draft report due.15 Final presentation and submit written reportVI. Assessing the Team Performance for ABET EC 2000 Table 2 below demonstrates how the assessment of the team’s performance on the projectcan satisfy many of the competencies stated in EC2000’s Criterion 3. The items in the leftcolumn describes the competencies that students are graded on, and the cells marked with an Xshow how they are linked to ABET EC2000’s Criterion 3, items a-k.VII. DESIGN OVERVIEW The design objectives for this project were to improve the video quality and maximize the framerate for the transmission of video between two computers over the Internet and/or a Local AreaNetwork (LAN). A description of the students’ approach is given in
qualities, such as creativity and ethicalreasoning, essential in the context of Industry 5.0 [7]. This conceptual framework has been proposedwith findings obtained from a comprehensive literature review and empirical data from the studentand faculty responses also discussed in this paper. The work analyzes the potential of AI to fosterthese human-centered qualities. The framework suggests dynamic, interdisciplinary learningenvironments and personalized educational trajectories, emphasizing continuous adaptation, lifelonglearning, and addressing the ethical issues of AI application. This approach modernizes engineeringeducation to meet Industry 5.0's demands and promotes comprehensive, human-centered learningexperiences, preparing technically
. Research Team Dr. Walter Lee Malini Josiam Artre Turner Crystal Pee Taylor Johnson Dr. Janice Hall Associate Professor PhD Student PhD Student PhD Student PhD Student Postdoc This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1943811. "Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation
collaborative administration and industry mentorship planning used to increase enrollments of woman and minorities with declared majors in the areas of Computer Science (CS), Engineering (E), Mathematics (M), and Science (S). Currently, Dr. Kappers is the fulltime Di- rector of the Rothwell Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence Worldwide Campus (CTLE – W) for Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. In addition, she holds Adjunct Assistant Professor status in the College of Arts and Sciences, Worldwide Campus, teaching RSCH 202 – Introduction to Research Methods, and in the College of Engineering, Daytona Beach Campus, teaching CS120 – Introduction to Computing in Aviation. Both positions allow her to stay focused upon
individuals mostinvolved in mentoring undergraduate researchers, the invitation emails specifically requested thatthe survey be completed by the individual most involved in mentoring the undergraduate(s).We were surprised to find that, on both surveys, more than 70% of respondents indicated thatthey were faculty members and about 20% of respondents were post-docs or graduate students.The few respondents who selected “other” included a post-bachelor lab manager and otherresearch staff. Table 1 summarizes the respondents’ self-identified roles at the University. Table 1: Respondents by University Role Pre-Survey (n=47) Post-Survey (n=56) What is your role at the
enable engineering schools to produce better-informed retention strategiesand transform engineering education. Page 23.1031.8References1. AAU Undergraduate STEM Initiative. Five-Year Initiative for Improving Undergraduate STEM Education. (AAU, 2011).2. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities. (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1998). at 3. Litzinger, T., Van Meter, P., Kapali, N., Zappe, S. & Toto, R. Translating education research into practice within an engineering
, "Escape rooms for education: A meta-analysis," International Journal of Instruction, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 219-234, 2024.[3] A. I. V. Vörös and Z. Sárközi, "Physics escape room as an educational tool," in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2017, vol. 1916, no. 1: AIP Publishing.[4] S. Nicholson, "Creating engaging escape rooms for the classroom," Childhood Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 44-49, 2018.[5] C. Borrego, C. Fernández, I. Blanes, and S. Robles, "Room escape at class: Escape games activities to facilitate the motivation and learning in computer science," JOTSE, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 162-171, 2017.[6] J. Moffett and D. Cassidy, "Building a digital educational escape room using an online design-thinking
. Ballen, C. Wieman, S. Salehi, J. B. Searle, and K. R. Zamudio, “Enhancing Diversity inUndergraduate Science: Self-Efficacy Drives Performance Gains with Active Learning,” LSE,vol. 16, no. 4, p. ar56, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-12-0344.[3] K. Ellis, “The impact of perceived teacher confirmation on receiver apprehension,motivation, and learning,” Communication Education, vol. 53, no. 1, p. 2, Jan. 2004, doi:10.1080/0363452032000135742.[4] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering,and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, Jun. 2014, doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111.[5] A. Skulmowski and G. D. Rey, “Embodied learning: introducing a taxonomy based on
