these service courses and need to be reminded of their importance to the major. Theexample given in the paper involves liberal arts students required to take a technical course inaeronautics. The reflective essay was proposed as an excellent way to have the students find theintersection of their major with the service course. Page 26.598.11Bibliography1. ABET Criterion 3 a-k, http://www.abet.org/DisplayTemplates/DocsHandbook.aspx?id=3143 accessed on February 1, 2015.2. Nankervis, K., “Service Teaching: Student experiences, issues and future directions at RMIT,” http://emedia.rmit.edu.au/edjournal/?q=node/326, accessed on January
and we talked about the importance of cooperation in engineering.” (Team Leader)Lessons Learned: • In HA training, stress the importance of small, interactive groups with manipulatives or hands-on elements, as opposed to longer lecture-style slide presentations. • In HA training, instruct teams to have seed questions prepared in advance so that the Q&A time has good participation. As an alternative, have the school liaison require the high school students do this in advance.5. Key Factor: Team RecruitmentWhile the attendance at the ambassador training event was good (>150 students), team leaders’ability to get the minimum 3-4 team members for an actual HA event was challenging for anumber of teams. This
research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.[28] Greene, J.C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.[29] Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.[30] Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8, 69-91.[31] Abes, E. S., Jones, S. R., & McEwen, M. K. (2007). Reconceptualizing the model of multiple dimensions of identity: The role of meaning-making capacity in the construction of multiple identities. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 1-22.[32] Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985
engineersresponded with the following. “By my observation, the biggest benefit of the capstone class is that it forces the students to draw upon the body of knowledge that they have developed to-date and to apply that knowledge in a fashion that is not already pre-defined for them.”Practicing engineers also provided feedback and suggestions for how the course could beimproved to better prepare students for their careers. “In lieu of having a few folks serve as general advisors to the class, I would suggest soliciting the help from additional practicing engineers. You could then have each of those individuals assigned to a specific team. They could arrange for a weekly Q&A session. I anticipate that each group
. (2010, July). Journals step up plagiarism policing. Nature, 466, 107. Page 26.683.1112. Wen, Q, & Gao, Y. (2007). Dual publication and academic inequality. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 221-225.13. Atwood, A. (2008, July 3). Allow me to rephrase, and boost my tally of articles. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/allow-me-to-rephrase-and-boost-my-tally-of- articles/402598.article14. Davis, P. M. (2005, April). The ethics of republishing: A case study of Emerald/MCB University Press journals. Library Resources & Technical
academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In Zimmerman, B.J. & Schunck, DH. (Eds.) (2001). Selfregulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives . New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, 138. 14 Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A.V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science , 312, 26 May, 2006. Page 26.962.11 15 Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N.M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences
software was not able to analyze the learning style dynamics, wedeveloped a novel set of algorithms that parsed our DLSI data to identify the nine learning styles,measure the margin of error, measure learning style dynamics, and perform statistical analysis.An algorithm flowchart of key components of our software is illustrated in Figure 7. As impliedby the flow chart, learning style inventory survey data in the form of an NxQ matrix is providedas Survey Input, where N is the number of survey participants and Q is the number of surveyquestions or answers. Depending on the ranking order of multiple choice questions, some surveytools may enumerate radio choices in the reverse order. In this case, the answer choices of thesurvey matrix were corrected
