thatwould directly impact the community and foster students’ appreciation for the relationshipbetween engineering and social responsibility.Fostering students’ “Base Skills,” a facet of the professional development realm related tosocially responsible engineering, as defined by Canney and Bielefeldt,1 aligns with the project’sconnection between technical abilities and resultant societal benefits. This connection is viewedas imperative for developing future engineers’ attitudes towards human-centered design and theirroles in society.2,3 Similarly, ABET calls for holistic skillsets that encompass both technicalskills and “an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility,” while the NationalAcademy of Engineering has emphasized the
feedback provided by individual students, the platform functions to dividea large class into multiple small study groups, within which, students can engage in peerinstruction to learn from each other. Meanwhile, the platform will provide instructor with theaggregated, analyzed, and visualized student feedback, which can be used to redesigninstruction in classroom. Made possible by the Viterbi iPodia platform at University ofSouthern California, this platform has been tested based on a technology-enabledinternational course that was attended by 138 students from 8 global universities.IntroductionThe instructional strategy of flipped classroom is increasingly embraced by the engineeringeducation community [1-2]. According to the survey conducted by
not attendthe conference, Donna Reese participated in this paper. The guiding questions for chairsconcerned: the influence of their leadership of the WIED on their career, their perspective on theclimate for women, the main issues the division faced when they were chair, and what researchquestions people should be asking now.IntroductionOn the occasion of the 125th anniversary of the American Society for Engineering Education, apanel of past chairs of the Women in Engineering Division (WIED) were assembled to discuss keyquestions they faced as Chairs of WIED during their two years of leadership. The chairs wereleaders of the division acrosstwenty years, selected in Table 1: Past Chair, Chair, Chair Elect/Program Chair and
developing educational software applications. The intent was to showhow computing and engineering professionals could make a positive difference in the lives ofothers, even if limited to working from behind a computer screen. However, the project waslargely self-directed by the students, as each team picked the subject for a provided grade leveland then wrote a software application for it. While the project allowed students to displaytechnical competency, it embraced a person-centric view towards learning as an internal process.In his seminal work, Kolb discusses the characteristics associated with the concept ofexperiential learning [1], where thoughts and ideas are not fixed, but are formed and reformedthrough continuous processes grounded in
formation as engineersand non-engineers work together. While we understand this study to be limited in scope, thefeedback provides preliminary evidence for collaborative research across disciplines and howprofessional skills are fostered in the classroom.IntroductionUndergraduate engineering students are often trained in disciplinary concepts and techniques oftheir specializations, but are rarely given opportunities to work with collaborators from differentdisciplines. In Gary Lee Downey’s words, the very educational processes “producing engineersas outcomes” [1] may neglect key professional skills that those engineers need.Skills that relate to collaborating with peers in different disciplines are increasingly necessary forpracticing engineers
importance of supporting women as underrepresented participants intheir university-based STEM community. They felt a personal responsibility to share theirinsights as academically and socially integrated upperclassmen. Findings suggest that mentoringprograms should leverage the skills and achievements of peer mentors while enhancing theirleadership transitions through the development of the self-determination of their mentees.IntroductionGender disparities in participation in engineering have been persistent in the U.S. for manyyears. Although the number of bachelor‘s degrees in engineering gradually increased by about30% from 2000 to 2012, the actual number of degrees awarded to women has remained nearlyconstant (Figure 1). In light of the increase
from different universities,undeclared first-year students, and a few students in different majors, including students from theSustainable Urban Environments degree program who are required to take this class during theirfirst or second year,The objectives of the Introduction to Civil Engineering course are 1. List the subdisciplines of civil engineering, identify types of projects that engage each, and understand the multidisciplinary nature of most large infrastructure projects; 2. Explain the overall role of civil engineers in design and operation of urban infrastructure, with understanding of the range of typical day-to-day tasks and responsibilities; 3. Discuss the ethical responsibilities of engineers to their
