/ reputation/ career. Affirmations can also help break down barriers betweenthe student and staff/ faculty when students hear that their worth is valued and recognized.In the participants own words, they have learned new ways of being and conversing with students: “This course was life changing. It has changed how I relate with other people. I feel much morecomfortable having difficult conversations with students and am learning to identify change talk.I have heaps still to learn and practice, but I feel confident that I will keep improving my skillsover time.” “It completely changed the way I think about and approach conversations withstudents.” “Discovering a better method to have awkward conversations.” “I still need to practicemy skills, but it
affirming, inclusive, and diverse education program that helps preparestudents to face the complex challenges they will meet in their post-graduation careers” (VirginiaTech Graduate School, 2019). A depiction of the alignment of course topics and the inclusionand diversity requirements can be found in Appendix A.Building on these two purposes, the following learning outcomes were developed for theGSSME course: 1. Developing effective interpersonal communication skills 2. Establishing and maintaining professional relationships 3. Dealing with personal differences in multicultural environments 4. Advancing equity and inclusion in professional environments 5. Developing responsible and ethical professional practices 6. Developing
onlinewithout the standard use of pencil and paper sketching. Upon closer investigation of the data, male studentsimproved more than female students did. Further study is needed to determine if these results arerepresentative of typical trends and how the training could be modified to result in more equitable outcomesfor all the students.IntroductionDecades of research has consistently shown that spatial skills are one of the strongest predictors of futuresuccess in STEM coursework and STEM careers independent of math and verbal ability. Wai et al. [1] andShea et al. [2] reviewed numerous longitudinal studies with many thousands of participants to concludethat spatial skills are critical to developing expertise in STEM. Additionally, visualization
thereal Arduino.4. DiscussionThe goal of this project was achieved. Rather than classroom-based lessons, this program was meant tobe fun as well as a one-week learning experience for the students. Therefore, no pre-tests or post-testswere given or deemed necessary. Hence, only a qualitative study was done of the students’ experiencesin the workshop. This introduction to a STEM field that they may not have experienced previouslywould hopefully increase their interest in considering a STEM career in the future.[4]The participants were surveyed before and after the workshop. Prior to this workshop, 75% ofthe students had little or no programming experience and only 4 students had experience with atext-based programming language. Over 80% of the
technology graduates-- graduates endowed with public policyskills, yet fully adroit in the latest and emerging technology, defining a contemporary needed role for thegood of the society. However, with a paucity of such talent (and jobs) available today, it’s crucial to growthese new career pathways which are destined to be in high demand 5-10 years from now. [2]Among its various charters, the PIT-UN is managing new curriculum introductions and courses acrossuniversities by first building awareness through various outreach programs. It’s time to reshape theengineers traditional role into an expert where constant private sector innovations will face competenttechnical staff with public policy skills.Figure 1 shows the PIT-UN first phase, high-level
and tion to HOME Program students. Student support for theFirst Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference August 6 - 8, 2017, Daytona Beach, FL W1A-1 Session W1AHOME Program includes peer and faculty mentoring, schol- 3. Provide participants with pre-college academic ex-arships, internships, co-ops, and mentoring. posure, career preparation and networking opportunities The impetus for launching the HOME Program was to re- 4. Provide structure and opportunities for a sense ofcruit students
collaborative within the NSF-funded National Girls Collaborative Project which brings together girl-serving organizations across Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. that are committed to increasing the number of young women pursuing science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) careers. Currently, Paige is serving as the Immediate Past President for the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Paige earned her Ph.D. and M.S. in industrial and systems engineering and B.S. in engineering science and mechanics from Virginia Tech. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Title: Exploring the incorporation of diversity and inclusion curriculum in engineering
Proposal Submitted in 2016”. Accessed 12-20-16.http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/EAC-Side-By-Side-Criteria.pdfAtadero, R. E., Paguyo, C., Rambo-Hernandez, K.E., & Henderson, H. L. (2017). BuildingInclusive Engineering Identities: Implications for Changing the Temperature of EngineeringCulture. European Journal of Engineering Educatio (online first)Dasgupta, N., Scircle, M. M., & Hunsinger, M. (2015). Female peers in small work groupsenhance women's motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(16), 4988-4993.Greenwood, J. D. (2009). The Disappearance of the Social in American Social Psychology. NewYork, NY: Cambridge University Press.Finelli, C
particularly enable a more diverse group of students to leveragecreativity and innovation toward success in engineering careers; 2) discover specific learningmodels that involve both STEM university students and pre-service teachers in order to developteamwork, self-efficacy, communication, and identity formation in the Maker environment; 3)pilot instruments to measure the impact of such programs on students’ self-efficacy,communication, and identity formation and 4) understand to what extent students who use themaker space for a class project become regular users of the space. This paper reports on theprogress and findings from the first year of implementation. Maker Space user log in data will beanalyzed as will preliminary results of student
and development product engineer for Test Acuity Solutions. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Where Resources End and Teaching Begins: Experience with Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders in the Freshman Engineering CurriculumAbstractA growing number of students diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are enrollingin science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) curricula in college. This paper focuseson first year engineering students, and the importance of accommodating students with an ASDthrough their academic career. It is becoming more common to have a student with an ASD inthe classroom. Colleges have a variety of resources to
