Mechanics Project across the three constituent courses was doneover a period of three years, as illustrated in Fig. 3. By accident of history, we implementedDynamics first. In one semester, we put in place all four of the major changes of (1) moving tothe flipped recitation using UGTAs and one lecture per module, (2) creating course materials—notes and examples—that allowed (3) the implementation of mastery-based grading, and (4) theintroduction of computing projects as a major component of the course. A year later we hoistedup Statics, and a year after that Deformable Solids.While not part of an intentional plan, there was some advantage to working through Dynamicsbefore Statics. For example, many of the notational decisions were made to support
) • Reservations attended: 3,589 (actual use of the platform) • Hours attended: 12,146.53Fig. 12. Use of the private cloud at the University of South Carolina between October 1, 2018 to September28, 2019. The platform was used to support academic classes, workshops, and research at the University ofSouth Carolina.The impact of this project is beyond cyberinfrastructure. While resources were placed forcyberinfrastructure courses, training workshops, and research, the Department of IntegratedInformation Technology (IIT) at the University of South Carolina is planning to extend the use ofthe platform to other areas, such as databases, programming, web systems, and others.Comparison between the private cloud and public clouds. Table 6 compares
’ projects. We were not sure about the impact of the settings in students’performance, however, there were no projects that were underperformed. We had a contingencyplan in place in case some teams were not delivering the appropriate quality, this plan includedextra monitoring from the faculty members and the PhD students that were teaching assistants inthe course but this was not required as every team performed accordingly. Furthermore, with thissetting the students were able to develop a project that was not only real, but more complex thatthe projects used in the past.The guidance from the engineering education researchers and instructors helped the teammembers to use several strategies to overcome the challenges. One of the strategies
wouldpatiently wait for them to finish – eager to get past the story they wished to present to the worldand into the complicated histories that have been buried along the way. It got me thinking aboutmy own narrative of how I came to be an engineer, and how tortured I felt to deliver a quick,understandable explanation for why I belonged in engineering. I remember trimming parts of thestory that did not go well in my conversations with others, eliminating the parts that didn’t fitwell, were confusing, or left doubts about my qualifications. I was curious to what extent I mightrecognize these efforts in the narratives of other women.I was also surprised when my opening question did not work as planned, when participants didnot seem to understand it as an
because of the logs? I try to answer the question instead of waiting for the answer even I speak in a low voice. And I will ask other classmates questions I don't understand after class and watch some relevant videos sometimes. After I need to finish the log, I will use the options on the log to plan what I will do in class or after class. For journaling reasons, I tried something I hadn't done before. Because of the participation log, I began to take notes in class and communicate with my classmates about the question that I have. I become more engaged especially out-of-class because I should pay more efforts and time to the course to earn the points for participation log. I have tried to answer the questions asked by teachers in class and as I
more than their fair share of time and words in most deliberations.Some research has explored the relationships between gender composition and teamperformance. Woolley, Chabris, Pentland, Hashmi, & Malone (2010) investigated the linkbetween collective intelligence factor of a group and their corresponding performance on variousteamwork tasks (e.g., brainstorming, planning events). They showed how collective intelligencewas more a function of social sensitivity of the members than the sum of individual intelligenceof each member. Notably, these factors were positively correlated with female participation andnegatively correlated with the number of speaking turns took during execution of tasks. Thesefindings emphasize that power dynamics and
rewarding for me.Spurred by her initial success as a chapter president, Shasha decided to take on moreresponsibility within the organization, ascending to the regional level. With that, came the samesense of duty to support the NSBE membership though on a much larger scale. My last year of college, I decided to run for a NSBE regional board position, so I became the [Regional Board member], which was so much fun. It was absolutely so much fun. I got to run or help with the running of 50 chapters in our region, and I got to attend like all the conferences. We were running all the conferences, so planning which events we have and really thinking critically about what will make students get the most out of this