this paper describes a Linear Systems laboratory project that involves designing a simplifiedspeech recognition system to recognize the 5 long vowel sounds for a team of 3 or 4 students. Thisproject is assigned soon after the student has been introduced to the Fourier Transform in theassociated Linear Systems lecture course. This paper describes the Laboratory project byillustrating the solution with a specific example drawn from real data for a single student team.This laboratory project has the primary goals: 1. Understand the importance of the Fourier Spectrum for developing useful signal analysis algorithms and systems. 2. Develop a speaker-independent vowel classification system to distinguish the 5 long vowel sounds for a
. Introduction Spatial reasoning is an important predictor of student success in STEM fields [1], [2]. Sorby reports that spatial cognition has been a focus of research for nearly a century. One important part of spatial cognition is "spatial visualization, which is defined as the process of 'apprehending, encoding, and mentally manipulating three dimensional spatial forms'" [3]. Given this importance of spatial visualization, an important question is if and how students' spatial visualization skills can be developed. Sorby studied the effect of students taking a 1-credit spatial skills course, and found multiple benefits: improved performance in introductory
, diversity, and inclusion in Additive Manufacturing.IntroductionAdditive manufacturing (AM) is a set of processes by which physical objects are made from digitalfiles generated by computer-aided design software. The term encompasses seven differenttechnologies, as per ASTM nomenclature [1], powder bed fusion, material jetting, directed energydeposition, binder jetting, vat photo polymerization, material extrusion and sheet lamination.These technologies use a variety of feedstock materials such as polymers, metals, ceramics, andconcrete by systematically depositing layer upon layer to create a near net shape of the final partrequired. As opposed to traditional machining techniques like CNC, milling, machining, in AM,material is added instead of
experiences of these womenin the engineering workplace. This systematized literature review synthesizes research on theexperiences of women within the non-academic, engineering workplace. This review examinesfemale engineers from an international perspective and is not limited to female engineers in theUnited States. Using scholarly articles, this review seeks to answer the following questions: 1)What types of experiences do women in the engineering workforce encounter in the workplace?2) How do these experiences influence women to leave or persist in the engineering workforce?In addition to answering the following questions, this review also seeks to identify any areaswhere further research is warranted. Using qualitative methods and analysis, three
engineeringinstructors often form teams in the classrooms. However, many factors can affect theeffectiveness of teamwork. One factor that could affect the result of teaming is the diversityin teams. Although team diversity could increase creativity and innovation in teams, if notmanaged well, it could also have negative consequences for teams. Of the various forms ofdiversity, race and gender have received the most attention in the literature, likely becausethey provide visual cues to teammates. In this study, we conducted a systematized literaturereview related to the race and gender in teamwork. To do this systematized literature reviewwe followed the procedure suggested by Borrego, Foster, and Froyd [1]. We searched fourdifferent databases including
pipeline and graduationrates. The process has also deepened our understanding of the needs of students in terms ofhow to better align student career aspirations with industry workforce needs. Theeffectiveness of the collaborative model could be replicated among other institutionsinterested in promoting engineering degrees among Hispanic and low income students.INTRODUCTIONPowerful indicators suggest that there may be more than 1 million new jobs in STEM fieldsby the year 2026, and, as a group, they will grow twice as fast as the average for alloccupations in the economy, according to recent projections by the Department of Labor,Bureau of Labor Statistics [1]. Equally powerful indicators suggest that Hispanics are one ofthe fastest growing
school is a small Historically Black College and University (HBCU) which offersengineering programs in civil engineering, electrical engineering, industrial engineering andtransportation systems. We serve a very diverse student population of about 1,300 undergraduatestudents in the School of Engineering (SOE) along with 135 graduate students pursuing master’sand doctoral programs. The engineering programs are supported by 35 full time faculty andabout 30 adjunct instructors. All four engineering programs are currently preparing for ABETreaccreditation in Fall 2019. Three programs are to be reviewed under the EngineeringAccreditation Commission (EAC); Civil, Electrical and Industrial Engineering [1] and oneprogram under the Applied and Natural