26, 2024].[6] “14 Grand Challenges for Engineering in the 21st Century.” National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Grand Challenges for Engineering, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspx. [Accessed March 26, 2024].[7] S. B. Parry, "Just what is a competency? (And why should you care?)," Training, vol. 35, (6), pp. 58-64, 1998. [Online]. Available: http://proxy.library.tamu.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/just-what- is-competency-why-should-you-care/docview/203387096/se-2.[8] H. E. Nejad, H., “A systematized literature review: Defining and developing engineering competencies.” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2017, Columbus, Ohio, USA, June 25-28, 2017
iiE.aspx3. Goog le Play On lin e. Goog le Pla y Report: In Ca se o f Em erg ency (ICE). (2012 ). Ju ly 28, 2012 from h ttps://p lay.goog le.co m/sto re/apps/details? id=com. appv en tive.ice4. L a tes t Andro id App s On lin e. Em erg ency Backpa ck App Review. (2012). Ju ly 29, 2012 fro m h ttp ://latestand roid apps.n et/app s/too ls/emer g ency-backp a ck /5. Sk ys cap e On lin e. Fr ee S ky scap e Me d ica l R esou rc e App. (2012). Ju ly 29, 2012 from h ttps://www. sk ys cape.co m/ind ex /ho me . aspx6. Med s cap e Mob ile On lin e. Med s cap e Mob ile App lica tion. (2012) . July 29 , 2012 f ro m h ttp ://www.me d s cape.co m/pub lic/mo b ileapp7. Epo crates On lin e. Epocrates Med ica l App lica tion fo r Andro id. (2012). Ju ly 29
⋅ N t (7)The unfinned area of the air side tubes was calculated from the average distance between fins,and the number of fins in the horizontal and vertical directions using the equation: Aunfin = 2 ⋅ S ⋅ t radiator ⋅ N f ,horizontal ⋅ N f ,vertical (8)The total heat transfer area on the air side was then calculated from the area of the fins, theunfinned area and the fin efficiency by the equation: As = Aunfin + A fin ⋅η (9)The heat transfer area on the ethylene glycol solution side of the tubes was calculated from theheight, length and width of the tubes, using the equation: Asol = 2 ⋅ (H tube + 2
informal interactions between students and faculty. Our research uses Driscoll et al.'s[14] student-faculty interaction assessment model to evaluate students' sense of belonging,incorporating Likert-scale questions and free-response inquiries to capture nuanced aspects oftheir experiences. By focusing on both immediate and lasting impacts, our investigation seeks toidentify improvements in students' perceptions and assess the sustainability of these positiveoutcomes over time.This study contributes to the broader discourse on student engagement, community building, andretention strategies in engineering or higher education in general with the translation from BMEeducation. The findings not only provide insights into the effectiveness of informal
,findings could inform guidelines and professional development for faculty and administrators onfacilitating constructive race dialogues among student populations. Outreach targeting familiesand communities may also be warranted to align messaging across spaces. Future work can delvedeeper into student backgrounds including where students spend their formative years and thetype of college they currently attend.References[1] K. Lajtha and S. Saini, “Biogeochemistry statement on #ShutDownSTEM and Black Lives Matter,” Biogeochemistry, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 237–237, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10533-020- 00682-7.[2] N. Subbaraman, “How #BlackInTheIvory put a spotlight on racism in academia,” Nature, vol. 582, no. 7812, Art. no. 7812, Jun. 2020
within interdisciplinary tracks may have difficulty navigating the epistemologicalassumptions and expectations of their professors.Conceptual framework In our study, we adopt a modified typology of epistemologies expressed in Cruz et al.’s(2021) work on student epistemologies. While they acknowledge that it is difficult to list allepistemologies (and that what precisely counts as an epistemology is contested), they provide auseful framework for this study. Specifically, they highlight nine epistemological positions: Positivism: A belief that there is an objective truth that can be discerned throughscientific methods. Knowledge is gained by understanding that objective truth. Post-positivism: A relaxed version of positivism
