Paper ID #18712MOSL: An Innovative Approach to a Supplementary Course of Mathematicsin EngineeringIng. Jose R. Portillo, Universidad Galileo Roberto Portillo is a mathematics professor and sub-director of the Teaching Assistants Department of Universidad Galileo in Guatemala. He holds a Bs. in Electronics and Computer Science and a Ms. in Operations Research. In several years he was awarded with the ”Excellence in Teaching” award. His current research interests are focused in Engineering Education.Dr. Alberth E. Alvarado, Universidad Galileo Alberth Alvarado received (with honors) the B.S. degree in Electronics and
Paper ID #17785Society of Women Engineers (SWE) Welding and Machining Day: Women’sConfidence with Individual Hands-On ManufacturingMs. Stacy Lynn Mann, Kettering University Stacy Mann is a second degree senior level student at Kettering University and creator of the April 2016 SWE Machining and Welding Day. She received a bachelor of arts with honor and highest distinction in 2011 from the University of Michigan in Anthropology and Asian Studies with a concentration in Chinese Studies. She is now pursuing a bachelor of science in mechanical engineering.Dr. Diane L Peters, Kettering University Dr. Peters is an Assistant
Paper ID #20374Student Paper: Small Team Agile Systems Engineering For Rapid Prototyp-ing of Robotic SystemsMr. Charles Avery Noren, Texas A&M University Vehicle Systems & Control Laboratory Charles Noren is an undergraduate research assistant at the Texas A&M University Vehicle Systems & Control Laboratory and task leader for the rail-based robotic system project. He is expected to graduate with a Bachelor of Science in Aerospace Engineering in May of 2018, and plans to continue his education at Texas A&M University with a Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering.Kendra Lynne Andersen, Texas A&M
Paper ID #17913Improving Student Engagement in Engineering Using Brain-Based LearningPrinciples as Instructional Delivery ProtocolsDr. John T. Solomon, Tuskegee University John T Solomon is assistant professor in the mechanical engineering department of Tuskegee Univer- sity. He received Ph.D in Mechanical Engineering from Florida State University, USA in 2010. Prior joining Tuskegee University he was working as a Research Associate in Florida Center for Advanced Aero Propulsion and an Adjunct Faculty at Florida State University. Dr. Solomon’s research interests include high speed flow control, actuator development
conducted a search for “handicapped doors.” Severalphotographs of wheelchair-accessible doors appeared on his iPad screen. He tapped on an imageof a door that appeared to be the most similar to the design that his group had in mind. When hetapped on the image, the website on which the image appeared was displayed on the screen. Hescrolled down the website skimmed it for information on the door’s costs. This exampledemonstrates how participants tended to use visual strategies, rather than written strategies, tofind information. Miguel could have typed “cost of average handicapped door” in a regularGoogle search engine, but instead he preferred to use a visual strategy that would result inimages rather than in words
Senior Design Experience in Electrical and Computer Engineering: Evolution and Lessons Learned Kim R. Fowler Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas 66506–5204, USA Don Gruenbacher Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas 66506–5204, USABackgroundThe Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department at Kansas State University hasdeveloped a Senior Design course over the past five years
learning activities in their professional positions. This study of IRE graduates in theworkforce provides evidence of the value of this approach showing that these engineers see thevalue of these skills, continue to practice them (albeit in modified ways from when at IRE), andshow evidence of being at an advantage in the “learning to learn” activities that are necessary intheir jobs.ReferencesABET, Inc., (2016). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2016-2017. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2016-2017/.Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R., eds. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington
Paper ID #19643From Professor to Teacher: Who Knows What Engineering Is Best in the K-12 Classroom?Sr. Mary Ann Jacobs Ed.D., Manhattan College Mary Ann Jacobs, scc is an assistant professor in the School of Education. She prepares secondary teacher candidates in all content areas through her courses in secondary pedagogy. Her areas of interest include STEM education, brain compatible strategies, and action research in the classroom.Dr. Zahra Shahbazi, Manhattan College Zhahra Shahbazi is as an assistant professor of Mechanical engineering at Manhattan College. She earned a B.S. degree from the University of Tehran
