speakers in Chinese andEnglish, to better understand the effects of foreign language on ethical judgments. Finally, asmentioned above, this survey will be re-administered to participants on a yearly basis for the nextthree years, to check the reliability of the MFQ and the effects of education on the normativeperspectives described here.References[1] S. Canaves, “Shanghai building collapses, nearly intact,” Wall Street Journal, 29-Jun-2009. [Online]. Available: https://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2009/06/29/shanghai-building- collapses-nearly-intact/. [Accessed: 13-Apr-2018].[2] J. Berlinger, “22 killed in China building collapse,” CNN, 11-Oct-2016.[3] “China bullet train crash ‘caused by design flaws,’” BBC, 28-Dec-2011
al. Knowledge Management in 2004 Ireland 14 behaviors of students Leckie et al.'s[44] Project-Based Learning studying to become (PBL*) Engineering Teams professionals. Modifying the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) engineeringLeachman
models, statewide pre-college math initiatives, teacher and faculty professional development programs, and S-STEM pro- grams.Ms. Olivia W. Murch, Purdue University Senior at Purdue University pursuing a Bachelor of Science degree in Biological, Food Process, Engi- neering. Currently conducting research under Dr. Ferguson through Engineering Education.Dr. Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Daniel M. Ferguson is CATME Managing Director and a research associate at Purdue University. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position he was Associate Director of the Inter-Professional Studies
include an attitude theory based instrument forcollecting information entrepreneurship orientation, a multi-part socio economic statusinstrument, and several additional questions developed by the authors to collect information toexplore ties between demographic and attitude measures of entrepreneurship.Instrument – Entrepreneurship ComponentThe attitude theory component, consisting of 75 Likert-type items, is a modified version of theEntrepreneurial Attitudes and Orientation (EAO) instrument originally developed by Robinson etal16. This instrument, developed in the early 1990’s, used two discrete populations: a populationof entrepreneurs and a population of non-entrepreneurs. The goal of the instrument is toestablish an attitude theory based
Computer Science (CS) and Integrated Science andTechnology (ISAT) departments who provided critical insight regarding the design of the coursewhich could address the issue of mobile technology development for social good.9. References[1]. Burd, B., Barros, J. a. P., Johnson, C., Kurkovsky, S., Rosenbloom, A., and Tillman, N.“Educating for mobile computing: Addressing the new challenges”. in ITiCSE-WGR 12, 2012,pp. 51-63[2]. Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., and Palincsar, A.“Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning”, EducationalPsychologist, Vol. 26 No. 3, 1991, pp. 369-398[3]. Thomas, A. and Zyl, A. V., Understanding of and attitudes to academic ethics among first
with this list that it comes from their memory: T, P, v, u, h, and s. The listcan expand with additional properties, but this is often a sufficient list for many problems. Theinstructor then asks students to evaluate each property to see if it is known or unknown. Maybethe property is clearly given in the problem statement, or it may be determinable from theinformation given in the problem statement. Students are encouraged to find two properties thatare either known or determinable. Again, students appear lost when T and P aren’t thedeterminable properties. In some problems, T and v may be the determinable properties, thenthis leads to a sequence of steps to determine how to evaluate other properties such as P, given Tand v. In many cases
students.Brief History Figure 1. The History of Linear AlgebraIn the 1960s (Figure 1), a group of mathematicians, notably associated with the Bourbaki Schoolsuch as J. Dieudonné and S. Lang, advocated for a significant overhaul in mathematicseducation, labeling it "Modern Mathematics." They believed that what students learned shouldmatch how mathematicians were logically constructing math at the time. Consequently, LinearAlgebra became a highly abstract and formalized subject. Aspects like Analytic Geometry andMatrix Calculus were largely overlooked in favor of emphasizing complex mathematicalstructures. The focus shifted away from intuition towards a more rigorous exploration of thesestructures, making Linear Algebra a