situate constructs ofinternational engineering doctoral students’ sense of belonging. The working definitions of theconstructs and future research plan will be provided.LimitationsAlthough this work provides a basic understanding of the belongingness constructs, the reviewedliterature in the current work is limited to the selected seminal papers for the purpose ofconceptualizing and situating our previous work [1]. To gain a clear and in-depth understandingof the conceptual structure of a sense of belonging, far more literature should be reviewed with asystematic process with specific search, inclusion, and exclusion criteria. Literature Review Sense of belonging in higher education: Inconsistencies in definitions and constructs Sense of
COVID-19 pandemic on scientists," Nature, Human Behavior, no. 4, pp. 880-883, 2020.[59] P. Vincent-Lamarre, C. R. Sugimoto and V. Larivière, "The decline of women's research production during the coronavirus pandemic," Nature Index, 2020.[60] E. Corbera, I. Anguelovski and J. Honey-Rosés, "Academia in the Time of COVID-19: Towards an Ethics of Care," Planning Theory & Practice, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 191-199, 2020.[61] M. Alvarez, "On a Knife’s Edge," The Chronicle of Higher Education, 21 May 2020.[62] R. K. Anderson, "Preaching to the Choir: University Diversity Committees as Affective Communities," Anthropology & Education Quarterly, vol. 51, no. 1, p. 47–65, 2019.[63] A. Barlow, C. Betensky, R. S. Buurma, S. Kahn and T
nothing seemed to be fruitful. Nothing was producing [results]. And that's when I started thinking, "Is computer science really for me or is it just a rough patch that 8 I'm going through right now?" And I was wondering, okay, let's say I change my major from computer science. What do I change it to? I've never thought about doing anything else, never thought about a plan B. What if I don't like this major? What am I going to do? That's what I'm thinking, "What am I going to do?" That was also adding to my anxiety because I didn't know-- I was anxious. I was depressed. I was sad all the time because I didn't know what was going on in my life. I didn't know
different engineering majors, career advice, internships, and other professional planning and support. The seminar also helps students develop resumes and cover letters, and learn other aspects of professionalism such as dining etiquette and professional attire. ● Most STARS students also take a class from the College of Education on wellness and resilience for college that is targeted towards first-year and transfer students. In this class, students are exposed to research-informed practices to help students enhance their wellbeing on campus by building skills such as mindfulness and emotion regulation. (3) Intrusive advisingAnother key component of the STARS program is intrusive or proactive advising, which is
the general level of teaching effectiveness across the college.2020 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Annual Conference Proceedings 179Introduction and motivationAs a teaching center, MTEI’s goal is to assist all faculty in improving their courses and teachingskills. For faculty at the beginning of their teaching careers, we provide information, support andfeedback for a strong start in teaching so they build confidence and identity as goodteachers. For highly skilled teachers, MTEI offers assistance with planning and assessment ofnew approaches, or technology, or learning activities they created. Both of these groups offaculty are highly motivated and seek out and welcome assistance. For teachers
” perspective of our persisting students.18 In addition, we see growth mindsetrepresented in the way that the students appear to be ready and willing to adapt and improve, as afixed mindset, on the other hand, would be in direct contradiction to these efforts.195. Future workIn an effort to address our driving research questions, the next steps of our ongoing work in thisstudy will be focused on completing the final coding of all 23 transcripts. As a component of ourprocess in developing conclusions via a grounded theory approach, we will report on the relativeprevalence of any coding strings from our master codebook. In addition, we also plan to searchfor patterns that may point to potential causal links between occurrences. As a hypotheticalexample
W. B. Wood, "Scientific teaching," Science, vol. 204, no. 5670, pp. 521-522, 2004.[46] B. A. Couch, T. L. Brown, T. J. Schelpat, M. J. Graham and J. K. Knight, "Scientific teaching: Defining a taxonomy of observable practices," CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2015.[47] M. T. Hora and J. J. Ferrare, "Instructional systems of practice: A multidimensional analysis of math and science undergraduate course planning and classroom teaching.," Journal of the Learning Sciences,, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 212-257, 2013.[48] Y. Doppelt, "Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment," International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 13, pp. 255- 272, 2003
- to engineering identity provide them with a more nuancedyear seminar, and were emblazoned on a twelve-foot-tall understanding than those in the sample taken by Meyer andbanner in the center of the engineering building. colleagues [6]. Students were also asked “Do you plan to work, conductVIII. Cross-Cutting Theme: Diversity in Engineering research, continue study, or teach engineering for at leastThe Campbell University School of Engineering emphasizes three years after graduation?” and 24 (69%) responded yes,the need for engineers from diverse backgrounds for
