enthusiastic customer.References [1] J. Richardson, K. Shomper, M. Lewellyn, B. Sprague, and C. Kohl, “CedarLogic Digital Logic Simulator,” https://github.com/CedarvilleCS/CedarLogic. [2] Logisim Evolution Developers, “Logisim Evolution,” https://github.com/logisim-evolution/logisim-evolution. [3] CircuitVerse Contributors, “CircuitVerse Digital Logic simulator,” https://circuitverse.org. [4] N. Nisan and S. Schocken, The Elements of Computing Systems: Building a Modern Computer from First Principles. MIT Press, 2005. [5] V. Rangan, “UPduino v3.1,” https://tinyvision.ai/products/upduino-v3-1. [6] R. Jacobs, “WebFPGA,” https://webfpga.io/. [7] L. Valenty, “TinyFPGA,” https://tinyfpga.com. [8] Lattice Semiconductor, “iCE40 – Low-power, High
evenjust awareness of the secondary and tertiary curricula could help both levels. However, it is stillrare to have this kind of pipeline. In the next section, we will focus on a case of a high schoolprogram and its connections to a university program that might offer some lessons for how thecreation of a pipeline might be supported.connection between college and high school programs An intrapreneurship training program for electrical and computer engineering studentswas implemented through an NSF S-STEM grant at an R1 university. The intrapreneurshipprogram was designed to teach students how to be innovative and entrepreneurial within anexisting company, since the vast majority of students will not be interested in starting their
students in computing-related programs. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Playing in the Sandbox: Developing Entrepreneurial Mindset Communication Skills in Introductory Programming Students Stephany Coffman-Wolph and John K. Estell Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Science Department Ohio Northern University Ada, Ohio 45810 Email: s-coffman-wolph@onu.edu, j-estell@onu.eduIntroductionAs one of the charter members of the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), theOhio Northern University
Biology 12 11% 10% Chemical Engineering 5% Student Count 10 Chemistry 16% Civil Engineering 8 Discover Engineering 21% 5% Discover S cience
is also tied to the perception of how others mightinvalidate its existence. This perception is supported by literature which indicates that asexuality“lack[s] social credibility” and suffers “social invisibility” across countries and cultures [30].Since asexuality is characterized by social invisibility, Kayla’s only desirable path forward toresisting was internal. She concluded that asexuality was not a useful or valid identity toexternally resist through, partly because it was socially invisible, and partly because she stillstruggled with her asexual identity development. Kayla's nuanced view of her asexualityhighlights in sharp relief Mollet's finding of the complexity of identity disclosure management,distinctly influenced by perceived
x x x x x x x x x H* 2 SN x x x x x x x x x x 3 L x x x x x x x x x x 4 S x x x x x x x x 5 AH x x x x x x x x x U* 6 K x x x x x x x x 7 AZ
– 8.597.8.[2] K. Gieskes and M. Elmore, “First-year engineering – deciding on a major,” 12th Annual First- Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conf., July 26 – 28, 2020, Michigan State, East Lansing, MI.[3] S. Zahorian, M. Elmore, and K. J. Temkin, “Factors that influence engineering freshman in choosing their major,” Proc. 120th ASEE Annual Conf. & Exposition, June 23 – 26, 2013, Atlanta, GA.[4] A. Theiss, J. E. Robertson, R. L. Kajfez, K. M. Kecskemety, and K. Meyers, “Engineering major selection: an examination of initial choice and switching throughout the first year,” In Proc. 123rd ASEE Annual Conf. & Exposition, June 26 – 29, 2016, New Orleans, LA.[5] S. L. Kelly, D. K. Maczka, and J. R
Impact on Student Success in Engineering and Engineering Technology Education,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2017, Columbus, OH.[2] Kennedy, E. D., McMahon, S. R., and D. Reis, “Independence in the Making: Using Makerspaces Experiences to Build Foundational Entrepreneurial Competencies,” Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogies, 0(0) pp 1-18. 2020.[3] “NAE Grand Challenge Scholars Program”, National Academy of Engineers. Accessed Jan. 27th, 2020. [Online] Available: http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/GrandChallengeScholarsProgram.aspx[4] “What Is KEEN,” Accessed Mar. 9th, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/what-is-keen[5] J. B. Hylton, D. Mikesell, J.-D. Yoder, and H
