H. Quantifying Uncertainty Into Numerical Probabilities for TheReporting of Intelligence. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Santa Monica : Rand, 1973. pp. 1-9. R-1185-ARPA.9. Brown, Thomas A. Probabilistic Forecasts and Reproducing Scoring Systems. Advanced Research ProjectsAgency. Santa Montica : Rand, 1970. pp. 1-32. RM-6299-ARPA.10. Strictly Proper Scoring Rules in an Absolute Grading. Dees, Robert, Gilliam, Ken S. and Kwinn, Michael J.West Point : American Society of Engineering Education, 2008. 2008 American Society of Engineering Education(ASEE) Zone 1 Regional Conference.11. Sibley, William L. A Prototype Computer Program for Interactive Computer-Administered AdmissibleProbability Measurement. Rand. Santa Monica : Defense
information centers in this time of rapid change.Dr. Robin A.M Hensel, West Virginia University Robin A. M. Hensel, Ed.D., is the Assistant Dean for Freshman Experience in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University. While her doctorate is in Curriculum and Instruction, focusing on higher education teaching of STEM fields, she also holds B.S. and M.A. degrees in Mathematics. Dr. Hensel has over seven years of experience working in engineering teams and in project management and administration as a Mathematician and Computer Systems Analyst for the U. S. Department of Energy as well as over 25 years teaching mathematics, statistics, computer science, and freshman
way of life”, Tribal College Journal, 19(4), pp.60–61, 2008.16. Slater, J., & Burson, T., “Connecting assessment to resource allocation: A demonstration project atQueens University of Charlotte”, New York, Wiley Periodicals, 2011.17. Suskie, L., “Assessing student learning: A common sense guide”, 2nd Ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2009.18. Flint, N. and Johnson, B., “Towards fairer university assessment: Recognizing the concerns ofstudents”, New York, NY: Taylor & Francis, 2011.
theirengineering first-year students with a focus on increasing retention. The authors also wouldintroduce some early appreciation to engineering design, the building of models, prototypetesting, and actual implementation of a product/process to first-year students. An innovative wayof illustrating Senior Capstone projects targeted on solving real-world water problems andenvironmental issues will be attempted.AcknowledgmentThe PI and Co-PIs want to thank the National Science Foundation - Division Of UndergraduateEducation for the grant Undergraduate Scholarships for Excellent Education in EnvironmentalEngineering and Water Resources Management (USE4WRM) (Award #1565049) for thefinancial support that could help enhance the recruitment and the retention in
University of Alabama. She has experi- ence working with many industries such as automotive, chemical distribution etc. on transportation and operations management projects. She works extensively with food banks and food pantries on supply chain management and logistics focused initiatives. Her graduate and undergraduate students are integral part of her service-learning based logistics classes. She teaches courses in strategic relationships among industrial distributors and distribution logistics. Her recent research focuses on engineering education and learning sciences with a focus on how to engage students better to prepare their minds for the future. Her other research interests include empirical studies to
andeffort expended with and without the adaptive platform. Data from our evaluation survey weretriangulated with qualitative data collected from the student focus groups and instructorinterviews, since the questions aligned. We conducted two focus groups with differentdemographic groups – 1) white males and 2) students who were not white males – to investigatepotential differences in perspective based on demographic background. The assessment analystfor the project (i.e., the first author) and an upper-level undergraduate student performed acontent analysis of the focus group data. They each independently coded the data and thendiscussed their responses to achieve consensus; thus, the focus group data were double-coded.Nonetheless, their first-time
floor pattern; steps were also installed to reach the raised floorplatform. Inside this perimeter, more stone blocks were installed as the bases for columns, andstone plinths were then placed on top of these column bases. Between these column basesmasonry strip foundations, functioning as grade beams, were installed. These strip foundationsdivided the floor space into cells that were filled with soil up to the floor elevation level. Finally,installation of stone slabs would complete the temple floor. Notice that in Stage VI of Fig. 2, thecolumn plinths project from the floor; the circular columns supporting the structure would beplaced on these plinths. The Hall of Central Harmony is depicted in Fig. 4; its frontal view is depicted on top of
