, Honolulu, HI, 2007.2. Brus, C., L. Zhao, and J. Jessop, "Visual-Spatial Ability in First-Year Engineering Students: A Useful Retention Variable?" American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR, 2004.3. Mathias, J., Gupta, L., Nicklow, J.W., Tezcan, J., Caffey, R., Chrisman, B., Pearson, C., Pericak-Spector, K., Kowalchuk, R., Lewis, E., and Sevim, H, "Improved retention through innovative academic and nonacademic programs", American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007.4. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, (Eds), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition, Washington DC
Technologies” to develop and facilitate thedistribution of culturally relevant, life-changing technologies in developing countries. The grouphas focused on designing human-powered irrigation pumps for farmers in developing countrieswith the idea of increasing farming productivity. Their product, the WaterCycle, is a bicycle-powered irrigation pump that is easy-to-use, durable, affordable, and easily transported. Moreinformation can be found in [4]. This team is one of 15 teams that was invited to participate inthe NCIIA/Lemelson Foundation March Madness for the Mind event held in March 2009 at theSmithsonian National Museum of American History in Washington DC.In 2008-2009, one student team of 2008-2009 Harold Frank Engineering Internship students
differentindividuals who each describe anengineer that they know. The fellowsalso designed “Sparky’s EngineerActivity Book”, which incorporatesdrawing, matching, searching, andmaze activities based on conceptsdeveloped within the story. Beforeintroducing this literature piece in theclassroom, the fellows presented the Figure 1. “Sparky’s Engineer” page 19.story and activity booklet to WPS Sparky is reviewing in his mind various typesteachers at a PIEE summer workshop. of engineering and what each engineer makes.The teachers, who were first skeptical There is only one problem: his owner is notof the idea of teaching engineering to one of these types of engineers! Sparky mustkindergarten students, welcomed the keep on
that provide awindow into what working life as an engineer is like. These broader initiatives should work intandem with efforts within our courses. Many of these initiatives must take place at theadministrative level to be effective 34,35. Without administrative support and relevant incentivesfor individual professors, reform efforts often fade, although a review of multiple studies alsoshows that change cannot be mandated in a top-down approach 36. Individual professors shouldreshape their courses with these issues in mind. However, it can be difficult to bring thesedifferent facets of student experience into focus, and understand what is possible within aspecific course. What guiding principles can we use in designing courses, if our goal
difficultto creatively apply to practical engineering problems. Felder and Brent confirm this intuitionwith several studies that show students need repetitive practice with consistent feedback todevelop new skills (1). Simply showing students how to solve a particular problem doesn’tguarantee they can apply these concepts on their own. With these ideas in mind, the lab morphedfrom a traditional recitation to weekly programming challenges solved in a group setting. Thelaboratory and lecture now focus on the C++ and MATLAB languages with plans to alsoincorporate Python in future semesters. This paper details the changes to the laboratory portion of the course to use problem-based learning (PBL) and just-in-time teaching (JiTT) in a collaborative
Paper ID #18207Engineering Leadership Development using an Interdisciplinary Competition-based ApproachDr. David Bayless, Ohio University Dr. Bayless is the Gerald Loehr Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of Ohio Uni- versity’s Coal Research Center, part of Ohio University’s Center of Excellence in Energy and the Envi- ronment. He is also the director of the Robe Leadership Institute and director of the Center for Algal Engineering Research and Commercialization (an Ohio Third Frontier Wright Project) He is engaged in the development of energy and environmental technology such as producing algal-based
Paper ID #23131Engineering Undergraduates’ Task Interpretation during Problem-Solving inThermodynamicsDr. Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University Dr. Oenardi Lawanto is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University, USA. He received his B.S.E.E. from Iowa State University, his M.S.E.E. from the University of Dayton, and his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Before coming to Utah State, Dr. Lawanto taught and held several administrative positions at one large private university in In- donesia. He has developed and delivered numerous international
