development and training of CHE graduate students. • Customized Learning Paths • Individual Development Paths • Modular Coursework • Student-Centered Approach • Continuous Assessment and FeedbackOverall Research Goals• Goal 1: • Create a personalized learning model (PLM) for graduate STEM education that is inclusive and incorporates professional training• Goal 2: • Generate the knowledge and examine the potential to extend the PLM from one STEM context to anotherDiversity, Inclusivity, and our PLM• IDPs are a student-centered tool for academic and career development planning. (Instructional Goals)• Increased choice in courses and professional development stream activities respects diverse interests and career paths. (Task
institutions: Rose-Hulman Institute ofTechnology (Rose-Hulman) and Colorado School of Mines (Mines). This collaboration is in itsearly stages, currently centered around the exchange of unique experiences between the twoinstitutions. While existing literature includes numerous studies on psychological safety inworkplace settings, there are comparatively fewer publications addressing psychological safetyin higher education contexts [3]. Through sharing their practices and experiences, the authorsaim to contribute to closing this gap in literature. In the GIFTS presentation, the authors plan toshare their experiences to date.Experimental Methods and Project ApproachAt Mines and Rose-Hulman, the authors have developed scenarios for role-playing related
, community-based projects foster a sense ofbelonging and purpose among first-year students who might otherwise feel disconnected in largeintroductory courses, creating supportive peer networks and mentorship opportunities [11].Research has shown that successful implementation of STEAM and service learning partnershipsrequires thoughtful structure, communication plans, and mutual benefits for all stakeholders [6].Perhaps most importantly, introducing service-learning at this formative stage helps establish anethos of social responsibility and ethical awareness that can shape students' approach toengineering throughout their education and careers. This workshop will explore proven strategies fordeveloping sustainable service-learning partnerships that
continuously attends and presents refereed papers at international, national, and local professional meetings and conferences. Lastly, Najafi attends courses, seminars, and workshops and has developed courses, videos, and software packages during his career. Najafi has more than 300 refereed articles. His areas of specialization include transportation planning and management, legal aspects, construction contract administration, public works, and Renewable Energy. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Sustainable Cities Using Renewable Energy: A Case Study of a Renewable CityAbstractThe paper aims to examine the ability of countries to develop
personal problems, not academic problem. For this reasonall those involved need to understand the policies and procedures that affect students'financial aid as well as have a clear understanding of how to effectively advise thosestudents in financial need.The career development center on campus needs to go beyond their traditional role aswell. They need to help students understand how their chosen study plan will learn aninteresting career that pays well. If they understand their career options/goals then theywill have a better focus on their classes. Career services should also organize shortseminars to help students better make the connection between their academic planningand their career goals.Another way to help make that connection is by
being particularly impactful. future generations. This trend is driven by growing environmental concerns, through a written report and PowerPoint presentation. curriculum, emphasizing how it provided a fresh perspective on construction Challenges included scaling and layout errors in site planning exercises, which regulatory changes and compliance, industry standards, and market demand. As a The Building Information Modeling and Integrated Practices Course taught projects. Key takeaways included: provided learning opportunities for future improvements
was an important trait that helps withretention of the girls in the program, since they are already at school and transportation isalready planned for by their adult. Adapting to their existing schedule and module meant thegirls were in a mindset for learning and being with their peers.We implemented with the grade levels kindergarten through 7th grade which is an importantfactor in the STEM career/degree pipeline, as underrepresentation starts early (Finn et al 2023,Fry et al. 2021). Many universities focus outreach and engagement on high school students toincrease enrollment potential and do not address the need in their target communities forengagement at a younger level. Our operational model is a “program on demand” style, withplanned