top 10 percent University Admission Profile 27-31 95% ranked in top 25 percentIn the senior year, engineering students are required to complete a capstone project to satisfytheir capstone experience. The EEIC offers a Multidisciplinary Capstone program (MDC) as anoption for students to replace their discipline specific capstone experience. Students arepartnered with industry companies to improve processes, reduce costs, or create new products.MDC also offers non-engineering students the opportunity to participate thru the EEIC’sengineering sciences minor program. This promotes discipline diversity in the program whilegiving students’ academic credit. Through
technologicalsystems. The approach emphasizes that components provide specific capabilities or functionsand are combined using the design process into technological systems. Initial results of thiswork-in-progress are encouraging. The FCSD framework has been used in engineering literacyand introductory courses. In preliminary studies students are able to articulate main conceptsand conduct a design project following an FCSD approach.AcknowledgementThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under awards: DUE-1121464 andDUE-0920164. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography 1. Pearson G
Systems in Computer Science and Software Engineering Education John C. Nesbit, Arita Liu, Qing Liu Simon Fraser University Olusola O. Adesope Washington State University Abstract Many research reports have been published over the last 30 years on the use of intelligent tutoring systems in computer science and software engineering education, but no previous systematic review has been conducted to describe and assess the field as a whole. This project (in progress) searched for publications meeting defined inclusion criteria
PBL. This approach is new, and data regarding its impact are notyet available.Undergraduate research opportunities early in a student’s program have been shown to support Page 26.1776.8STEM learning gains, particularly for minority students23. As the PI of the biology S-STEMgrant is the ECU’s Director of Undergraduate Research, several of the S-STEM students startedundergraduate research as sophomores and are continuing. Others began projects as juniors.Undergraduate research and living-learning programs are considered “high-impact” practices24.These are programs and practices that give today’s college graduates what are universallyunderstood
-Simon bet about thecost of materials [5]. The Bet, [6] is a book that details a famous bet between Paul Ehrlich,Biologist and Environmentalist and Julian Simon, Economist. Simon won the bet over thedecade 1980-1990. The lesson for students is that inflation adjusted prices of natural resourceshave a negative, not a positive trend, over sufficiently long periods of time. It is exactly this kindof insight, and arguments about the mechanisms that might give rise to it, that could be useful forengineering students in their careers. If they work as project planners and managers, it isvaluable to understand these larger trends and what they might mean for product development. Itcan promote a mindset sensitive to the impact of such external
. Acknowledgement Cognition and Instruction 18, 495-523 (2000).Many thanks to all of the students who willingly and 12 Prince, M. J. & Felder, R. M. Inductive teaching andenthusiastically participated in this study, who motivate us all learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and researchto be better teachers and researchers. Special thanks to course bases. Journal of engineering education 95, 123-138Learning Assistant Elissa Barone (UT Austin) for her support (2006).of this project, and statistical consulting provided by the UT 13 Lane, E. S. & Harris, S. E. A new tool for measuring student behavioral
the best-liked aspect was “I liked living with other engineers. We have mostof the same classes and this helps with homework, understanding concepts, and projects.” Thisbest response is counted once in “Living with other engineering students,” once in “AcademicHelp from peers,” and once in “Common Classes.” Table VI should be viewed as a summary ofthe common responses that we encountered; it does not include sporadic items that appeared veryinfrequently.Discussion We have tried to account for differences in college preparedness by creating the matchingcohorts. But there are problems with that approach. Namely, the matching cohort selection didnot screen for participation in other LLCs on campus. And, there were no matches made for in
introductory computer science. We include this requirementfor several reasons. First, it means that all graduating physics students know sufficientrudimentary programming to model experiments on computers. Second, by exposing physicsstudents to programming, the course has the potential to spark their interest in computationalphysics. Physics students constitute a significant portion of the enrollment in the introduction tocomputer science course, and the course is being partially adapted to this audience. Theseadaptations include recent student projects in modeling a physical system, and plans to teachMATLAB programming as well as Java in future offerings of this course.h. AU physics student feedbackIn addition to the above considerations, student
