world. Retrieved from The Telegraph: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/large-hadron-collider/3351899/Large- Hadron-Collider-thirteen-ways-to-change-the-world.html4. Khan, S., & Kissick, B. (2008). Beating the Competition Down with the Stick of Education: A Winning Strategy for a Global World. AC 2008-2662, (p. 9).5. Esparragoza, I., Larrondo Petrie, M. M., Jordan, R., & Paez Saavedra, J. (2007). Forming the Global Engineer for the Americas: Global Educational Experiences and Opportunities Involving Latin America and the Caribbean. AC 2007-576, (p. 20).6. Esparragoza, I., Larrondo, M., & Sathianathan, D. (2008). : Global Engineering Education in the Americas
://www.californiacommunitycolleges.cccco.edu/Portals/0/StudentSuccessTaskForce/SSTF_FinalReport_We b_010312.pdf3. Dunmire, E., Enriquez, A., and Disney, K. (2011). The Dismantling of the Engineering Education Pipeline, Proc. 2011 Annu. Conf. ASEE.4. Schroeder, C., Scott, T., Tolson, H., Huang, T., & Lee, Y. (2007). A meta analysis of national research: Effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(10), 1436–1460.5. Smith, K., Sheppard, S., Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroombased practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87–101.6. Menekse, M., Stump, G., Krause, S., & Chi, M.T.H. (2013). Differentiated overt
teamwriting team, review a test led to team used contributed test preferably not the coordinator. long and questions, but were ultimately This team should create the unproductive responsible for creating and solutions and rubrics for grading discussions. printing the final version(s) of its the tests as part of the test design. assigned test. Instructors who Any instructor could express Provide a deadline for comments weren’t directly concerns about any questions that prior to review by the test creation involved in had been submitted to the Google team and then
, 2004.5. Toohey S., "Designing courses in Higher Education", Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press, 1999.6. F.P. Deek, F.P., Kimmel, H., & McHugh, J., “Pedagogical changes in the delivery of the first course in computer science: Problem solving then programming”, Journal of Engineering Education, 87, 3, pp. 313-320, July 1998.7. Meier, R.L., Williams, M.R., and Humphreys, M.A., “Refocusing our efforts: assessing non-technical competency gaps”, Journal of Engineering Education, 89, 3, pp. 377-385. 2000.8. Massa N.M., Masciadrelli G.J, Mullett G.J., " Re-Engineering Technician Education for the New Millennium ", Proceedings of ASEE AC 2005-504.9. Bransford, J. D., Donovan, M. S., Pellegrino, J. W., (Eds.), How People Learn
profiles16,15, language recognition with the study ofspecific patterns from bilingual speakers17, classification of species, and many otherdisciplines including medicine, biology, image classification, speech recognition, computerscience, insurance, among others18,19.K-Means algorithmK-Means is a partition-based clustering algorithm that takes as input parameters a set S ofentities and an integer K (number of clusters), and outputs a partition of S into subsets S1,...,Skaccording to the similarity of their attributes20. Although there are several different variationsand optimizations of K-Means algorithm21, this paper is focused on its four methods (Lloyd,Forgy, MacQueen and Hartigan-Wong).The estimation of the number of clusters in a data collection
and build the "Bombe," a machine that was successfully used by the United States during the war to analyze and “crack” encoded communication messages from the German Naval Enigma machine. While Desch’s work and contributions to the design and manufacturing of such machines led him to be awarded the Presidential Medal for Merit by President Harry S. Truman in 1947, it was not until 1992 that this work was declassified. 8|P a g e In this interview, Anderson discusses her life and career, such as the difficulties of being a woman in the STEM fields. Although not of a STEM profession, she provides encouragement to continue
characterized as a heterogeneous formof communication that leveraged programming and other forms of content expertise as“linguistic resource[s].” 5, 20 These two studies, therefore, challenged the mutual exclusivity oftechnical and social practices under the technical/social dualism and thus highlighted theheterogeneity of the actual engineering practice.Looking across the division of labor literature, scholars illustrate the co-production of gender andtechnology (including engineering) via the technical/social dualism while disrupting how, asBuck and colleagues described, “organizational structures and occupational ethos of engineeringperpetuate this co-constituency.” 2 This body of literature also empirically and conceptuallyadvanced Faulkner’s call
