] H. M. Matusovich, R.A Streveler, and R. L. Miller, “Why Do Students Choose Engineering? A Qualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of Student’s Motivational Values,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 289- 303, October 2010. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01064.x. [Accessed January 13, 2019].[7] Q. Li, D. B. McCoach, H. Swaminathan, and J. Tang, “Development of an Instrument to Measure Perspectives on Engineering Education Among College Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 47-56, January 2008. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00953.x. [Accessed January 13, 2019].[8] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein
.” [Online]. Available: https://learningassistantalliance.org/modules/about/about_laa.php.[29] V. Betihavas, H. Bridgman, R. Kornhaber, and M. Cross, “The evidence for ‘flipping out’: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 38, pp. 15–21, 2016.[30] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Understanding Student Differences,” no. January, 2005.[31] R. M. Felder, “Learning Styles and Strategies,” North Carolina State University, 2000. [Online]. Available: http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSdir/styles.pdf.[32] D. Bye, D. Pushkar, and M. Conway, “Motivation, interest, and positive affect in traditional and nontraditional undergraduate students,” Adult Educ. Q., vol
, S. Reeves, and B. Zierler, “Measuring the impact ofinterprofessional education on collaborative practice and patient outcomes,” Journal ofInterprofessional Care, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–3, Jan. 2016.[4] Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel, Core Competencies forInterprofessional Collaborative Practice. Washington, DC, pp. 1–56, 2011.[5] J. Fawcett, “Thoughts About Interprofessional Education,” Nurs Sci Q, vol. 27, no. 2, pp.178–179, Apr. 2014.[6] B. C. K. Choi and A. W. P. Pak, “Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity andtransdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives,and evidence of effectiveness,” Clinical and Investigative Medicine, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 351–364,Dec. 2006
agentic perspective,” Asian J. Soc. Psychol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 21–41, 1999.[11] A. Bandura, “Toward a Psychology of Human Agency,” Perspect. Psychol. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 164–180, 2006.[12] G. H. Elder, “Time, Human Agency, and Social Change: Perspectives on the Life Course,” Soc. Psychol. Q., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 4–15, 1994.[13] A. Giddens, The constitution of society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, 1984.[14] A. Bandura, “The evolution of social cognitive theory,” in Great minds in management: The process of theory development, K. G. Smith and M. A. Hitt, Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 9–35.[15] J. Martin, “Self-Regulated Learning, Social Cognitive Theory, and
; expand thecontent for more advanced research; and transfer the content into additional platforms anddistribution channels outside of the current NYU Classes.[1] L. Holman, "A comparison of computer-assisted instruction and classroom bibliographicinstruction," Reference & User Services Quarterly, v ol. 40, (1), p p. 53-60, 2000.[2] C. A. Germain, T. E. Jacobson and S. A. Kaczor, "A comparison of the effectiveness ofpresentation formats for instruction: teaching first-year students," College and ResearchLibraries, v ol. 61, (1), pp. 65-72, 2000.[3] Q. Zhang, M. Goodman and S. Xie, "Integrating Library Instruction into the CourseManagement System for a First-Year Engineering Class: An Evidence-Based Study Measuringthe Effectiveness of
might refer to the output of the circuit (O) as next state (Q+) revealing aconflation of the two ideas.We identified the emergent themes across the two datasets in two stages. First, we compared thethemes generated from the prior studies to each other to determine which themes were domain-general and which were domain-specific. Second, we compared each theme’s supportingevidence (constructed from comparisons amongst the three other granularities) to find similartrends in how each theme emerged from the data. Similar trends in each theme’s supportingevidence were grouped and renamed to describe the trend, which resulted in three themes.LimitationsWhile the goal of our work is to identify the patterns and nuances in students’ interactions