, employer partners, and students (or interns)as they collaborate in experiential learning programs. The platform was created in collaborationwith experiential educators worldwide and was integrated into the intervention in 2018. Theintervention leverages Practera to: • mediate the three-way relationship between an employer partner, the educator, and the student/s. • provide the educational scaffolding to empower students who have not previously worked on employer projects with the skills and perspective to successfully contribute in a work environment—especially when navigating as a remote worker. • provide the educator with real-time learning analytics designed to unearth collaboration issues, track each
region of south Texas where manycounties have Hispanic/Latinx majority populations [4]. As a result, TAMUK has a highpercentage of undergraduates that identify as Hispanic/Latinx, 75% in fall of 2020 [5]. Researchin higher education has identified challenges for Hispanic students at all levels, communitycolleges [6,7], universities [8,9], and in graduate study [10,11]. Recently completed research hasaffirmed that these challenges exist for Texas A&M University-Kingsville students [12,13,14].Rendón et al.’s report of perceived challenges to Latinx student success in STEM (based on theNSF award # 1759134 to Laredo College) provides a succinct summary: “(1) Lack of culture ofsupport, (2) Lack of educational resources, (3) Academic deficiencies
future.8 AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants No.1723209 and 1723245. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.9 References[1] R. W. Fairlie, F. Hoffmann and P. Oreopoulos, "A Community College Instructor Like Me: Race and Ethnicity Interactions in the Classroom," The American Economic Review, vol. 104, no. 8, pp. 2567-2591, August 2014.[2] A. Perrakis and L. S. Hagedorn, "Latino/a Student Success in Community Colleges and Hispanic-Serving Institution Status," Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol
discussion posts indicate that the design andimplementation of this course was effective in meeting the established learning goals andsupporting students’ experiential education experiences in research. Although we hope toincorporate some in-person activities into future offerings of EGR 193, the bulk of the coursewill likely remain online to provide flexibility for students who are pursuing a wide range ofresearch experiences. One important adjustment to future online offerings of this course will beto integrate more opportunities for students to receive encouragement and positive reinforcementfrom their peers and the instructor. As noted in the discussion of week 3’s recommendation letterexercise, the asynchronous nature of this course meant that
techniques to diverse audiences.In short, after completing the course, students should be able to understand the economicimplications of various courses of action.The course has been taught as a fairly traditional course on engineering economics, using astandard textbook. The learning activities and format for the course have varied depending on theinstructor. The instructor who taught the course in Spring 2019 used a traditionallecture/homework format. In other recent semesters, the instructor has designed a partially“flipped” format. In this format, to prepare for class meetings students are asked to read one ormore sections of the textbook, watch one or more short video clips, and attempt 1-3 problemsbased on the concepts in the reading(s
, the authors plan to continue to study the impact of MESH on onlinecourses on disaggregated student grades by collecting more student responses in these courses in2021. Long-term the authors plan to create a MESH planning tool to help professors think abouthow to incorporate MESH structures into both synchronous and asynchronous class time, andmake intentional choices about how to create a culturally balanced online environment.Bibliography[1] Riegle-Crumb, C., King, B., & Irizarry, Y. (2019). Does STEM Stand Out? Examining Racial/Ethnic Gaps inPersistence Across Postsecondary Fields. Educational Researcher, 48(3), 133–144[2] Hurtado S, Cabrera NL, Lin MH, Arellano L, Espinosa LL. Diversifying Science: Underrepresented StudentExperiences
properties of polysulfones. Macromolecules, 25:3434, 1992. 5. Aitken, C.L., Mohanty, D.K. and Paul, D.R. Gas trans- port properties of poly(arlether bissulfones) and poly(arylether bisketones). J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed., 31:983-989, 1993. 6. Nichol, C.A., and Paul, D.R. Gas transport properties of polysulfones based on dihydroxynaphthalene isomers. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed., 31:1061-1065, 1993. 7. Nichol, C.A., Zhang, F., and McGinity, J.W. Extrusion of acrylic films. Pharm. Res., 13(5):804-808,1996. 8. Nichol, C.A., Yang, D., Humphrey, W., Ilgan, S., Tansey, W., Higuchi, T., Zareneyrizi, F., Wallace, S., and Podoloff, D., Biodistribution and Imaging of Polyethyleneimine, a gene delivery agent. Drug Delivery