student population as part of a survey conductedfor all students at our home institution, and to enhance participation as much as possible.Acknowledgements: Page 26.25.13 Financial support for this program came from Armour College of Engineering, PritzkerInstitute of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Wanger Institute for Sustainable EnergyResearch (WISER), and Carol and Ed Kaplan (endowed fund to Armour College).Bibliography1. Boyer Commission. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York.2. Smith, S. J., Pedersen-Gallegos, L
Satisfied (5) to Very Dissatisfied (0). **Percentage responding yes.Faculty comments provided to the open-ended questions were also very positive. When asked tocomment what s/he thought was the most valuable outcome of group interaction from the lunchseries, one faculty member answered “Meeting other faculty especially from other departments.Also, the more experienced faculty have provided great support and insight into how to getthings done at OU.” Other faculty members stated “Information gathering. Resources that arealready in place on campus [are] not easy to find online - therefore, the interaction makes it [an]information gathering channel” and “Meeting the other faculty and staff because then I had an
, Australia, 1989.2. Diamond R.M., " Designing and Assessing Courses and Curricula: A Practical Guide " San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass,1997.3. Fink L.D., "Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses", San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 20034. Saroyan A., Amundsen C., "Rethinking teaching in higher education: From a course design workshop to a faculty development framework", Sterling, VA, Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2004.5. Toohey S., "Designing courses in Higher Education", Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press, 1999.6. F.P. Deek, F.P., Kimmel, H., & McHugh, J., “Pedagogical changes in the delivery of the first course in computer science: Problem solving then programming”, Journal of
changing in the future would be to focus more on directexamples of technologies useful in the green design field. However, this is a model that we willcontinue to implement and would recommend to others.References:[1] M. Rickinson, C. Lundholm, and N. Hopwood, Environmental Learning: Insights from research into the s tudent experience, 2010 edition. Dordrecht ; New York: Springer, 2009.[2] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Definition of Green Building. http://www.epa.gov/greenbuilding/pubs/about.htm; Accessed Jan 02/2015.[3] Smith, G. Sustainability and Schools: Educating for Interconnection, Adaptability, and Resilience. The Journal of Sustainability Education; Vol. 8, 2010[4] “Stockholm 1972
choice question, detailing chapter aspect of this feedback with appropriate page#, location on chapter to test the explanation(s) that feedback page etc.; reader's help explain why explanations, and a understanding, with the distractor photocopy for the one correct choice choices are tutor, on another and three incorrect, and aspect of the "distractor" - explain why the
Paper ID #11864Mapping Student Development in Culturally Contextualized DesignLaura S´anchez-Parkinson, University of Michigan Laura S´anchez-Parkinson is a Research Assistant for the Office of the Provost, Global and Engaged Ed- ucation at the University of Michigan (U-M) and a Program Coordinator at the National Center for In- stitutional Diversity. She holds a B.A. in Organizational Studies and Sociology and a M.A. in Higher Education Management and Organizations from the U-M. Her research focuses on organizational change by exploring deep-seated inequalities at colleges and universities to promote positive change for
Page 26.1512.4themselves while earning engineering degrees in various disciplines were compared to those ofstudents earning degrees in physics, chemistry, math, economics and psychology at the sameinstitution. Inclusion of these degrees was informed by the University of Colorado Boulder (CUBoulder)’s 20-year historical trends of the degrees students earn when they leave the College ofEngineering and Applied Science (CEAS), but continue on to earn university degrees. The topmajors of those students who earn degrees outside of the CEAS, who were in the college at sometime are: 1. economics, 2. finance, 3. psychology, 4. integrative physiology, 5. biochemistry, and6. math. Of those, economics and psychology were chosen for the study because they
