FIELD EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING PEDAGOGY IN ENGINEERING MECHANICS A MEANS OF IMPROVING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE Oludare Owolabi, DSc., PE, Department of Civil Engineering Morgan State1700 East Cold Spring Lane, Baltimore, MD 21251, CBEIS 340, USA, Tel: 443-885-5445 Fax: 443-885-8219; Email: oludare.owolabi@morgan.eduMorgan State University has remained focus in broadening the participation of underrepresentedstudents through experiential learning, in-order to gain the necessary knowledge in STEM aswell as link theory with practice. This initiative has been via internships, field trips, and meetingswith consultants. As it has been noted that students become more engaged when
Paper ID #17216Can a Five-Minute, Three-Question Survey Foretell First-Year EngineeringStudent Performance and Retention?Stephanie M. Gratiano, Roger Williams University Stephanie Gratiano is a Junior Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering student at Roger Williams Uni- versity. She is an officer of both the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and Engineers Without Borders (EWB) Chapters at the university. Her future career interests include Product Design or Mechanical Design, and she wishes to further her education in Industrial Design after graduating.Dr. William John Palm IV P.E., Roger Williams University
Paper ID #17138Teaching Patents And Design Novelty to Engineering Students A NarrativeCase Study Based ApproachProf. Daniel P Brown, Northwestern University Award winning Designer, Inventor, Entrepreneur & Professor, in the Segal Design Institute – North- western University. Dan Brown is a champion of establishing a design-leadership based culture in our economy & society. ”Design is how humans create value, I believe in the power of design as a discipline of creative based problem solving through enlightened strategic practice.” Dan’s vision is to educate and empower the future design leaders to serve society
. First, the project focuses on faculty community, rather thanexternal communities such as companies or local residential communities. The definition ofcommunity we adopted is not just in a physical location, but in an organizational location, in “thecooperation in labor, order and management,” (Tönnies, 2000, p. 43). This is important in ourconsideration of community of engagement, as we go beyond physical boundaries, such as thosebetween university and its wider locale, to cognitive boundaries, such as those within and amonguniversity colleges and departments. It is with this in mind that we define engagement andengaged communities. Second, it expands the definitions and model of community engagementby highlighting how engineering faculty
Psychol. 2006;20(3):343–352.5. van Merrienboer JJG, Kirschner PA, Kester L. "Taking the Load Off a Learner’s Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning.", Educ Psychol. 2003;38(1):5–13.6. Cheville RA. "Engineering Education Today: Capturing the Afterlife of Sisyphus in Five Snapshots. ", Proc IEEE. 2012;100(Special Centennial Issue):1361–75.7. Ethnography & Evaluation Research | University of Colorado Boulder [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jan 26]. Available from: http://www.colorado.edu/eer/research/steminquiry.html8. Mason GS, Shuman
Paper ID #14726The Engineering Design Log: A Digital Design Journal Facilitating Learningand Assessment (RTP)Dr. Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology Roxanne Moore is currently a Research Engineer at Georgia Tech with appointments in the school of Mechanical Engineering and the Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC). She is involved with engineering education innovations from K-12 up to the collegiate level. She received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2012.Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is Assistant Director
individual experiences (cases) and collaboratively inquiring across them, we hopeto illustrate common ideas that may be central to this type of work, and that should likely be partof an ongoing conversation about the nature and practice of SOI in engineering education research.Though we do not offer definitive answers, using our collective reflection upon and across ourexperiences could support others as they consider if a current project or program might be an SOIeffort, or as they find new directions in on-going projects that could benefit from this form ofscholarship. Our examples and collaborative inquiry can also be potentially used to reflect uponthe common strategy of keeping the user in mind throughout SOI efforts, the challenges
2005, and which has been held annually since that time. The outreachevent takes place in Boise, Idaho, and at the time of its onset was the only outreach or campactivity in the state focused on girls or young women. Across ten years, 510 total girls haveparticipated, with approximately 85% of them coming from the immediate metropolitan area.The program was developed with a mind toward marketing engineering as an exciting, creativeactivity; including activities developed specifically from that perspective.1 The specific topic ofthis paper is an investigation into the motivation for volunteers and students to support thisprogram. Our hypothesis is that, in particular, the women found this an experience that helped tocreate community among like