further study.1 ABET Outcomes, Criterion 3. Retrieved 12/18/15 from http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017/#outcomes2 Giesecke, F., Mitchell, A., Spencer, H., Hill, I., Dygdon, J., Novak, J., & Lockhart, S., (2009). Technical Drawing, 13th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.3 Ullman, D., (1994). The Mechanical Design Process, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA4 Zemke, S. & Zemke, D., (2013). Cognitive hindrances to learning mechanical design. International Journal of Engineering Education 29(2): 450-458.5 Eckert, C. & Stacey, M. (2001). Dimension of communication in design, International Conference on Engineering
Franklin Technology Partners Grant that established the ”Center of Excellence in Signal Integrity” at Penn State Harrisburg. He was a co-author for the Best Poster Paper Award at the IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics 2007, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the paper ”Transmitter Pre-emphasis and Adaptive Receiver Equalization for Duobinary Signaling in Backplane Channels”. In addition, of Best Paper Award at the IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems 96, Seoul, Korea, for the paper ”Basis Matrix Representation of Morphological Filters with N-Dimensional Structuring Elements”.Dr. Sedig Salem Agili, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, The Capital College Sedig S. Agili received his BS, MS
difficult to get along with, very shy, or skilled at forging relationshipswith others. While interpersonal obstacles are not always related to discrete work tasks, anengineer’s social skills can influence how tasks are carried out.An engineer who is particularly well connected socially can have an easier time gatheringinformation to complete a work task, particularly if s/he needs to gather backchannel informationor rely on colleagues’ candor. In one example, Hannah, a member of the Quality Team at a steelmill, needed to find out why a slab of steel was being transported back and forth between twostorage locations, especially since she had submitted written documentation weeks before tohave it taken to the scrapyard. One constraint in her situation
all’curriculum, in Improving science education: The contribution of research, J. Millar, Editor. 2000, McGraw-Hill Education: UK. p. 147-164.4. Varma, R., Making computer science minority-friendly. Communications of the ACM, 2006. 49(2): p. 129-134.5. Sjøberg, S., Investing all children in 'science for all', in Improving science education: The contribution of research, J. Millar, Editor. 2000, McGraw-Hill Education: UK. p. 165-186.6. Jenkins, E., 'Science for all’: Time for a paradigm shift, in Improving Science Education: The Contribution of Research, J. Millar, Editor. 2000, McGraw-Hill Education: UK. p. 207-226.7. Duschl, R., Making the nature of science explicit, in Improving science education: The
data such as parent educationlevel and ethnicity.5. AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the Cal State University Course Redesign with Technologyprogram for providing funding for this redesign effort. The authors also would like to thankundergraduate student assistants Chantel Ylaya and Sekani Robinson for assisting with the datacollection and analysis.6. References[1] Felder, R. M. and Brent, R. (2009). Active learning: An introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2 (4).[2] Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., and Wenderoth, M. P.(2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410-8415.[3
Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering, [Webpage], Retrieved January 29, 2017 from URL http://sites.computer.org/ccse/SE2004Volume.pdf [5]. The Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula: IEEE-CS and ACM, (2015), Software Engineering 2014 Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering, [Webpage], Retrieved January 29, 2017 from URL https://www.acm.org/education/se2014.pdf [6]. Acharya, S., Ackerman, A. (2012), Software Engineering Education Needs more Engineering, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition – Software Engineering Constituent Committee, June 10 – 13 – San Antonio, TX[7]. McGraw, G. Software Security - Building Security In, Addition-Wesley
applicants to M-C,twenty-two were accepted to the M-C 2019 Cohort. During a blind review of applicants, one ofthe KS HSIs placed at the top of the M-C applicant ranking and the other placed mid-range.Moving forward, KS plans to set the expectation for transitioning to M-C for ATE proposaldevelopment at the beginning of new Cohorts. KS will also more proactively recommend thateligible candidates attend the M-C orientation webinar and have M-C leaders speak at KS CohortMeeting(s) to describe the opportunity.In 2018, a pilot was conducted with one KS college participating in the M-C 2018 Cohort. Thepilot helped to improve the coordination of timelines between the two programs in thecollaborative and as a result the applications for the M-C 2019 Cohort