Paper ID #18841Gender and Ethnic Differences in Classroom Engagement and KnowledgeBuilding in Engineering Energy Science CoursesDan Haskett, Georgia Southern University Georgia Southern StudentDr. Jonathan C. Hilpert, Georgia Southern University Dr. Jonathan C. Hilpert is an Associate Professor of Educational Psychology in the Department of Cur- riculum Reading and Foundations in the College of Education at Georgia Southern University. His re- search interests include student motivation, engagement, and interactive learning; emergent and self- organizing properties of educational systems; and knowledge construction of
Paper ID #18173Design in Biomedical Engineering: Student Applications of Design Heuristicsas a Tool for Idea GenerationMiss Anastasia Katharine Ostrowski, University of Michigan Anastasia Ostrowski is a graduate student in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Michigan, con- ducting research with the Daly Design and Engineering Education Research Group. Her undergraduate degree is in Biomedical Engineering focusing on electrical engineering. Her current research focuses on understanding how engineering students in biomedical engineering engage in the design process.Mr. Jin Woo Lee, University of Michigan Jin Woo Lee is
sustainability componentsOne of the main objectives of the development of K-12 outreach activities via service learningexperiences was to provide a sustainable way to promote active CPP engineering studentparticipation in the education and motivation of the K-12 community. The sustainability of theprogram was achieved developing the curriculum model shown in Figure 1.Sustainability component 1-The service learning instructional model provided academic credit tostudents(this provided time in students’ schedules to engage in the creation, modification andfurther implementation of the hands-on outreach activities while keeping in mind thecharacteristics of the K-12 partner). The course was officially designated as a service learningcourse, which added all
. and Eodice, M. (Eds.) 2017. Creative Ways of Knowing in Engineering. Springer, Berlin. Bransford, J., Brown, A., and Cocking, eds. 1999. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington,DC: National Academy Press. Byerley, A. R. 2001. “Using Multimedia and ‘Active Learning’ Techniques to ‘Energize’ an Introductory EngineeringThermodynamics Class. Proceedings of the 31st Frontiers in Education Conference, Reno, NV. American Society forEngineering Education. doi: 10. 1109/FIE.2001.963906. Bordolo, Loni M., and James J. Winebrake. 2015. “Bringing the Liberal Arts to Engineering Education.” Chronicle ofHigher Education, April 27. Brophy, Sean P. 2000. “Guidelines for Modular Design.” VaNTH Engineering
Paper ID #20096Teaching the Nature of Engineering in K-12 Science Education: A DelphiStudy (Fundamental)Dr. Brian Hartman, Walla Walla University Brian is a professor of education at Walla Walla University. He has 5 years of experience teaching high school science and practiced engineering for 12 years. His research interests include K-12 biological and chemical engineering curriculum development, nature of engineering, and creativity in engineering design.Randy L. Bell, Oregon State University Dr. Bell is an Associate Dean and Professor of Science Education in the College of Education at Oregon State University. His
the program, he had aresearch question in mind. Brandon proposed measuring road roughness from a mechanical,rather than a civil engineering perspective. He claimed civil engineers know all about the roadand nothing about signal processing. The current standard of measuring road roughness entailedmeasurements made at constant speed under ideal conditions. This approach did not accuratelyrepresent normal driving conditions. Brandon considered multiple factors and conditions in hisapproach, arising from his past project experience with the research institute.Interpreting the Case through the CoCPBrandon amassed substantial domain-relevant skills across domains over his extensive career.He was confident in his testing and design skills, his
student immersion and growth in mind, the programhas developed to include an engineering cornerstone project in which students work in teams todesign, build, and program autonomous robots to complete tasks on an interactive roboticscourse. In support of the project, a variety of technologies were designed and polished as theprogram grew. Classroom methodologies were also evaluated and improved with time inresponse to student feedback and research on best practices.This paper provides a historical review of practice for the program with an emphasis on thetechnologies and methodologies that have been most effective in the program as it hasdeveloped.IntroductionFor 23 years researchers in autonomous robot design have worked on the advancement of