Foundationdivisions of Engineering Education and Centers in the CAREER program under Grant No.1943805 and the Graduate Fellowship Program under grant no. DGE-2241144. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005, p. 11338. doi: 10.17226/11338.[2] J. Mills and D. Treagust, “Engineering education - Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer?,” Australas. Assoc. Eng. Educ., vol. 3, 2003.[3] D. Therriault, E. Douglas, E. Buten, E. Bates, J. Waisome, and M. Berry
Paper ID #41514Use of Theories in Extended Reality Educational Studies: A Systematic LiteratureReviewDr. Kimia Moozeh, Queen’s University Kimia Moozeh is a research associate at Queen’s university in Engineering Education. Her PhD dissertation at University of Toronto explored improving the learning outcomes of undergraduate laboratories. Her research interests are lab-based learning, online learning and metacognition.Dr. Paul Cameron Hungler P.Eng., Dr. Paul Hungler is an assistant professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Ingenuity Labs at Queenˆa C™s University. Prior to starting his current position, Major
then submit first select Solar data Figure 5. Parameter selection screen for desired location.5. The next screen will display the data, see Figure 6. Only one row of the data is needed for the analysis: the "tilt 39" row which represents the radiation for a panel tilted at the geographic latitude for this location. However, to keep track of the header information, select the range of data shown in Figure 6 using a mouse. Copy the highlighted field and then paste into a M/S Excel worksheet. When performing the pasting it is important to "paste special/unicode text" to create a nice set of column delimited data as shown in Figure 7. Page 22.1245.6
White Male Tenure Track 1-5 Brownland University Kermit White Male Tenure Track 5-10 Brownland University Michael White Male Tenured >20 University C Rick White Male Tenured 10-15 Brownland University Sam White Female Tenured 5-10 Brownland University Sarah White Female Lecturer 15-20 Brownland University Sarah S White Female Tenure Track 5-10 Brownland University Scott White Male Tenured 15-20 Brownland University Suze
; BackgroundAssigning grades as a practice in educational systems has been used commonly since the early1900’s [1]. Grades are globally ubiquitous to students’ academic success. Whether representedalphabetically (A, B, C, D, & F) or numerically (through percentages or grade-point averages)grades can be considered a universal language taught to nearly everyone as early as primary andelementary school.Grades are a practice tool and serve dual function in educational systems. Formative assessmentsare ideally low stakes assignments that happen multiple times in a way that scaffolds studentlearning and development and deliver frequent real-time feedback to students [2], [3], so anygrades that are a result of a formative assessments (e.g., homework, quizzes
values. In addition, discrete compounding or continuous compounding can be used. Finally, the BSM equations or the BS option table can be used. Shown below are solutions for all combinations of the alternatives, except using the BS option table. a) T = 24, discrete compounding, with rf = (1.04)1/12 -1 = 0.003274 and F = sqrt[(0.30)2/12)] = 8.6603%. S = $55.00, X = $58.50, d1 = {ln(55/58.50) + [ln(1.003274) + (0.086603)2/2](24)}/ [0.086603sqrt(24)] = 0.25161, d2 = 0.25161 - 0.086603sqrt(24) = -0.17266, N(d1) = 0.59933, N(d2) = 0.43146, and C = 55(0.59933) - 58.50(0.43146)/(1.04)2 = $9.63 b) T = 24, continuous compounding, with rf = ln(1.04)/12 = 0.0032684 and F = sqrt[(0.30)2/12) = 8.6603%. S = $55.00, X = $58.50, d1 = {ln(55
perceive their learning experiences in laboratory environments (remote and in-person)? The study was conducted at a Research-1 institution in the Northeastern region of the UnitedStates in a capstone senior engineering laboratory course. Qualitative and quantitative data wascollected via post-questionnaires and interviews. Data was analyzed in terms of laboratoryenvironment, i.e., in-person or virtual/remote and student background/experiences as described ininterviews. This work will help researchers and educators understand what aspects of courseevaluation instruments are useful in comparing laboratory environments and how theseinstruments relate or inform the instructor about perceived usefulness of course content andmechanism(s) of
literature, and the media.Yet, once past the title and initial discussion, the focus invariably is on entrepreneurship – notinnovation. This focus on entrepreneurship is fueled by the excitement of “the start-upexperience,” the aura of its founders as entrepreneurs, and the community for economicdevelopment. “Entrepreneurship leverages innovation to create value” [10] and “entrepreneursneed to search purposely for the sources of innovation” [11] to be successful. Whereas“[i]nnovation – or practical creativity – is mainly about making new ideas useful [and] aninnovator…solve[s] old problems with new ideas…or solve[s] new problems with old ideas usedin radically different ways.” [12] Innovation is possible without entrepreneurship