120, an introductoryengineering course that encompasses all branches of engineering. In exchange for volunteering,the students were offered a pizza dinner once a week during focus group sessions and a $40.00gift certificate to Amazon.com or Starbucks at the end of the study.There were 8 Engineering 120 courses with a class size of about 36 each. After a briefexplanation of the project and incentives, a sign up list was sent around that asked the interestedvolunteers to indicate where they lived. Because WSU has a policy that all freshmen must live indorms their first year, it made it much simpler to separate the students who opted to live in
document camera, the ability to easily plug in a laptop computer, and an audiosystem, all connected to a projection system mounted on the ceiling. The instructor can selectand use any delivery device with the capability of easily switching back and forth between them.Besides a wireless environment, each seat in the classroom also has the ability to connect alaptop computer to the university computing system using a cat-5 cable. The University has alsomade WebCT-Vista available to all instructors.The engineering faculty has gradually started incorporating various forms of technology in theirclassroom instruction. The primary author has further incorporated several new innovations intothe teaching of engineering economy, a course required in many
of 50 by 50 mm without using the CNC stages, allowing for much higher-speed machining. • The beam can be focused to a spot size adjustable between 6 and 24 microns (µm) with CNC axis resolution at 0.1 µm. This provides the capability of micron-level high- precision machining. A human hair is typically on the order of 50 µm in diameter. • Two solid-state cameras assist in precision alignment, while two additional solid-state cameras provide access to view the machining process during operation. • The PC drives three LCD monitors. A fourth LCD monitor is used to display the image projected by one of the cameras in the workspace. • It is a completely enclosed class I system which means that when all
interviews, andother relevant college relations activities. Milliken has found that being a member of our MEP board has been a tremendous benefit inhelping meet their recruiting goals on an annual basis. Our Minority Engineering Program hashelped Milliken get closer to the students in order to identify new leaders that will fit Milliken’sculture and passion for excellence. Company representatives spend time in the classroom,support student group activities, and work with faculty to provide students with real worldexperience on challenging engineering and business-related projects that will result in full timeemployment after graduation.During our 2006 Summer Transition Program, our MEP office worked with Milliken and sent agroup of approximately 60
. Motors provide the necessary torque tothe mechanical system, e.g. linear slides, robotic arms or some other actuator design. Motorselection and mechanical design is a critical part of a motion control system, and mostmanufacturers provide a wealth of data and assistance in this process.The motion sensor is a device that captures actual movement and closes the feedback loop to themotion controller. A motion sensor is not always required for such as with stepper motors, but isessential for servo motor control. For this project, a widely used motion sensor called aquadrature encoder was used. It senses the shaft position of the motor and feeds the result to themotion controller. Other feedback devices include potentiometers for analog position
Burghart, D. M. & M. Hacker, (2003). New York State Curriculum for Advanced Technological Education.5 Bell, M., et al, (2002). Everyday Mathematics, The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. Chicago, IL: SRA/McGraw-Hill. Page 12.489.8Appendix A – Kindergarten Matrix Example Kindergarten Integrated Engineering Curriculum Units Engineering Physical Science Earth Science Life Science Nature of Gravitational Electromag- Science and Force and netic Force & Natural
project leader for course support of distributed education courses, consultant to faculty on issues of technology integration, instructional design and content development, and researcher and evaluator for emerging instructional technologies. Chris earned a Master of Science degree in Curriculum Development and Instructional Technology in May, 2000 from the University at Albany. Chris has six years of experience in instructional design and integrating information technologies in support of teaching and learning. Page 12.1479.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The