Paper ID #16891A Two-Step Program for Undergraduate Students to Gain Authentic Experi-ence in the Research ProcessDr. Charles E. Pierce, University of South Carolina Dr. Pierce is a Bell South Teaching Fellow and Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of South Carolina. He is a member of the American Concrete Institute, American Society of Civil Engineers, and American Society for Engineering Education.Dr. Nicole Berge, University of South Carolina Dr. Nicole Berge received her B.S. and M.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of South
Paper ID #14503Learning about Design from the Lakota NationDr. George D. Catalano, Binghamton University Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Binghamton University Previously member of the faculty at U.S. Military Academy and Louisiana State University. Two time Fullbright Scholar – Italy and Germany. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Learning about Engineering Design from the LakotaAbstractAn engineering design paradigm is developed using an enriched morally deep world-view. Thenew design approach borrows from the wisdom of the Lakota Nation as evidenced through anexamination of
Paper ID #15393Narrating the Experiences of First-year Faculty in the Engineering Educa-tion Research Community: Developing a Qualitative, Collaborative ResearchMethodologyDr. Courtney June Faber, The College of New Jersey Courtney is an Assistant Professor in the Technological Studies Department at The College of New Jersey. She joined The College of New Jersey after completing a Ph.D. in Engineering & Science Education at Clemson University. Prior to her Ph.D. work, she received her B.S. in Bioengineering at Clemson University and her M.S. in Biomedical Engineering at Cornell University. Courtney’s research interests
mode ofreflection constitutes Macmurray’s criticism of the Cartesian emphasis on rationality; that therational mind can exist in isolation but as humans we cannot exist as people without otherpeople.Thus from the perspective offered by Macmurray’s system how assessment and evaluation isperformed, for what purpose, and the mental models developed by this activity have a large rolein the form of the engineering profession that we all contribute to creating. The next sectionprovides several critiques of the existing ABET criteria and the potential impacts the proposedchanges to criteria three and five may have.CritiquesThis section provides several critiques of the EC 2000 process from the perspective ofMaymurray’s philosophy system. These
topossible solution.19 For engineering teams using these, they may start out as just a representationof the problem as described by a customer, then grow features over time as the team movestoward a solution. An advantage of mind mapping is that it enriches verbal descriptions with itspictures and relationship arrows.There are hundreds of different variations on brainstorming and creativity techniques that areuseful in engineering education. All have in common a step where the participants arechallenged to widen their view of the issues to be solved, so as to bring in a solution from awider field. Burnett and Figliotti's book is an example of one targeting the classroom as thedomain for building creativity skills.20A Creative Problem Solving Tool
our uncertainty (tolerance for ambiguity). In this course, students experiencedmultiple levels of uncertainty and instructors offered permission as part of the course design tosafely take risks, fail, and move forward. As a result, final products were much more innovativeand creative in nature than ideas presented at the beginning of the class. Students recognized theimportance of the challenges they faced (group dynamics, work dynamics, distaste for the coursedesign and overwhelming amount of group work, etc.) in moving through the creative designprocess.With that in mind, we look to student reflections, specifically those of the engineering students,to identify strategies that contribute to creative practice and to help students
Paper ID #15120Gender in the Workplace: Peer Coaching to Empower Women in the Class-room and as ProfessionalsDr. Jennifer L. Groh, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Groh joined the Purdue Women in Engineering Program (WIEP) in 2009. She received a B.S. in microbiology from Purdue University, and a Ph.D. in microbiology from the University of Oklahoma. Prior to joining WIEP, she was the Graduate Programs Coordinator in the Purdue Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering. As Associate Director of WIEP, Dr. Groh administers the undergraduate Mentee & Mentor Program and the Graduate Mentoring Program, teaches two Women in