of this work is to examine how students view online assessment in introductory engineering courses likestatics. Quizzes and tests with mostly formula type questions were used for assessment in this study. Through the use of assessmenttools and options available, tests and quizzes were designed so that each student obtained different versions of the exam or the quiz. Atthe end of semester, surveys were distributed to obtain student feedback on the assessment methods. The questionnaires were designedto obtain a student’ s r esponse on effectiveness, scheduling, flexibility, and lear ning r obustness, to name a few. As a r esul t, this studyfound that students prefer certain aspects of online assessment. This assessment type allows students
Paper ID #45761A Gender-based Comparative Analysis of Motivations and Challenges in ConstructionEducationDr. Saeed Rokooei, Mississippi State University Saeed Rokooei is an associate professor in the Department of Building Construction Science at Mississippi State University. Dr. Rokooei’s primary research interests include community resilience, engineering education, simulation and serious games, project management methodologies, data analytics, creativity and innovation, and emerging technologies.Mr. George D Ford P.E., Mississippi State University Dr. George Ford P.E. is the Director of Mississippi Stateˆa C™s Building
by National Science Foundation Experiential Learning for Emergingand Novel Technologies (ExLENT), Award No. ITE- 2322532. References:1. Teaching Critical Skills in Robotic Automation: iR-Vision 2D Course in Robotic Vision Development and Implementation, A. Sergeyev, S. Parmar, N. Alaraje, Technology Interface International Journal, 013-T-16, V17, #2, p. 13, 2017.2. Robotics and Automation Professional Development Workshop for Faculty, A. Sergeyev, N. Alaraje, Technology Interface International Journal, V17, #1, p.99, 2016.3. University, Community College and Industry Partnership: Revamping Robotics Education to Meet 21st Century Workforce Needs, A. Sergeyev, N. Alaraje, S. Kuhl
' cultural backgrounds and departmental culture might influencestudents’ motivational orientations.References[1] A. Wigfield and J. S. Eccles, “Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 68–81, 2000, doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.[2] J. Guo, P. D. Parker, H. W. Marsh, and A. J. S. Morin, “Achievement, motivation, and educational choices: A longitudinal study of expectancy and value using a multiplicative perspective,” Dev. Psychol., vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 1163–1176, 2015, doi: 10.1037/a0039440.[3] J. Allen and S. Robbins, “Effects of Interest-Major Congruence, Motivation, and Academic Performance on Timely Degree Attainment,” J. Couns. Psychol., vol. 57, no. 1
opportunity to improve access and support to increase gender diversity in these spaces.Other literature points to methods of studying student experience and emotion when using CAD fordesign, such as Villanueva et al.’s 2018 multimodal study on emotions and electrodermal activity indesign activities [59], which could have applications for finding ways of making CAD software moreaccessible. Similarly, Zhou et al. [60], Phadnis et al. [61], and Deng et al.’s [62] studies point to multi-user CAD as a new technology with the potential for higher user engagement, collaboration, and learning.Unfortunately, these studies, even when they report participant gender, are limited by a lack of genderanalysis, thus failing to report on how women may experience
with digital savvy, new skills in innovating and collaborating, problemframing expertise, and horizontal leadership skills, while putting emphasis on the impacts in theeconomic development of rural regions.In the initial stages, 1990’s–2000’s, the program’s faculty spent time innovating in courses andcurricula trying to shift towards the recently released ABET 2000 student outcome criteria in arural community college setting. The mid-2000’s brought the development of a multi-disciplinary upper division university satellite program that embraced the Aalborg (DK) modelof PBL. The new multi-disciplinary program had ABET outcomes at its core, focusing on thedevelopment of a whole new engineer, especially developing innovative strategies
, MS1:Milestone 1, in which student teams present their preliminary design ideas. (Note that in thetranscript the pseudo-student/Instructor 2 refers to “MS1”.)Besides building a fully functional autonomous OSV, each ENES100 team is assigned a missionto solve with their OSV design. The students will test their OSVs in a sand pit containinggeographical features such as a liquid pool and varying terrain. In the context of the role-play,pseudo-student/Instructor 2’s “team” was assigned the chemical mission; the “team” had tomeasure and neutralize the pH of the liquid in the pool.The fishbowl structure of the design review roleplay included an inner and outer circle of UTFs.The inner part of the fishbowl contained pseudo-student/Instructor 2 and