college. The University tries tokeep a finger on the pulse of its entering classes. In addition, the University would like toconnect students to their new community. As it recognizes the newest trends, it must adjust itsstructure and curricula to accommodate. This research aims to help with this continuousimprovement.The Cornerstone course has, since its origin, been trying to provide what the students are lookingfor in their first engineering course. A cornerstone course at McMaster University was developedwith this quote in mind, “The objective of the Cornerstone is to instill in first-year engineersenjoyment from learning, motivation to continue learning, and genuine intellectual curiosityabout the engineering in the world around them [16
Paper ID #21825A Conceptual Design Activity for a First-year Mechanical Engineering CourseDr. Oziel Rios, University of Texas, Dallas Dr. Oziel Rios earned his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2008 where his research focused on design of robotic systems with an emphasis on kinematic and dynamic modeling for analysis and control. Dr. Rios teaches the first-year and CAD courses in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Texas at Dallas. Dr. Rios has also taught kinematics and dynamics of machines and graduate-level CAD courses. Dr. Rios’ research and teaching
visual representations in organic chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2014. 15(1): p. 47-58.29. Brown, J.R. and M.B. McGrath, Visual learning for science and engineering. IEEE Comput Graph Appl, 2005. 25(5): p. 56-63.30. Stelzer, T., et al., Comparing the efficacy of multimedia modules with traditional textbooks for learning introductory physics content. American Journal of Physics, 2009. 77(2): p. 184.31. Velazquez-Marcano, A., et al., The Use of Video Demonstrations and Particulate Animation in General Chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2004. 13(3): p. 315-324.32. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, eds. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded
nationwide.Additionally, the course choice opportunity data gathered from the institution catalogscharacterize the degree programs at a single point in time; however, curricula can change overtime. Some students matriculating through the degree programs (such as transfer students orthose with Advanced Placement course credit) may experience curricular choice opportunity thatis incongruent with what is reported in the catalog.Keeping these limitations in mind and looking at the program correlations next to the medianpercentages of their bachelor’s degrees earned by women, it is interesting to cautiously note thatthe correlations were the lowest (and not significant) for chemical and civil engineering, which—of the four disciplines—were more popular with women in
who came to speak to us…’ - ‘Yes, because I know things about engineering that I did not know before’ConclusionThe main focus of this paper was to share the experiences of the ongoing year-long activities ofthe project funded by EiF and jointly organized by Savannah State University and SCCPSS forthe local middle school girls with an aim to inspire them to pursue careers in engineering andtechnology areas. One-on-one conversations with the participants and some of the encouragingstatements, collected through a post-camp survey, revealed that activities like these might havehad a positive impact on the young minds that can help to make career decision in future.Although the overall impact of the program will be understood only after
Paper ID #25160Board 5: Collaborative Research: Experiential Process Safety Training forChemical EngineersDr. Daniel D. Anastasio, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Daniel Anastasio is an assistant professor at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received a B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 2009 and 2015, respectively. His primary areas of research are game-based learning in engineering courses and membrane separations for desalination and water purification.Brittany Lynn ButlerProf. Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut Daniel Burkey is the Associate Dean of
Paper ID #15921Creating a University-Industry Advisory Board for a Joint Engineering SchoolDr. Duncan J Bremner, University of Glasgow Dr Duncan Bremner has over 30 years in the semiconductor industry and has held operational and strategic executive roles in product development and technology planning within leading organisations such as National Semiconductor and The Intel Corporation. Duncan is presently employed by the University of Glasgow’s School of Engineering working with both academic staff and industry partners to develop collaborative projects. He is also responsible for the development and delivery of the
Paper ID #17202Enhancing Software Engineering Curricula By Incorporating Open, Data-Driven Planning MethodsMr. John (Lalit) Jagtiani, University of Bridgeport Mr. Lalit (John) Jagtiani is currently a Ph.D. candidate focused on Technology Management at the Uni- versity of Bridgeport, School of Engineering. His research interests include software technology manage- ment, software metrics, technology change management, and technology risk management. Mr.Jagtiani has 25+ years of industry experience with technology management and strategic business solutions. He currently serves as a consultant to several organizations and