, affirms, and values the worth of individuals, families, and communities and protects and preserves the dignity of each. (2015)Diversity needs to remain an educational—not just administrational—goal to enrich theeducational experience of students and increase the cultural competence of the academiccommunity. Among the standards listed by the ACRL are: 1) Cultural awareness of self andothers; 2) Cross-cultural knowledge and skills; 3) Organizational and professional values; 4)Development of collections, programs, and services; 5) Service delivery; 6) Language diversity;7) Workforce diversity; 8) Organizational dynamics; 9) Cross-cultural leadership; 10)Professional education and continuous learning; and 11) Research. These standards
well as identifying barriers thatmay disproportionately affect Black men or women.BackgroundThe need to diversify engineeringIn recent decades, the emphasis on increasing the number of engineering graduates has beencoupled with greater concern about the lack of diversity in engineering fields. Research hasidentified the benefits of identity diversity (e.g., race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status,etc.) in engineering education, including more innovative groups [1], greater engagement inactive thinking processes, growth in intellectual engagement and motivation, and an increase inacademic skills [2, 3]. A variety of educational policies and programs have been initiated toboost participation and increase graduation rates of under
looking incompetent, to avoid a lowscore, etc. Students can be high in all three, low in all three, or have a mix of motivations. Thereis a strong literature on achievement orientation in higher education, though it typically is notspecific to the engineering context; most studies suggest that students with a high learningorientation are more likely to persist in a difficult context and more likely to take on a task with alower degree of expectancy of success. It also seems that men are more likely to hold highperformance orientations than women [1-4].In the academic orientation literature, achievement orientation is hypothesized to affect howstudents select academic tasks in a rather neutral-of-context process: Students with high
, Joshua Enszer, PhD2, Tia N. Barnes, PhD1, Rachel Davidson, PhD2 2 1 University of Delaware, College of Education and Human Development 2 University of Delaware, College of EngineeringIntroductionThe underrepresentation of women and underrepresented minorities (URM, def. non-White, non-Asian) in engineering undergraduate programs can be attributed to a multitude of factors,including, but not limited to, insufficient access to high-quality curriculum and instruction andbarriers in recruiting into engineering programs at the K-12 level, low self-efficacy, lack of peersupport, inadequate academic advising or faculty support, harmful stereotypes of
Engineering Education, 2019 Affordances of Engineering for Elementary-aged English Learners (Fundamental, Diversity)IntroductionEnglish learners are a rapidly growing population in elementary schools [1, 2]. Over 16% ofchildren entering kindergarten are English learners and this number is growing [3]. Thesestudents bring a wealth of perspectives and ideas to the classroom and need the opportunity toparticipate in classroom experiences, including those in engineering, science, and math, todevelop interest in and knowledge of these fields. Currently English learners areunderrepresented in STEM fields. Tapping the ideas and knowledge of English learners isimportant to bring greater equity to school systems, advance the
forms of collaboration between differentengineering disciplines for the development of integrated products such as automobiles [1]. Thedefinition of transdisciplinarity was provided by Ertas, who defined it as “the integrated use ofthe tools, techniques, and methods from various disciplines” as it is concerned with what is“simultaneously between disciplines, across different disciplines, and beyond all disciplines”,and was discussed with the general design process and transdisciplinary approaches to teachingdesign in the previous work [1,13,14]. In contemporary industrial practice, engineeringspecialists are required to work in teams, follow the same design process steps, effectivelycommunicate, and exercise professional skills. A line of
help students develop a high level of design self-efficacy, the belief in one’s ability to complete engineering design tasks. Engineers problem-solve by practicing design tasks. As a result, design self-efficacy is a critical component of asuccessful engineer [1]. Preparing students to become successful engineers, in both industry andacademia, therefore demands that design tasks be taught to a level where students may obtainself-efficacy [2, 3]. The importance of design tasks has also been acknowledged by theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). This work seeks to measure theimpact of different variables on design self-efficacy, based on the specific project experiences ofthe students at the end of their two-semester
program available to all majors; the program’s scope includes a portfolio of 25 teams, 900 students from 35 majors, 38 faculty involved in advising and instruction, and an annual operating budget of over $1 million. From 2006-2015, Rick worked as the Sponsored Projects Manager for Michigan Tech’s Enterprise and Senior Design Programs, where he was successful in securing more than $6 million in externally-sponsored projects for these programs. Since 2008, Rick has also served as the faculty advisor to Michigan Tech’s Supermileage Systems Enterprise, a multidisciplinary team who develops energy-efficient vehicles for the SAE Supermileage and Shell Eco- marathon vehicle design competitions. c