Collaboration ReflectionSelf-Reflection AssignmentsThe self-evaluation rubric has been incorporated into a junior-level chemical engineeringundergraduate course through self-reflection assignments. Five times during the semester,students were given an essay prompt to identify one or more skills to work on in the followingtwo-week period (first essay) or one-month period (subsequent essays except the last). Studentswere asked to assess their current proficiency level in that skill according to the self-evaluationrubric, describe their goals related to the skill and their plan for improvement, and share progressin the skill(s) if any had been made since the previous essay. This process required the
over the course of the semester, ensuring that each GTA workedwith each undergraduate precalculus assistant and with all or nearly all of the otherundergraduates. The content of the combined course was closely connected to the precalculusclassrooms at the university and to cooperating teacher classrooms at the high schools.Pedagogical content knowledge was addressed directly and repeatedly, as were reflection onpractice and professional identity.Use of Cases in the Combined CourseIn the 1990’s, the Harvard Mathematics Case Development Project (HMCDP) sought to establisha basis of cases for the preparation of mathematics teaching professionals. Several of those caseswere published as Windows on Teaching Math: Case Studies in Middle and
V2 V2 = Q& net,in + W&net,in + d Esys ∑ m& i h + + gz − ∑ m& e h + + gz Energy dt in 2 i out 2 e Q& j + S&gen with S&gen ≥ 0 d Entropy dt Ssys = ∑Tj + ∑ m&
were associated with academic and social engagement outcomes.These findings on perceived development are further supported by Simmons et al.’s [33] surveyof undergraduate engineering students. Students reported personal development, socialdevelopment, and social engagement as the greatest benefits of participating in extra-/co-curricularactivities. The most common types of participation were in job; sports; design competition team;culture, faith, gender, and identity; and professional experiences (e.g., internships). The variety inthese top activities illustrates a range of engineering student involvement in both engineering andnon-engineering activities. Other studies have affirmed distinct benefits of non-engineering versusengineering
statusquo. As we, as engineering educators, look to the future work of pre-college engineering,continuing to learn with and from BIPOC youth and designing experiences towards counteringexclusion remains vital continued work.References[1] A. Johri and B. M. Olds, “Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 151–185, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x.[2] G. J. Kelly and J. L. Green, Theory and Methods for Sociocultural Research in Science and Engineering Education. Routledge, 2018.[3] K. L. Gunckel and S. Tolbert, “The imperative to move toward a dimension of care in engineering education,” Journal of Research in
serves as a guide to other departments seeking ways to bridge their advisors andfaculty.Literature ReviewAcademic advising emerged in the mid-1800’s when colleges began to develop programs withelectives and more academic choices [19]. College administrators noted that students neededguidance in navigating their growing course options and class electives as colleges introducedmore majors and career paths [5]. Kenyon College was one of the first colleges that required theirstudents to choose a faculty member to assist them in this process and mentorship [20]. Aboutthirty years later, Johns Hopkins University would establish one of the first formal advising modelsbetween students and faculty members [21]. During these early years, the faculty would
faculty (VF) ○ Motivation: Decrease workload and increase project variety ● 2020-21 Single principal instructor model with assigned collaborative faculty (AF) ○ Motivation: Maintain project variety and reduce faculty workload while short- staffed lead instructors ● 2021-22 Multi-instructor model with split responsibilities (MI-S) ○ Motivation: address workload and project management difficulties of previous models 6 NUMBEROFPARTICIPATINGFACULTY 5
LIS scholarship, Peterson believes that multiculturalism has“clogged our literature primarily with the mantra ‘Everyone is different, and isn't that special?’[4]” Observing a superficial treatment of these underlying issues with little reflection or analysison the implications for our practice, Honma [26] builds on Peterson’s work, noting that althoughLIS scholarship often uses words like diversity, equity, and inclusion when discussing race andracism, “the precise reasons why we need to ‘diversify’ seldom receive(s) any close scrutiny.”Honma goes on to say that “the focus on concepts such as ‘diversity’ and ‘ethnicity’ elides anymention of race, problematically divorcing these terms from the distinct power relations of theirracialized