code for creation and analysis of a cam profile.%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Program Name: CamAnalysis%%Program Description: Analyzes and Creates Cam Profile%%Inputs: Number of Zones and the Parametersassociated with% each%%Outputs: S,V,A,J Curves, Force, Power, Torque,Pressure Angle,% and Cam Profile Plots. Tabular Data Sets.Max Values.%%Date Created: 11-5-2016%%Revisions:%%0) 11-5-2016 Creation%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%clearclc%Parameters%s_harmonic = @(h,theta,Beta,Beta_time) h/2*(1-cos(pi*theta/Beta));v_harmonic = @(h,theta,Beta,Beta_time)pi*h/2/Beta_time
assessment instruments.III. E XPERIMENTAL S TUDY D ESIGNBuilding on the related research and pedagogical underpinnings in Section II, we consider herethe design of the experimental study. The primary hypothesis of the research study is as follows:“There exists significant improvement in the engagement, student interest, and motivation forsoftware engineering content using an integrated approach of active and deign-based learningcompared to traditional teaching approaches.” Traditional approaches refer to a combinationof lectures, tutorials and lab sessions for a software engineering course.To test this hypothesis, the experimental study included the design of software-engineeringcourse content, coordination of the study’s control (traditional) and
m questionns for the daay; see Sectiion 3.3. Thesequestions provided th he rationale for coveringg the materiaal on a particcular day. When W viewedd atthe end of o the semestter the questtions represeented a frameework withinn which the course wasorchestraated and a means m for the students to frame their Semester S Leearning Essaays.3.1 Courrse organizaationThe relattionship betw ween the teaam organizattion and the course c conteent is displayyed in Figuree 2
questions are presented in Table 4.Table 4 – Survey questions administered to participants. # Survey Questions and their Intended KSBA Model Elements SQ1 What ideas, concepts, knowledge, or facts have you learned? (K) SQ2 What skills have you developed? (S) How have some of your behaviors, habits, or practices changed, and/or what are SQ3 new ones that you have developed or adopted? (B) How have some of your attitudes or beliefs changed, and/or what are new ones SQ4 that you have developed or adopted? (A) Based on what you now know and have studied, how do you understand the idea SQ5 of Sustainability? (K) What
assignment(s). Cheating students would struggle to answer questions abouta paper they did not write, and the teacher would be more easily alerted to deceptive acts. Therefore, Agile educationcould increase student accountability, and perhaps deter cheating. Additionally, the rising use of large-scale, transformer-based models in daily life is apparent: students have and willuse them during the course of their education [16]. It may be possible, however, to ameliorate this seeming dilemma.Students could be required to use GPT or BERT for particular assignments, where they must then edit, revise andannotate the automatically generated assignment through their own effort, showing, with references or sound reasoning,how the model arrived to this
theparticipant to select an answer or multiple answers to a question, which correspond to one of thefour learning styles, each participant’s answers for each learning style were totaled. 1. Difference in Brain ActivationThe brain activations were averaged across all brain waves and across all brain regions for eachDesign Problem. Utilizing a t-test, it was determined that there were significant changes in brainactivations across multiple regions and across the varying waves. To further the conclusions ofthe results, a t-test was applied to each set to the individual brain waves to decisively determinewhich brain wave(s) and brain regions caused these strong correlations. The results of this testindicated that the Beta Low frequency was the most
accommodation does not appear to work witha course structure, the disability office can often help to adapt the accommodation to the course.3) Do not ask students to disclose their disabilities.When a student has obtained accommodations through the university, they have gone throughthe process of providing their official diagnosis(s) and the appropriate paperwork for experts todetermine their accommodations. The information an instructor receives will simply state thatthe student has a disability, and will outline the associated accommodations, but will not revealthe disability diagnosis. While it might seem like a harmless question, an instructor asking astudent to disclose their disability can be a frightening thing.1,28 Students are not obligated