Goals and DescriptionsProgram GoalsOur engineering school is committed to creating leaders who thrive at acquiring and applying theknowledge required to solve global challenges. Using a variety of innovative programs andcourses, we teach engineers to tackle large, complex problems using a human-centered designprocess. These programs and courses emphasize real-world experience and outcomes, and ourstudents, from first-year to graduate students, deliver solutions to real clients while consideringsocial context and impact. Our programs teach students how to better serve society, and byoffering such opportunities, we help retain socially-minded students within engineering. Ourcurrent initiatives include efforts to not only add depth to our programs
education ofengineers for decades, and we will continue to be in this struggle for the long haul. Now is thetime for us (once again) to organize, to build coalitions, and to leverage all of our socialanalytical ability toward the effort of winning hearts and minds in support of the broad educationof engineers. What appeared to be consensus over EC2000 is now revealed to have been fragileat best, and we must work to strengthen and re-build this movement. I propose several ways inwhich the LEES Division can act as a clearinghouse with convening power to build coalitionsacross those who advocate for liberal education of engineers, across ASEE divisions, and acrossthe broader set of professional engineering societies, which comprise the membership of
Paper ID #16319Student use of prototypes to engage stakeholders during designMr. Michael Deininger, University of Michigan Michael Deininger is a Ph.D. student in Design Science at the University of Michigan. He received his B.S. in Industrial Design from the Art Center College of Design in Pasadena in 1999. His research focuses on the use of prototypes during design, particularly related to engineering education and medical device development for resource-limited settings. Michael works in the Laboratory for Innovation in Global Health Technology (LIGHT) and is co-advised by Kathleen Sienko and Shanna Daly.Dr. Kathleen
emphasizes onacquiring soft skills besides the engineering concepts such as professional code of conduct,report writing, and team management. These skills are critical in todays emerging globaleconomies for a successful engineering career. With this in mind, the purpose of the course is toequip the students with technical and non-technical professional skills that could be implementedon engineering design problems, while working in a global team with different dynamics. For thestudents, to be successful in the course, they have to develop and sharpen skills in organization,time management, self-discipline, and technical writing, while working as a strong teammember.At the end of the school year, the capstone design course concludes with a one-day
actual content of the work he was assigned. The highlights of his time at thesupply chain company were when he could solve problems for warehouse managers by gatheringand analyzing novel data. After his term ended, Vinson asked him if he would be returning to thecompany for another term: Chris: As of right now I don’t think so anymore. I think right now I want to just finish my degree [and not take extra time away from coursework to work]. Vinson: Why did you change your mind? Chris: Originally I thought that logistics was something I’d be very interested in. I think it’s still interesting, but not the stuff that I was doing at [supply chain company] which was being like a warehouse engineer as opposed to a
. Section 3: Cartoons as Cultural SymbolsIn addition to their ability to engage and energize students, cartoons are symbolic texts thatrequire interpretation based on cultural awareness and critical thinking. Interpreting cartoons istherefore a valuable educational exercise, not just an attention-grabbing hook or mindlessentertainment. It crucially relies on skills that ABET values for engineering students, such asconsidering multiple perspectives and thinking about social contexts. When cartoons areanalyzed aloud during class, as discussed above, then students also practice oral communicationskills, including defining an explanation and listening with an open mind to others’interpretations.Like all sources, cartoons are multi-layered and
, Iowa State University Dr. Yilmaz is an Associate Professor of Industrial Design. She teaches design studios and lecture courses on developing creativity and research skills. Her current research focuses on identifying impacts of differ- ent factors on ideation of designers and engineers, developing instructional materials for design ideation, and foundations of innovation. She often conducts workshops on design thinking to a diverse range of groups including student and professional engineers and faculty member from different universities. She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and the ISU Site Director