interacting points of view) alongside discussions of“objectivity.” Integrating conversation architectures that value and develop intersubjectivestatements allows multiple perspectives to come out so teams can take advantage of them in theirwork. Open Sentences also allow students to share their personal interests and values; connectingwith these inner interests can increase their intrinsic motivation [15].Open Sentences can lead to emotionally vulnerable spaces when students share their values,motivations, and fears. In our experiences, engineering curricula do not typically provide manyspaces for the development of affective skills, and facilitators should keep this in mind. Forinstance, it may be helpful to use a progression of Open Sentences that
Paper ID #18877Are Students Overworked? Understanding the Workload Expectations andRealities of First-Year EngineeringMs. Darlee Gerrard, University of Toronto Darlee Gerrard is a Coordinator for pre-university science and engineering outreach programs in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto. She is also a Ph.D. student in the department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning at OISE (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education) in the collaborative Engineering Education program. She received her Hon. B.Sc. from the University of Toronto, B. Ed. from Brock University, and Masters degree
: including“specified criteria for success” as they go about defining problems, and planning and carryingout “fair tests in which variables are controlled and failure points are considered to identifyaspects of a model or prototype that can be improved.”6 Another principle for elementary through high school engineering education, accordingto the Committee on K12 Engineering Education, is that it promotes engineering habits of mind.Specifically, the committee referenced the following habits of mind: “systems thinking,collaboration, ethical considerations, creativity, communication and optimism.”7 Optimism“reflects a world view in which possibilities and opportunities can be found in every challengeand an understanding that every technology can
Paper ID #20467Fostering an Asset Mindset to Broaden Participation through the Transfor-mation of an Engineering Diversity ProgramDr. Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder Beverly Louie is the Director for Teaching and Learning Initiatives in the Broadening Opportunities through the Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center in The University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. She holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in chemical engineering from CU, and a D.Phil. in mechanical engineering from the University of Oxford, England. Louie’s research inter- ests are in the areas of engineering student
Tech, College of Engineering and theUniversity of Nottingham, Faculty of Engineering, now entering its fourth year. The programfacilitates the exchange of students, faculty, technology and ideas pursuant to researching futureelectronic transport systems and alternative energy systems. This strong institutional partnershipprovides students with the opportunity to conduct this international research while acquiringglobally minded engineering practices. The National Science Foundation grant (#1261162)supports up to (10) students from Virginia Tech in conducting paid summer research related totheir academic and professional interests under the mentorship of faculty members at theUniversity of Nottingham and in cooperation with Virginia Tech
Paper ID #20261Cognitive Processing of Cryptography Concepts: An fMRI StudyMr. Joseph William Beckman, Purdue University Joseph Beckman is a Ph.D. student in information security at Purdue University researching cognitive processing as it applies to learning in information security.Ms. Melissa Jane Dark, Purdue University Melissa Dark is W.C. Furnas Professor of Technology in the College of Technology at Purdue University. Her work is in cybersecurity teaching, learning and thinking.Mr. Pratik Kashyap, Purdue University Pratik Kashyap is a PhD student in Electrical Engineering at Purdue University whose field of research
Paper ID #17975A Pretest-Posttest Quasi-Experimental Study for a Game Intervention in anUndergraduate Wireless Communications CourseMr. Joshua Alex´ei Garc´ıa Sheridan, Virginia Tech Joshua Garc´ıa Sheridan is a PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He received his Bachelor’s of Science in Electrical Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. His current research work include gaming and game-like interventions in engineering ed- ucation and designing interactive educational tutorials for radio engineering, with research interests in explicitly mapping childhood
Paper ID #19066Measuring Students’ Subjective Task Values Related to the Post-UndergraduateCareer SearchDr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Dr. Brunhaver joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and