the modern IT and are expected torevolutionize the way instruction being delivered online in the future. Implementation Level of IT Adoption and Timeline Figure 1: Standard S-curve35 showing the projected IT adoption and implementation level in education with time. Although the outcome of using multimedia elements in teaching subject matter is beneficialfor students and instructors, a large number of instructors do not follow this approach. We foundthat the following six shortcomings can be attributed to the low rate of IT adoption inengineering education by instructors: a. Time
precalculus classes. Problem sets are due atmidnight on specified days. Problem sets are still available after the due date and somestudents work problem sets for practice before each exam.The system automatically records the students’ problems, saved work, initial answers,final answers, time of all accesses of the system, ip-addresses of all accesses of thesystem, and whether they checked the help page for problems they missed.AnalysisSince the system was first developed in Trigonometry, we have the most data in thatcourse (a key consideration for a data-mining project). So we will focus our analysis onTrigonometry. The first question is whether it is possible to detect conceptualunderstanding from analysis of procedural work. Van Hiele4 has noted
who was not aSEAGEP Scholar, the responses show the high value they placed on the mentoring and financialsupport they received from the program and the opportunities for networking and professionaldevelopment, as shown below:• Someone who is a SEAGEP scholar gets extra help, extra push, and feels she is not alone• The support network provided by SEAGEP was irreplaceable. We formed a network with faculty and students within UF as well as outside UF. There was also support in terms of providing laptops, sending us to conferences, and providing us a venue to showcase our work. We also received opportunities to mentor undergraduate students.• Funding - ability to select project of choice, exposure to research, networking, support
, comprehensive and high-quality course design 8, and cooperative learning 9,10.Among these existing instructional strategies, engineering laboratory experience has been widelyrecognized as an effective pedagogical practice that plays a significant role in developing andreinforcing students’ understanding of a variety of important engineering concepts taught inclassroom lectures 11-14. Engineering laboratory experience has been integrated into suchmethods as active learning, cooperative learning, project-based learning, problem-based learning,and research-based learning in various engineering disciplines.Engineering laboratory experience has been particularly emphasized when it comes to the
loop that shows theimpact of teaching through student co-op performance. This information is beingused in curricular reform projects around campus to both illuminate areas forreform and to measure the impact of changes on co-op student performance. TheUniversity of Cincinnati has been awarded a $1 million US Department ofEducation Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education [FIPSE] grantto be used for the Development of a Corporate Feedback System for Use inCurricular Reform.Using aggregated data from employer assessments of cooperative educationstudent work performance to measure curricular effectiveness forms a cornerstoneof outcomes based assessment at the University of Cincinnati. One problem is thatresults may get buried in both
Engineering 4 Soil Mechanics 4 Fluid Mechanics 3 Turkish I 0 Summer Practice I 0Semester 6CGN 3501 Civil Engineering Materials 4 Construction Eng. & Management 3CEG 4011 Soil Mechanics 4 Foundation Engineering I 3SUR 2322 Project Dev. And 3 Hydromechanics 4 Visualization Engineering Hydrology 3CWR 3201
has the potential to be a more effective teaching pedagogy compared to traditionalinstructor-centered teaching environments, and should be applied to math, science and otherengineering courses with traditionally high attrition rates.6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis project was supported by Hewlett Packard through the Technology for Teaching grant, andthe @ONE Scholar Program. The author would also like to thank Darla Cooper and Michelle Page 12.487.12Barton of the @ONE Scholar Program, and Charles Iverson of Cañada College for invaluableinput, discussions, comments and suggestions.7. REFERENCES1 Birk, J., and J. Foster. “The importance of Lecture in
best. As a guide, they are given a handout that summarizesrules for arguments along with their typical forms and typical flaws, drawn from A Rulebook forArguments.10 While we do not have much time to adequately develop their argumentation skills,this handout and use of the principles in the discussions and evaluations of their argumentsshould improve their abilities to defend their decisions, and hopefully to make better decisionsby recognizing flaws in their analysis.There are many excellent engineering case studies available on the internet. Because there are somany, a project was carried out to categorize the cases to aid faculty in selecting ones that meettheir needs. The resulting table is available on the ethics web site in the College