students enrolled in an introductory course inform teaching considerations and strategies. The purpose was to explore how student academic and demographic data might be used inform course planning and teaching at the start of the semester. 3. Exploring DFW rates (non-passing grades) for an example introductory course led to course and advising changes. The purpose was to consider an example of changes to Introductory Physics courses and advising to prompt questions and ideas for one’s undergraduate program. 4. Exploring data on an introductory course sequence grades disaggregated by number of attempts (students who are taking the course for the first time or repeating). The purpose was to insights from
, andwe only introduced only those important ideas which are crucial for understanding AI/ML. Wealso provided engaging datasets for linear algebra for AI literacy lessons, includingFeedback from our participants on our linear algebra for AI literacy lessons showed that linearalgebra concepts and notations helped them understand neural networks and enabled them totinker with the code within the given colab notebooks themselves. They felt empowered throughlearning solid and foundational knowledge.Future WorkWe plan to teach this linear algebra component in the first week of our incoming summerprogram in 2025. The initial research result will be used to develop the qualitative methods forthe next phase of the research project. Particularly, we
workshops are being planned, focusing onsystems thinking, engineering careers, and other STEM topics. Strengthening Regional CollaborationsPartnerships with Virginia Tech’s Center for Educational Networks and Impacts (CENI), andother regional stakeholders have played a critical role in expanding the project’s reach. TheCENI Educator Liaison Network has been particularly valuable, facilitating connections withschool systems across the region and identifying opportunities for deeper engagement. Weeklymeetings with this network have allowed the project team to remain responsive to the evolvingneeds of educators and to build relationships that are essential for long-term impact.Engagement with regional initiatives, such as
academic success, particularly within online learningcontexts where students must often self-regulate in the absence of structured face-to-faceinteractions [2], [3], [4]. The self-directed nature of online education requires students to notonly master content knowledge but also develop efficient time management strategies. Researchshows that inadequate time management skills correlate with increased stress, diminishedacademic performance, and higher dropout rates [5]. Therefore, understanding the specific timemanagement challenges faced by online students is important for crafting suitable interventionsand support frameworks.Time management entails a range of skills, including planning, prioritization, goal-setting, andself-monitoring, alongside
thetimeline data for about one hour in a classroom setting were asked “Will information from thisexercise affect how you will do design in the future? How?” [7]. An analysis of the open-endedstudent responses showed that students claimed that they would change their design behaviorgoing forward. The student responses were grouped into three categories that map to theliterature of metacognition [10], [11], with most responses in “Planning”, followed by“Monitoring”, and then “Evaluating.” A sample of student responses include: “I will make sureto break up the time spent modeling to check other aspects of the problem. I will make sure togather a lot of information/ideas in the beginning before I start modeling” and “I will make surethat I am not too
Paper ID #39628Cornerstone to Capstone Engineering Design: Evolving StudentPerspectives through the Academic Journey with Implementable CurricularImplicationsDr. Kris Jaeger-Helton, Northeastern University Professor Beverly Kris Jaeger-Helton (Kris), Ph.D. is on the full-time faculty in the Department of Me- chanical and Industrial Engineering at Northeastern University (NU) teaching Simulation Modeling & Analysis, Human-Machine Systems, Facilities Planning & Material Handling, and Capstone. She has also been a faculty advisor for Capstone design projects in Mechanical Engineering, Industrial Engineer- ing, and
commonfirst-year educational pathway that every beginning engineering student must go through beforedeclaring their engineering professional program (i.e. Civil engineering, mechanical engineering,multidisciplinary engineering, etc.). Students are selected in the late spring term of the first yearbased on self-selected interest, achieving a minimum 2.5 GPA in FYE coursework, and passing aformal portfolio screening process conducted by the theatre department within the College ofLiberal Arts. Once accepted into the MDE program theatre engineering cohort, all studentsfollow an established plan of study (Appendix 1.) designed specifically to incorporate the 3-yearcapstone design pedagogy, and culminating in a senior capstone design experience.Three
, teamwork, generating spec reports, social and ethical responsibility ● PFE 2 – Project and time management, patent searches, data visualization, building a business case, workplace communication skills, proposal writing ● PFE 3 – Trouble-shooting, reverse engineering, test plans and validation, design reviews/design tradeoffs, technical reporting, regulations, and standardsThe students in all three PFE courses will have the opportunity to be part of the TRUEprojects, concurrently serving various roles as part of the team and applying the learning fromPFE immediately in real-world design projects.TRUE Lecture Series (TLS)TLS aims to create a meaningful and direct link between students of all classes (first-years toseniors) with
needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors. ● ABET Student Outcome 3: an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. ● ABET Student Outcome 4: an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts. ● ABET Student Outcome 5: an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet
activities, iv) Family Caféevents, and v) Summer workshop for STEM teachers.i) NASA-STEM content developmentThe NASA STEM contents were first identified based on the existing lesson plans adopted inparticipating schools in Broward and Palm Beach Counties in Florida. Then, the NASA STEMcontents were embedded into the NGSSS based on the lesson plans and instructional calendar.The methodology adopted for NASA-STEM content development is shown in Figure 1. Thevarious steps were: i) Review and analyze the existing curriculum followed by the schools andwork closely with the STEM teachers to identify available time-slots to introduce NASA-STEMcontent to their existing lesson plans; ii) Download the NASA’s STEM content for Grades 6, 8,11-12 from the NASA
appearing categories, concepts, and events helped theresearch team construct assertions based on the events leading up to the teachers’ conceptions ofengineering design, plans for integrating engineering design-based tasks, and the actualimplementation of engineering design tasks.Classroom observations. The aim of classroom observations was to observe and characterizedesign-informed pedagogical methods employed by SLED teachers. Initially, members of theresearch team conducted informal classroom observations that included open field notes focusingon the teacher; specifically, his/her instructional practices exhibited during a given lesson. Basedon early field notes and a review of existing classroom observational protocols (e.g., RTOP,STAMM, and
nationalcompetition that recognizes excellence in creativity for advertising and advertising arts. This isan important and very high-profile event in most communities where advertising is produced.Agencies and creative professionals who receive recognition in the ADDY Awards gain statuswith their clients and within the community as recognized experts in their field. A track record ofaward-winning work becomes part of a company’s marketing and public relations plan helpingthem attract more business and higher-profile clients. Continuing success in the ADDYcompetition can have a direct relationship to a company’s bottom line.In the Tri-Cities, planning for this event starts in September with a request for proposal (RFP) forsubmission of a marketing campaign
. In the Industrial Engineering Senior Project he worked with Fragrance Manufacturing Incorporated of Bethlehem, PA. Michael was also a member of the Integrated Learning Experience during fall 2007 which provided consulting on Lehigh’s master plan for their athletic campus.Gerard Lennon, Lehigh University Gerard P. Lennon is Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Associate Dean of the College of Engineering and Applied Science. He earned a BS from Drexel University, and an MS and a PhD from Cornell University. He authored over 70 papers, and his groundwater research has been funded by five different federal and state agencies, including an NSF investigation of ocean
. Page 13.235.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Assessment and Evaluation of Engineering Technology Program Outcomes Using Direct MeasuresAbstractIn order to ensure the quality of a program on an ongoing basis, it is essential that a program hasa sound and viable Continuous Improvement Plan. The two key elements of the plan areassessment and evaluation. The term “assessment” means one or more processes that identify,collect, use and prepare data that can be used to evaluate achievement of program outcomes andeducational objectives. The term “evaluation” characterizes one or more processes forinterpretation of the data and evidence accumulated through assessment practices that (a)determine the extent
present a course structure for assessing design processes and products in engineering capstone design courses. • To present a methodology for designing assessment instruments for design processes and products in capstones.The research plan for this paper is to review literature on design processes, products, and currentassessment practices in capstone design courses, and then use this as the basis for assessmentdevelopment. A description and synthesis of common design processes and resulting productswill be presented to identify those particular to capstone courses. Following, a brief review ofcurrent assessment practices for design processes and products in capstone courses will suggestappropriate assessments for