. Perry, W. G., Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years – A Scheme, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968, 1970. 2. Guttenplan, D. D., “Measuring the Wealth Effect in Education”, in The New York Times, 12/1/2013, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/02/world/europe/measuring-the-wealth-effect-in-education.html? , (accessed 1/26/2015). 3. Strauss, S., “The Connection Between Education, Income Inequality, and Unemployment”, in The Huffington Post, 1/2/2012, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between- ed_b_1066401.html , (accessed 1/26/2015). 4. Morse, R. and M. Foster, “How U.S. News Calculated the Best Global Universities Rankings”, in US News
, Hocevar D, Hagedorn LS. A social cognitive construct validation: Determining women’s and men's success in engineering programs. J Higher Educ. 2007;78(3):337-364.4. Vogt C. An account of women’s progress in engineering: A social cognitive perspective. J Women Minor Sci Eng. 2003;9(3&4):217-238.5. Zeldin AL, Pajares F. Against the Odds: Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Women in Mathematical, Scientific, and Technological Careers. Am Educ Res J. 2000;37(1):215-246.6. Lent R, Brown S. Cognitive assessment of the sources of mathematics self-efficacy: A thought-listing analysis. J Career Assess. 1996;4(1):33-46.7. Seymour E, Hewitt NM. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduate Leave the Sciences. 12th ed. Boulder, CO
control. Dr. Rodriguez has given over 70 invited presentations - 13 plenary - at international and national forums, conferences and corporations. Since 1994, he has directed an extensive engineering mentoring-research academic success and professional development (ASAP) program that has served over 500 students. These efforts have been supported by NSF STEP, S-STEM, and CSEM grants as well as industry. Dr. Rodriguez’ research inter- ests include: control of nonlinear distributed parameter, and sampled-data systems; modeling, simulation, animation, and real-time control (MoSART) of Flexible Autonomous Machines operating in an uncertain Environment (FAME); design and control of micro-air vehicles (MAVs), control of bio
to the following for their contributions to the learning modules: KimWoodrow and members of the Woodrow lab, Suzie Pun, Barry Lutz, Rahil Jain, and IanAndrews.Bibliography1. Yilmaz, M., Garcia, C., Guillen, T. & Ramirez, D. (2011). A K-12 Advanced Research Camp for Engineeringand Science Disciplines. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference 2011, Vancouver, Page 26.283.14Canada, 2011. 2. Yilmaz, M., Ren, J., Ramirez, D., Custer, S. & Coleman, J. (2010). An Improved K-12 Outreach Camp
produce marginal impacts;on the other hand, activities requiring more effort may be more difficult to replicate, yet producepotentially stronger impacts. By implementing experimental activities that require a combinationof moderately easy effort and more intensive effort, we aim to create larger impacts on thedevelopment of inclusive engineering identities among freshmen participants. The followingactivities are listed in order of perceived expenditure of effort, from least to most.Student trading cards. Barker, O’Neill, & Kazim2 suggest printing trading cards of students thatinclude their pictures and names. At the beginning of each period, the professor will shuffle thecard deck. Whenever s/he poses a question to the class, the professor
provided for Spring Break for Research came from a grant throughthe Engineering Excellence Fund, a student-led organization in our College of Engineering andApplied Science. This fund is managed by a group of student leaders who receive funding througha portion of student fees. The BOLD Center also contributed funds to support the workshops, food,and other nominal program costs. For future years we have included a line item for the program inour next round of proposed funding through the Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation.References[1] Figueroa, T., Hurtado, S. (2013). Underrepresented Racial and/or Ethnic Minority (URM) Graduate Students in STEM Disciplines: A Critical Approach to Understanding Graduate School Experiences and
instrumentality, whichdescribes the degree to which an individual considers something s/he is learning to be useful inhis/her future. Measures of instrumentality have been shown to predict course performance in avariety of settings, including engineering [33, 34]. Essentially, when students don’t see a need tolearn something, their learning tends to be negatively impacted. Commonly, the courses thatgate-keep advanced coursework—such as capstone design courses—include a large componentof introductory or basic content that stands in as disciplinary knowledge [35]; in such cases,students who don’t see these components as useful will tend to perform less well. Increasinginstrumentality for struggling and underserved learners is one way to support them. For
