form showing relevant details for selectededucational institutes is provided in Appendix 1.Generally, required qualifications consist of several components including: Academic Credentials Research Potential (s) Scholarly Achievements Industrial ExperienceWhile all institutes of higher education include academic credentials at the top of the list of thequalifications, they differ on the other components. This applies to institutes in the US as well asin other parts of the world.Universities generally require research potential(s), and scholarly achievements. This is becauseuniversities in general consider research to be an essential and a vital part in their missionbesides teaching. Research universities emphasize this
knowledge of the content presented during the course.4.2 Student Attitudes Toward STEM (S-STEM) SurveyThe Student Attitudes Toward STEM (S-STEM) Survey was used to answer the project's second researchquestion. This survey was developed at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation – College ofEducation North Carolina University [18] to collect and interpret information about students’ attitudestoward science, technology, engineering, and mathematics subjects, postsecondary pathways, andcareer interests. This instrument is free to access and modify for educational use and can be adapted tolocal conditions as long as the source is cited.Given that the audience of the course is Spanish-speaking, the project used, translated, and adapted aversion
that fosters community.The process started with Author 1 and Author 2’s continuous virtual conversations over textmessages, emails, and video conferencing platforms such as Zoom. After several exchanges,both of them decided on the topics and came up with some prompts pertaining to the topic ofinterest, IWoC’s transition experiences building on the transition theory [6]. Also, all the authorsmet on Zoom collectively twice. Author 1 and author 2 discussed the findings and theirnarratives multiple times. We made sure to maintain the trustworthiness of our research bycapturing the thorough narratives of each researcher. We also ensured the member check-inprocess.The overarching prompt for this autoethnographic exploration includes, “How do you
, The State University of New York Dr. Matilde S´anchez-Pe˜na is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo – SUNY where she leads the Diversity Assessment Research in Engineering to Catalyze the Advancement of Respect and Equity (DAREtoCARE) Lab. Her research focuses on developing cultures of care and well-being in engineering education spaces, assessing gains in institutional efforts to advance equity and inclusion, and using data science for training socially responsible engineers.Esther Jose, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering Faculty and Role Models: A Work in
Probability Distribution for Extra Tuition paid by students who did and did not identify as a Student ofColor.Figure 6 shows the average earned credits by level for the different groups and includes all creditfrom transfer, AP, and CBE. This shows that earned upper-level credits are very similar amongthe groups, but there are significant differences in the 100-level. Transfer students have moreearned credits, but many of their transfer courses only count toward general credit and do not fulfilldegree requirements. There is also a larger number of 100-level credits for students of color andPell-eligible students as they are more likely to transfer credits or change majors. AV E R AG E AT T E M P T ED C R ED I T S BY C O U RSE L EV EL
study contribute to sustainable construction and engineering education bodies ofknowledge by preparing the future workforce with the necessary skills and knowledge to meetthe challenges of building in a sustainable, economical, and responsible way.AcknowledgmentOne of the authors was funded by FIU University Graduate School Dissertation Year Fellowship,and this support is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the FIU University Graduate School.References[1] F. Cruz Rios, D. Grau, and M. Bilec, “Barriers and Enablers to Circular Building Design in the US: An Empirical Study,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag
college Institutional Researchoffices to assess the impact of Summer Bridge participation on future math course completion,internship participation, and transfer to 4-year universities.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Naval Research, the USDepartment of Energy, or the National Science Foundation.REFERENCESAckerman, S. (1991). The benefits of summer bridge programs for underrepresented and low- income transfer students. Community/Junior College Quarterly of Research and Practice, 211-224.ALLIANCE, N. I. (2022). Includes Analyses. Mission Viejo, CA: Saddleback College.Center, C. C. (2023, January 23
and raising awareness of the social aspectof sustainability within the future engineering workforce.References[1] White House, “President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law | The White House,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.whitehouse.gov/bipartisan-infrastructure-law/. [Accessed: 31-Jan-2022].[2] J. Norman, “Biden ’ s $ 1 . 2 trillion infrastructure bill is good policy – and good politics.” pp. 1–2, 2021.[3] L. Carey, S. J. Naimoli, and M. Higman, “The American Jobs Plan Gets Serious about Infrastructure and Climate Change.” 2021, doi: http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/321229.[4] J. Elkington, “Accounting for the Triple Bottom Line,” Meas. Bus. Excell., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 18–22, 1998