), 1993, pp. n1.2. W. C. Lee, Providing Co-Curricular Support: A Multi-Case Study of Engineering Student Support Centers, 2015: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.3. V. Tinto, Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition, 2nd, Series University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994.4. R. K. Yin, Case study research: Design and methods, 4, Series Sage, 2009.5. R. E. Stake, Multiple case study analysis, Series The Guilford Press New York, 2006.6. Carnegie Foundation. The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. 2015 January 24]; Available from: http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/.7. M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Series
). The designathon was created as a model to move the resultsgenerated from Figure 3’s Quadrant III to Quadrant II, toward the quicker and valuableresults. Figure 3: Regimes of results under different problem-solving events.To characterize the differences in these events is to understand the relationship between Q (thequality of results from the yield of a given event) and t (the time spent working or hacking at thatevent). Observation suggests that Quality is a function of the log of time, where tH , tD , and tRrepresent the optimized event time horizons for hackathons, designathons, and traditional Page 26.1455.5research
strongleaders and strong engineers.T ABLE 1 : S AMPLE S URVEY Q UESTIONS Survey Sample Question Focus CodesectionPart 1: Age: 20-29; 30-39; 40-49; 50-59; 60+ Self Demographics (AgeDemographics Category)Part 2: As a student, when dreaming about my future, I Self Time (student)Student imagined doing technically complex work. Situationexperiences (1 never, 2 rarely, 3 occasionally, 4 frequently, 5 (aspiration/satisfaction
; Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[9] M. Stickel, S. Hari and Q. Liu, "The Effect of the Inverted Classroom Teaching Approach on Student/Faculty Interaction and Students' Self-Efficacy," in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[10] J. L. Bishop and M. A. Verleger, "The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of Research," in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013.[11] N. K. Lape, R. Levy, D. H. Yong, K. A. Haushalter, R. Eddy and N. Hankel, "Probing the Inverted Classroom: A Controlled Study of Teaching and Learning," in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, 2014.[12] H. Jia, "The Student Life," The Associated Students of
. Educational Theory 45 (2): 1-22.26. Giffney, N. (2009). Introduction: The “q” Word. In N. Giffney, ed., The Ashgate Research Companion to Queer Theory (pp. 1-13). Farnham, Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing27. Adams, R.S., et al. (2011). Multiple Perspectives on Engaging Future Engineers. Journal of Engineering Education 100 (1): 48-88.28. Davis, L. J. (2014). Disabilities Studies Reader, 4th Edition. New York: Taylor & Francis.29. Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.30. Slaton, A.E. (2010). Race, Rigor and Selectivity in US Engineering: The History of an Occupational Color-Line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.31. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political
. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 465-481.[50] Lindlof, T. R. & Taylor, BC (2002). Qualitative communication research methods.[51] Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.[52] Zhu, Q., Zoltowski, C. B., Feister, M. K., Buzzanell, P. M., Oakes, W. C. & Mead, A. D. (2014). The development of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decisionmaking in project-based design teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods. To appear in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN.[53] Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings
metacognition in natural settings. Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE 730–732 (2013). doi:10.1109/FIE.2013.668492231. Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W. & Kellam, N. N. Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study. J. Eng. Educ. 102, 626–659 (2013).32. Bloom, B. S. et al. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York 16, 207 (David McKay Company, 1956).33. Owens, R. J. Q. & Pauk, W. How to Study in College. (Cengage Learning, 2013).34. Bean, C. H. The Curve of Forgetting. (Press of the New era printing Company, 1912).35. Finkenbinder, E. O. The Curve of Forgetting. Am. J. Psychol. 24, 8–32 (1913).36. Latham, G. P
1 u 2 u v2 dq 2 2 1 p 2 dp (21) Page 26.1273.8 1 o2 owhere o tan o is the projection slope. For the initial conditions stated in Eqs. (16) and (17),observe that v 1 when u o , and also recognize that p and q are merely dummy variablesof integration. After the indicated operations are performed, Eq. (21) yields