improvements with the appropriate support from all levels across the valuestream.References 1. Balzer, W.K. (2010). Lean higher education: Increasing the value and performance of university. CRC Press: New York. 2. Balzer, W.K., Francis, D., Krehbiel, T. & Shea, N. (2016). A review and perspective on Lean in higher education, Quality Assurance in Education, 24(4), 442-462. 3. Mazumder, Q. H. (2014). Applying six sigma in higher education quality improvement. Proceedings from 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. 4. Francis, D.E. (2014). Lean and the learning organization in higher education. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 157, 1-23. 5
Conference on Mathematics Education in a Global Community, Palermo, Italy, 2007.11. Allen, K., The Statistics Concept Inventory: Development and analysis of a cognitive assessment instrument instatistics (Doctoral dissertation), SSRN Electronic Journal, 2006, doi:10.2139/ssrn.213014312. Wilcox, B., Caballero, M., Baily, C., Sadaghiani, H., Chasteen, S., Ryan, Q., and Pollock, S., “Development anduses of upper-division conceptual assessments”, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020115 – Published 23September 2015, http://journals.aps.org/prstper/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.02011513. Streveler, R., Miller, R., Santiago-Roman, A., Nelson, M., Geist, M., and Olds, B., “Rigorous Methodology forConcept Inventory Development: Using the 'Assessment Triangle
improvements during an industry-‐sponsored civil engineering senior design course. Proceedings of the ASEE 2015 Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: ASEE. Paper ID #12028 11. Golder, K., & Webb, D. B. (2015). Educating, enlightening, and entertaining: Audience perceptions of the educational value of a presentation competition for engineering students. Proceedings of the ASEE 2015 Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: ASEE. Paper ID #12335 12. Gotch, C. M., Langfitt, Q., French, B. F., & Haselbach, L. (2015). Determining reliability scores from an energy literacy rubric. Proceedings of the ASEE 2015
environment,” Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 2000, 30-43.2. Bishop, J. L., M.A. Verleger, “The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of Research,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, Atlanta, GA (2013).3. Foertsch, J., G. Moses, J. Strikwerda, M. Litzkow, “Reversing the Lecture/Homework Paradigm Using eTEACH Web-based Streaming video Software,” Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), 2002, 267-274.4. Talbert, R. “Learning MATLAB in the Inverted Classroom,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, San Antonio, TX (2012).5. Kecskemety, K. M., B. Morin, “Student Perceptions of Inverted Classroom Benefits in a First-Year Engineering Course,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, Indianapolis, IN (2014).6. Stickel, M., S. Hari, Q
electronics.VI. Subsystem Design A. Rails and ArmatureThe team needed to assess whether the selected rail and armature materials would melt under thespecified current. An equation from the Melt Wear Control of Metals in High-Speed Sliding Contactspublication by then Doctoral Candidate Edin E. Balic was referenced in order to derive Equation 13,which calculates the maximum temperature rise at the exit of a metal coming in contact with anothermetal. T = 2qdkπPe α + TO (13)where d is the half-length of the armature contact path, q is the power per area, k is the thermalconductivity, Pe is the Perclet number, and α is the thermal diffusivity of the rail material. This
College. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (1989).16. https://www.google.com/search?q=saundra+mcguire+study+cycle&biw=1084&bih=797&tbm=isch&tbo=u&so urce=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwijjqTnnMXKAhXjkIMKHQKGAhkQsAQIPA#imgrc=BwL4uD4aB4fHJM %3A.