types of research activities the teams participated in, thecontent and focus of the professional development activities, and an overview of the developedlesson plans.1. IntroductionAs an aspect of the extensive K-12 outreach and extension activities of The Engineering Place inthe College of Engineering at NC State University the authors submitted and were awarded anNSF Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) Site[1] grant. The grant concept involves stratifiedlaboratory research teams working on aspects of NAE Engineering Grand Challenge[2]-focusedproblems including: sustainability (solar/renewable energy), health (biomechanics), security(computer network security), and joy of living (personalized learning). Each research teamincludes one
creating social-scientific experts outside ofengineering [1].Upon this foundation, the challenge of adding social justice to the engineering curriculum beganto be discussed. In 2008, the National Science Foundation sponsored a workshop on SocialJustice, Sustainable Community Development and Engineering at the National Academy ofEngineering, which included a session titled “Implications for Engineering Education” [2]. Inreflecting on the workshop, lead workshop organizer, Rachelle Hollander, noted that “thequestion of engineering and social justice was a hotly contested topic at the meeting, whilehumanitarianism and engineering or engineering and social responsibility was not. Someengineers did not think social justice (whatever it was) was an
technical problem solvers anddesigners. For example, the National Academy of Engineering envisions engineers who “willremain well grounded in the basics of mathematics and science, and who will expand their visionof design through a solid grounding in the humanities, social sciences, and economics” and whowill “rapidly embrace the potentialities offered by creativity, invention, and cross disciplinaryfertilization to create and accommodate new fields of endeavor, including those that requireopenness to interdisciplinary efforts with nonengineering disciplines such as science, socialscience, and business” [1]. The American Society of Civil Engineers suggests that “civilengineers will serve as master builders, environmental stewards, innovators and
)program for ten years [1, 2, 3] . In 2008, the US National Academy of Engineering (NAE)announced 14 Grand Challenges in engineering that require solutions in the 21st century. This listincludes the challenge to “provide access to clean water” [4]. This RET program is motivated bythis challenge, and aims to support thirty high school through community college teachers in theeducation of our youth about the interdisciplinary aspects of water research. The intention is thatthe teachers can then bring these experiences into their classrooms to educate local students aboutcritical water issues. To accomplish this, the Water ECubeG (Engineering, Ecology, Environment,Geosciences) site was developed by an interdisciplinary team of faculty and graduate
Committee for International Conference on ReConFigurable Computing and FPGAs in 2013 and IEEE Journal of Transactions on VLSI Systems in 2016.Ana Cristina Cadavid,Dr. Vicki A. Pedone, California State University Northridge c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 AnInterdisciplinaryTeamBasedResearchInitiativeThroughActiveLearningtoIncreaseUndergraduateStudents’Motivation,Engagement, andRetention Shahnam Mirzaei1, Ph.D., Ana C. Cadavid2, Ph.D., Vicki A. Pedone3, Ph.D. California State University, Northridge CA 91330, USA 1 smirzaei@csun.edu, 2ana.cadavid@csun.edu, 3vicki.pedone@csun.edu
mentality that is no longer met by traditional passive teaching approaches. Thestudents crave new strategies which encompass authentic exploration and learning, visualstimulation and community-based practices [1].Several pedagogical paradigms have been proposed to help better engineering education;Constructivist, constructionist, and action-based learning theories help lay the pedagogicalfoundation needed to adapt instruction in higher education to meet this need [2]. The foundationfrom these theories provides instructional methods that help promote critical-thinking,experimental inquiry and collaboration while the use of technology plays a vital role incontributing to access and manipulation of information along with knowledge retention [3]–[5
job placement rates through mandatory paid co-op experiences, and (iv)to serve as a model for other universities to provide vertical transfer students access to thebaccalaureate degree.VTAB project is funded by a five-year grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) thatbegan in September 2017. In its program solicitation [1], NSF stated its goals to be: (i) toincrease the number of low-income academically talented students in STEM, (ii) to improve theeducation of these STEM students, and (iii) to generate knowledge to advance understanding offactors that lead to the success of these students. VTAB is leveraging the lessons learned from anearlier TiPi (Transfer Pipeline) project to achieve the first two goals [2]. The third goal