoralstudent in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research includes utilization of technology in education, and socially constructed education in low- resource settings. His current work is on developing engineering skills curriculum for out-of-school youth in Africa utilizing digital learning materials. He is the Global Student Forum Chair for 2016 in SPEED. He is also the
Paper ID #16169Work in Progress: Developing a Quantitative Instrument for Measuring Un-dergraduate Engineering Students’ Future Time PerspectivesCatherine McGough, Clemson University Catherine McGough is currently a graduate research assistant in Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. She obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Clemson University in 2014. Her research interests are in undergraduate engineering student motivations and undergraduate engineer- ing problem solving skill development and strategies.Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of
. However, traditional classroom activities emphasizewell-defined problems and encourage students to manipulate abstract symbols such as physics ormathematical formulas to identify solutions. Such reliance on abstract operation, along withhaving little experience of concrete modeling through embodied and prototyping techniques, hasled students to face great challenges when entering engineering programs2. Therefore, middleschool students need increased exposure to engineering design experiences that transform their“habit of the mind”—from fixating on thinking-before-prototyping towards prototyping-to-think.In this study, we structured a toy design workshop to provide hands on and engaging designactivities for middle school students, to help them
FIELD EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING PEDAGOGY IN ENGINEERING MECHANICS A MEANS OF IMPROVING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE Oludare Owolabi, DSc., PE, Department of Civil Engineering Morgan State1700 East Cold Spring Lane, Baltimore, MD 21251, CBEIS 340, USA, Tel: 443-885-5445 Fax: 443-885-8219; Email: oludare.owolabi@morgan.eduMorgan State University has remained focus in broadening the participation of underrepresentedstudents through experiential learning, in-order to gain the necessary knowledge in STEM aswell as link theory with practice. This initiative has been via internships, field trips, and meetingswith consultants. As it has been noted that students become more engaged when
Paper ID #14416How are Social Media, Engineering and Leadership Related to One Anotherfrom a Student Perspective?Dr. Jed S. Lyons, University of South Carolina Dr. Jed Lyons is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering and Computing at the University of South Carolina. His passion is developing authentic engineering learning experiences for students from grades K through Ph.D. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 How are Social Media, Engineering and Leadership Related to One Another