://innovationfootprints.com/industry-study-nanotechnology/ (accessed January 30, 2016.(9) NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering. http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/.(10) Design Of Learning Environments. In How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., R., C. R., Eds., 2000; pp 129-154. (11) Capobianco, B. M.; Yu, J. H. Using the construct of care to frame engineering as a caring profession toward promoting young girls' participation. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 2014, 20.(12) Krapp, A. Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education 1999
Paper ID #14573Professional Science Graduate Program Revolutionizes the Educational Ex-perience of EngineersDr. Saeed D. Foroudastan, Middle Tennessee State University Dr. Saeed Foroudastan is the Associate Dean for the College of Basic and Applied Sciences (CBAS). The CBAS oversees 10 departments at Middle Tennessee State University. He is also the current Director for the Masters of Science in Professional Science program and a professor of engineering technology at MTSU. Foroudastan received his B.S. in civil engineering, his M.S. in civil engineering, and his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Tennessee
Paper ID #13845Using On-Line Education to Meet the Needs of Working Engineering Profes-sionalsDr. Sandra Denise Anderson P.E., University of Wisconsin Madison Sandra Anderson, PhD, is director of the Master of Engineering in Engine Systems program at the Uni- versity of Wisconsin Madison. She worked in the aerospace industry designing jet aircraft engines before joining Ford Motor Company. At Ford, she trained power-train designers and engineers in CAD and CAE and produced web-based trainings on topics such as reliability and experimentaldesign. She also worked in the Office of the Technical Fellow, exploring new
is also helpful for first-year students to understand the methods by whichengineering results are communicated to co-workers, management or the general public:graphs and charts, drawings and diagrams, written communications and oralpresentations. Some general guidelines can be quite useful (e.g., keep in mind theintended audience and their background and knowledge) without having to undertake thecomplete instruction of the students in these modes of communication.CONCLUSIONS It is my thesis in this paper that first-year engineering students should be exposedto a general structure of how engineering is applied by focusing on the general conceptswithout going into a great deal of detail by relying on examples that use high schoolphysics
Paper ID #15473Undergraduate Research in Science as an Elective Course for EngineersDr. James O’Brien, Wentworth Institute of Technology James G. O’Brien is an associate professor of Physics at Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston, MA. James is currently pursuing educational pedagogies in engineering education through game-ification of education and the design of competitive table top games which engage students in an exciting atmo- sphere to help facilitate learning of essential physics concepts. Aside from a love of gaming and its role in education, James is also the Vice President of the International
Paper ID #16948Innovative Course Modules for Introducing ECE to Engineering FreshmenDr. Girma Tewolde, Kettering University Girma S. Tewolde received the B.Sc. degree in Electrical Engineering from Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, the M.Eng.Sc. degree from the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Aus- tralia, and the Ph.D. Degree in Systems Engineering from Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan. Dr. Tewolde is currently an Associate Professor of Computer Engineering in the Electrical and Computer En- gineering Department of Kettering University, Flint, MI. His areas of interest are in Embedded Systems
alsoimportant to keep in mind the resources and mechanisms that the veterans themselves bring tothe academic environment. Brawner, et. al.[4], provides a discussion of the assets of studentveterans to the academic environment, as well as some of the challenges of student veterans inthe classroom. Student veteran assets include determination, motivation, flexibility, and workethic. Their challenges include balancing family and academic requirements, working in a less-structured environment, dealing with service-related disabilities, and seeking assistance whenneeded.A recent report provided university data of four engineering institutions. Out of approximately18,000 engineering students across these universities, only 180 or 1% are veterans receiving