effectivedesign of engineering projects [49, 50].In this current iteration, five of the design teams had unrelated design projects, while theremaining four teams performed projects that were a subset of their larger research project. Thischoice was at the discretion of each team’s project advisor. The teams are formed from 37senior-level engineering students. Most teams have a majority of mechanical engineeringstudents with a minority of systems engineering or electrical engineering students. In this work,we sought to discover if varying the depth of instruction in the design process steps would havean effect on the students’ execution of the designette project, as well as their execution of theirlonger-term, real world project. It is with this in mind
Paper ID #18490Listening and Negotiation IIDr. Adjo A Amekudzi-Kennedy, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Adjo Amekudzi-Kennedy is Professor and Associate Chair for Global Engineering Leader- ship and Research Development in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Georgia Tech, with responsibilities for managing and expanding the School’s global/leadership education and research programs and impact, and directing the Institute’s Global Engineering Leadership Minor Program. Her research, teaching and professional activities focus on civil infrastructure decision making to promote sustainable
workshops thathighlight exemplary academic planning within our institution. Another external factor, marketforces, pointed to the need for interdisciplinary, “well-rounded,” and “T-shaped” students.17, 18 In addition to these external factors, internal factors also played a significant role in thedesign of the minor. For example, pre-existing faculty relationships influenced which classes weselected as core classes and student characteristics influenced logistical decisions related to theminor (e.g., prerequisites, capstone requirements, marketing strategies).Interdisciplinarity and General Education While the Innovation Pathways Minor is housed in the College of Engineering, it isimportant to keep in mind that it is a general
Paper ID #19359The Assertion-Evidence Approach to Technical Presentations: OvercomingResistance in Professional SettingsElizabeth L. Miller, Pennsylvania State University Elizabeth Miller is a rising senior studying mechanical engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She is a student in the Schreyer Honors College and an Engineering Ambassador. Last summer she had an internship in Siemens’ Energy Management Division, and this summer she will be working in Capital One’s Management Rotation Program.Mr. Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Michael Alley is an associate professor of engineering
Institute of Technology (MIT) and Singapore University of Technologyand Design (SUTD). During GLP, a design-based wilderness education class addressesthe development of design thinking, engineering science, and leadership skills; it consistsof project-based classroom and shop activities on campus, followed by a multidaywilderness expedition. After the 2015 class, students tended to place increasedimportance on tasks related to immediate action such as building. At the same time,decreased importance was placed on exploratory tasks such as understanding the problemand iterating. The 2016 curriculum was modified with these findings in mind, increasingthe time spent discussing exploratory aspects of the design process and increasing thenumber of
Paper ID #17857Development and Use of a Client Interaction Rubric for Formative Assess-mentDr. John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University Dr. John K Estell is Professor of Computer Engineering and Computer Science at Ohio Northern Uni- versity, providing instruction primarily in the areas of introductory computer programming and first-year engineering. He has been on the faculty of the Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Science Department since 2001, and served as department chair from 2001-2010. He received a B.S.C.S.E. degree from The University of Toledo and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science
perceived divisions between STEM andthe liberal arts by linking those perspectives and assignments to broader habits of mind that arenecessary for engineers and designers. We then describe our strategies for integrating a richdesign experience into the course and consider how that integration alters typical approaches todesign projects. Finally, we discuss our plan to implement assessments that account for bothstudents’ technical abilities and their application of course theories and concepts.Course development was supported at the Institution by a summer course development grant thatencouraged faculty to partner across disciplines to create unique course offerings. Thepartnership between the Humanities & Social Sciences (HSS) and the