in the Laboratory: Comparison of industrially situated virtual laboratories to capstone physical laboratories. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3) 540-573.8. Steadman, R. H.; Coates, W. C.; Huang, Y. M., et al (2006) Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for acquisition of critical assessment and management skills. Critical Care Medicine, 34(1) 151-157.9. Curtin, L. B.; Finn, L. A.; Czosnowski, Q. A.; Whiman, C. B. and Cawley, M. J. (2011) Computer-based simulation training to improve learning outcomes in mannequin-based simulation exercises. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(6) 1-6.10. De Jong, T. & Van Joolingen, W. (1998) Scientific discovery learning with computer
answer categories below, which arevisualized in Figure 10: 1. More forms of active feedback or direct contact between client and project teams, 2. More definition and data prioritization at the beginning of the project, 3. Client involvement in project team formation, and 4. No change needed.Over half of the responses made it clear that more consistent communication and more optionsfor communication between the project team and the client were desired. One student suggested,“Offer maybe a Q&A conference call once a month or every other week to begin the project andoffer that human interaction to help reduce any confusion with people. I felt like some of theanswers given in the email didn't always get answered right away.”Figure
Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA.9. Vaz, R., Quinn, P., Heinricher, A., & Rissmiller, K. (2013, June). Gender Differences in the Long-Term Impacts of Project-Based Learning. Paper presented at the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA.10. Vaz, R., & Quinn, P.. (2014, October). Long Term Impacts of Off-Campus Project Work on Student Learning and Development. Paper presented at the Frontiers In Education Conference, Madrid, Spain.11. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.12. Landivar, L. C. (2013). The Relationship Between Science and Engineering Education and Employment in STEM
/508.pdf 4. National Academy of Engineering. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004. 5. Qazi, S., Khalid. A., and Malik, Q., Incorporating New Trends and Teaching Methodologies: Improving State of Engineering Education in Pakistan. Proceeding of ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 2013. 6. http://www.pec.org.pk/ 7. Skinner, E. A., and Belmont, M. J., Motivation in the class room: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student behavior across the school year. Journal of Education Psychology, 85(4), 1993 8. Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., and Gonyea, R. M., Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on
challenging team scenario of engineering students attempting to worktogether. During this activity, the actors and actresses manifest common difficulties onengineering teams, including gender dynamics, miscommunications, misunderstandings, andother frustrations that emerge from teamwork. Afterwards, the facilitator leads a discussion withthe students, including a Q&A session between students and the actors and actresses in character.The interactive theater sketch ends with an invitation for the audience to brainstorm strategies toimprove interactions within teams. The actors/actresses then re-enact their scenario, butincorporate the suggested strategies to improve their synergy. Findings suggest that theinteractive theater sketch can help
. Barron, and C. Hulleman, "Expectancy-Value-Cost model of motivation," in International Encyclopediaof Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Oxford. 2015.[4] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, "An analysis of motivation constructs withfirst--‐ ‐ year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and careerplans" in Journal of engineering education, vol. 99.4, 2010, pp. 319-336.[5] Q. Li, D. B. McCoach, H. Swaminathan, and J. Tang, “Development of an instrument to measureperspectives of engineering education among college students,” in Journal of Engineering Education, vol.97.1, 2008, pp. 47-56.[6] T. Perez, J. C. Cromley, and A. Kaplan, "The role of identity development, values, and costs in
interestof this manuscript is the fact that this elementary education program is 100%engineering driven.BackgroundThere are many approaches to introducing engineering into the elementary schoolenvironment. Many of these pathways have been presented at the American Associationfor Engineering Education annual conference. The Society conducts workshops on thistopic and has also published papers on various approaches. Readers are encouraged toexplore the ASEE website, https://www.asee.org/search?q=elementary+education , formore details. The DLJ program was developed in partnership with the University ofSouth Florida College of Engineering; a National Science Foundation designatedRegional Center for Advanced Technological Education in