of these, including the student team responsible for lighting andsound at campus events. As one LGBTQ student told us, “Not everyone needs a safespace” (WPI, 2015).Our specific research plan emerged from our sense that the LGBTQ community at WPI isrelatively large for an engineering school. We hypothesized that there may be aconnection to the unique curriculum here, although we have never isolated the effects ofour off-campus projects, our six-course humanities requirement, or our strong artsprogram on LGBTQ students. Rather, we have conducted surveys and interviews to hearfrom students about their experiences as queer engineering undergraduates. Beyondsupport for LGBTQ engineering students, our project points the way toward enabling16 More
administrative offices such as Women in Engineering and Multicultural Engineeringprograms, who may at times benefit from forming coalitions without losing the identity andgoals of individual groups and students. At our home institution, the students of a thrivingNational Society of Black Engineers chapter have met with a newly forming chapter of theSociety of Hispanic Professional Engineers to advise on logistical procedures and strategies forfinancial support and to co-plan activities. Rather than seeing an identity difference as a barrieror subsuming the groups in a coalition which erased identities of the sub-groups, this strategicpolitical partnership represents a possible productive outcome of considering politicalintersectionality. The theory may
document to analyze,articulate, measure, and discuss (in)equity in their team dynamics.Mapping Assets Builds Student ConfidenceFirst, identifying one’s own assets can build student confidence, particularly for students who areor have been stereotyped as less capable (Maton and Hrabowski III, 2004). A Native Americanand first generation college student explains: ….the asset map shows me what I’m capable of….I plan on editing my asset map again because I’m going to need it to remind myself what I’m good at. Until I work on enough projects, assets never stop, I feel that my asset map should pages long by the time I’m 40. I will continue to utilize my asset map to help me in the future
. Laura Palucki Blake, Harvey Mudd College Laura Palucki Blake is the Director of Institutional Research and Effectiveness at Harvey Mudd Col- lege, where her primary role is to coordinate data collection, interpretation and dissemination to support teaching and learning, planning and decision-making across the college.Sarah SilcoxMr. Joseph John Sinopoli, Harvey Mudd CollegeProf. Gordon G. Krauss, Harvey Mudd College Gordon G. Krauss is the Fletcher Jones Professor of Engineering Design in the Department of Engineering at Harvey Mudd College. His design research interests include improving the way designers interact with each other in the design process and how design process tools are applied. Prior to joining Harvey
planned. Others have noted that team effectiveness theory from industrial andorganizational psychology may be helpful in dealing with student teams [4]. The instructor iscurrently collaborating with the School of Psychology at Florida Tech to evaluate team dynamicsand trust in aerospace capstone teams [10]; additional collaboration may yield insights on how tofurther improve the combination of time cards and instructor evaluations and to better preparestudent team leaders to deal with the challenges of holding their teams accountable. Another areaof forward work is to seek out other capstone instructors with large classes and an existing peerfeedback system who may be willing to experiment with the approach described here and toprovide an
see projects completed fromstart to finish—I felt that allowing students to keep their respective designs would bestaccomplish these objectives. The cost of parts for each robot is shown in Figure, 23 arrangedfrom most expensive to least. These costs include shipping and, in most cases, were bought inlarge quantities from AliExpress [5]. I have found the parts to be of sufficiently high quality but,since the shipping time is about 6 to 8 weeks, planning ahead is very important. At just $35 perrobot, the Dean approved this expenditure and felt the remaining $65 was acceptable to maintainthe lab. Main PCB Board - Osh Park $ 6.72 Rubber Bands 2.5" x .5" $ 0.10 MG996R Servo Motor x2
). Intrinsic value, part of themotivational belief measure, refers to a student’s perception of the reasons for engaging in alearning task. Intrinsic value based reasons for engaging in a task include: curiosity, mastery, orfor the challenge of it. Self-regulation and strategy use comprise the learning strategies measure.Self-regulation refers to a combination of cognitive regulation; the use of planning andcomprehension monitoring, and effort regulation which consists of measuring a student’s abilityand willingness to persist at tasks. Strategic use indicates one’s ability to strategically implementpractices such as rehearsal, elaboration, and organization learning strategies [24, 29].The 20 students in the 2017 AcES cohort took the MSLQ survey at