comparison for project-minded professionals. Both groupsshould have very similar attitudes as expected. However significant and interestingdifferences have been found and are discussed in the paper.A strikingly higher emotional discomfort level was found in Indian male participants for crosscultural diversity. In addition this study studied the differences between male and femaleresponses across cultures. Finally the results of these two studies were compared to the resultsof surveys with engineering students from U.S.A., Germany, Poland and Russia fromprevious cross cultural diversity studies conducted by the authors.BackgroundIn the age of global grand challenges, engineers are likely to work in international teams so asto find good opportunities
tomature systems engineering knowledge and skills in the engineering profession.IntroductionSolutions to meet fundamental human needs often lead to large and complex engineered systemsthat can only be successful if they are socially acceptable and provide value to our global society.Yet, as humanity attempts, through engineering and technology, to make the world a better place,our ever-evolving society creates new and ever greater challenges. With these challenges in mind,the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) formed an international task forceof experts in 2012 to develop the Systems Engineering Vision 20251 report on the future ofsystems engineering. This vision is shaped by the global environment and includes human
Paper ID #17553What Underrepresented Minority Engineering Majors Learn from Co-Ops& InternshipsDr. Terrell Lamont Strayhorn, The Ohio State University Dr. Terrell Strayhorn is a professor of higher education and director of the Center for Higher Education Enterprise (CHEE) at The Ohio State University. Author of 10 books, more than 50 book chapters, and over 100 journal articles and scientific abstracts, Strayhorn is a former NSF CAREER grant recipient, reviewer for the Journal of Engineering Education, and one of the nation’s leading diversity scholars.Dr. Royel Montel Johnson, Center for Higher Education Enterprise Dr
Paper ID #18996Applying to Graduate School in Engineering: A Practical GuideDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Initiatives at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engi- neering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing undergraduate education through hands
courseprepares students for a profession,” Educational Technology Research andDevelopment, vol. 53, no.1, pp.65-85. Mar. 2005.[15] B. A. King and S. Magun-Jackson, “Epistemological beliefs of engineeringstudents,” Journal of Technology Studies, vol.35, no.2, pp.56-64, Win. 2009.[16] B. A. King and S. Magun-Jackson, “Differences in engineering students' beliefsabout knowledge across educational levels,” Conference paper for the EducationDivision's 2011 ASQ.[17] W. G. Perry, Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years:A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.[18] M. F. Belenky, B. M. Clinchy, N. R. Goldberger and J. M. Tarule, Women's waysof knowing: the development of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books, 1986
toacknowledge that there are likely other factors that influence female student retention in engineering. Forexample, the unwelcoming climate that women face in the engineering through micro-aggression andimplicit bias is a factor. A more thorough investigation student perception of different majors is neededto show correlation between perceptions of majors at the current setting.Note1. It’s also important to note that the numbers listed above assume binary gender options. The numbersand results can vary slightly, keeping in mind that some of the numbers might change when gender nonbinary students are included.2. There might be some overlap with these numbers. So for example, a small number of students might bea part of the HES, have taken the ENGR
Paper ID #30296Repurposing of a Nuclear Integrated System Test Facility forEngineering EducationDr. Hector E. Medina, Liberty University Dr. Medina is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Liberty University (Lynchburg, Va.). He obtained a B.Sc. in Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines, and both an M.Sc. and Ph.D. in Mechani- cal and Nuclear Engineering from the Virginia Commonwealth University. Prior to graduate school, he worked in the oil industry and 7-12 education, in his native Venezuela and Aruba. Since 2012, he has published and presented about forty articles in peer-review journals and conference
development lifecycle, and the business of medical devicesas a whole. The Biodevelopment mission is to reduce or remove regulatory barriers andfacilitate and accelerate the development and translation of scientific research discoveries andbiomedical device innovation into commercially viable products that can help people in need.The four-part platform of the Biodevelopment program is depicted in figure 1. It has beendesigned with three objectives in mind: 1) advance regulatory and translational science in themedical device industry; 2) establish and optimize multidisciplinary research collaborations andclinical operations to accelerate translation of innovative medical devices; and 3) cross train andequip engineering students, clinical researchers