2017 ASEE Mid Atlantic SectionSpring Conference: Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland Apr 7 Paper ID #20826Illuminated Umbrella: An Engineering/Visual Arts Interdisciplinary Prod-uct DevelopmentDr. Peter Raymond Stupak, Raritan Valley Community College Peter Stupak enjoyed a 22 year career in the optical-fiber manufacturing industry living and working in 7 countries where he held a variety of hands-on technical and business-management positions. Starting as a R&D Engineer, Peter became fascinated by how a manufacturing business operates and made succes- sive steps into engineering and manufacturing management
Engineering Education, 2016 Integrating instrumentation and mechatronics education in Mechanical Engineering curriculumAbstractA diverse and effective undergraduate mechanical curriculum should integrate learning from thedifferent spheres of mechanical engineering, educate students about recent technologicaladvances, and motivate them to pursue careers in this field. However, a seamless integration ofvaried topics in mechanical engineering curriculum is challenging, as courses range fromtraditional engineering classes in thermal fluids, solids and controls, to courses coveringemerging technological aspects of instrumentation, sensors, measurement techniques, advancedcontrol algorithms, electronics, and electrical
paper describes our origins and approach, andsummarizes some of our progress and challenges to date.IntroductionThere is increasing demand for higher education to produce graduates who are job- or career-ready 1,2. For example, most technical companies expect that new hires will be able to tacklecomplex multidisciplinary problems, and the ability to innovate is now an “integrative meta-attribute” desired in all engineering graduates 3. Pulling together disparate fields in innovativeways is now an expectation. A series of reports from the National Academies, e.g., “Educatingthe Engineer of 2020” 4 and “Rising Above the Gathering Storm” 5 emphasize the need forlifelong learning that bridges multiple disciplines. Engineering educators in
is significantly different. For these youngest elementary school students, the focus is not on career education so much as it is toward problem solving, creativity, working with others--in point of fact--engineering habits of mind [7]. Multiple approaches to engineering curricula for younger students have emerged in the last ten years [7] [8] [9] [10] Some lean on robotics, some on LEGO, but two in particular place their engineering problems in the context of stories. EIE [8] and Novel Engineering [10] use story books (custom or trade) to provide context for the youngest of engineering investigators. This literacy-based approach [11] provided inspiration for the design of activities for the pre-K- second grade students at this engineering
their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the
, University of Connecticut Arash E. Zaghi is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Connecticut. He received his PhD in 2009 from the University of Nevada, Reno, and contin- ued there as a Research Scientist. His latest research endeavor is on creativity and engineering education, with a focus on the unique potential of students with ADHD. Supported by multiple grants from the Na- tional Science Foundation, his research was highlighted the American Society of Engineering Education’s Prism Magazine. He received a CAREER Award in 2016 to study the significance of neurodiversity in developing a creative engineering workforce.Ms. Christa L. Taylor
University of Washington. She received her BS in engineering from the Colorado School of Mines and MS and PhD in mechanical engineering from Stanford University. She is the head of the Ability & Innovation Lab, dedicated to designing new tools and techniques to improve human ability through engineering, and also a leader of AccessEngineering to enable individuals with disabilities to pursue careers in engineering. Dr. Steele previously worked in multiple hospitals as an engineer, including The Children’s Hospital of Colorado, Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital, and the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago.Dr. Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington Dr. Dianne Hendricks is a Lecturer in the Department of
complexity of many social issues, fostered by their engagement in service. The participant would generally feel a strong sense of solidarity with the group they are working with and may become an activist for that cause.5. Internalization In this phase the participant has fully integrated their volunteer experiences into their life. This may include lifestyle or career changes to live lives more consistent with the values that they gained from their involvement with the social issue.DevelopmentalVariables1. Intervention Characterizes each phase through the mode (group or individual) and degree of interaction between the
contest regions and worldwide events, over the last five years.The first question of the survey investigates how beneficial is the competition for the students’professional development and future career as engineer. The majority of the students’ commentsreflect their positive perceptions of learning new computer-based-tools, new technologies, andpresenting their projects in front of a professional audience.“I learned a lot while developing the project itself. It required getting used to a lot of new toolsand features. I now have a much deeper understanding of Xilinx FPGAs then before.”“I learned a lot about putting the software and hardware together. It was beyond theory”.“It was a nice experience to present an alternative to an industry solution
Engineering Programs at the State University of New York (SUNY) at New Paltz. He received his B.S. from National Tsing-Hua Univer- sity in Taiwan in 1990 and M.S. and Eng.Sci.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Columbia University in 1995 and 1997, respectively. Subsequently he joined IBM Microelectronics as an R&D sci- entist/engineer for a 21-year career in the microelectronics industry to develop advanced semiconductor technologies. He joined SUNY New Paltz in 2018 with expertise in materials science and solid mechan- ics, as well as research interests in stress-induced phenomena in engineering materials, microelectronics reliability and additive manufacturing of metals. He has over 50 technical