interventions are intended to promote ideation flexibility,one’s ability to switch between preferred and non-preferred methods of concept generation aspreferred by the problem. Given insight into how the three interventions impact idea quality,engineers, educators, and students will be able to make informed decisions about whichinterventions to use under different conditions with different concept generation goals in mind.1.1 Concept GenerationConcept generation or ideation is the primary means by which solutions are created. Thesesolutions to engineering problems, frequently referred to as ideas or concepts, undergo a vettingprocess to select which solutions warrant further development. The outcomes of conceptgeneration and selection can have far
into Engineering Education, National Academies Press, ISBN 978-0- 309-30719-2, 2012. 6. Nelson Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., Kuh, G. D., & Schwarz, M. J., “The Effects of Discipline on Deep Approaches to Student Learning and College Outcomes,” Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 469–494, 2008. 7. T. A. Litzinger, L. R. Lattuca, R. G. Hadgraft and W. C. Newstetter, Engineering Education and the Development of Expertise, Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 2011, 123-150. 8. D.A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.9. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown and R.R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience
generations of entrepreneurially-minded engineers. This is achieved by partnering and invest- ing in educational initiatives and programs between industry and institutions of higher learning. Under Michael’s leadership, The Boeing Company has won the multiple Awards for Excellence and Innova- tion for their industry academic partnerships and joint programs Michael has served on various advisory groups including, the editorial board of the Journal of Engineering Education, Boeing Higher Education Integration Board, American Society for Engineering Education Project Board and the National Science Foundation I-UCRC Industry University Collaborative Research Center Advisory Board. Michael has au- thored or co-authored over 25
Paper ID #16116’Making’ an Impact: An Ethnographic Approach to University Maker SpacesMs. Meredith Frances Penney, James Madison UniversityMr. James Deverell WatkinsBryan Levy, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Julie S Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Julie S. Linsey is an Assistant Professor in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technological. Dr. Linsey received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas. Her research area is design cognition including systematic methods and tools for innovative design with a particular focus on concept
Paper ID #15433Multidisciplinary Patient-Centered Capstone Senior Design ProjectsDr. Mansoor Nasir, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Mansoor Nasir received his B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of California-Berkeley. He worked as a research scientist at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C. before joining the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He has several publications in the areas of microflu- idics, chemical and biological sensors, and MEMS technology. He is also passionate
Paper ID #16758STEM: Explore, Discover, Apply – Engaging Electricity Modules for MiddleSchool (P12 Resource Exchange)Dr. Krystal S. Corbett, Cyber Innovation Center Dr. Krystal Corbett is the Director of Curricula at the Cyber Innovation Center (CIC). She received her B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering (2008/2010), M.S. in Mathematics (2012), and Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2012) at Louisiana Tech University. Through the CIC, Dr. Corbett manages various educational enterprises. Additionally, she is designing and implementing a three-part middle school elective course, STEM: Explore, Discover, Apply, which fosters
from 56 senior-level engineering students. Most teams have a majority of mechanicalengineering students with a minority of systems engineering or electrical engineering students.The designette was a well-scoped design problem that was unrelated to the students’ capstone,long-term, real-world project. In this work, we sought to discover if it would be advantageous toassign a designette that is a small portion of the long-term, real world project, or to continue toassign a artifical, unrelated designette project. It is with this in mind that we developed ourresearch question: Research Question: What are the advantages and disadvantages of relating the designette project to the larger
. Four out of the five students who participated in the product family design projectresponded to the survey.One of the open ended questions asked the participants to state three things that they learnedfrom the research experience. The responses, with the corresponding number of responses inbrackets, were as follows: 1. Engineering design process (3) 2. System design with reconfigurable manufacturing systems design in mind (2) 3. How to work with suppliers (2) 4. The difference between theoretical and actual processes (1) 5. Various unforeseen circumstances that may hinder progress (1) 6. How to better communicate with drawings and the importance of clearly presented drawings (1) 7