1 1 96.2 1.9 1.9 9 39 13 0 75.0 25.0 0.0 10 28 18 6 53.8 34.6 11.5 11 38 13 1 73.1 25.0 1.9 12 38 8 6 73.1 15.4 11.5 13 44 3 5 84.6 5.8 9.6 14 40 8 4 76.9 15.4 7.7 15 40 7 5 76.9 13.5 9.6 Avg8 42.4 7.2 2.4 81.53 13.84 4.61: Q: Question from survey (see Appendix A)2: positive: Total number of students that provided positive feedback3
have different insights about their cases and after hearing many of them connections between what they were saying, the readings, and other material started to emerge. The variety of experienced speakers seemed to complement the learning process very well! If there exists a "correct" order for the presentations, this was it. The guest speakers gave an invaluable opportunity to listen to their experience, up close, whatever the outcome. Having experts come in and give testimony to their experience. Its difficult to put a value on the opportunity to have an open floor Q and A session with respected professionals.It also made some think differently about research: I enjoyed thinking
; • Didn’t apply Poisson’s equation correctly.Procedural mistakes: • Incorrectly determine the direction of Dn components; • Didn’t make complete conclusion when discussing the potential and E field at various locations.6. Capacitance.Conceptual mistakes: • Forgot ε0 when calculating D or E; • Didn’t correctly understand the total charge Q; • Had problems in recognizing different capacitor connection.Procedural mistakes: • Didn’t correctly apply boundary condition.7. Ampere’s law.Situational mistakes: • Mixed up concepts of H and B; • Couldn’t differentiate line current source vs. volume current source, so had trouble in deciding the correct coordinate system.Conceptual mistakes
provides insight to the up and coming technology. Ms. Monereau, presently is an active member of the Associated General Contractors (AGC), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE), and the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). Through her tenure within these organizations she has served on the Board of Directors for NSBE, and multiple leadership roles throughout her undergraduate career with AGC and ASME. For more insight into her research, review her paper: Reality in the Nuclear Industry: Augmented, Mixed, and Virtual (https://peer.asee.org/?q=monereau).Dr. Makita R. PhillipsMs. Arielle M. Benjamin
– Articles • Video – Keith Sawyer “Group Genius” • Assignment Module 11 (Team) – Transformation Tech. Exec. Perspective and Virtual-Live Discussion12 Integration & Sustainment • Reading – Articles • Assignment Module 12 (Team) – Capstone Presentation – to be presented in Module 1413 Team Preparation for Capstone • Virtual-Live open discussion – Q&A in preparation for Capstone Presentation Presentation
(8), 3-15.27. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professionaldevelopment effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American educational research journal, 38(4),915-945.28. Hochstedt, K., Zappe, S., Litzinger, T., Liu, S., & Bertram Gallant, T. (2015). The impact of faculty developmentworkshop on students’ understanding of academic integrity. 122nd American Society of Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition. Seattle, WA.29. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.30. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Educational researcher, 4-14.31. Shulman, L. S. (1987
.” Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange. Retrieved from http://www.iie.org/opendoors.13. Intolubbe-Chmil, L., Spreen, C. A., & Swap, R. J. 2012. Transformative learning: Participant perspectives on international experiential education. Journal of Research in International Education, 11(2), 165–80.14. Jackson, J. 2014. The process of becoming reflexive and intercultural: Navigating study abroad and reentry experience.” In J. S. Byrd Clark & F. Dervin (Eds.), Reflexivity in language and intercultural education: Rethinking multilingualism and interculturality (43–63). New York: Routledge.15. Jesiek, B. K. 2015. Personal communication.16. Jesiek, B. K., Zhu, Q., Woo, S., Thompson, J. Thompson, & Mazzurco, A
. Some seminars are delivered by individuals, and some are delivered by aportion, or all, of the project team. Some seminars are 30 minutes long, and some are 3 hours induration. Some constitute a series over multiple days. Significant time for discussion and Q&A isprovided at the end of each seminar. A survey instrument is used to assess the impact of theseminar. Overall, the seminars have been very well received, as evinced by survey data presentedin a later section of this paper. The following section provides examples of the kind of materialthat is presented in these seminars.Ingenuity in NatureAccording to Mechanical Engineering Professor Robert L. Norton, a machine is defined as “asystem of elements arranged to transmit motion [and
, solicited comments seem to imply that the Page 24.1357.17benefit of shorter videos may be a moot point in the face of playback controls that allow studentsto watch a video, no matter its length, at whatever pace is to their liking. The authors lookforward to seeing future studies, along the lines of the one conducted by Kim et al.10, that wouldexamine student viewing patterns when having the option to watch a video at 1.5×, 2×, etc., andeventually link those patterns to learning and retention.References[1] N. Halyo and Q. Le, “Use of video technology to improve student learning,” 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA
graduate student) offered in-person Q&A times to supplementthe videos and regular teaching assistants provided additional help to students. In otherwords, the main teaching role of the faculty person was via the online videos (although in thispilot version the faculty instructor did hold weekly office hours). In order to compareteaching methods and learning outcomes, this course is being offered in a more traditionalformat by the faculty instructor during the Winter quarter 2014, and it will be offered againby a teaching fellow in the online-with-tutored-instruction format in the Spring. The quantummechanics course may also be offered in the teaching fellow format in the Spring or Summerof 2014. The fourth of the initial EE Online courses
, student had an option to take as muchtime as they needed. Some of the projects were also presented in class for peer review andcritique. Faculty were available to provide feedback at any stage of the project completion. Theinstructors held Q&A sessions about badges throughout the semester as needed by students.Assignments completed as part of a badge were evaluated by two or more faculty membersand/or teaching assistants involved in a particular learning experience, using a detailed rubricthat was also available to learners. These evaluators would provide detailed feedback on eachassignment and may require from students to revise and resubmit without penalty as many timesas needed until the competency was attained. Students could not get
, Chubin DE. A retrospective on undergraduate engineering success for underrepresented minority students. J Eng Educ. 2003;92(1):27 – 39.15. Haden C. Evaluating support for underrepresented students in engineering degree programs. In: Proceedings of 114th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.; 2007.16. Roberts S, Bray K, Shishodia V, et al. Evaluation of retention and other benefits of a fifteen-year residential bridge program for underrepresented engineering students. In: Proceedings of 116th ASEE Annual Conference & Exhibition. Austin, TX; 2009.17. Ackermann SP. The benefits of summer bridge programs for underrepresented and low income transfer students. Community Jr Coll Res Q Res Pract. 1991;15(2):211–224
classroom as wellas instructing students to watch online video modules ahead of face-to-face session. Interactiveproblem solving and Q & A still comprised a good part of the classroom activities.The following sections describe the new curriculum developed to support the power industry(Section 2), teaching the Power Electronics course for the first and second year (Section 3),course assessment, results and findings (Section 4), and Conclusions (Section 5).II. New Curriculum Supporting Power IndustryAt (…) University, the engineering and engineering technology curricula have been currentlydeveloping to support the power industry in the region. Specifically, the electrical engineeringcurriculum was selected to comprise two common fundamental
Society of Engineering Education, 20124. Anderson, L.W. et al. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., Illinois, 2001.5. Bland, L. “Applying Flip/Inverted Classroom Model in Electrical Engineering to Establish Life-Long Learning,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2006.6. Redekopp, M.W. and Ragusa, G. “Evaluating Flipped Classroom Strategies and Tools for Computer Engineering,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2013.7. Stickel, M., Hari, S., and Liu, Q. “The Effect of the Inverted Classroom Teaching Approach on Student/Faculty Interaction and Students’ Self
. (2014). Women of Color engineering faculty : An examination of the experiences and the numbers An Examination of the Numbers : African American Female Faculty in. In 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.11. Yoder, B. (2011). Engineering by the numbers, 11–47.12. Blake, S. (1999). Mentoring dilemmas: Developmental relationships within multicultural organizations (p. 288). Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.13. Malcom, S. M., Hall, P. Q., & Brown, J. W. (1976). The double bind : The price of being a minority woman in science (pp. 1–79).14. Adams, M., Anne Bell, L., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (2007). Teaching for diversity and social justice (Second.). New York: Routledge.15. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought
O’Conner, K. (2014). Professional Engineering Work. In Johri, A. and Olds, B. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 119-140). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.15 Jesiek, B. K. and Beddoes, K. (2010). From Diplomacy and Development to Competitiveness and Globalization: Historical Perspectives on the Internationalization of Engineering Education. In Downey, G. L. and Beddoes, K. (Eds.), What is Global Engineering Education For?: The Making of International Educators (pp. 45-76). San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool.16 Jesiek, B. K., Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Thompson, J., and Mazzurco, A. (2014). “Global Engineering Competency in Context: Situations and Behaviors.” Online Journal of
influence on the measured coaxiality of the part. Page 26.467.15References[1] Nicolai M. Josuttis. The C++ Standard Library: A Tutorial and Reference, 2nd edition edition, April 2011.[2] Keyence Inc., Osaka, Japan. High-speed, High-precision Micrometer Measuring Instrument LS9000 User’s Man- ual, January 2014.[3] Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Japan. Melservo-J3 Series Servo Amplifier Instruction Manual, sh(na)030084-d edition, August 2012.[4] Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Japan. Type QD75MH Positioning Module - User’s Manual, sh(na)030084-d edition, January 2012.[5] Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Japan. Melsec Q