three weeks of the term were just a hack fest); used notextbook and our own lecture notes (that was a lot of preparation work) to a classic softwareengineering tome as the textbook (which only half the students bought and few of them read);had teams create full use case requirements, specification, design, and test plan documents(Document Engineering again) to preparing user stories, design, and simple acceptance testspecifications (this seems like about the right mix); in different versions, we had the projectimplemented in C++, Java, and Python and as a desktop application and a web application; it hasbeen delivered blended [4] and completely face-to-face. In one version of the course, we chooseone of the classic texts with the idea that in
) from Carnegie Mellon University, and National Scholarship (2007; 2008) from China. Dr. Zhang has re- search interests in developing and leveraging advanced technologies to support construction engineering and management, construction automation, and sustainable infrastructure, including building information modeling (BIM), artificial intelligence (AI) [i.e., natural language processing (NLP), machine learning, and automated reasoning], virtual reality (VR), and construction robotics. His research has been sup- ported by Federal and State agencies such as Transportation Research Center for Livable Communities and Michigan Office of Highway Safety Planning. He has been awarded two National Science Founda- tion (NSF
organizationand the strategic approaches created to change the organization.6 Use of this approach improvesunderstanding of the organization; ensures that interventions positively impact the university atthe structural, human resource, political, and symbolic levels; and, therefore, supportssustainability of key grant activities beyond the length of the grant. The organizational analysisapproach also aids in project administration and evaluation.However, no plan is ever perfect. Even a change process needs to be open to change to beeffective. This paper presents the transformational strategy and organizational framework thatwere proposed and undertaken at the start of the grant and later refined as activities progressedand were evaluated and adjusted to
“boost”. The boost strategy incorporated in the current work involves the use of an emailcommunication to identified students. The correspondence, which is outlined in further detail inSection 6.2, also asks the students to create a customized, personal action plan. As noted above,this study (which was the first iteration of the boost for this course), focused on implementingmethodologies that could be scaled to other universities by other professors. With this in mind,the boost was done in a way to create minimal extra requirements to students and courseinstructors.4 Context and Framework4.1 Research QuestionsIn order to evaluate the effectiveness of the current study, the authors focused on the followingtwo research questions: 1. RQ1
with program faculty. Finally, students created portfolios and individualdevelopment plans which would be expected to support their career development, but studentsreported that these requirements were more onerous than helpful. The D3EM program serves asan example of how impactful programs can be designed to encourage students to explore avariety of potential future career pathways, particularly beyond tenure-track faculty positions.Implications from the findings include the continued implementation of such programs andsustained efforts to change the conversation about PhD careers that reflect the job market andgraduate student interests.Introduction In the past decade, graduate engineering education has emerged as a research
universities withABET-approved undergraduate engineering programs. Twenty of the original universitiesreceived $5,000 planning grants to develop proposals to implement curricular and extra-curricular components to augment their undergraduate engineering programs in support of theKEEN mission. Twelve universities submitted KEEN Phase I proposals to the Kern FamilyFoundation and eleven were funded with $50,000 to develop their engineering entrepreneurshipprograms. Each grant recipient named two Kern Fellows, with one of the fellows designated asthe Principle Investigator (PI) responsible for administering the grant.Of the eleven KEEN Phase I universities, four had already established entrepreneurship
teachers?; (d) how were teachers motivated by theengineering TPD?; and (e) what were teachers’ plans to integrate engineering into theirinstruction?II. MethodA. Teacher Professional Development in Engineering (Summer Academy)Week long (~40 hours) Summer Academies were offered by the INSPIRE on the universitycampus and at a particular school district site in south central U.S. The four stated goals for theINSPIRE’s introductory week-long academies are to prepare teachers to (a) convey a broadperspective of the nature and practice of engineering; (b) articulate the differences andsimilarities between engineering and science thinking; (c) develop a level of comfort indiscussing what engineers do and how engineers solve problems; and (d) use problem
are shown below b in Tabble 1, reprodduced from thhe Bureau oofLabor Staatistics.Table 1 Page 25.800.5 urse schedulling softwaree, MS Projecct is used to expose the cclass to project managemIn the cou mentmethods such as Gan ntt Charts an nd Critical Paath Method ((CPM). Thee “Commerccial ConstrucctionProject Plan” P is a tem mplate availaable on the website w that iincludes the sequenced aactivities