Secondary School Karu, Abuja. 1st March, 2009[24] J. P. Keeves, and C. Morgenstern, “Attitudes toward science: Measures and effects,” In J.P.Keeves (Ed.) The IEA Study of Science III: Changes in science Education and Achievement:1970-1984 (pp. 122-140). 1992, New York: Pergamon[25] J. V. Mallow, “Science Anxiety,” Research and Action Handbook of College ScienceTeaching in J.J. Mintzesve W.H Leonard, (eds), NSTA press Virginia, USA, 2006[26] J. S. Lewis, and C. T. Eddy. Understanding Children, an Introduction to Psychology ofAfrican Teachers London: George Allen and Unwin limited, 1967, Page 25.[27] B. Schneider, S. Martinez, and A. Ownes, Barriers to Educational Opportunities forHispanics in the United States. National Research Council (US) Panel
Influence in Robotics Engineering Activity,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 23, no. 4, 2014.[10] B. Latour and S. Woolgar, Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.[11] J. L. Lemke, Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood, NJ: 1990, 1990.[12] J. Bransford, “Preparing People for Rapidly Changing Environments,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. January 20, pp. 1–3, 2007.[13] S. A. Kirch, “Identifying and resolving uncertainty as a mediated action in science: A comparative analysis of the cultural tools used by scientists and elementary science students at work,” Sci. Educ., vol. 94, pp. 308–335, 2010.[14] J. Roschelle, “Learning by collaboration: Convergent conceptual
. Simpson, and D. T. Kenrick, Eds. New York: Psychology Press, 2006, pp. 143–162.[3] A. M. Grant and B. Schwartz, “Too much of a good thing: The challenge and opportunity of the inverted U,” Perspect. Psychol. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 61–76, Jan. 2011.[4] G. M. Walton and G. L. Cohen, “A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students.,” Science, vol. 331, no. 6023, pp. 1447–51, Mar. 2011.[5] G. M. Walton and G. L. Cohen, “A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 82–96, 2007.[6] G. M. Walton and S. T. Brady, “The many questions of belonging,” in Handbook of Competence and Motivation (2nd Edition
environment, which is typical unattainable for undergraduate students.References [1] D. A. Willis, P. S. Krueger, and A. Kendrick, “The Influence of a Research Experiences for Undergraduates Program on Student Perceptions and Desire to Attend Graduate School,” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, vol. 14, no .2, pp. 21, 2013. [2] W. D. Jemison, W. A. Hornfeck, and J. P. Schaffer, “The Role of Undergraduate Research in Engineering Education,” In Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM, 2001. [3] N. Dukhan, and M. Jenkins, “Undergraduate Research as a Motivation for Attending Graduate School,” In Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI, June 2007. [4
Engineering program was conducted.II. IntroductionIn the early 2000’s, forecasters believed the United States was on the verge of a nuclearrenaissance. Tremendous growth in the energy industry was expected at that time since theaverage age of the nuclear power sector was 48 years of age which ranked among the oldest inany US industry 1. Many colleges and universities geared up new programs with help fromfederal agencies such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Department ofEnergy (DOE). Over 40 college programs across the country were developed to create a pipelineto help fill the shortage of workers 2. The majority of the programs were two-year Associatedegree programs designed for entry level positions in nuclear fields. At that
at University of Minnesota and her Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at Iowa State University. She teaches courses in both Industrial and Mechanical Engineering at SAU, focusing in Engineering Graphics, Manufacturing, the Engineering Sciences, and Design. She was recently the PI of an NSF S-STEM grant to recruit rural stu- dents from Iowa and Illinois into STEM. Dr. Prosise mentors the collegiate chapter of SWE and organizes many outreach events encourage girls to go into STEM. She leads a study-abroad trip for engineering students to Brazil every-other-year, where students design, build, and implement assistive technologies for people with disabilities. Her research focus is to develop
engineering education?” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 36:3, pp. 301-312, 2011.[3] K. Bain, What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.[4] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, vol.111:23, pp. 8410– 8415, 2014.[5] J.S. Bruner, “The act of discovery,” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 31, pp. 21-32, 1961.[6] J.S. Bruner, The Process of Education, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.[7] S. Gómez Puente, M. Eijck, and W. Jochems, “A sampled literature review of