District, Educational Leadership Program Enhancement Project at Syracuse University and the University at Albany through the Teacher Leadership Quality Program. She holds an advance degree in Educational Theory and Practice from the University of New York/SUNY Albany, with experience in teaching educational methods at the master’s level as well as an introduction to education courses designed to develop new interest in teaching careers. She has worked as an elemen- tary classroom teacher developing specific curricula for gifted and talented students as well as inclusion classrooms in a school district eligible for rural and low-income programs. Dr. Gullie’s experience and past projects qualify her for the position of
endometrium in rural contexts. Recently she and her colleagues have empirically demonstrated the continued problem of sexual harassment and assault in the field sciences, and forthcoming results suggest a link between these experiences and the career trajectories of female scientists. She continues to perform research on issues of inclusion, identity, and diversity in science through collaborations with GAMES, the Committee for the Status of Women in Astronomy, and other organizations.Dr. Ruby Mendenhall, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Ruby Mendenhall is an Associate Professor at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. She holds joint faculty appointments in Sociology, African American Studies, Urban and
1997, when he joined the faculty at Northeastern. He has consulted for numerous companies in the fields of catalysis, solid/gas contacting, zeolite synthesis and applications, and equipment design for space applications. Sacco has more than 192 publications (including book chapters) in the areas of carbon filament initiation and growth, transition metal and acid catalyst and their deactivation, and zeolite synthesis, and he has been the principal inves- tigator on more than $24 million in research grants. Using his space flight experience, Sacco has given more than 300 presentations to approximately 27,000 K-12 teachers and their students as a means to mo- tivate students to consider careers in science and
assessments were with regard to their feelings on the role PFF programming playedon their choice of academic career path, securing a job, and the initial transition from graduatestudent to faculty member.Of the aforementioned categories, alumni reported the most valuable interventions to be thementoring relationship and PFF interventions organized at their home institutions; site visits tocluster campuses closely followed. Most specifically, of value were the discussions withmentors on the faculty roles and responsibilities, balancing research, teaching, and service, andstructures of institutional governance; direct observation of cluster campus courses, facultymeetings, and strategies for teaching diverse student populations; and opportunities
differenttypes of infrastructure that civil engineers play a critical role in development of, but the ReportCard as well as the Game Changers (at times) can be used to challenge stereotypes aboutengineering as well as prompt exploration into careers that are associated with the differentinfrastructure types. Students may become interested in water quality or levees and begininvestigating the different types of engineering involved or even the different sub-disciplineswithin civil engineering that may be involved. For instance, in the creation of levees, civilengineers involved may have specializations in hydrology (environmental engineering), soilcompact-ability and soil types (geotechnical engineering), and the actual construction process ofthe levee
participate in this voluntary community. The dean of the collegeextends a personal invitation to each participant, department chairs support this effort by reinforcingthe message and arranging faculty teaching schedules to not conflict during the meeting times, and theNFLC activities are selected to directly benefit the participants’ careers at UW-Platteville. Participantsare encouraged to apply for internal start-up grants supporting retention of women andunderrepresented minorities, which exposes them to issues surrounding women in engineering. TheNFLC programming is developed in coordination with the College’s Women in Engineering Program. Thisintentional approach prepares new faculty to become allies in the retention effort. Work/life
competitive jobs and activities wheresituations for advancement often exist.There have been several programs implemented to provide hands-on activities in a way thatpromotes females’ sense of belonging, which have been studied by various researchers. Carlsonand Sullivan 12 found many females, in addition to other underrepresented populations, have beenapproached at middle school and high school level to take part in different hands on educationexperiences with a focus in computer science and coding tasks. The purpose of this was topromote STEM fields for a career path, which many of the female students would otherwise notconsider. In some cases, these programs provided them with female role models and femaleengineering mentors in order to help with
for the Discover Abroad office. She is currently working on a Master’s degree in Public and International Affairs and a Certificate in Nonprofit Management with the expected graduate date of May 2017. Her focus is on community change and cultural democracy.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical
Austin.MITE provides the opportunity to discover engineering through faculty-led sessions forhigh school juniors at the Cockrell School of Engineering at the UT Austin. It also servesas a recruitment strategy to increase the number of underrepresented minority groups.History of the EOE ProgramThe Cockrell School of Engineering established the EOE program in 1970 to promote therecruitment and academic development of African American, Hispanic, and NativeAmerican students interested in pursuing careers in engineering. Since that time, theEOE program has expanded its goals and now seeks to increase the diversity of itsstudent body (i.e. first-generation, low socioeconomic status, LGBTQ, veterans, etc.) bysupporting students who come from historically
excluded.Of those who said the curriculum did change their minds there were several themes: I have more knowledge about the impacts that can be made by engineers and/or how they can help (20) I know now more about ethics and the care that must be taken when making decisions (13) I now have a desire to make a positive contribution to the world (6) I realized I must think about society as a whole/culture/local traditions (5) This class confirmed my choice of major/career or gave me knowledge about my future career (4) I have more knowledge of the problems that need to be addressed (3) I realize we need to see the big picture/global impacts and connections (3) I have a new world view (3