work should be built. Appropriating the turtle in 1 It is important to note, this is the first CS course, since UC Berkeley has been tracking student course data, thathas ever achieved that feat.the LOGO programming environment gave children a way to think about the principles ofcomputation and the practice of programming.Design of an Inclusive CS0 CourseAt UC Berkeley, there are two separate ways a students can get a CS degree. They can either get aBachelor of Arts (B.A.) through the College of Letters and Sciences (L&S), or get a Bachelor ofScience (B.Sc.) through the College of Engineering. The major difference between the two tracksis that students who get the B.A. get to take breadth requirements that gives them exposure tomore
asoriginally recorded...”). However, in viewing the original video footage, the authors found thatthe vignette and the video data do not correspond. The vignette that NGSS provides states thefollowing: “Ms. S. moved over to another group that had just broken into laughter and asked what was so funny. Rick related, ‘I see smashed cans all the time. I think an airfoot stomped the tanker down. And the molecules transformed into a molecule foot.’ Ms. S. asked, ‘What is this imaginary foot?’ Latasia answered, ‘Air.’ Ms. S. guided the students, ‘Let’s add that idea to the model.’ (The teacher validated the use of place [smashed cans in the neighborhood] to keep the students engaged and make a
/. [Accessed: 31- Mar-2015].[4] H. P. Mandel, The Psychology Of Underachievement : Differential Diagnosis And Differential Treatment. New York: Wiley, c1988.[5] E. W. Gordon, Supplementary Education : The Hidden Curriculum Of High Academic Achievement. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, c2005.[6] C. M. Steele and J. Aronson, “Stereotype threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans.pdf,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 797–811, 1995.[7] S. Hurtado, C. B. Newman, M. C. Tran, and M. J. Chang, “Improving The Rate Of Success For Underrepresented Racial Minorities In STEM Fields: Insights From A National Project,” New Dir. Institutional Res., vol. 2010, no. 148, pp. 5–15
(s) [13].We expect to have an increase on students enrolled in the EGT programs as the new MET programis in place; we also expect some migration of students from the current programs (EET, MMET)to the MET program. An additional pressure on our faculty body can be anticipated, as we will berequired to meet to the demand from our constituents, as suggested by the survey results. Thesefacts fully support the creation of a new faculty line to be fulfilled by a new faculty member.Faculty Professional DevelopmentCurrency maintenance involves continuing scholarly activities and/or professional interactionsthat strengthen the faculty member's knowledge of his/her field and its interdisciplinaryadvancements, best business practices, newest technology
(3) face-to-face but taught in parallel with the online section. 600 500 400 300 Other 200 Reform 100 0Figure 2: Calculus I enrollment by semester.Total students “captured” by the reform project, as a percent of enrollment is shown in Figure 3.It appears to be stabilizing in the low to mid 70’s, which currently reflects the portion of calculusthat Boise State University has chosen to offer as honors, online, or face-to-face but parallel toonline. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40
targeted toward engineering design. The collaboration between two universities (LTU and UDM) and three different colleges (Biomedical, Mechanical and Nursing) combines the diverse backgrounds and capabilities of students. Multidisciplinary team of this kind are the norm in industry and require project management skills such as effective communication, decision making, resource gathering and scheduling of various tasks. Therefore, the students not only must demonstrate a prototype designed for specific customer need(s) but also the execution process followed by the teams. This requires the students to recognize their roles for contributions in the team.The following sections give a brief
pN-3 … p0. The digital DDFSuses the MSB (i.e., pN-1) as the square wave output. One interpretation is to treat the pN-1 bit as asignal that divides the output period into two equal parts (i.e., two equal phases). The values of 0and 1 are assigned to the two phases, respectively. It is possible to assign multi-bit values, suchas 2 and 7, for the amplitude, and the output wave will oscillate between 2 and 7 instead. Similarly, if two MSBs (i.e., pN-1 pN-2) are considered, the same period is divided into fourphases. Different values can be assigned to the four phases. The same concept can be extendedto S MSBs, which leads to 2S phases in a period. A phase-to-amplitude lookup table with 2Sentries can be created to define the shape of the