the formal introduction of SLRs to the field of engineering education in 2014by Borrego and colleagues, increasing trends in SLR use and impact were observed. While thegoal of SLRs is to answer a clearly formulated (set of) research question(s), the goal of SMRs isto define and describe the broader landscape of existing scholarly research on a topic. In this way,SMRs may be particularly useful for defining the scope of follow-on SLRs in engineeringeducation research.Keywords: literature reviews, systematic maps, systematic mapping reviews, systematic literaturereviews, engineering education Introduction The field of engineering education research (EER) has experienced rapid growth since
from each identified document according to the following criteria:author/s, publication date, document type, purpose, study design/methods/sample, and outcomesor conclusions.Stage 5. Collating, summarizing, reporting results There were 90 papers identified from the first two databases that included “graduateprogram director” and “engineering” as search terms in the title/abstract/subject and 70 identifiedresults in the last database that searched specifically for “graduate program director” in all fields.In the screening phase, a total of 147 were screened and 134 excluded followinginclusion/exclusion criteria which included the title and abstract review and a skim of the fulltext when needed, thus leaving 13 records for analysis
search inquiry keywords were personal narratives, stories, engineering, classroom,university, college, students, STEM, education, intervention, pedagogy, and psychology. Throughiterative searching using these keywords, some new keywords were added (e.g., expressivewriting intervention) and removed (e.g., students). Ultimately, we ended up using the followingkeywords: engineering, education, narrative(s), personal narrative, storytelling, story, stories, 5psychology, STEM, college, university, expressive writing intervention, pedagogy, curriculum.At the same time, our target samples were post-secondary students in higher education, such thatwe
three caregivers enacted over the course of a five-month engineering program conducted in an out-of-school context. Our research question was asfollows: What roles do caregivers enact with/for their child during a family-based engineeringdesign project? Subsequently, we considered the contextual factors of the program that seemedto influence and shape caregivers’ role enactment. Results of our work provide further evidenceof the impact of caregiver inclusion in the process of learning engineering, not only on thestudent(s) involved, but also on caregivers. Findings support the benefit of incorporating familiaradults into the engineering learning process, while providing distinct avenues by whichcaregivers might acknowledge and value their own
culturally heterogeneous process where peopleengage in various repertoires of practices and literacies rooted in different communities [12],[13], [14]. Learning is revealed to be a collective, communal, reciprocal, and agentic activitywhere meaning is created in interaction with others [13], [15], [16], [17]. And because learning issituated and contextual, it does not escape from but is in fact deeply affected by the influence ofpower relationships.Learning happens within and between communities. People grow from being more novice toexperts. In communities of practice, learning is being facilitated through network(s) of cognition[13]. When it comes to learning, the flow of power occurs between people, activities and theenvironment [13], [18]. In
-centered design typepedagogies and the parallels between students’ interdisciplinary learning and faculty learning tonavigate institutional processes to create interdisciplinary courses [20]. Her recent research hasbeen to integrate social, political, and economic contexts into technical engineering courses. Asan actor in engineering education working to integrate broader societal contexts into theengineering curriculum at Tufts University, Ozkan’s positioning as a practitioner and researcherof pedagogical change informs and motivates her to pursue this collaborative research oncontextualization.Human-Centered Design: Contextualization for Better Design(s)Research on engineering design education demonstrates how treatment of design