education in the past four decades as the impetus for the current reality and develops aspecific theory in which to consider it [7]. In the latter part of the nineteenth century, the authorsrelate, universities began to focus on science-based programs such as engineering andagriculture, areas that focused more on the application of science to industry. Beginning in the1970’s, universities in the United States began to see public funding shrink. That, coupled withspecific but short-lived economic downturns in the following decades tightened the financial beltfurther. But at the same time, the economy itself was shifting, moving toward a place whereinformation and knowledge outstripped industrial manufacturing. Into this atmosphere,partnerships
. Lorenzo Delgado, T. Sola Martínez, and M. P. Cáceres Rrche, “El liderazgo femenino en los cargos directivos: un estudio longitudinal en la Universidad de Granada (1990- 2005),” Educ. y Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 177–194, 2007.[2] S. Riquelme, “MUJERES EN ESPACIOS DE DECISIÓN. ESCENARIO ACTUAL EN LAS UNIVERSIDADES ESTATALES CHILENAS,” Gob. y Adm. Pública, no. 2, pp. 40–61, 2021, doi: 10.29393/gp2-3mesr10003.[3] A. Buquet, J. A. Cooper, A. Mingo, and H. Moreno, “Intrusas en la universidad,” Perfiles Educativos, vol. 35, no. 141. pp. 196–199, 2013, doi: 10.1016/S0185-2698(13)71843-9.[4] P. Marcano, P. Aragón, C. Campo, G. Guiliany, and S. Barros, “Female leadership: A management style at the University of
: 10.1007/s43683-020-00030-z.[10] R. E. Clark, “Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 445–459, Dec. 1983, doi: 10.3102/00346543053004445.[11] M. E. Beier, M. H. Kim, A. Saterbak, V. Leautaud, S. Bishnoi, and J. M. Gilberto, “The effect of authentic project-based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 3–23, 2019, doi: 10.1002/tea.21465.[12] N. Falchikov and D. Boud, “Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta- Analysis,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 395–430, 1989, doi: 10.2307/1170205.[13] J. Seifried and A. Rausch, “Applying the Experience Sampling Method to Research on Workplace Learning,” in Methods for
extracurricular nature of these research opportunities. Bibliography[1] B. P. Chang and H. N. Eskridge, “What Engineers Want: Lessons Learned from Five Years of Studying Engineering Library Users,” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, p. 26.1721.1-26.1721.17. Accessed: Feb. 24, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/what-engineers-want-lessons-learned-from-five-years-of-studying- engineering-library-users[2] J. de la Cruz, A. Winfrey, and S. Solomon, “Navigating the Network: An Exploratory Study of LGBTQIA+ Information Practices at Two Single-Sex HBCUs | de la Cruz | College & Research Libraries,” Mar. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.83.2.278.[3] F. Albarillo, “Information
, R.H., “Interactive Learning Tools: Animating Mechanics of Materials,” Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, June 16-19, 2002.2. Zecher, J., Davis, J., Deaton, H., & Pawlaczyk, D., “Development of Multimedia Instructional Tools for Strength of Materials,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, June 12-15, 2005.3. Steif, P.S., “Use of Simplified FEA to Enhance Visualization in Mechanics,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 20-23, 2004.4. Navaee, S., “Computing and Programming with LabVIEW,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Confer- ence &
: Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect Homes and Classrooms. Thry into Prtce. vol. 31, num. 2. 1992.7. J. P. Martin, M. K. Miller, & D. R. Simmons, “Exploring the Theoretical Social Capital ‘Deficit’ of First Generation College Students: Implications for Engineering Education,” IJEE, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1–16, 2014.8. S. Brown, L. Flick and T. Fiez, “An investigation of the presence and development of social capital in an electrical engineering laboratory”, JEE, vol. 98, num. 1, pp. 93-102, 2009.9. P.W. Jackson. Life in classrooms. New York, NY. USA, Teachers College Press. 1990.10. R. Dreeben, “Social relations in a secondary school,” Scil Frcs, vol. 47, num. 2, pp. 235- 236. 1968.11. C. S. Rea, K. Shiekh,, Q Zhu, &D
: Departmental contexts that matter in faculty careers. Research in Higher Education, 55(1), 49-74.Cross, T. M. (2014). The gritty: grit and non-traditional doctoral student success. Journal of Educators Online, 11(3), n3.Davies, C., Arbeit, C. A., & Yamaner, M. (2022). Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Science, Engineering, and Health Graduate Enrollment: US Part-Time Enrollment Increases as Full-Time Temporary Visa Holder Enrollment Declines. InfoBrief. NSF 22- 317. National Science Foundation.Gardner, S. K., & Gopaul, B. (2012). The part-time doctoral student experience. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 63.Graham, C. D., & Massyn, L. (2019). Interaction equivalency theorem: Towards