, A. V. (2012). A realistic look at STEM and the role of community colleges. Community College Review, 40, 2.12. Harland, D. J. (2011). STEM Student Research Handbook. National Science Teachers Association.13. Heinze, N., & Hu, Q. (2009). Why college undergraduates choose IT: A multi-theoretical perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 18 (5), 462-475.14. Houston, R. & Heflin, M. (2015) Go flight! the unsung heroes of mission control, 1965-1992. Library of congress catalog.15. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational psychology review, 16(3), 235-266.16. Jones, J. (2010). Closing the Gender Gap, Civil Engineering, 80, 7, 60-63.17. Lent, R
, 2010.[8] B. A. Smikle Jr., “Solving Minority Underrepresentation In STEM Careers,” TheHill, 06-Mar-2015. .[9] R. Boege, “North Carolina’s 2015 STEM Report Card,” The Alliance for Science & Technology Research in America, Washington DC, 2015.[10] J. U. Ogbu and H. D. Simons, “Voluntary and Involuntary Minorities: A Cultural-Ecological Theory of School Performance with Some Implications for Education,” Anthropol. Educ. Q., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 155–188, 1998.[11] A. L. Harris, “I (don’t) hate school: revisiting oppositional culture theory of blacks’ resistance to schooling,” Soc. Forces, vol. 85, no. 2, p. 797+, Dec. 2006.[12] I. A. Toldson and D. Owens, “Editor’s Comment: ‘Acting Black’: What Black Kids
. 95-112.16. Faniel, I.M. and A. Majchrzak, Innovating by Accessing Knowledge Across Departments. Decision Support Systems, 2007. 43(4): p. 1684-1691.17. Jones, Q., G. Ravid, and S. Rafaeli, Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Information systems research, 2004. 15(2): p. 194-210.18. Attewell, P., Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing. Organization Science, 1992. 3(1): p. 1-19.19. Leonardi, P.M., Activating the Informational Capabilities of Information Technology for Organizational Change. Organization Science, 2007. 18(5): p. 813-831.20. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of
learned from a product realization ret site: Maximizing success for teacher research and high school student impact. in 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22, 2008 - June 24, 2008 (American Society for Engineering Education, 2008).24. Benson, L., Medders, E. & Cass, C. Teachers as scientists: A qualitative study of outcomes for an RET program. in 2010 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 20, 2010 - June 23, 2010 (American Society for Engineering Education, 2010).25. Patton, M. Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. (Sage Publications, Inc, 2001).
design for innovative concept generation. Journal of Mechanical Design, 136(5).24. Fila, N. D., Hess, J. L., Dringenberg, E., & Purzer, Ş. (in press). Exploring the role of empathy in a decontextualized engineering design task. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2).25. Postma, C. E., Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, E., Daemen, E., & Du, J. (2012). Challenges of doing empathic design: Experiences from industry. International Journal of Design, 6(1), 59-70.26. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261-283.27. Young, R. A., & Collin, A. (2004). Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism
. Lu, W., Peng, Y., Shen, Q., and Li, H. (2013). Generic Model for Measuring Benefits of BIM as A Learning Tool in Construction Tasks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(2), 195-203.28. McGraw-Hill Construction. (2009). The Business Value of BIM: Getting Building Information Modeling to the Bottom Line. McGraw-Hill Construction, Bedford, MA.29. McGraw-Hill Construction. (2012). The Business Value of BIM in North America: Multi-Year Trend Analysis and User Ratings (2007-2012). McGraw-Hill Construction, Bedford, MA.30. McGraw-Hill Construction. (2014). The Business Value of BIM for Construction in Major Global Markets: How Contractors Around the World Are Driving Innovation With Building Information
. Service oriented programming: A new paradigm of software reuse.In Software Reuse: Methods, Techniques, and Tools, volume LNCS 2319, pages 39-47, 2002.8. K. Sung, C. Hillyard, R. L. Angotti, M. W. Panitz, D. S. Goldstein, and J. Nordlinger. Game-themedprogramming assignment modules: A path-way for gradual integration of gaming context into existingintroductory programming courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2010.9. Q. Yu, X. Liu, A. Bouguettaya, and B. Medjahed. Deploying and managing web services: issues,solutions, and directions. The VLDB Journal, 17:537-572, May 2008.