described a level of mastery equal to what was expected of them at the end of the course,and a 5 was reserved for situations where they had prior knowledge that exceeded theexpectations of the course. The perceived need scale followed a similar pattern, with 1 meaningthat they did not anticipate needing this skill in future classes, a 2 indicating it might be useful tohave, but they could get by without it, a 3 indicating that they would likely see the content againbut would have an opportunity to relearn it as part of that new experience, a 4 indicating that thepreparation this class provided would aid them with future classes in the near future, and a 5indicating that this content area was directly related to their future career plans, and there
underpressure” [20]. Research participants stated that professional skills have an impact not only insuccess in industry, but also with studies. This notion is supported in other research [21]. Timemanagement, teamwork, and prioritization were explicitly cited as skills learned at work andapplied in school. It seems from this research that even minimal work experience helps studentswith their ability to plan and produce. In other words, internships have an impact on thesestudents’ ability to learn. Experience at work seems to have taught students how they focus bestand how to prioritize as well as concentrate on the work. They seemed to have learned how tolearn in order to best understand the material to suit their own particular needs.Specific
members and supervisors, how to planevents, how to reach out and network, and how to maintain organization in a makerspace. Now,Glen learns to build efficient and effective forms of communication to other board members,supervisors, and other student workers. She develops a voice that allows herself to be heard andclearly understood. This aids in her ability to plan events for the space where she must networkand go beyond her current contacts so as to provide for the needs of the community. So for me it’s a lot of administrative stuff. It’s -- okay, so someone wants to do a workshop, let me make sure that the resources for that – let me get them a room, and pick a time, let me put it on Facebook and email people. Or like say we
. Reasons for attending included the need for motivation and addressingstruggles they were facing in their programs. These reasons point to challenges students facetransitioning to graduate school (e.g. balancing act). Students were reassured after attending thisworkshop that they possessed or could enhance the skills needed to persist and achieve successin graduate school.For the second PEGS21 cohort (entering Fall 2017), we applied first cohort feedback byencouraging the students to attend GradPathways workshops in pairs or groups as a means tofurther build community within the group. Time during seminar was also dedicated to eachparticipant sharing the two workshops they planned to attend. A list of these workshops andplanned attendees was
stakeholder interaction (defined before the course). Incorporatingstakeholder interaction into curricular goals might be necessary, as a prior study showed thatwhile design teams might develop ambitious plans for stakeholder interaction, they are likely todrastically reduce the level of stakeholder interaction they conduct during the design course24.Additionally, we have identified several project traits (Table 4) that may facilitate increasing thelevel of stakeholder interaction during design. This demonstrates the importance of projectselection when developing design courses that seek to emphasize specific design processes (suchas human-centered design). The project traits identified here could form the basis for additionalresearch in the area of
, handling stress, etc. Service and Civic Responsibility: Engineering is a service profession. Engineers are charged to use their talents and gifts to solve problems that impact others. The performance and practice of engineering is an act of service. Understanding of Engineering Ethics: Engineers are expected to exhibit the highest standards of honesty and integrity. Engineers are to hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public. Those whom engineers serve deserve nothing less. As one example, the competencies are also used in the required first-year seminar course, wherestudents create action plans and write goals to
settings. Students identify whatthey know and what they need to learn, plan how they will learn more, conduct research, anddeliberate over the findings together in an attempt to structure and solve a challenge or problem.This study explores students’ perspectives on the STEM-ID curriculum regarding what they havefound challenging, engaging, and academically useful, specifically related to their coremathematics and science courses. This study is guided by the following evaluation questions:1) What are students’ perceptions of the STEM-ID curriculum?2) What are students’ perceptions of key components of the curriculum such as collaboration?3) To what extent do STEM-ID students make connections between the STEM-ID curriculum and core science and
Paper ID #18699Switching Midstream, Floundering Early, and Tolerance for Ambiguity: HowCapstone Students Cope with Changing and Delayed ProjectsDr. Kris Jaeger-Helton, Northeastern University Professor Beverly Kris Jaeger-Helton, Ph.D. is on the full-time faculty in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Northeastern University (NU) teaching Simulation Modeling and Analysis, Facilities Planning, and Human-Machine Systems. She is Director of the Galante Engineering Business Program as well as the Coordinator of Senior Capstone Design in Industrial Engineering at NU. She has also been an active member of