Navigating STEM Identity,” J. ofNegro Educ., vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 358–378, Summer, 2019.[9] K.A. Callwood, M. Weiss, R. Hendricks, and T.G. Taylor, “Acknowledging and SupplantingWhite Supremacy Culture in Science Communication and STEM: The Role of ScienceCommunication Trainers,” Frontiers in Com., vol. 7, pp. 1–8, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2022.787750.[10] N. Hatfield, N. Brown, and C.M. Topaz, “Do introductory courses disproportionately driveminoritized students out of STEM pathways?” PNAS Nexus, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1–10, Sep. 2022,doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac167.[11] S. Fries-Britt and D. White-Lewis, “In pursuit of meaningful relationships: How Blackmales perceive faculty interactions in STEM,” The Urb. Rev., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 521–540, Feb
curriculum that promotes students' confidence in both design and projectprocess and practical aspects of mechanical and electrical fabrication, integration, andtroubleshooting.References[1] ABET EAC, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” Baltimore, MD: ABET, 2023.[2] El-Abd, M., Preparation of Engineering Students for Capstone Design through a Microprocessors Course, International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2017.[3] Goldberg, J., Preparing Students for Capstone Design, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, November/December, pp. 98-99, 2009.[4] Rutherford, A. Stanton, B., Turoskiu, S. and Varnes, E., Designing a Comprehensive Project for a Junior-level Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Course
The computer science program is ABET accredited and has built-in assessments in all core courses in computing. CS I TABLE VII and CS II are a part of these core courses. C OURSE NUMBER TRANSLATIONS ABET states specific proficiencies that students must pos- sess at the conclusion of the semester. They are abilities to: Course # Name Semester COMP 1000 Computer Science I Fall 1) Choose the appropriate data type(s) for implementing a
international perspective,” J. Nanoparticle Res., vol. 21, no. 11, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11051-019-4638-7.[2] L. Wright, S. D. Eigenbrode, and T. A. Martin, “Architectures of adaptive integration in large collaborative projects,” vol. 20, no. 4, 2015.[3] B. Akbar, J. Brummet, S. Flores, A. Gordon, B. Gray, and J. Murday, “Global perspectives in convergence education,” J. Nanoparticle Res., vol. 21, p. 229, 2019.[4] S. Anwar, N. A. Bascou, M. Menekse, and A. Kardgar, “A systematic review of studies on educational robotics,” J. Pre-College Eng. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 19–42, 2019, doi: 10.7771/2157-9288.1223.[5] I. M. Verner, D. Cuperman, and M. Reitman, “Exploring robot connectivity and
inclusive and diverse STEM community.7. References[1] M. Riojas, S. Lysecky, and J. Rozenblit, “Educational Technologies for Precollege Engineering Education,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 20–37, 2012, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2011.16.[2] N. Kerimbayev, N. Beisov, А. Kovtun, N. Nurym, and A. Akramova, “Robotics in the international educational space: Integration and the experience,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 5835–5851, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10257-6.[3] S. Anwar, N. A. Bascou, M. Menekse, and A. Kardgar, “A systematic review of studies on educational robotics,” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, vol. 9, no. 2. Purdue University Press
Conference, 2008.[10] A. L. Campbell, I. Direito and M. Mokhithi, “Developing growth mindsets in engineering students: a systematic literature review of interventions”, European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 503-527, 2021, DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2021.1903835[11] A.J. Elliot, H.A. McGregor, and S. Gable, “Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: a mediational analysis,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 91, no. 3), pp. 549-563, 1999.[12] P. Hsieh, , J.R. Sullivan, and N.S. Guerra, “A closer look at college students:Self-efficacy and goal orientation,” Journal of Advanced Academics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 454–476, 2007, DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.549[13] A. Vrugt
introducing a smalllottery-based compensation for survey participation. (These amendments to the survey protocolare subject to IRB approval.) Additionally, the 360 Coaching program will continue to seekfeedback from the 360 Coaches throughout the year and respond to these by considering andimplementing improvements.References[1] S. Tantum, S. T. Santillan, L. Temiquel-McMillian, and J. Ganley, “Work-in-Progress: 360 Coaching to support whole-student advising in the first-year,” presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, June 26–29, 2022.[2] K. Bartimote-Aufflick, A. Bridgeman, R. Walker, M. Sharma, and L. Smith, “The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy,” Studies in Higher
and satisfaction. The formative evaluation helps determinewhether project goals were met and what hampered their implementation. A summative reviewassessed this program's impact on student's professional abilities for global employment. TheGlobal Perspective Inventory [20] and Engineering Global Preparedness Index were used tocreate a survey (e.g., the belief that one can make a difference through engineering problem-solving). The evaluator used a Likert scale to poll students before and after IRES. The surveytool examined research skills and global perspective inventory professional skills. Research Skill Development - Pre v/s Post Survey Peer review and publication process Report writing and poster presentation Result
&M University Victor Ugaz is the Carolyn S. & Tommie E. Lohman ’59 Professor in Engineering Education in the Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering at Texas A&M University. He joined the faculty in Jan- uary 2003. His research focuses broadly on harnessing the unique characteristics of transport and flow at the microscale, with specific interests in microfluidic flows (both single-phase and nanoparticle suspen- sions), microchip gel electrophoresis, PCR thermocycling in novel convective flow devices, and construc- tion of 3D vascular flow networks for biomedical applications. Ugaz earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin, and a Ph.D. in
. Didion, N. L. Fortenberry, and E. Cady, Colloquy on Minority Males in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. 2012, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[3] Y. E. Pearson, Inclusion, Diversity Now Factor Into Accreditation Standards. PE Magazine, 2019.[4] NSPE Adopts New Policy on Diversity. 2017: NSPE Today.[5] Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering Phase III: Voices on Women's Participation and Retention. 2017.[6] R. Reisberg, The University Experience: Retention to Degree, in ASEE-TUEE-WIE Discussion Starter. 2015, ASEE.[7] C. Corbett, and C. Hill, Solving the Equation: The Variables for Women's Success in Engineering and Computing. 2015: AAUW[8] L. L. Long III, T. S
integration of this in the Laplace domain becomes Va/s.Omega represents Va(s) multiplied by the transfer function, and this equation can be solved to determinethe response to a step function (such as a flipped switch which allows current to flow). The graph shown in Figure 6 shows a system with a step input Va and a DC motor’s resultingoutput (omega). Eventually, omega becomes a constant as steady state operation is reached, but intransient responses it is a first order system. Figure 6: Voltage represents a step function, while omega is a DC Motor’s response to that step.Stove Types Figure 7: Gas (left) and electric (right) stoves Consider two different stove types – gas and electric – as shown in
. What question(s) do you still have? 4. How can you incorporate what you learned in the zoom discussion in your report for the project?Then each student had to reply to at least two peers’ posts and do one of the following tasks: 1. Give ideas for how they can answer their question(s). 2. Share some feedback to their thoughts about their project.Finally, for one of the projects, the students completed peer reviews of each other’s reports. Eachstudent read, graded and gave feedback on two other reports. The purpose of the peer reviews wasto allow the students to learn about topics they did not choose and to learn from their colleagues’reflections and change sections.Mechanical Systems Design: Module 1 DescriptionTo date, one
, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2017.[8] G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, S. M. Lord, L. A. Gelles, F. Bilow, and J. A. Mejia, "An Integrated Approach to Energy Education in Engineering," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 21, p. 9145, 2020.[9] L. A. Gelles, S. M. Lord, G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, and J. A. Mejia, "Compassionate Flexibility and Self-Discipline: Student Adaptation to Emergency Remote Teaching in an Integrated Engineering Energy Course during COVID-19," Education Sciences, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 304, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/10/11/304.[10] University of San Diego. "Courses - Integrated Approach to Energy." https://www.sandiego.edu/engineering/programs/integrated
%20NSF_RAPID_GraduateStudentExperiences_Covid19_White_Paper.pdf[2] N. Winstone et al., “Who stands to benefit? Wellbeing, belonging and challenges to equity inengagement in extra-curricular activities at university,” Act. Learn. High. Educ., Feb. 2020.[3] S. K. Gardner and B. J. Barnes, “Graduate student involvement: Socialization for theprofessional role,” J. Coll., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 369-387, 2007.[4] K. Farley, M. McKee, and M. Brooks, “The Effects of Student Involvement on GraduateStudent Satisfaction: A Pilot Study,” Alabama Counseling Association Journal vol. 37, no. 1, pp.33-38, 2011.[5] J. A. Austin, “Flourishing Elements: Psychological, Social, Contemplative, Physical, andEmotional Well-Being: COVID-Impacted,” Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 2020.[6] A. E. Lundquist and L. Carter